We currently have a Kenwood bread machine and are happy with the results
however we are starting to have a problem with the paddle sticking to the
loaf and having to be prised out.
Our last machine had a special tool to do this but the Kenwood does not have
one.
I have tried oiling the paddle, buttering it and greasing (edible) it before
putting in the water but it is still sticking.
Does anyone know how to treat the paddle so that it will not stick to the
loaf?
Thank you.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 27/02/2015 19:27, Stewart wrote:
We currently have a Kenwood bread machine and are happy with the results
however we are starting to have a problem with the paddle sticking to
the loaf and having to be prised out.
Our last machine had a special tool to do this but the Kenwood does not
have one.
I have tried oiling the paddle, buttering it and greasing (edible) it
before putting in the water but it is still sticking.
Does anyone know how to treat the paddle so that it will not stick to
the loaf?
Thank you.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

New paddle?

Please stop advertising that antivirus product. Especially with the
cocked up signature separator. (Should be "-- " not "---".)

--
Rod

polygonum wrote:
On 27/02/2015 19:27, Stewart wrote:
We currently have a Kenwood bread machine and are happy with the results
however we are starting to have a problem with the paddle sticking to
the loaf and having to be prised out.
Our last machine had a special tool to do this but the Kenwood does not
have one.
I have tried oiling the paddle, buttering it and greasing (edible) it
before putting in the water but it is still sticking.
Does anyone know how to treat the paddle so that it will not stick to
the loaf?
Thank you.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

New paddle?

Please stop advertising that antivirus product. Especially with the
cocked up signature separator. (Should be "-- " not "---".)


To be clear, that's hyphen, hyphen, SPACE, not just hyphen, hyphen. ;-)

Tim

Stewart scribbled


We currently have a Kenwood bread machine and are happy with the results
however we are starting to have a problem with the paddle sticking to the
loaf and having to be prised out.
Our last machine had a special tool to do this but the Kenwood does not have
one.
I have tried oiling the paddle, buttering it and greasing (edible) it before
putting in the water but it is still sticking.
Does anyone know how to treat the paddle so that it will not stick to the
loaf?


Prize it out immediately, by sticking a wooden chopstick into the
spindle hole.

Stewart wrote

We currently have a Kenwood bread machine and are happy with the results
however we are starting to have a problem with the paddle sticking to the
loaf and having to be prised out.

Our last machine had a special tool to do this but the Kenwood does not
have one.

I have tried oiling the paddle, buttering it and greasing (edible) it
before putting in the water but it is still sticking.

Does anyone know how to treat the paddle so that it will not stick to the
loaf?

Best to get a new paddle. I found with my Brevilles
that when I replaced one with another because the
seal in the bottom of the can had failed and I found
another of the same model at a garage/yard sale for
peanuts that they had done a much better job on
the later example and it no long sticks anymore.

That second one has now lasted for nearly a decade
and the seal hasn't failed either. The seal may however
be due to the fact that I reversed the order that I put
the ingredients in and do the opposite of what the
instructions say to do, put the water in last, after the mix.

In message , Tim Streater
writes
In article , Stewart
wrote:


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

What's this ****? And this is a news post, not a ****ing email. And
what is a "virus", such that your "email" needs checking by "anti-virus
software" (whatever that may be)?

Why would you care?
--
Chris French

In message , Huge
writes
On 2015-02-28, Chris French wrote:
In message , Tim Streater
writes
In article , Stewart
wrote:


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

What's this ****? And this is a news post, not a ****ing email. And
what is a "virus", such that your "email" needs checking by "anti-virus
software" (whatever that may be)?

Why would you care?

What gives you the right to tell other people what to think?


Where am I telling Tim what to think?

I'm perfectly happy with Tim thinking whatever he wants to think, I just
wondered why he cared enough about a sig from some AV software to be
writing such a reply
--
Chris French

Tim Streater wrote:

I was amused when my Mac-hating brother showed me how he could attach
*gasp* more than one screen to his PC and *gasp* move a window from one
screen to the other. I didn't have the heart to tell him I'd been able
to do that on a Mac 15 years earlier.

So? Win2K could handle multiple monitors 15 years ago.

On 28/02/2015 14:28, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Andy
Burns wrote:

Tim Streater wrote:

I was amused when my Mac-hating brother showed me how he could attach
*gasp* more than one screen to his PC and *gasp* move a window from one
screen to the other. I didn't have the heart to tell him I'd been able
to do that on a Mac 15 years earlier.

So? Win2K could handle multiple monitors 15 years ago.

So, 1990. The first Macs to do that came out in 1987.


You could attach two screens on the original IBM PC back in 1981. Mind
you, one had to be monochrome.

