Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Christopher Tidy
 
Posts: n/a
Default The secret of a neat fillet weld?

Hi all,

I've been using a stick welder for occasional hobby projects for about 9
years now (the welder is a Cytringan Bantam 180 amp oil-cooled unit).
I've mastered butt welds and can achieve an even bead with neat
restarts, but I can't quite get fillets right. I've tried varying the
current, moving the electrode slowly up and down, following the
instructions regarding angle in my welding book etc., but my fillets
still contain small slag inclusions. I'm using E 6013 electrodes and 3-5
mm thick 43A mild steel plate (these might both be British-only
standards). Now I find that I'm designing my projects so as to avoid
fillet welds. Can anyone suggest how to improve my fillet welds, or do I
just need more practice?

Any hints would be much appreciated.

Best wishes,

Chris

  #2   Report Post  
Grant Erwin
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Christopher Tidy wrote:
Hi all,

I've been using a stick welder for occasional hobby projects for about 9
years now (the welder is a Cytringan Bantam 180 amp oil-cooled unit).
I've mastered butt welds and can achieve an even bead with neat
restarts, but I can't quite get fillets right. I've tried varying the
current, moving the electrode slowly up and down, following the
instructions regarding angle in my welding book etc., but my fillets
still contain small slag inclusions. I'm using E 6013 electrodes and 3-5
mm thick 43A mild steel plate (these might both be British-only
standards). Now I find that I'm designing my projects so as to avoid
fillet welds. Can anyone suggest how to improve my fillet welds, or do I
just need more practice?


Isn't 6013 a drag rod? Try no weave at all, just a straight motion right down
the axis. Watch the puddle, not the arc. Remember, a fillet weld requires a bit
more current than a flat weld because the current has to flow two ways. Make
sure your puddle flows evenly on both sides of the fillet. The best way to
conquer this is not to avoid it, but rather to practice. You may find it easier
if you support your left arm on an armrest and use it to support your right arm,
assuming you're right-handed. Get your body comfortable, don't sway around. I
often sit down when a weld is critical. Turn off the welder and do a dry run on
the movement until you can support your hand throughout its range of travel --
don't forget, the electrode gets shorter! Flip up your filter and look through
your hood and make sure you can see across the range too. Don't squeeze the
electrode holder, that will make your muscles shake -- a light grip is all you
need. I have to admit, I've little or no experience with 6013, I went from 6011
to 7014 to 7018 and now sometimes I use 6010. If 6013 isn't a drag rod, try
7014, it's a dead easy rod to run.

GWE
  #3   Report Post  
Christopher Tidy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Grant Erwin wrote:
Christopher Tidy wrote:

Hi all,

I've been using a stick welder for occasional hobby projects for about
9 years now (the welder is a Cytringan Bantam 180 amp oil-cooled
unit). I've mastered butt welds and can achieve an even bead with neat
restarts, but I can't quite get fillets right. I've tried varying the
current, moving the electrode slowly up and down, following the
instructions regarding angle in my welding book etc., but my fillets
still contain small slag inclusions. I'm using E 6013 electrodes and
3-5 mm thick 43A mild steel plate (these might both be British-only
standards). Now I find that I'm designing my projects so as to avoid
fillet welds. Can anyone suggest how to improve my fillet welds, or do
I just need more practice?



Isn't 6013 a drag rod?


I don't think 6013 is intended as a drag rod. It doesn't say so on the
packet, and the flux is thinner than that on a 7018 rod. I was given
some 7018 rods when I first started welding, but found them very hard to
use, so I talked to the guy at the welding store and bought 6013.
Apparently 7018 is best with a DC machine. I have about 10 kg of 6013 so
I'd like to learn to use them for fillets.

Try no weave at all, just a straight motion right
down the axis. Watch the puddle, not the arc. Remember, a fillet weld
requires a bit more current than a flat weld because the current has to
flow two ways.


Ah! A guy told me the opposite, because "you want to weld more slowly to
give you time to spread the metal around", or some such argument. Maybe
he didn't know what he was talking about? I'll try turning up the
current a notch.

Make sure your puddle flows evenly on both sides of the
fillet.


