Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT - Methanol fuel in lawn tractor??
Am homebrewing biodiesel and therefore have a drum of methanol on hand.
Since methanol burns much cleaner than gasoline in an IC engine, it occurs to me that fueling my lawn tractor with the stuff might reduce the raw exhaust fumes that I don't enjoy breathing much and which makes the clothes stink. However, maybe the methanol is not engine friendly (seals and hoses I suspect). I've tried it with a walkbehind mower and it seems to work well (engine runs OK and much less stink). Was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions? TIA for any help..... Laurie Forbes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:SMqte.65840$HI.42443@edtnps84... Am homebrewing biodiesel and therefore have a drum of methanol on hand. Since methanol burns much cleaner than gasoline in an IC engine, it occurs to me that fueling my lawn tractor with the stuff might reduce the raw exhaust fumes that I don't enjoy breathing much and which makes the clothes stink. However, maybe the methanol is not engine friendly (seals and hoses I suspect). I've tried it with a walkbehind mower and it seems to work well (engine runs OK and much less stink). Was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions? TIA for any help..... Laurie Forbes If your lawnmower is producing that much noticable exhaust, it needs the attention of a good mechanic. I'll bet your insurance agent would love to hear that you are 'homebrewing' and storing untested volatile fuels. -Carl (who homebrews-and tests- light and dark ales) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Carl Byrns wrote:
"Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:SMqte.65840$HI.42443@edtnps84... Am homebrewing biodiesel and therefore have a drum of methanol on hand. Since methanol burns much cleaner than gasoline in an IC engine, it occurs to me that fueling my lawn tractor with the stuff might reduce the raw exhaust fumes that I don't enjoy breathing much and which makes the clothes stink. However, maybe the methanol is not engine friendly (seals and hoses I suspect). I've tried it with a walkbehind mower and it seems to work well (engine runs OK and much less stink). Was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions? TIA for any help..... Laurie Forbes If your lawnmower is producing that much noticable exhaust, it needs the attention of a good mechanic. Not necessarily true. Lawnmowers have *no* significant emissions controls and some people are more sensitive than others to the smell. I'll bet your insurance agent would love to hear that you are 'homebrewing' and storing untested volatile fuels. Non sequitur and purely an assumption. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:SMqte.65840$HI.42443@edtnps84... Am homebrewing biodiesel and therefore have a drum of methanol on hand. Since methanol burns much cleaner than gasoline in an IC engine, it occurs to me that fueling my lawn tractor with the stuff might reduce the raw exhaust fumes that I don't enjoy breathing much and which makes the clothes stink. However, maybe the methanol is not engine friendly (seals and hoses I suspect). I've tried it with a walkbehind mower and it seems to work well (engine runs OK and much less stink). Was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions? TIA for any help..... Laurie Forbes Any carbureted engine can run methanol. To get the same power as gasoline, you need to increase the main jet diameter. Try mixing methanol with gasoline 50:50 first. 100 percent methanol could be very hard to start in cold weather, or even impossible. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Good one, Carl! Great start for a hot Monday morning - it sort of reminds
one there is a chance for some enjoyment later in the day. Bob Swinney "Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:58rte.11061$aR1.8844@trndny02... "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:SMqte.65840$HI.42443@edtnps84... Am homebrewing biodiesel and therefore have a drum of methanol on hand. Since methanol burns much cleaner than gasoline in an IC engine, it occurs to me that fueling my lawn tractor with the stuff might reduce the raw exhaust fumes that I don't enjoy breathing much and which makes the clothes stink. However, maybe the methanol is not engine friendly (seals and hoses I suspect). I've tried it with a walkbehind mower and it seems to work well (engine runs OK and much less stink). Was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions? TIA for any help..... Laurie Forbes If your lawnmower is producing that much noticable exhaust, it needs the attention of a good mechanic. I'll bet your insurance agent would love to hear that you are 'homebrewing' and storing untested volatile fuels. -Carl (who homebrews-and tests- light and dark ales) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If you don't like the exhaust fumes from gasoline, you are really not
going to like the exhaust from methanol. One of the main compononents is formeldyhyde. It makes your eyes burn something awful. I know ethanol is really bad for any rubber in the fuel system, and suspect that methanol is as well. It dries out the rubber, and will it to shrink and/or break down. JW |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
GrumpyOldGeek wrote:
If your lawnmower is producing that much noticable exhaust, it needs the attention of a good mechanic. Not necessarily true. Lawnmowers have *no* significant emissions controls and some people are more sensitive than others to the smell. I'll bet your insurance agent would love to hear that you are 'homebrewing' and storing untested volatile fuels. I run methanol in my race car. Methanol exhaust has noxious aromatic components that are really irritating to eyes and lungs. These are not regulated, but they are there in methanol exhaust. You trade less CO and NOX for more aromatics, which may be carcinogens. Methanol is bad on plastic and rubber, but if engine doesn't have them it may be okay. Jets need to be drilled out 40% larger in diameter (double in area) as mixture ratio needs to be about twice the fuel as with gasoline (yeah, it will really gobble up the fuel). It actually puts out MORE C02 (greenhouse gas) than gasoline. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
bw wrote:
"Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:SMqte.65840$HI.42443@edtnps84... Am homebrewing biodiesel and therefore have a drum of methanol on hand. Since methanol burns much cleaner than gasoline in an IC engine, it occurs to me that fueling my lawn tractor with the stuff might reduce the raw exhaust fumes that I don't enjoy breathing much and which makes the clothes stink. However, maybe the methanol is not engine friendly (seals and hoses I suspect). I've tried it with a walkbehind mower and it seems to work well (engine runs OK and much less stink). Was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions? TIA for any help..... Laurie Forbes Any carbureted engine can run methanol. To get the same power as gasoline, you need to increase the main jet diameter. Try mixing methanol with gasoline 50:50 first. 100 percent methanol could be very hard to start in cold weather, or even impossible. True. One does not run methanol in cold weather without some sort of alternate starting system. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
jw wrote:
If you don't like the exhaust fumes from gasoline, you are really not going to like the exhaust from methanol. One of the main compononents is formeldyhyde. It makes your eyes burn something awful. I know ethanol is really bad for any rubber in the fuel system, and suspect that methanol is as well. It dries out the rubber, and will it to shrink and/or break down. JW Standard practice in race cars is to drain fuel if it will not be used again soon, use good alcohol-proof filters, clean or replace them FREQUENTLY. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"GrumpyOldGeek" wrote in message ... Carl Byrns wrote: "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:SMqte.65840$HI.42443@edtnps84... Am homebrewing biodiesel and therefore have a drum of methanol on hand. Since methanol burns much cleaner than gasoline in an IC engine, it occurs to me that fueling my lawn tractor with the stuff might reduce the raw exhaust fumes that I don't enjoy breathing much and which makes the clothes stink. However, maybe the methanol is not engine friendly (seals and hoses I suspect). I've tried it with a walkbehind mower and it seems to work well (engine runs OK and much less stink). Was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions? TIA for any help..... Laurie Forbes If your lawnmower is producing that much noticable exhaust, it needs the attention of a good mechanic. Not necessarily true. Lawnmowers have *no* significant emissions controls and some people are more sensitive than others to the smell. Quite so except it has no emissions control at all, has acted this way since new and smells the same as any other "untreated" gasoline exhaust fumes. I'll bet your insurance agent would love to hear that you are 'homebrewing' and storing untested volatile fuels. Non sequitur and purely an assumption. Also true but I'll be sure to let him know in any case |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"bw" wrote in message ... "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:SMqte.65840$HI.42443@edtnps84... Am homebrewing biodiesel and therefore have a drum of methanol on hand. Since methanol burns much cleaner than gasoline in an IC engine, it occurs to me that fueling my lawn tractor with the stuff might reduce the raw exhaust fumes that I don't enjoy breathing much and which makes the clothes stink. However, maybe the methanol is not engine friendly (seals and hoses I suspect). I've tried it with a walkbehind mower and it seems to work well (engine runs OK and much less stink). Was wondering if anyone had any advice or suggestions? TIA for any help..... Laurie Forbes Any carbureted engine can run methanol. To get the same power as gasoline, you need to increase the main jet diameter. I've found that adjusting the mixture screw towards rich solved stalling problems I was having at first. Also, I need to leave the choke partially engaged until the engine warms up. Try mixing methanol with gasoline 50:50 first. 100 percent methanol could be very hard to start in cold weather, or even impossible. Quite so but since this is for lawn mowing only, it should not be a problem. .. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"jw" wrote in message ups.com... If you don't like the exhaust fumes from gasoline, you are really not going to like the exhaust from methanol. One of the main compononents is formeldyhyde. It makes your eyes burn something awful. I don't know - so far I'm pleased with the results with no stink or eye irritation. We will see (I hope I guess. I know ethanol is really bad for any rubber in the fuel system, and suspect that methanol is as well. It dries out the rubber, and will it to shrink and/or break down. JW |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"GrumpyOldGeek" wrote in message ... Carl Byrns wrote: If your lawnmower is producing that much noticable exhaust, it needs the attention of a good mechanic. Not necessarily true. Lawnmowers have *no* significant emissions controls Wrong-o. Newer small engines are subject to emissions laws (thanks, Kalifornia!) and feature fixed main jet carburetion, ignition timing control (some of the newer ignition assemblies are pretty sophisticated) and the muffler may be coated with a catalytic material. Further, it's illegal to sell older-design engines that can't meet the new standard. Short block, yes, complete engine, no. Kohler has been selling a electronically fuel-injected V-twin for some time now and then general consensus is carbs are going to be history on any engine of less than 15 hp. The company I work for sells Briggs & Stratton, Kohler, Tecumseh, Ford, Shindiawa, Mitsubishi, Kubota, and Gawd alone knows what, so I'm pretty up to date on this stuff. and some people are more sensitive than others to the smell. Which begs the question to the OP "If gasoline exhaust bothers you, why doesn't alcohol (which is far worse)?" I'll bet your insurance agent would love to hear that you are 'homebrewing' and storing untested volatile fuels. Non sequitur and purely an assumption. Not hardly. Ask your insurance agent how his/her company feels about the subject. Along the same lines, how do you feel about having a neighbor cooking up their own fuels (or making crack- that's one dangerous hobby right there!). I've got a fair amount of blood, sweat and hard earned money invested in my humble abode and I'd be mighty ****ed off if the nutjob next door burned my house down while playing Exxon in the basement. -Carl |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert Swinney" wrote in message ... Good one, Carl! Great start for a hot Monday morning - it sort of reminds one there is a chance for some enjoyment later in the day. Bob Swinney My Monday was a train wreck. The high point of my day was the aforementioned ale when I got home (homebrew pilsner, not unlike Bass ale- the older UK import, not the US brewed stuff). Carl |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:m1Lte.17416$fa3.9647@trndny01... "GrumpyOldGeek" wrote in message ... Carl Byrns wrote: If your lawnmower is producing that much noticable exhaust, it needs the attention of a good mechanic. Not necessarily true. Lawnmowers have *no* significant emissions controls Wrong-o. Newer small engines are subject to emissions laws (thanks, Kalifornia!) and feature fixed main jet carburetion, ignition timing control (some of the newer ignition assemblies are pretty sophisticated) and the muffler may be coated with a catalytic material. All of which has nothing to do with my case (as OP) as my lawn tractor is at least 15 yrs old. and some people are more sensitive than others to the smell. Which begs the question to the OP "If gasoline exhaust bothers you, why doesn't alcohol (which is far worse)?" Who says it's "far worse". I notice little or no fumes at all. And, is it not methanol that is typically used with fondue heaters (usually indoors no less)? I'll bet your insurance agent would love to hear that you are 'homebrewing' and storing untested volatile fuels. Do you know anything at all about biodiesel or biodiesel production?? Non sequitur and purely an assumption. Not hardly. Ask your insurance agent how his/her company feels about the subject. Along the same lines, how do you feel about having a neighbor cooking up their own fuels (or making crack- that's one dangerous hobby right there!). I've got a fair amount of blood, sweat and hard earned money invested in my humble abode and I'd be mighty ****ed off if the nutjob next door burned my house down while playing Exxon in the basement. Still more assumptions. If that "nutjob" you haughtily refer to is me, rest easy as it's not nearly as dangerous as you seem to imagine. As well, all work is carried out in a well ventalated detached garage and, on an acreage so lots of space between houses. I would not be so stupid as to "play Exxon" in my basement. But no, wait! The aforementioned methanol is mixed with caustic soda (before adding to the vegtable oil) forming sodium methoxide so nobody's house or car paint is safe. BTW, I'm also a Chem Eng so I think I can handle it.......... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Laurie Forbes wrote:
Which begs the question to the OP "If gasoline exhaust bothers you, why doesn't alcohol (which is far worse)?" Who says it's "far worse". I notice little or no fumes at all. And, is it not methanol that is typically used with fondue heaters (usually indoors no less)? Canned fuel burns at atmospheric pressure. Methanol in IC engines is burned at high temps and high compression ratios. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
If you're a ChemE then you should know that there's no way in hell that