--
Reentrant

On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 16:29:57 +0000, Reentrant wrote:

On 28/02/2015 14:28, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Andy
Burns wrote:

Tim Streater wrote:

I was amused when my Mac-hating brother showed me how he could attach
*gasp* more than one screen to his PC and *gasp* move a window from
one screen to the other. I didn't have the heart to tell him I'd been
able to do that on a Mac 15 years earlier.

So? Win2K could handle multiple monitors 15 years ago.

So, 1990. The first Macs to do that came out in 1987.


You could attach two screens on the original IBM PC back in 1981. Mind
you, one had to be monochrome.

And indeed one had to be colour. And lowish resolution.



--
My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
wish to copy them they can pay me £30a message.
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
*lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

On 28/02/2015 17:10, Tim Streater wrote:


And you could use the second screen as an extended desktop? I don't
think so.


Desktop? With DOS?

You could certainly use both concurrently; DOS program on one and 3270
terminal emulator session on the other, or compiled code on one with a
debug session on the other.

--
Reentrant

On 28/02/2015 19:26, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
Reentrant wrote:

On 28/02/2015 17:10, Tim Streater wrote:


And you could use the second screen as an extended desktop? I don't
think so.

Desktop? With DOS?

I'll take that as a No, then. Suggest you re-read my OP, in which I
specifically talked about Extended desktop and the ability of moving a
window from one screen to the other.


I was simply referring to the point about "handling multiple monitors"
from a h/w view.

And to get back on topic, our Panasonic SD-251 breadmaker has been used
once or twice a week for many years (at least 6 or 7) and the non-stick
surface is as good as ever.

--
Reentrant

Tim Streater wrote:

Reentrant wrote:

You could attach two screens on the original IBM PC back in 1981. Mind
you, one had to be monochrome.

And you could use the second screen as an extended desktop?

No, but it was handy for debugging (only threw a hercules card and mono
monitor out last year).

On 27/02/2015 22:50, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Stewart
wrote:

We currently have a Kenwood bread machine and are happy with the
results however we are starting to have a problem with the paddle
sticking to the loaf and having to be prised out.
Our last machine had a special tool to do this but the Kenwood does
not have one.
I have tried oiling the paddle, buttering it and greasing (edible) it
before putting in the water but it is still sticking.
Does anyone know how to treat the paddle so that it will not stick to
the loaf?

Once this starts you need to buy a new paddle, because the non-stick on
the paddle is too damaged. I got a new one for our Panny a couple of
years ago (off Amazon) and it hasn't stuck once since.

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

What's this ****? And this is a news post, not a ****ing email. And
what is a "virus", such that your "email" needs checking by "anti-virus
software" (whatever that may be)?



He is probably trying to get you to install a virus, after all a con man
will tell you that the message has been checked and is safe.
You wouldn't trust a message like that would you?
This makes it somewhat worth less than not having the message.

Thanks Dennis, if it continues then as you suggest I shall get another
paddle.
I do not understand the comments about avast. That is the virus checker i
use but I do not know why it should check outgoing messages to a news group
nor why it shows that it has done so.
How can I stop it doing this?



"Dennis@home" wrote in message
web.com...

On 27/02/2015 22:50, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Stewart
wrote:

We currently have a Kenwood bread machine and are happy with the
results however we are starting to have a problem with the paddle
sticking to the loaf and having to be prised out.
Our last machine had a special tool to do this but the Kenwood does
not have one.
I have tried oiling the paddle, buttering it and greasing (edible) it
before putting in the water but it is still sticking.
Does anyone know how to treat the paddle so that it will not stick to
the loaf?

Once this starts you need to buy a new paddle, because the non-stick on
the paddle is too damaged. I got a new one for our Panny a couple of
years ago (off Amazon) and it hasn't stuck once since.

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

What's this ****? And this is a news post, not a ****ing email. And
what is a "virus", such that your "email" needs checking by "anti-virus
software" (whatever that may be)?



He is probably trying to get you to install a virus, after all a con man
will tell you that the message has been checked and is safe.
You wouldn't trust a message like that would you?
This makes it somewhat worth less than not having the message.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

"Stewart" wrote:

I do not understand the comments about avast. That is the virus checker i
use but I do not know why it should check outgoing messages to a news
group nor why it shows that it has done so.

I don't think it's unreasonable. Some newsgroups allow people to post
binary attachments; it's perfectly reasonable to have outbounds mails & news
posts scanned to prevent the infected attachments from being sent.

How can I stop it doing this?

Why would you want to stop it?

--
Jeremy C B Nicoll - my opinions are my own.

Email sent to my from-address will be deleted. Instead, please reply
to replacing "aaa" by "284".

Jeremy Nicoll - news posts wrote:

"Stewart" wrote:

How can I stop it doing this?

Why would you want to stop it?

Let it scan, but stop it advertising itself in a broken .sig

https://feedback.avast.com/responses/how-to-prevent-avast-from-modifying-my-e-mails-adding-advertisement