Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
Hi,
Can anyone advise? I have what I think is the ringmain in a room, set into the brickwork behind the plaster. It runs at the same level as the sockets, and looks exactly right for a ringmain. It has been chased very badly such that at certain points it rises proud of the plaster (corners etc). However, it has a brass outer skin. This made me think gas pipe, but there is no gas pipe of that description going from the meter, and no gas in the room. My voltstick registers nothing, but the brass would shield it anyway, so that's no surprise. Any thoughts? Is this just a bely and braces solution to stop people accidentally chopping the cable? Cheers, Ben |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting?
Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused:
How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 19:02, Lurch wrote:
On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused: How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. The building is 1920's, but has been retrofitted with new electrics at some point. The wire in question crosses a blocked in fireplace, so it can't be original. It is chiseled into the brickwork for most of its length, except a few places. I'm on the top floor, so I doubt that damp is a problem. Ben |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr 2007 11:17:00 -0700, "Ben"
mused: On 13 Apr, 19:02, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused: How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. The building is 1920's, but has been retrofitted with new electrics at some point. The wire in question crosses a blocked in fireplace, so it can't be original. It is chiseled into the brickwork for most of its length, except a few places. I'm on the top floor, so I doubt that damp is a problem. Does sound like it could be MICC. Can you not expose a bit and provide us with a photo? -- Regards, Stuart. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 19:24, Lurch wrote:
On 13 Apr 2007 11:17:00 -0700, "Ben" mused: On 13 Apr, 19:02, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused: How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. The building is 1920's, but has been retrofitted with new electrics at some point. The wire in question crosses a blocked in fireplace, so it can't be original. It is chiseled into the brickwork for most of its length, except a few places. I'm on the top floor, so I doubt that damp is a problem. Does sound like it could be MICC. Can you not expose a bit and provide us with a photo? -- Regards, Stuart.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - take a look at the wires in one of the accessories it serves |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 19:47, "cynic" wrote:
On 13 Apr, 19:24, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 11:17:00 -0700, "Ben" mused: On 13 Apr, 19:02, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused: How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. The building is 1920's, but has been retrofitted with new electrics at some point. The wire in question crosses a blocked in fireplace, so it can't be original. It is chiseled into the brickwork for most of its length, except a few places. I'm on the top floor, so I doubt that damp is a problem. Does sound like it could be MICC. Can you not expose a bit and provide us with a photo? -- Regards, Stuart.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - take a look at the wires in one of the accessories it serves By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG I suspect the suggestion of MICC may be correct though. Ben |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 19:47, "cynic" wrote:
On 13 Apr, 19:24, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 11:17:00 -0700, "Ben" mused: On 13 Apr, 19:02, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused: How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. The building is 1920's, but has been retrofitted with new electrics at some point. The wire in question crosses a blocked in fireplace, so it can't be original. It is chiseled into the brickwork for most of its length, except a few places. I'm on the top floor, so I doubt that damp is a problem. Does sound like it could be MICC. Can you not expose a bit and provide us with a photo? -- Regards, Stuart.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - take a look at the wires in one of the accessories it serves By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG I suspect the suggestion of MICC may be correct though. Ben |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 19:47, "cynic" wrote:
On 13 Apr, 19:24, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 11:17:00 -0700, "Ben" mused: On 13 Apr, 19:02, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused: How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. The building is 1920's, but has been retrofitted with new electrics at some point. The wire in question crosses a blocked in fireplace, so it can't be original. It is chiseled into the brickwork for most of its length, except a few places. I'm on the top floor, so I doubt that damp is a problem. Does sound like it could be MICC. Can you not expose a bit and provide us with a photo? -- Regards, Stuart.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - take a look at the wires in one of the accessories it serves By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG I suspect the suggestion of MICC may be correct though. Ben |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 19:47, "cynic" wrote:
On 13 Apr, 19:24, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 11:17:00 -0700, "Ben" mused: On 13 Apr, 19:02, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused: How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. The building is 1920's, but has been retrofitted with new electrics at some point. The wire in question crosses a blocked in fireplace, so it can't be original. It is chiseled into the brickwork for most of its length, except a few places. I'm on the top floor, so I doubt that damp is a problem. Does sound like it could be MICC. Can you not expose a bit and provide us with a photo? -- Regards, Stuart.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - take a look at the wires in one of the accessories it serves By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG I suspect the suggestion of MICC may be correct though. Ben |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 19:47, "cynic" wrote:
On 13 Apr, 19:24, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 11:17:00 -0700, "Ben" mused: On 13 Apr, 19:02, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused: How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. The building is 1920's, but has been retrofitted with new electrics at some point. The wire in question crosses a blocked in fireplace, so it can't be original. It is chiseled into the brickwork for most of its length, except a few places. I'm on the top floor, so I doubt that damp is a problem. Does sound like it could be MICC. Can you not expose a bit and provide us with a photo? -- Regards, Stuart.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - take a look at the wires in one of the accessories it serves By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG I suspect the suggestion of MICC may be correct though. Ben |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 19:47, "cynic" wrote:
On 13 Apr, 19:24, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 11:17:00 -0700, "Ben" mused: On 13 Apr, 19:02, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused: How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. The building is 1920's, but has been retrofitted with new electrics at some point. The wire in question crosses a blocked in fireplace, so it can't be original. It is chiseled into the brickwork for most of its length, except a few places. I'm on the top floor, so I doubt that damp is a problem. Does sound like it could be MICC. Can you not expose a bit and provide us with a photo? -- Regards, Stuart.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - take a look at the wires in one of the accessories it serves By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG I suspect the suggestion of MICC may be correct though. Ben |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
Ben wrote:
By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG Yup that is MICC / Pyro (no need to post four times - we heard the first!) -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 19:47, "cynic" wrote:
On 13 Apr, 19:24, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 11:17:00 -0700, "Ben" mused: On 13 Apr, 19:02, Lurch wrote: On 13 Apr 2007 10:11:57 -0700, " mused: How old is your house? Old enough to have had gas lighting? Is it of unusual construction e.g. solid granite? The cable may be pyro, a copper jacketed cable intended for surface mounting, (e.g.on solid stone walls) and the plaster added subsequently. That was my first thought. There are a few houses round here that have suffered damp problems on the groun floors so downstairs sockets have been run in in MICC. As it`s got an earthed metal cover then you can run it pretty much wherever you want too. -- Regards, Stuart. The building is 1920's, but has been retrofitted with new electrics at some point. The wire in question crosses a blocked in fireplace, so it can't be original. It is chiseled into the brickwork for most of its length, except a few places. I'm on the top floor, so I doubt that damp is a problem. Does sound like it could be MICC. Can you not expose a bit and provide us with a photo? -- Regards, Stuart.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - take a look at the wires in one of the accessories it serves By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG I suspect the suggestion of MICC may be correct though. Ben |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 20:13, John Rumm wrote:
Ben wrote: By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG Yup that is MICC / Pyro (no need to post four times - we heard the first!) -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ Yeah, I'm not sure what went on there. I think it was each time I refreshed the page it resent the post data and added a new post. Sort about that :-) Cheers, Ben |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:13:34 +0100, John Rumm