If one plate is horizontal and the other vertical, how do you stop the
weld pool from forming predominantly on the horizontal plate due to the
action of gravity? Roughly what horizontal and vertical electrode angles
should I be using?

Many thanks for your advice.

Chris

  #4   Report Post  
RoyJ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

6013 is a piece of cake on clean steel.

For a fillet weld with one leg vertical and 6013 try these settings and
angles:
Rod tipped 15 degrees into direction of travel (dragging not pushing)
Rod 30 to 35 degrees off of the horizontal surface (pushing the puddle
into the vertical piece.
Tip of the rod 1 diameter from the work
110 amps on 1/8" (3mm) rod)
75 amps on 3/32" rod
length of weld should be 1/2 to 2/3rds the length of the rod consumed.
no weave, watch the puddle, make sure it flows to both surfaces. Move
that way if it doesn't.


Christopher Tidy wrote:
Grant Erwin wrote:

Christopher Tidy wrote:

Hi all,

I've been using a stick welder for occasional hobby projects for
about 9 years now (the welder is a Cytringan Bantam 180 amp
oil-cooled unit). I've mastered butt welds and can achieve an even
bead with neat restarts, but I can't quite get fillets right. I've
tried varying the current, moving the electrode slowly up and down,
following the instructions regarding angle in my welding book etc.,
but my fillets still contain small slag inclusions. I'm using E 6013
electrodes and 3-5 mm thick 43A mild steel plate (these might both be
British-only standards). Now I find that I'm designing my projects so
as to avoid fillet welds. Can anyone suggest how to improve my fillet
welds, or do I just need more practice?




Isn't 6013 a drag rod?



I don't think 6013 is intended as a drag rod. It doesn't say so on the
packet, and the flux is thinner than that on a 7018 rod. I was given
some 7018 rods when I first started welding, but found them very hard to
use, so I talked to the guy at the welding store and bought 6013.
Apparently 7018 is best with a DC machine. I have about 10 kg of 6013 so
I'd like to learn to use them for fillets.

Try no weave at all, just a straight motion right down the axis. Watch
the puddle, not the arc. Remember, a fillet weld requires a bit more
current than a flat weld because the current has to flow two ways.



Ah! A guy told me the opposite, because "you want to weld more slowly to
give you time to spread the metal around", or some such argument. Maybe
he didn't know what he was talking about? I'll try turning up the
current a notch.

Make sure your puddle flows evenly on both sides of the fillet.



If one plate is horizontal and the other vertical, how do you stop the
weld pool from forming predominantly on the horizontal plate due to the
action of gravity? Roughly what horizontal and vertical electrode angles
should I be using?

Many thanks for your advice.

Chris

  #5   Report Post  
Christopher Tidy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

RoyJ wrote:
6013 is a piece of cake on clean steel.

For a fillet weld with one leg vertical and 6013 try these settings and
angles:
Rod tipped 15 degrees into direction of travel (dragging not pushing)
Rod 30 to 35 degrees off of the horizontal surface (pushing the puddle
into the vertical piece.
Tip of the rod 1 diameter from the work
110 amps on 1/8" (3mm) rod)
75 amps on 3/32" rod
length of weld should be 1/2 to 2/3rds the length of the rod consumed.
no weave, watch the puddle, make sure it flows to both surfaces. Move
that way if it doesn't.


Thanks, Roy. I'll try those settings. One thing I think I've been doing
wrong is to hold the electrode at too great an angle to the horizontal
(probably 45 degrees). This is because the handle of the electrode
holder or cable catches on the bench if I don't. I'll have to figure out
a way around this.

Chris



  #6   Report Post  
R. Zimmerman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I do just about what Roy does with some modifications. I use the 45 degrees
but the rod is pointed about 1/16th more onto the horizontal surface. I use
a "J" motion. Imagine a letter "J" laying on its side. I move forward then
back and up against the vertical surface watching the puddle form behind the
rod. I move down and forward again and then hooking back. Each time I hook
back I am hesitating and looking to see that the molten metal is piling up
against the vertical surface properly. If you hook up too high you will
burn into the vertical surface and create undercut.
Randy
"Christopher Tidy" wrote in message
...
RoyJ wrote:
6013 is a piece of cake on clean steel.

