On Nov 17, 1:04*pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:
Why does he owe a billion, Tawwwwwwwwm?

Do you get it, Tawwwwwwm? The idea is that the money is needed to cover our
debt. The top tax bracket is at historical LOWS, except for a couple of
years. For decades, rates much HIGHER than our current rates were considered
to be appropriate and fair -- and our economy was growing at a much higher
rate.

Is all of that sinking in? Or is it a bit much for you to absorb all at
once?

You phony.

--
Ed Huntress

There is Ed going with the Tawwwwwwm and ending with " you phony. "
Reminds me of a 13 year old.

And making statements about how our economy was growing at a faster
rate when the rich paid a higher percentage of their income in taxes.
As if there was a causal relationship. Now the top income brackets
pay a higher percentage of the income taxes paid even though the
percentage of income paid in income taxes is less. So why don't you
face it. Your argument is false. Can you understand that?

Dan

On 11/17/2011 5:01 PM, wrote:
On Nov 17, 1:04 pm, "Ed wrote:
Why does he owe a billion, Tawwwwwwwwm?

Do you get it, Tawwwwwwm? The idea is that the money is needed to cover our
debt. The top tax bracket is at historical LOWS, except for a couple of
years. For decades, rates much HIGHER than our current rates were considered
to be appropriate and fair -- and our economy was growing at a much higher
rate.

Is all of that sinking in? Or is it a bit much for you to absorb all at
once?

You phony.

--
Ed Huntress

There is Ed going with the Tawwwwwwm and ending with " you phony. "
Reminds me of a 13 year old.

And making statements about how our economy was growing at a faster
rate when the rich paid a higher percentage of their income in taxes.
As if there was a causal relationship. Now the top income brackets
pay a higher percentage of the income taxes paid even though the
percentage of income paid in income taxes is less. So why don't you
face it. Your argument is false. Can you understand that?

Dan


Dan, Eddie lost it long ago. I've been one of his hate objects for a
long time now but couldn't care less, I feel pity for him.

"Tom Gardner" wrote in message
...

On 11/17/2011 5:01 PM, wrote:
On Nov 17, 1:04 pm, "Ed wrote:
Why does he owe a billion, Tawwwwwwwwm?

Do you get it, Tawwwwwwm? The idea is that the money is needed to cover
our
debt. The top tax bracket is at historical LOWS, except for a couple of
years. For decades, rates much HIGHER than our current rates were
considered
to be appropriate and fair -- and our economy was growing at a much
higher
rate.

Is all of that sinking in? Or is it a bit much for you to absorb all at
once?

You phony.

--
Ed Huntress

There is Ed going with the Tawwwwwwm and ending with " you phony. "
Reminds me of a 13 year old.

And making statements about how our economy was growing at a faster
rate when the rich paid a higher percentage of their income in taxes.
As if there was a causal relationship. Now the top income brackets
pay a higher percentage of the income taxes paid even though the
percentage of income paid in income taxes is less. So why don't you
face it. Your argument is false. Can you understand that?

Dan


Dan, Eddie lost it long ago. I've been one of his hate objects for a long
time now but couldn't care less, I feel pity for him.

Tawwwwwm, you've been a blowhard and a liar for at least a couple of years
now. You pretend to be stupid for the sole purpose of belittling others.
You're full of hot air and a phony to the core.

Dan, if someone says the sky is blue, you'll spend ten messages of sophistic
nonsense to show that perhaps it's really green, challenging the definition
of "blue." It's a relief not to see most of your messages.

And as I cut down the messages I read from the right-wing freaks, the
welfare queens who want to murder anyone to the left of them, the characters
who want to threaten elected officials with guns, and the ones who argue for
the sole purpose of arguing, I'm finding that RCM still has a refreshing
core of pleasant, civil, and interesting folks to talk to. I just have to
trim a bit more to get rid of the self-aggrandizing, mean-spirited,
self-important bull****ters.

--
Ed Huntress

On 11/17/2011 7:18 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
//
Dan, Eddie lost it long ago. I've been one of his hate objects for a
long time now but couldn't care less, I feel pity for him.

Tawwwwwm, you've been a blowhard and a liar for at least a couple of
years now. You pretend to be stupid for the sole purpose of belittling
others. You're full of hot air and a phony to the core.

