Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for
cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? Davy |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Davy wrote:
I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? Davy Seriously - if you can't do such a simple job, give it to someone who knows what to do! That may save other body parts from injury as well as your fingers. |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Davy" wrote in message om... I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? Davy Usual thing is to hold the axe against the log and bring them both down on the block with 'moderate' force so the axe goes in a fraction and sticks to the log. Then bring them both down with enough force to do the job. |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Davy wrote:
I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Dawson wrote:
Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... What he said. Hold it with another bit of wood. It's what I do now I'm bored of skimming the ends off fingers... |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Guy Dawson" wrote in message ... Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... thanks guys, your suggestion does have the advantage that if I accidentally hit the piece of kindling that I am using to steady the log then no harm is done to the axe. Not true of my first attempt when I used bbq tongs! I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! BRG's post does leaves a nasty taste in the mouth though. But I suppose that if you ask questions on a newsgroup then you've got to expect occasional replies/trolls like that. thanks to everyone Davy |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 6:53 pm, "Davy" wrote:
BRG's post does leaves a nasty taste in the mouth though. But I suppose that if you ask questions on a newsgroup then you've got to expect occasional replies/trolls like that. He was right. |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Davy
writes "Guy Dawson" wrote in message ... Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... thanks guys, your suggestion does have the advantage that if I accidentally hit the piece of kindling that I am using to steady the log then no harm is done to the axe. Not true of my first attempt when I used bbq tongs! I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! BRG's post does leaves a nasty taste in the mouth though. But I suppose that if you ask questions on a newsgroup then you've got to expect occasional replies/trolls like that. Sorry, but I completely agree with him I can't believe anyone can be so clueless -- geoff |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Davy
writes I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? For ****ing ****s sake are you really so clueless ? get a man in -- geoff |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Davy
writes "Guy Dawson" wrote in message ... Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... thanks guys, your suggestion does have the advantage that if I accidentally hit the piece of kindling that I am using to steady the log then no harm is done to the axe. Not true of my first attempt when I used bbq tongs! I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! BRG's post does leaves a nasty taste in the mouth though. But I suppose that if you ask questions on a newsgroup then you've got to expect occasional replies/trolls like that. shrug It obviously makes some people feel better to make smart arse, or just plain rude comments, rather than anything helpful, or just keeping their mouth shut. Forget them and move on, most people most of the time here are helpful. -- Chris French |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 8:41 pm, chris French
wrote: It obviously makes some people feel better to make smart arse, or just plain rude comments, rather than anything helpful, or just keeping their mouth shut. Forget them and move on, most people most of the time here are helpful. I agree with that too. But blimey! Where do you start? I dare say someone will pop a great idea up for patenting, hollow logs or something. Still, this is a help group. But, blimey! You can make kindling from newspaper by rolling it into strips and twisting it tight enough to hold its shape. Then there is the subtle art of collecting dead twigs from trees. |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff wrote:
In message , Davy writes "Guy Dawson" wrote in message ... Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... thanks guys, your suggestion does have the advantage that if I accidentally hit the piece of kindling that I am using to steady the log then no harm is done to the axe. Not true of my first attempt when I used bbq tongs! I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! BRG's post does leaves a nasty taste in the mouth though. But I suppose that if you ask questions on a newsgroup then you've got to expect occasional replies/trolls like that. Sorry, but I completely agree with him I can't believe anyone can be so clueless I sometimes think along those lines, but some people just don't have the benefit of having seen someone else do it. I'm happy to tackle most jobs on a car, but I know people who wouldn't know how to start checking the oil, simply because they've had parents who've never done it, or their father wasn't around to show them. A lot of "common sense" is stuff you learn through observation without realising it IMO. |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Davy wrote:
"Guy Dawson" wrote in message ... Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... thanks guys, your suggestion does have the advantage that if I accidentally hit the piece of kindling that I am using to steady the log then no harm is done to the axe. Not true of my first attempt when I used bbq tongs! I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! Easy peasy. Get a big wide bit of log to use as a block, and swing it like a sledgehammer. |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:55:47 -0000, Davy wrote:
I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? Carefully. 2kg (4lb) seems a bit heavy to me for a hand axe. Indeed looking at what Screwfix have on offer, 4lb is of heavy felling axe size. This is not the tool for spliting kindling. A hand axe has a shaft about 15" long and a head weight of about 0.5kg... -- Cheers Dave. |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Doki
writes geoff wrote: In message , Davy writes "Guy Dawson" wrote in message ... Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... thanks guys, your suggestion does have the advantage that if I accidentally hit the piece of kindling that I am using to steady the log then no harm is done to the axe. Not true of my first attempt when I used bbq tongs! I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! BRG's post does leaves a nasty taste in the mouth though. But I suppose that if you ask questions on a newsgroup then you've got to expect occasional replies/trolls like that. Sorry, but I completely agree with him I can't believe anyone can be so clueless I sometimes think along those lines, but some people just don't have the benefit of having seen someone else do it. I'm happy to tackle most jobs on a car, but I know people who wouldn't know how to start checking the oil, simply because they've had parents who've never done it, or their father wasn't around to show them. A lot of "common sense" is stuff you learn through observation without realising it IMO. But there are limits I think that this one crossed the line -- geoff |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
chris French wrote:
In message , Davy writes "Guy Dawson" wrote in message ... Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... thanks guys, your suggestion does have the advantage that if I accidentally hit the piece of kindling that I am using to steady the log then no harm is done to the axe. Not true of my first attempt when I used bbq tongs! I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! BRG's post does leaves a nasty taste in the mouth though. But I suppose that if you ask questions on a newsgroup then you've got to expect occasional replies/trolls like that. shrug It obviously makes some people feel better to make smart arse, or just plain rude comments, rather than anything helpful, or just keeping their mouth shut. Forget them and move on, most people most of the time here are helpful. Not intended as "smart arse or rude" simply factual - if a question like that has to be asked in a public group for a task that is so simple that it was being done by ten year olds in my day, then the competence of the OP must be doubted for his own safety - remember, you can easily cut the fingers off your hand, but it's a damn site harder to replace them. So the moral here was simply to either get someone who knows how to do the job, or get that person to show him how it is done - a million words typed in this group does not count for the experience of being shown. Especially with -- "Easy peasy. Get a big wide bit of log to use as a block, and swing it like a sledgehammer." In this case, using that method can cause a large lump of the block to fly and either hit the OP in the face or an innocent bystander such as a child - doing rather a lot of damage to soft tissue. Again. someone giving advice without really knowing what to do himself. BTW, I could have been far more acerbic, abusive and foul-mouthed in my reply but that was not my intention. I gave my opinion of the matter as simply as I could and if that has caused offence, then my response to that is simply to get a thicker skin as very often the truth hurts far worse than bull****! BRG |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, Weatherlawyer writes On Feb 2, 8:41 pm, chris French wrote: It obviously makes some people feel better to make smart arse, or just plain rude comments, rather than anything helpful, or just keeping their mouth shut. Forget them and move on, most people most of the time here are helpful. I agree with that too. But blimey! Where do you start? I dare say someone will pop a great idea up for patenting, hollow logs or something. Still, this is a help group. But, blimey! Yep, sometimes I see questions that I think, 'what, that's so obvious as to not need a question. but I'd suggest that if someone isn't able to post a helpful reply to genuine question - even if the think the question is stupid question they just move on to the next thread. -- Chris French |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
chris French wrote:
In message , Weatherlawyer writes On Feb 2, 8:41 pm, chris French wrote: It obviously makes some people feel better to make smart arse, or just plain rude comments, rather than anything helpful, or just keeping their mouth shut. Forget them and move on, most people most of the time here are helpful. I agree with that too. But blimey! Where do you start? I dare say someone will pop a great idea up for patenting, hollow logs or something. Still, this is a help group. But, blimey! Yep, sometimes I see questions that I think, 'what, that's so obvious as to not need a question. but I'd suggest that if someone isn't able to post a helpful reply to genuine question - even if the think the question is stupid question they just move on to the next thread. Firstly, I never consider any question a stupid one. Would you then rather the advice not be given, even if it is actually true - surely it's not the purpose of this group to give just the advice that someone wants to hear - even if it is said rather plainly (which seems to be the problem with one or two here)? Or would rather me have made some rather inane statement (like some in this thread) that really would not ease the ignorance of the OP and perhaps cause injury - it's too late when the fingers are gone. BRG |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BRG wrote:
chris French wrote: In message , Davy writes "Guy Dawson" wrote in message ... Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... thanks guys, your suggestion does have the advantage that if I accidentally hit the piece of kindling that I am using to steady the log then no harm is done to the axe. Not true of my first attempt when I used bbq tongs! I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! BRG's post does leaves a nasty taste in the mouth though. But I suppose that if you ask questions on a newsgroup then you've got to expect occasional replies/trolls like that. shrug It obviously makes some people feel better to make smart arse, or just plain rude comments, rather than anything helpful, or just keeping their mouth shut. Forget them and move on, most people most of the time here are helpful. Not intended as "smart arse or rude" simply factual - if a question like that has to be asked in a public group for a task that is so simple that it was being done by ten year olds in my day, then the competence of the OP must be doubted for his own safety - remember, you can easily cut the fingers off your hand, but it's a damn site harder to replace them. So the moral here was simply to either get someone who knows how to do the job, or get that person to show him how it is done - a million words typed in this group does not count for the experience of being shown. Especially with -- "Easy peasy. Get a big wide bit of log to use as a block, and swing it like a sledgehammer." In this case, using that method can cause a large lump of the block to fly and either hit the OP in the face or an innocent bystander such as a child - doing rather a lot of damage to soft tissue. Again. someone giving advice without really knowing what to do himself. I'd like you to explain how. Hit a log square on with a splitting maul and you'd be doing very well to make anything fly upwards at you. IMO there's no room for innocent bystanders when you're splitting logs as stuff will fly out to the sides, but not up into your face. |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BRG" wrote in message ... chris French wrote: In message , Weatherlawyer writes On Feb 2, 8:41 pm, chris French wrote: It obviously makes some people feel better to make smart arse, or just plain rude comments, rather than anything helpful, or just keeping their mouth shut. Forget them and move on, most people most of the time here are helpful. I agree with that too. But blimey! Where do you start? I dare say someone will pop a great idea up for patenting, hollow logs or something. Still, this is a help group. But, blimey! Yep, sometimes I see questions that I think, 'what, that's so obvious as to not need a question. but I'd suggest that if someone isn't able to post a helpful reply to genuine question - even if the think the question is stupid question they just move on to the next thread. Firstly, I never consider any question a stupid one. Would you then rather the advice not be given, even if it is actually true - surely it's not the purpose of this group to give just the advice that someone wants to hear - even if it is said rather plainly (which seems to be the problem with one or two here)? Or would rather me have made some rather inane statement (like some in this thread) that really would not ease the ignorance of the OP and perhaps cause injury - it's too late when the fingers are gone. I didn't think it was stupid, inane or troll-like. Not that my opinion matters :-) Mary BRG |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "AJH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:14:16 -0800 (PST), Weatherlawyer wrote: Then there is the subtle art of collecting dead twigs from trees. By hook or by crook? :-) If there's a local rookery or magpie nesting area there'll be plenty on the ground, dropped by said birds. Mary AJH |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doki" wrote in message ... ... IMO there's no room for innocent bystanders when you're splitting logs as stuff will fly out to the sides, but not up into your face. Guaranteed? Course not. There's always the unusual, inexplicable event. I always wonder what's meant by 'innocent bystander' though, is there a 'guilty bystander'? Mary |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Davy wrote:
I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! I use one. I'm 65 and not particularly large. You have to remember that some logs simply won't split. If at first you don't succeed - quit! Another Dave |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mary Fisher wrote:
"Doki" wrote in message ... ... IMO there's no room for innocent bystanders when you're splitting logs as stuff will fly out to the sides, but not up into your face. Guaranteed? Course not. There's always the unusual, inexplicable event. I always wonder what's meant by 'innocent bystander' though, is there a 'guilty bystander'? Many, many years ago I lived in Berlin. My parents told me that in any traffic accident everyone present shouldered a part of the blame 'for being there' - I think 10%. So, in that sense, German law appeared to say there are guilty bystanders. (I have no idea of the actual truth of this 'blame percentage', but it was passed on to me and I always thought it an interesting concept.) -- Rod |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BRG wrote:
Not intended as "smart arse or rude" simply factual - if a question like that has to be asked in a public group for a task that is so simple that it was being done by ten year olds in my day, There you have it. I was doing it when I was 10. My kids weren't, because we've never had an open fire and we live in a smokeless zone where garden bonfires are forbidden. It's just a skill that most people never need any more; the OP has presumably moved somewhere where it is. Andy |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Rod
writes Mary Fisher wrote: "Doki" wrote in message ... ... IMO there's no room for innocent bystanders when you're splitting logs as stuff will fly out to the sides, but not up into your face. Guaranteed? Course not. There's always the unusual, inexplicable event. I always wonder what's meant by 'innocent bystander' though, is there a 'guilty bystander'? Many, many years ago I lived in Berlin. My parents told me that in any traffic accident everyone present shouldered a part of the blame 'for being there' - I think 10%. So, in that sense, German law appeared to say there are guilty bystanders. (I have no idea of the actual truth of this 'blame percentage', but it was passed on to me and I always thought it an interesting concept.) Schmarrrrrrren -- geoff |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Andy Champ