For a fillet weld with one leg vertical and 6013 try these settings and
angles:
Rod tipped 15 degrees into direction of travel (dragging not pushing)
Rod 30 to 35 degrees off of the horizontal surface (pushing the puddle
into the vertical piece.
Tip of the rod 1 diameter from the work
110 amps on 1/8" (3mm) rod)
75 amps on 3/32" rod
length of weld should be 1/2 to 2/3rds the length of the rod consumed.
no weave, watch the puddle, make sure it flows to both surfaces. Move
that way if it doesn't.


Thanks, Roy. I'll try those settings. One thing I think I've been doing
wrong is to hold the electrode at too great an angle to the horizontal
(probably 45 degrees). This is because the handle of the electrode
holder or cable catches on the bench if I don't. I'll have to figure out
a way around this.

Chris



  #7   Report Post  
Christopher Tidy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

R. Zimmerman wrote:
I do just about what Roy does with some modifications. I use the 45 degrees
but the rod is pointed about 1/16th more onto the horizontal surface. I use
a "J" motion. Imagine a letter "J" laying on its side. I move forward then
back and up against the vertical surface watching the puddle form behind the
rod. I move down and forward again and then hooking back. Each time I hook
back I am hesitating and looking to see that the molten metal is piling up
against the vertical surface properly. If you hook up too high you will
burn into the vertical surface and create undercut.
Randy


Thanks. I'll try the J-method as well. I need to do some experimenting
and see what works best for me. When you say "the rod is pointed about
1/16th more onto the horizontal surface" do you mean the tip of the rod
is 1/16" closer to the horizontal surface than the vertical surface?

Chris

  #8   Report Post  
Artemia Salina
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 01:21:54 +0000, Christopher Tidy wrote:


If one plate is horizontal and the other vertical, how do you stop the
weld pool from forming predominantly on the horizontal plate due to the
action of gravity? Roughly what horizontal and vertical electrode angles
should I be using?


If it is practical to lean the structure so that you are welding into
the bottom of a V (i.e. rotating the fillet joint into the flat position)
it should make things easier. It might also solve your cable snagging
problems too.

  #9   Report Post  
Randy Zimmerman
 
Posts: n/a
Default



The tip is not closer as in a closer arc. It is not pointing to the
exact corner but 1/16 closer to you on the flat surface.
This trick works for wire feed and even when pointing a flame in
Oxy-acetylene welding. It helps to prevent accidental melting of the
vertical surface and the resulting undercut. Undercut is the one thing
you want to avoid.


Christopher Tidy wrote:



Thanks. I'll try the J-method as well. I need to do some experimenting
and see what works best for me. When you say "the rod is pointed about
1/16th more onto the horizontal surface" do you mean the tip of the rod
is 1/16" closer to the horizontal surface than the vertical surface?

Chris

  #10   Report Post  
footy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

6013 is indeed a drag rod. You do not use a whipping motion. And you
should not weave more that about 2-3 times the diameter of the filler
metal.

6013 should give you a beautiful weld. The reason you are getting
inclusions is that you are moving the puddle back over flux that has
already solidified. You can get away with this a bit with a rod like
7018 which is more penetrating, but not with 6013 which is designed for
sheet metal.

The way to get equal length legs on bot plates is to favor the top
plate. Instead of your electrode splitting the angle between the two
plates, it needs to be laid a bit down toward the bottom plate so that
the tip points more towards the vertical plate than the bottom plate.
Gravity will bring the molten pool back down towards the bottom plate.

If a simple drag motion does not make a big enough bead, just make
multiple passes.


  #11   Report Post  
Brian Lawson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 01:47:04 +0000 (UTC), Christopher Tidy
wrote:



Thanks, Roy. I'll try those settings. One thing I think I've been doing
wrong is to hold the electrode at too great an angle to the horizontal
(probably 45 degrees). This is because the handle of the electrode
holder or cable catches on the bench if I don't. I'll have to figure out
a way around this.