Eeeeeeeedddddddiiiiiieeeee, you've been a ****-twit and a ****head for
at least a couple of years now. You don't need any help, you belittle
YOURSELF better than anybody else possibly could.

You are the one proven to be full of **** and an asshole to the core!
(new computer, you haven't been plonked yet...so, you want to play do you?)

On Nov 17, 7:18*pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:
"Tom Gardner" *wrote in message

...

On 11/17/2011 5:01 PM, wrote:









On Nov 17, 1:04 pm, "Ed *wrote:
Why does he owe a billion, Tawwwwwwwwm?

Do you get it, Tawwwwwwm? The idea is that the money is needed to cover
our
debt. The top tax bracket is at historical LOWS, except for a couple of
years. For decades, rates much HIGHER than our current rates were
considered
to be appropriate and fair -- and our economy was growing at a much
higher
rate.

Is all of that sinking in? Or is it a bit much for you to absorb all at
once?

You phony.

--
Ed Huntress

There is Ed going with the Tawwwwwwm and ending with " you phony. "
Reminds me of a 13 year old.

And making statements about how our economy was growing at a faster
rate when the rich paid a higher percentage of their income in taxes.
As if there was a causal relationship. *Now the top income brackets
pay a higher percentage of the income taxes paid even though the
percentage of income paid in income taxes is less. *So why don't you
face it. *Your argument is false. *Can you understand that?

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan

Dan, Eddie lost it long ago. *I've been one of his hate objects for a long
time now but couldn't care less, I feel pity for him.

Tawwwwwm, you've been a blowhard and a liar for at least a couple of years
now. You pretend to be stupid for the sole purpose of belittling others.
You're full of hot air and a phony to the core.

Dan, if someone says the sky is blue, you'll spend ten messages of sophistic
nonsense to show that perhaps it's really green, challenging the definition
of "blue." It's a relief not to see most of your messages.

You should not be seeing any of my messages since you plonked me.
Don't tell me you lied when you said you plonked me.

And as I cut down the messages I read from the right-wing freaks, the
welfare queens who want to murder anyone to the left of them, the characters
who want to threaten elected officials with guns, and the ones who argue for
the sole purpose of arguing, I'm finding that RCM still has a refreshing
core of pleasant, civil, and interesting folks to talk to. I just have to
trim a bit more to get rid of the self-aggrandizing, mean-spirited,
self-important bull****ters.

--
Ed Huntress

wrote in message
...
On Nov 17, 7:18 pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:
"Tom Gardner" wrote in message


You should not be seeing any of my messages since you plonked me.

I should not be seeing any of Tom Gardner's messages since I have him
plonked.

But Ed replied to him........and since I don't have Ed plonked.....

Don't tell me you lied when you said you plonked me.

Don't tell me you are really that stupid....




















































( because I've known that for quite some time now )

"PrecisionmachinisT" wrote in message
news:uKOdnTJvCtRNKVvTnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@scnresearch. com...


wrote in message
...
On Nov 17, 7:18 pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:
"Tom Gardner" wrote in message


You should not be seeing any of my messages since you plonked me.

I should not be seeing any of Tom Gardner's messages since I have him
plonked.

But Ed replied to him........and since I don't have Ed plonked.....

Don't tell me you lied when you said you plonked me.

Don't tell me you are really that stupid....

================================================== ===============

[reply]

Have a nice conversation with Dan. From experience, I can suggest that it
may go on for a long time -- even if he really gets it the first time. d8-)

--
Ed Huntress




















































( because I've known that for quite some time now )

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...


Have a nice conversation with Dan. From experience, I can suggest that it
may go on for a long time -- even if he really gets it the first time.
d8-)

--
Ed Huntress


I've got better things to do with my time--and since I'm sure he'll have no
problem finding something worse to do with his....

On Nov 18, 2:40*pm, "PrecisionmachinisT"
wrote:



Don't tell me you are really that stupid....

( because I've known that for quite some time now )

Sorry. I figured that if Ed plonked me, then he did not want to read
anything I wrote. And thought that he was smart enough to skip over
anything that I wrote when it was in someone's reply. I guess I am
stupid to make such assumptions.


Dan