Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
Great stuff.
I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
"Grimly Curmudgeon" wrote in message ... Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Dumb Britain. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
"Grimly Curmudgeon" wrote in message ... Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052... Pure Darwininsm. There is a pic at a local sub station where I used to go to work on lorry cranes of a Pikey melted to the side of a transformer complete with the bolt croppers still in his semi skeletal hands. Dumb **** of the year award (Posthumously!) |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 21/02/2013 16:03, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:
Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Shame the judge did not order him to pay for some of his treatment as well... -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
In article , Grimly
Curmudgeon writes Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 quote Glynn Wales, chairman of the bench in Darlington, said: €œThese are serious matters." /quote So serious that they gave the f'ckr a suspended sentence so no judicial punishment for the offence at all, I despair. -- fred it's a ba-na-na . . . . |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
The man is clearly a major criminal:
He takes 31 tables every day... |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:
Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 I see the article says that he has transferred his activities to stealing tables. -- €¢DarWin| _/ _/ |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 21/02/2013 18:32, Bert Coules wrote:
The man is clearly a major criminal: He takes 31 tables every day... Maybe he's the chairman of the local thieves association and likes to table a motion ... or motion tables at least. |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
John Rumm wrote:
On 21/02/2013 16:03, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Shame the judge did not order him to pay for some of his treatment as well... "sending 11,000 volts through Wayne Houfe" - how long should the journo get for that one :-): -- Adam |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
In article , ARW
writes John Rumm wrote: On 21/02/2013 16:03, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Shame the judge did not order him to pay for some of his treatment as well... "sending 11,000 volts through Wayne Houfe" - how long should the journo get for that one :-): Outrage, no capital V on Volts! -- fred it's a ba-na-na . . . . |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 21/02/2013 20:01, fred wrote:
In article , ARW writes John Rumm wrote: On 21/02/2013 16:03, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Shame the judge did not order him to pay for some of his treatment as well... "sending 11,000 volts through Wayne Houfe" - how long should the journo get for that one :-): Outrage, no capital V on Volts! The abbreviation is V but the name is volt, so far as I know. (And if I am wrong, charge me.) -- Rod |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 21/02/2013 21:09, polygonum wrote:
On 21/02/2013 20:01, fred wrote: In article , ARW writes John Rumm wrote: On 21/02/2013 16:03, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Shame the judge did not order him to pay for some of his treatment as well... "sending 11,000 volts through Wayne Houfe" - how long should the journo get for that one :-): Outrage, no capital V on Volts! The abbreviation is V but the name is volt, so far as I know. (And if I am wrong, charge me.) Is that the current usage? |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
In article , polygonum
writes On 21/02/2013 20:01, fred wrote: Outrage, no capital V on Volts! The abbreviation is V but the name is volt, so far as I know. (And if I am wrong, charge me.) Think you're right, I was assuming that named after bloke would inherit the proper noun status but I was wrong. Happy to head off any potential conflict . . . -- fred it's a ba-na-na . . . . |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 21/02/2013 20:43, fred wrote:
In article , polygonum writes On 21/02/2013 20:01, fred wrote: Outrage, no capital V on Volts! The abbreviation is V but the name is volt, so far as I know. (And if I am wrong, charge me.) Think you're right, I was assuming that named after bloke would inherit the proper noun status but I was wrong. Happy to head off any potential conflict . . . Huh! Boring... :-) Had you been writing about German, you would have been right, and I would have been wrong: 'The CGPM rules state that the names of units follow the grammatical rules associated with common nouns: in English and in French they start with a lowercase letter (e.g., newton, hertz, pascal), even when the symbol for the unit begins with a capital letter. This also applies to "degrees Celsius", since "degree" is the unit. In German, however, the names of units, just like all German nouns, start with capital letters.' -- Rod |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:03:30 +0000, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:
Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Definitely in a bad way if he has to take 31 tables (sic) every day. -- Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org My posts (including this one) are my copyright and if @diy_forums on Twitter wish to tweet them they can pay me £30 a post *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
In message , polygonum
writes On 21/02/2013 20:43, fred wrote: In article , polygonum writes On 21/02/2013 20:01, fred wrote: Outrage, no capital V on Volts! The abbreviation is V but the name is volt, so far as I know. (And if I am wrong, charge me.) Think you're right, I was assuming that named after bloke would inherit the proper noun status but I was wrong. Happy to head off any potential conflict . . . Huh! Boring... :-) Had you been writing about German, you would have been right, and I would have been wrong: The Spannung's killing me -- geoff |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 21/02/2013 22:27, geoff wrote:
In message , polygonum writes On 21/02/2013 20:43, fred wrote: In article , polygonum writes On 21/02/2013 20:01, fred wrote: Outrage, no capital V on Volts! The abbreviation is V but the name is volt, so far as I know. (And if I am wrong, charge me.) Think you're right, I was assuming that named after bloke would inherit the proper noun status but I was wrong. Happy to head off any potential conflict . . . Huh! Boring... :-) Had you been writing about German, you would have been right, and I would have been wrong: The Spannung's killing me Das war ein gutes Wortspiel. -- Rod |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:29:59 +0000, ARW wrote:
John Rumm wrote: On 21/02/2013 16:03, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Shame the judge did not order him to pay for some of his treatment as well... "sending 11,000 volts through Wayne Houfe" - how long should the journo get for that one :-): The journo's mistake is that it's amps that go through you not volts! The volts are across you. TOJ |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
In article ,
The Other John writes: On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:29:59 +0000, ARW wrote: John Rumm wrote: On 21/02/2013 16:03, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Shame the judge did not order him to pay for some of his treatment as well... "sending 11,000 volts through Wayne Houfe" - how long should the journo get for that one :-): The journo's mistake is that it's amps that go through you not volts! The volts are across you. I suspect it was the arc-flash that got him. Very unlikely to still be around if he got 11kV across him. -- Andrew Gabriel [email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup] |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Thursday, 21 February 2013 20:01:24 UTC, fred wrote:
Outrage, no capital V on Volts! The real outrage is that you can't send Volts 'through' anything, only Amps. |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 22/02/2013 00:11, Arty Effem wrote:
On Thursday, 21 February 2013 20:01:24 UTC, fred wrote: Outrage, no capital V on Volts! The real outrage is that you can't send Volts 'through' anything, only Amps. You can induce volts through many things without any current flowing through them. |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:12:18 PM UTC, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article , I suspect it was the arc-flash that got him. Very unlikely to still be around if he got 11kV across him. And it was a 50/50 chance that he got 6.3kV to earth or 11kv between phases. |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Thursday 21 February 2013 23:12 Andrew Gabriel wrote in uk.d-i-y:
In article , The Other John writes: On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:29:59 +0000, ARW wrote: John Rumm wrote: On 21/02/2013 16:03, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...hief-left-red- face-1708052 Shame the judge did not order him to pay for some of his treatment as well... "sending 11,000 volts through Wayne Houfe" - how long should the journo get for that one :-): The journo's mistake is that it's amps that go through you not volts! The volts are across you. I suspect it was the arc-flash that got him. Very unlikely to still be around if he got 11kV across him. My dad was in the burns unit back in the 60's with another LEB engineer. This man had taken an 11kV voltage reading at an isolatable test point in a substation (bare metal probes, HV meter). He forgot to throw the test point isolator before grabbing both probes with both hands. The theory was that the arc had flashed over his skin, hand to hand largely not going through him. Needless to say he was a bit fried... -- Tim Watts Personal Blog: http://squiddy.blog.dionic.net/ http://www.sensorly.com/ Crowd mapping of 2G/3G/4G mobile signal coverage Reading this on the web? See: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=Usenet |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Friday, February 22, 2013 9:22:10 AM UTC, Tim Watts wrote:
He is a reformed man and has a job with a local bus company. He's a conductor. |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 22/02/2013 10:59, Onetap wrote:
On Friday, February 22, 2013 9:22:10 AM UTC, Tim Watts wrote: He is a reformed man and has a job with a local bus company. He's a conductor. Thought you were going to say he had joined the police... ..... there is a joke there if you look for it. -- Rod |
#26
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 22/02/2013 11:03, polygonum wrote:
On 22/02/2013 10:59, Onetap wrote: On Friday, February 22, 2013 9:22:10 AM UTC, Tim Watts wrote: He is a reformed man and has a job with a local bus company. He's a conductor. Thought you were going to say he had joined the police... .... there is a joke there if you look for it. Only if its the poleish police. |
#27
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 22/02/2013 13:00, dennis@home wrote:
On 22/02/2013 11:03, polygonum wrote: On 22/02/2013 10:59, Onetap wrote: On Friday, February 22, 2013 9:22:10 AM UTC, Tim Watts wrote: He is a reformed man and has a job with a local bus company. He's a conductor. Thought you were going to say he had joined the police... .... there is a joke there if you look for it. Only if its the poleish police. Only ordinary coppers. -- Rod |
#28
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 22/02/2013 09:00, Broadland Wanderer wrote:
On Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:12:18 PM UTC, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , I suspect it was the arc-flash that got him. Very unlikely to still be around if he got 11kV across him. And it was a 50/50 chance that he got 6.3kV to earth or 11kv between phases. If you are cutting through a multicore cable you would be unlikely to touch two cores. If its a single core cable you would be unlikely to touch another phase at the same time so 11kV is to earth is more likely. |
#29
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Friday, February 22, 2013 1:03:59 PM UTC, dennis@home wrote:
If you are cutting through a multicore cable you would be unlikely to touch two cores. If its a single core cable you would be unlikely to touch another phase at the same time so 11kV is to earth is more likely. Except 11kV is Phase to Phase. 6.3kV phase to earth |
#30
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Friday, February 22, 2013 9:22:10 AM UTC, Tim Watts wrote:
snip My dad was in the burns unit back in the 60's with another LEB engineer. This man had taken an 11kV voltage reading at an isolatable test point in a substation (bare metal probes, HV meter). He forgot to throw the test point isolator before grabbing both probes with both hands. The theory was that the arc had flashed over his skin, hand to hand largely not going through him. Needless to say he was a bit fried... Some time ago I was doing an installation in Gibraltar (fibre optics, not electrical). Just before I arrived they'd had an accident in the dockyard. A jointer had prepared an 11kV cable for jointing - isolation, earthing, and he'd marked the point to cut with tape. He'd then gone away and left the cutting to his assistant, who proceeded to take his hacksaw and attack the *other* 11kv cable which was running parallel to the one with the marker on. He was very lucky and survived, with burns where the metal had been vaporised and ejected from the cut. I think he lost all the hair on his head. They never found the hacksaw blade... |
#31
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:52:12 PM UTC, The Other John wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:29:59 +0000, ARW wrote: John Rumm wrote: On 21/02/2013 16:03, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Shame the judge did not order him to pay for some of his treatment as well... "sending 11,000 volts through Wayne Houfe" - how long should the journo get for that one :-): The journo's mistake is that it's amps that go through you not volts! The volts are across you. No the volts were across him :-) Which obviuosly caused a rasin of the currant. |
#32
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Friday, February 22, 2013 11:03:40 AM UTC, polygonum wrote:
.... there is a joke there if you look for it. Lots. It was a phase he was going through, but now he'll be able to resist temptation. |
#33
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Feb 21, 4:44*pm, "Nthkentman" wrote:
"Grimly Curmudgeon" *wrote in message ... Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again.http://www.mirror.co..uk/news/uk-new...d-face-1708052... Pure Darwininsm. In completely the wrong direction, unless you know the "accident" left him infertile. MBQ |
#34
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 22/02/2013 13:53, Onetap wrote:
On Friday, February 22, 2013 11:03:40 AM UTC, polygonum wrote: .... there is a joke there if you look for it. Lots. It was a phase he was going through, but now he'll be able to resist temptation. And I thought we'd moved away from Red for Live! (Perhaps he'd have appreciated becoming a smurf...) -- Rod |
#36
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
In article om,
"dennis@home" writes: On 22/02/2013 09:00, Broadland Wanderer wrote: On Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:12:18 PM UTC, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , I suspect it was the arc-flash that got him. Very unlikely to still be around if he got 11kV across him. And it was a 50/50 chance that he got 6.3kV to earth or 11kv between phases. If you are cutting through a multicore cable you would be unlikely to touch two cores. If its a single core cable you would be unlikely to touch another phase at the same time so 11kV is to earth is more likely. The 11kV cables I've seen (single or multicore) all have an earthed shield. Often it's very thin (much thinner than SWA armour), and it can't be steel on single core cable (has to be non-magnetic), but it's just there to guarantee an earth fault if the cable is cut, to trip out the upstream earth leakage breakers. That will probably reduce the chance of a direct electrocution, but it's perfect fuel to form the arc-flash plasma, which is basically a bomb going off in your face. If you're still holding the cut end when the recloser operates (or it's laying on you or on the ground near you), then you would likely be electrocuted. He may be lucky if the arc flash blow him clear of the cable end, or the fault current whipped the cable away from him. -- Andrew Gabriel [email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup] |
#37
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On Friday, February 22, 2013 3:03:53 PM UTC, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Some valid comments. I wasn't disagreeing with you, but being lazy and not making myself clear. Yes, it was probably the flashover that got him, but there was a 50/50 chance that it was 6.3kV to earth rather than '11kV' as so often reported in the media. Your comments also put me in mind of an instance where fairly long lengths of lv s/c cables had been laid in steel pipes installed by a builder. I can't remember the full detail, but I think it was a supply from a transformer, probably 500 or 800kVA, into a factory. Hysteresis currents in the pipes melted the insulation on the cables, to catastrophic effect. |
#38
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
polygonum wrote:
On 21/02/2013 20:01, fred wrote: In article , ARW writes John Rumm wrote: On 21/02/2013 16:03, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: Great stuff. I suspect he might be stupid enough to do that again. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...d-face-1708052 Shame the judge did not order him to pay for some of his treatment as well... "sending 11,000 volts through Wayne Houfe" - how long should the journo get for that one :-): Outrage, no capital V on Volts! The abbreviation is V but the name is volt, so far as I know. (And if I am wrong, charge me.) What with, Coulomb's law? -- Adam |
#39
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
On 22/02/2013 13:17, Broadland Wanderer wrote:
On Friday, February 22, 2013 1:03:59 PM UTC, dennis@home wrote: If you are cutting through a multicore cable you would be unlikely to touch two cores. If its a single core cable you would be unlikely to touch another phase at the same time so 11kV is to earth is more likely. Except 11kV is Phase to Phase. 6.3kV phase to earth Oh well, I must learn to proof read. |
#40
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Cable thief burned
dennis@home wrote:
On 22/02/2013 13:17, Broadland Wanderer wrote: On Friday, February 22, 2013 1:03:59 PM UTC, dennis@home wrote: If you are cutting through a multicore cable you would be unlikely to touch two cores. If its a single core cable you would be unlikely to touch another phase at the same time so 11kV is to earth is more likely. Except 11kV is Phase to Phase. 6.3kV phase to earth Oh well, I must learn to proof read. -- Adam |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Thief Visits | Woodworking | |||
Thief Aware! | Woodworking | |||
Thief Aware! | Home Repair | |||
Teens bust pedophile car thief | Electronics Repair | |||
Stopping a thief | Home Ownership |