mused: Ben wrote: By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG Yup that is MICC / Pyro Whoever did the polarity and installation tests should have identified the conductors. The black wires you see are site applied, the actual presentation of a terminated MICC pot is actually 2 bare copper wires. You can get sleeving in most colours which makes identification easier, but most people use exclusively black sleeving and coloured tape for some reason. (no need to post four times - we heard the first!) Seven and counting. -- Regards, Stuart. |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr, 21:09, Lurch wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:13:34 +0100, John Rumm mused: Ben wrote: By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG Yup that is MICC / Pyro Whoever did the polarity and installation tests should have identified the conductors. The black wires you see are site applied, the actual presentation of a terminated MICC pot is actually 2 bare copper wires. You can get sleeving in most colours which makes identification easier, but most people use exclusively black sleeving and coloured tape for some reason. (no need to post four times - we heard the first!) Seven and counting. -- Regards, Stuart. Thanks for that. If I want to in insert a socket into the main is there anything special to know about this cable, or is it just like any other - since it's unlabeled I'll have to do a continuity check to work out live and neutral. How about earth? Is the sheath used for that...? Cheers, Ben |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On 13 Apr 2007 14:45:27 -0700, "Ben"
mused: On 13 Apr, 21:09, Lurch wrote: On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:13:34 +0100, John Rumm mused: Ben wrote: By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG Yup that is MICC / Pyro Whoever did the polarity and installation tests should have identified the conductors. The black wires you see are site applied, the actual presentation of a terminated MICC pot is actually 2 bare copper wires. You can get sleeving in most colours which makes identification easier, but most people use exclusively black sleeving and coloured tape for some reason. (no need to post four times - we heard the first!) Seven and counting. -- Regards, Stuart. Thanks for that. If I want to in insert a socket into the main is there anything special to know about this cable, or is it just like any other - Gogle MICC termination and tools. Costs a fair few quid for the proper kit and not many people can actually terminate MICC properly. since it's unlabeled I'll have to do a continuity check to work out live and neutral. How about earth? Is the sheath used for that...? Usually sheath is earth, yes. -- Regards, Stuart. |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
"Ben" wrote in message oups.com... On 13 Apr, 21:09, Lurch wrote: On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:13:34 +0100, John Rumm mused: Ben wrote: By the time they make it into the socket boxes they are two black insulated cores (makes live/neutral identification interesting!) A photo is he http://www.bbarker.co.uk/cable.JPG Yup that is MICC / Pyro Whoever did the polarity and installation tests should have identified the conductors. The black wires you see are site applied, the actual presentation of a terminated MICC pot is actually 2 bare copper wires. You can get sleeving in most colours which makes identification easier, but most people use exclusively black sleeving and coloured tape for some reason. (no need to post four times - we heard the first!) Seven and counting. -- Regards, Stuart. Thanks for that. If I want to in insert a socket into the main is there anything special to know about this cable, or is it just like any other - since it's unlabeled I'll have to do a continuity check to work out live and neutral. How about earth? Is the sheath used for that...? Cheers, Ben Ah, Yes the earth is the sheath, but special tools and glands are need for the cable ends if is just a one off you may find it better to get the pro in, and warn them it is a MICC cable.... |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
Lurch wrote:
Gogle MICC termination and tools. Costs a fair few quid for the proper kit and not many people can actually terminate MICC properly. One option if you don't have the tools and experience, and there is no particular reason to need MICC, is going back to T&E for the new wiring, and replacing the existing MICC at the point(s) you plan to join to the ring. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
In message , Lurch
writes Gogle MICC termination and tools. Costs a fair few quid for the proper kit and not many people can actually terminate MICC properly. Very easy for beginners to end up with shorted ends. Proper assembly requires a bit of practice and an insulation tester. Once you've done a few hundred you get used to it. :P -- Clive Mitchell http://www.bigclive.com |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:53:02 GMT, Clive Mitchell
mused: In message , Lurch writes Gogle MICC termination and tools. Costs a fair few quid for the proper kit and not many people can actually terminate MICC properly. Very easy for beginners to end up with shorted ends. Proper assembly requires a bit of practice and an insulation tester. Just to confirm, I wasn't suggesting the OP actually reterminates any MICC, just that he has a look at what he can't do. Once you've done a few hundred you get used to it. :P I've still got my first 4 MICC pots from college (2L1.5). Perfect, and that was the first 4 of many more perfect terminations. -- Regards, Stuart. |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Ring main...or not
Ben, as you are discovering, Google groups is a poor way to contribute to
Usenet. If your ISP (Be) dosn't offer a newserver, you can sign up for a free account with news.datemas.de or, if you dont mind paying a few Euros news.individual.net -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Spurs off a ring main | UK diy | |||
Load on a ring main | UK diy | |||
Making a New Ring Main | UK diy | |||
Radial-main, Ring-main or Spur? | UK diy | |||
Ring Main help | UK diy |