writes BRG wrote: Not intended as "smart arse or rude" simply factual - if a question like that has to be asked in a public group for a task that is so simple that it was being done by ten year olds in my day, There you have it. I was doing it when I was 10. My kids weren't, because we've never had an open fire and we live in a smokeless zone where garden bonfires are forbidden. It's just a skill that most people never need any more; the OP has presumably moved somewhere where it is. And a problem which could be solved quite easily by rubbing two neurons together -- geoff |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doki wrote:
BRG wrote: chris French wrote: In message , Davy writes "Guy Dawson" wrote in message ... Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... thanks guys, your suggestion does have the advantage that if I accidentally hit the piece of kindling that I am using to steady the log then no harm is done to the axe. Not true of my first attempt when I used bbq tongs! I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! BRG's post does leaves a nasty taste in the mouth though. But I suppose that if you ask questions on a newsgroup then you've got to expect occasional replies/trolls like that. shrug It obviously makes some people feel better to make smart arse, or just plain rude comments, rather than anything helpful, or just keeping their mouth shut. Forget them and move on, most people most of the time here are helpful. Not intended as "smart arse or rude" simply factual - if a question like that has to be asked in a public group for a task that is so simple that it was being done by ten year olds in my day, then the competence of the OP must be doubted for his own safety - remember, you can easily cut the fingers off your hand, but it's a damn site harder to replace them. So the moral here was simply to either get someone who knows how to do the job, or get that person to show him how it is done - a million words typed in this group does not count for the experience of being shown. Especially with -- "Easy peasy. Get a big wide bit of log to use as a block, and swing it like a sledgehammer." In this case, using that method can cause a large lump of the block to fly and either hit the OP in the face or an innocent bystander such as a child - doing rather a lot of damage to soft tissue. Again. someone giving advice without really knowing what to do himself. I'd like you to explain how. Hit a log square on with a splitting maul and you'd be doing very well to make anything fly upwards at you. IMO there's no room for innocent bystanders when you're splitting logs as stuff will fly out to the sides, but not up into your face. Doki, Let's get the thing straight, you made the statement "Easy peasy. Get a big wide bit of log to use as a block, and swing it like a sledgehammer" - no mention of any splitting maul or other implement - as I said "someone giving advice without really knowing what to do himself". Besides, as the OP was actually asking how to cut *kindling* then you would hardly go to the trouble of using a 'maul' (as you put it) on a block of wood around a foot long - you would simply use a sharp hatchet. BRG |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mary Fisher wrote:
"Doki" wrote in message ... ... IMO there's no room for innocent bystanders when you're splitting logs as stuff will fly out to the sides, but not up into your face. Guaranteed? Course not. There's always the unusual, inexplicable event. I always wonder what's meant by 'innocent bystander' though, is there a 'guilty bystander'? Mary Very often Mary, there are people who raise arson and then stand and watch the fire-brigade fight the fire! BRG |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy Champ wrote:
BRG wrote: Not intended as "smart arse or rude" simply factual - if a question like that has to be asked in a public group for a task that is so simple that it was being done by ten year olds in my day, There you have it. I was doing it when I was 10. My kids weren't, because we've never had an open fire and we live in a smokeless zone where garden bonfires are forbidden. It's just a skill that most people never need any more; the OP has presumably moved somewhere where it is. Andy Where I lived there was nothing but coal fires and along with many others of the time, at the age of 10 it was my job to cut the kindling from 'blocks' that my father got from the local pit - and my two kids (boy and girl) were brought up in a house with gas c/h, but they were still taught how to use basic tools such as hammer, saw, axe, spanners, screwdrivers, checking oil etc on vehicles - along with how to prepare and cook a meal with ingredients that came from the garden and butchers and not the supermarket chill cabinet or freezer (kids usually grow up into adults and will need these skills at some time or other). But lets face the true facts here - if the OP is intelligent (sigh, more comments I suppose) then it really wouldn't take long to work out how to safely cut *KINDLING* from a log around a foot long with a sharp hatchet (you don't need a two handed felling axe for this) - it's all down to Mr Common Sense really! BRG |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 3, 5:43 pm, "BRG" wrote:
But lets face the true facts here - if the OP is intelligent (sigh, more comments I suppose) then it really wouldn't take long to work out how to safely cut *KINDLING* from a log around a foot long with a sharp hatchet (you don't need a two handed felling axe for this) - it's all down to Mr Common Sense really! No, I don't think it is. It's pretty much all down to experience. My son (now at University) cuts kindling by balancing the target between two pieces of wood, and hitting the side with the axe - yes, I've tried to teach him to do it properly, but he just won't hold a piece of wood anywhere near where he is aiming the axe. To the OP. Start out by practising with short pieces of thick wood that have been sawn square - that way they will stand up on their own. When you have got more comfortable that you know where the blade will end up, you can hold the piece in one hand, and cut with the other. It isn't as dangerous as it seems - you "know" where your fingers are (even with your eyes shut), and you quite soon learn where the axe head is going (because your hand is on the shaft) |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
geoff wrote:
In message , Rod writes Mary Fisher wrote: "Doki" wrote in message ... ... IMO there's no room for innocent bystanders when you're splitting logs as stuff will fly out to the sides, but not up into your face. Guaranteed? Course not. There's always the unusual, inexplicable event. I always wonder what's meant by 'innocent bystander' though, is there a 'guilty bystander'? Many, many years ago I lived in Berlin. My parents told me that in any traffic accident everyone present shouldered a part of the blame 'for being there' - I think 10%. So, in that sense, German law appeared to say there are guilty bystanders. (I have no idea of the actual truth of this 'blame percentage', but it was passed on to me and I always thought it an interesting concept.) Schmarrrrrrren Just in time for Shrove Tuesday? http://www.downloadtopc.com/recipe/0/62169/schmarren.html -- Rod |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BRG wrote:
Doki wrote: BRG wrote: chris French wrote: In message , Davy writes "Guy Dawson" wrote in message ... Davy wrote: I've just bought a rather nice 2kg hand axe which is very efficient for cutting small logs for kindling. But it is very sharp and I would like to keep all my fingers. Anybody recommend a way of holding the log steady whilst I take a swing at it with the axe? With a piece of kindling. You just have to cut the first piece carefully... thanks guys, your suggestion does have the advantage that if I accidentally hit the piece of kindling that I am using to steady the log then no harm is done to the axe. Not true of my first attempt when I used bbq tongs! I have just had a log burning stove installed so I'm suddenly needing to learn new skills - including how to use a 6lb log-splitting maul. That is some animal! BRG's post does leaves a nasty taste in the mouth though. But I suppose that if you ask questions on a newsgroup then you've got to expect occasional replies/trolls like that. shrug It obviously makes some people feel better to make smart arse, or just plain rude comments, rather than anything helpful, or just keeping their mouth shut. Forget them and move on, most people most of the time here are helpful. Not intended as "smart arse or rude" simply factual - if a question like that has to be asked in a public group for a task that is so simple that it was being done by ten year olds in my day, then the competence of the OP must be doubted for his own safety - remember, you can easily cut the fingers off your hand, but it's a damn site harder to replace them. So the moral here was simply to either get someone who knows how to do the job, or get that person to show him how it is done - a million words typed in this group does not count for the experience of being shown. Especially with -- "Easy peasy. Get a big wide bit of log to use as a block, and swing it like a sledgehammer." In this case, using that method can cause a large lump of the block to fly and either hit the OP in the face or an innocent bystander such as a child - doing rather a lot of damage to soft tissue. Again. someone giving advice without really knowing what to do himself. I'd like you to explain how. Hit a log square on with a splitting maul and you'd be doing very well to make anything fly upwards at you. IMO there's no room for innocent bystanders when you're splitting logs as stuff will fly out to the sides, but not up into your face. Doki, Let's get the thing straight, you made the statement "Easy peasy. Get a big wide bit of log to use as a block, and swing it like a sledgehammer" - no mention of any splitting maul or other implement - as I said "someone giving advice without really knowing what to do himself". Besides, as the OP was actually asking how to cut *kindling* then you would hardly go to the trouble of using a 'maul' (as you put it) on a block of wood around a foot long - you would simply use a sharp hatchet. The OP (as in original post) was about cutting kindling, the post I replied to was about how to use a splitting maul. The point of quoting replies is that you don't have to restate everything the last person said to make it clear what you're on about. What other name is there for a splitting maul by the way? And I for one would like to see you split slices of branches or trunk with a hatchet for more than 10 minutes at a time... |
#34
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mary Fisher wrote:
"Doki" wrote in message ... ... IMO there's no room for innocent bystanders when you're splitting logs as stuff will fly out to the sides, but not up into your face. Guaranteed? Course not. There's always the unusual, inexplicable event. I always wonder what's meant by 'innocent bystander' though, is there a 'guilty bystander'? Mary Course there is. Loitering within tent. |
#35
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mary Fisher wrote:
"AJH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:14:16 -0800 (PST), Weatherlawyer wrote: Then there is the subtle art of collecting dead twigs from trees. By hook or by crook? :-) If there's a local rookery or magpie nesting area there'll be plenty on the ground, dropped by said birds. Absolutely tons in our garden at present. Many magpies which now appear to be considering nesting material. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kindling for the Fire | Electronics Repair |