Chris


Hey Chris, Two hints from another "wish-I-could-weld-like-that" guy.
First, loop the cable over your shoulder(s) to take the "weight" off
it and stop it dragging and catching; and second, when you put the rod
in the stinger handle, take and bend the rod right at the handle to an
angle that suits what you are doing. Have you ever seen a weldor do
that? He inserts the new rod in the best angled "groove" in the
stinger clamp handles, then with one hand he grabs the very end of
both the clamps right at the rod and squeezes hard, to hold it shut
(so it won't slip), and then with the other hand grabs the rod "up
short" and bends it to suit. If you don't grab it up short, you'll
crack all the flux. It has to bend right where their is no flux.

Ohhhhh....and ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS wear gloves when you do it!!
Always!! Owwwwwwwchhh... Yes....ALWAYS!! You'll get a poke or a burn
if you don't.

Take care.

Brian Lawson,
Bothwell, Ontario.
  #12   Report Post  
Christopher Tidy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brian Lawson wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 01:47:04 +0000 (UTC), Christopher Tidy
wrote:



Thanks, Roy. I'll try those settings. One thing I think I've been doing
wrong is to hold the electrode at too great an angle to the horizontal
(probably 45 degrees). This is because the handle of the electrode
holder or cable catches on the bench if I don't. I'll have to figure out
a way around this.

Chris



Hey Chris, Two hints from another "wish-I-could-weld-like-that" guy.
First, loop the cable over your shoulder(s) to take the "weight" off
it and stop it dragging and catching; and second, when you put the rod
in the stinger handle, take and bend the rod right at the handle to an
angle that suits what you are doing. Have you ever seen a weldor do
that? He inserts the new rod in the best angled "groove" in the
stinger clamp handles, then with one hand he grabs the very end of
both the clamps right at the rod and squeezes hard, to hold it shut
(so it won't slip), and then with the other hand grabs the rod "up
short" and bends it to suit. If you don't grab it up short, you'll
crack all the flux. It has to bend right where their is no flux.

Ohhhhh....and ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS wear gloves when you do it!!
Always!! Owwwwwwwchhh... Yes....ALWAYS!! You'll get a poke or a burn
if you don't.


Thanks for that suggestion. I've never seen anyone bend a rod before
and, believe it or not, I'd never thought to try it. It's easy with my
welding set as the stinger screws down hard on the rod, instead of just
holding it with a spring clamp. I'll try it next time a weld seems awkward.

Might get chance to try out a few of your suggestions tonight. Will let
you know how it goes.

Best wishes,

Chris

  #13   Report Post  
Christopher Tidy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

footy wrote:
6013 is indeed a drag rod. You do not use a whipping motion. And you
should not weave more that about 2-3 times the diameter of the filler
metal.

6013 should give you a beautiful weld. The reason you are getting
inclusions is that you are moving the puddle back over flux that has
already solidified. You can get away with this a bit with a rod like
7018 which is more penetrating, but not with 6013 which is designed for
sheet metal.

The way to get equal length legs on bot plates is to favor the top
plate. Instead of your electrode splitting the angle between the two
plates, it needs to be laid a bit down toward the bottom plate so that
the tip points more towards the vertical plate than the bottom plate.
Gravity will bring the molten pool back down towards the bottom plate.

If a simple drag motion does not make a big enough bead, just make
multiple passes.


Can you get 6013 drag rods and 6013 non-drag rods? My 2.0 mm 6013 rods
have a flux coating which is perhaps 2/3 the core diameter, but my 3.2
mm 6013 rods have a coating which is only about 1/3 the core diameter. I
wasn't sold these as drag rods. Mostly I weld angle sections, tubes and
channels with a wall thickness of 2 to 5 mm. How suitable do you think
6013 rods are for this work?

By the way, is there a good site anywhere which gives information about
the different types of electrodes? I couldn't find much by doing a
Google search.

Best wishes,

Chris

  #14   Report Post  
Andrew H. Wakefield
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Christopher,

I run a lot of 6013 rod, and love it ... most of the time. There are
situations where it can be terrible for slag inclusions. Poor fit-up can
trap slag; if fit-up is an issue, do an initial pass with 6011 (using a
whipped motion) to "seal" the gaps. Even if the fit is good, I find that if
I don't get the 6013 started well on both sides of the fillet, I inevitably
get slag trapped, and it is hard to overcome this mid-weld. (Well, let me be
clearer -- there is no way to go back and take care of the problem without
stopping and grinding, and if you're not careful the problem will propagate
down the rest of the weld.) Two things that I have found contribute to the
problem is failure to keep the tip of the rod steady and right down at the
weld -- too long an arc gap tends to invite slag to get trapped, as does
accidentally backing up because I didn't have my hand steadied adequately.
The other thing is not running quite hot enough -- I find that the hotter I
run it, the less trouble I have with slag ... though of course, then burn
through can become an issue!