your engine will run on methanol if was set-up for gasoline and working properly. Since your engine does run well on methanol, you know that there's something seriously wrong with the carburetor... and the fact that it would have been running about 40% too rich on gasoline probably accounts for the original problem... excess gasoline making fumes that bother you. When we purge the methanol out of our carbs with gasoline... it's almost impossible to keep the engine running because all of the jets and passages have been opened up to accommodate the extra flow required for running on methanol. Running straight methanol in an engine that's properly tuned for gasoline would probably result in engine damage... if it ran at all, it would be very lean. "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:uBMte.70019$HI.39070@edtnps84... "Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:m1Lte.17416$fa3.9647@trndny01... "GrumpyOldGeek" wrote in message ... Carl Byrns wrote: If your lawnmower is producing that much noticable exhaust, it needs the attention of a good mechanic. Not necessarily true. Lawnmowers have *no* significant emissions controls Wrong-o. Newer small engines are subject to emissions laws (thanks, Kalifornia!) and feature fixed main jet carburetion, ignition timing control (some of the newer ignition assemblies are pretty sophisticated) and the muffler may be coated with a catalytic material. All of which has nothing to do with my case (as OP) as my lawn tractor is at least 15 yrs old. and some people are more sensitive than others to the smell. Which begs the question to the OP "If gasoline exhaust bothers you, why doesn't alcohol (which is far worse)?" Who says it's "far worse". I notice little or no fumes at all. And, is it not methanol that is typically used with fondue heaters (usually indoors no less)? I'll bet your insurance agent would love to hear that you are 'homebrewing' and storing untested volatile fuels. Do you know anything at all about biodiesel or biodiesel production?? Non sequitur and purely an assumption. Not hardly. Ask your insurance agent how his/her company feels about the subject. Along the same lines, how do you feel about having a neighbor cooking up their own fuels (or making crack- that's one dangerous hobby right there!). I've got a fair amount of blood, sweat and hard earned money invested in my humble abode and I'd be mighty ****ed off if the nutjob next door burned my house down while playing Exxon in the basement. Still more assumptions. If that "nutjob" you haughtily refer to is me, rest easy as it's not nearly as dangerous as you seem to imagine. As well, all work is carried out in a well ventalated detached garage and, on an acreage so lots of space between houses. I would not be so stupid as to "play Exxon" in my basement. But no, wait! The aforementioned methanol is mixed with caustic soda (before adding to the vegtable oil) forming sodium methoxide so nobody's house or car paint is safe. BTW, I'm also a Chem Eng so I think I can handle it.......... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
David Courtney wrote in message ... If you're a ChemE then you should know that there's no way in hell that your engine will run on methanol if was set-up for gasoline and working properly. True but irrelevant since it did not run well initially (stalling and surging under load; choke had to be partially engaged until engine completely warmed up). Same with my walkbehind mower (which I converted to meth first). Since your engine does run well on methanol, you know that there's something seriously wrong with the carburetor... and the fact that it would have been running about 40% too rich on gasoline probably accounts for the original problem... excess gasoline making fumes that bother you. That's possible but not likely as I adjusted the mixture screw shortly after buying the machine due to the fumes and percieved high fuel consumption.. I doubt in any case that was ever 40% rich as there was never any visible carbon in the exhaust. You may have missed the part where I said I had to adjust the mixture screw (outwards; richer) to get it to run properly on meth (still however have to leave it partially choked, longer than with gasoline, until engine gets good and warm). When we purge the methanol out of our carbs with gasoline... it's almost impossible to keep the engine running because all of the jets and passages have been opened up to accommodate the extra flow required for running on methanol. Running straight methanol in an engine that's properly tuned for gasoline would probably result in engine damage... if it ran at all, it would be very lean. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Don Stauffer wrote in message ... Laurie Forbes wrote: Which begs the question to the OP "If gasoline exhaust bothers you, why doesn't alcohol (which is far worse)?" Who says it's "far worse". I notice little or no fumes at all. And, is it not methanol that is typically used with fondue heaters (usually indoors no less)? Canned fuel burns at atmospheric pressure. Methanol in IC engines is burned at high temps and high compression ratios. Quite so but I still notice practically no fumes at all with the meth (maybe my nose is defective). |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:uBMte.70019$HI.39070@edtnps84... "Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:m1Lte.17416$fa3.9647@trndny01... All of which has nothing to do with my case (as OP) as my lawn tractor is at least 15 yrs old. Which means it's worn out. Even the best air cooled engine (and most garden tractors do not use the best grade engine) won't last that long. Things like the valve guides, camshaft gear wear, crankshaft bushing/bearing wear, throttle bushing wear (and air leaks) and more all have some degree of influence on combustion efficiency and exhaust quality. Not to