Have you used much 6011? I find that to be an essential complement to 6013
(or 7018 or 7014, for that matter). Not only does it deal nicely with fit-up
issues (if you learn the whip motion), but also it can be a fast fix of
sorts where there is a slag inclusion that you just don't want to bother
grinding out -- i.e., the weld is already more than strong enough, and
you're wanting just to improve the cosmetics. Or at least that is how I
treat it, but then again I'm still relatively new to welding, so maybe
that's a major no-no -- Roy? Randy?

One last word -- you seem to be objecting to the idea of 6013 as a "drag
rod" because of the thickness of the flux. Yes, the flux on 6013 is thinner
than on 7018, but on the other hand, it is thicker (and an entirely
different composition) from the flux on 6011. More importantly, it leaves a
relatively thick slag behind, whereas something like 6010/6011 leaves only a
very, very thin "scum" of a slag. You can, as a previous poster noted, do
some weaving (such as the J motion), but you do have to use the proper
technique -- this would be equally true for 7018. If you try to weave back
and forth in the direction of travel -- i.e., back over the weld puddle --
you are asking for slag inclusions. If you keep the tip of the rod just
ahead of (and pointed into) the weld puddle -- i.e., the tip never gets back
into the weld puddle, but leads it -- then you can do some weaving
*perpindicular* to the direction of travel to get a wider bead. The J motion
is somewhat contrary to what I've just said, but the motion is designed to
push the slag where it needs to be (at least that's what I was taught). In
any case, the point is that you never want to let the slag get ahead of
where you're welding.

Contrast all of this with 6010 or 6011, for which it is routine to "whip"
the tip back and forth *along* the direction of travel -- these rods leave a
very thin slag coating, and are very aggressive, so they can go back on top
of the weld puddle and burn through the little bit of slag and float it to
the top.

HTH,

Andy

"Christopher Tidy" wrote in message
...
footy wrote:
6013 is indeed a drag rod. You do not use a whipping motion. And you
should not weave more that about 2-3 times the diameter of the filler
metal.

6013 should give you a beautiful weld. The reason you are getting
inclusions is that you are moving the puddle back over flux that has
already solidified. You can get away with this a bit with a rod like
7018 which is more penetrating, but not with 6013 which is designed for
sheet metal.

The way to get equal length legs on bot plates is to favor the top plate.
Instead of your electrode splitting the angle between the two plates, it
needs to be laid a bit down toward the bottom plate so that the tip
points more towards the vertical plate than the bottom plate. Gravity
will bring the molten pool back down towards the bottom plate.

If a simple drag motion does not make a big enough bead, just make
multiple passes.


Can you get 6013 drag rods and 6013 non-drag rods? My 2.0 mm 6013 rods
have a flux coating which is perhaps 2/3 the core diameter, but my 3.2 mm
6013 rods have a coating which is only about 1/3 the core diameter. I
wasn't sold these as drag rods. Mostly I weld angle sections, tubes and
channels with a wall thickness of 2 to 5 mm. How suitable do you think
6013 rods are for this work?

By the way, is there a good site anywhere which gives information about
the different types of electrodes? I couldn't find much by doing a Google
search.

Best wishes,

Chris



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The secret of a neat fillet weld? Christopher Tidy Metalworking 1 August 28th 05 06:56 PM
Newbie can't see TIG weld pool mclorson Metalworking 10 August 5th 05 03:01 AM
Copper Casting In America (Trevelyan) Yuri Kuchinsky Metalworking 330 July 22nd 04 12:59 AM
making fillet weld with oxyacet? mongke Metalworking 2 January 12th 04 05:39 PM
Question for the weld people out in cyberland Koz Metalworking 3 October 17th 03 03:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"