mention that the methanol will do a dandy job of cleaning 15+ years of accumulated crud right out of the fuel system and dumping it into the most expensive and delicate part- the carburetor. Or that unburned fuel will leak past the rings and into the crankcase where it can wreak all kinds of havoc. Which begs the question to the OP "If gasoline exhaust bothers you, why doesn't alcohol (which is far worse)?" Who says it's "far worse". I notice little or no fumes at all. And, is it not methanol that is typically used with fondue heaters (usually indoors no less)? Fondue heaters typically are not pressurized-combustion engines, nor do they introduce lube oil into the exhaust, nor do they burn their fuel at anything near as high a temperature. Alcohol, as someone else pointed out, forms formaldehyde during combustion. Surely that smells worse than gasoline engine exhaust. Still more assumptions. If that "nutjob" you haughtily refer to is me, No assumptions- someone without your degree of training might try this with spectacular results. Do ask your agent about this and prove me wrong. BTW, I'm also a Chem Eng so I think I can handle it.......... So was my dad (electrochemist, lots of patents) but he had a rather fuzzy idea how machinery worked. Speaking of assumptions, you are assuming that your 15 year old engine is in perfect condition and the reason the exhaust smells is the fuel when it could very well be something else. Without _knowing_ that the engine is in good mechanical condition or adjusted properly you cannot generate any meaningful data- actually it sounds like you are making the experiment fit the desired results. But, hey, it's your money- have at it. -Carl |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:gB3ue.655$Z.582@trndny05... All of which has nothing to do with my case (as OP) as my lawn tractor is at least 15 yrs old. Which means it's worn out. More wrong assumptions - the engine runs just as well now as it did when I bought it (same gasoline fumes as when new; does not burn a drop of oil, rest of the mower is not quite so good though). Even the best air cooled engine (and most garden tractors do not use the best grade engine) won't last that long. Maybe it depends on the service and work load. See above - my walkbehind mower is about 30 yo. It also still runs well (starts easily, does not burn oil, the only part that's worn is the muffler). Things like the valve guides, camshaft gear wear, crankshaft bushing/bearing wear, throttle bushing wear (and air leaks) and more all have some degree of influence on combustion efficiency and exhaust quality. Not to mention that the methanol will do a dandy job of cleaning 15+ years of accumulated crud right out of the fuel system and dumping it into the most expensive and delicate part- the carburetor. Or that unburned fuel will leak past the rings and into the crankcase where it can wreak all kinds of havoc. Which begs the question to the OP "If gasoline exhaust bothers you, why doesn't alcohol (which is far worse)?" Who says it's "far worse". I notice little or no fumes at all. And, is it not methanol that is typically used with fondue heaters (usually indoors no less)? Fondue heaters typically are not pressurized-combustion engines, nor do they introduce lube oil into the exhaust, nor do they burn their fuel at anything near as high a temperature. Alcohol, as someone else pointed out, forms formaldehyde during combustion. Surely that smells worse than gasoline engine exhaust. It doesn't to me - why do you assume it does? I won't argue with the formaldehyde formation but unless the amount is quantified it's an assumption to claim it smells worse than gas exhaust or in fact is detectable by smell at all. Still more assumptions. If that "nutjob" you haughtily refer to is me, No assumptions- someone without your degree of training might try this with spectacular results. Do ask your agent about this and prove me wrong. BTW, I'm also a Chem Eng so I think I can handle it.......... So was my dad (electrochemist, lots of patents) but he had a rather fuzzy idea how machinery worked. Funny you should mention that......... Speaking of assumptions, you are assuming that your 15 year old engine is in perfect condition and the reason the exhaust smells is the fuel when it could very well be something else. See above - it smells the same as when I bought it (v similar to my walkbehind mower BTW). Without _knowing_ that the engine is in good mechanical condition or adjusted properly you cannot generate any meaningful data- I'm not trying to generate data - all I know is that running on methanol produces far less fumes than gasoline (at least to my nose & eyes). I have no specific data but it seems reasonable to attribute at least some of the result to the fact there's v little or no sulphur in methanol. Methanol also burns "cleaner", probably because it contains oxygen and has a much higher percentage of hydrogen vs carbon, (formalehyde formation notwithstanding). actually it sounds like you are making the experiment fit the desired results. Huh?? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Laurie Forbes" wrote in message
news:2g4ue.70816$HI.26770@edtnps84... but it seems reasonable to attribute at least some of the result to the fact there's v little or no sulphur in methanol. Modern gasoline also has very little if any sulfur AFAIK, in fact all burning oils these days are low, IIRC. Them ol' emissions regulations and such. Besides, sulfur (as H2S or SO2/SO3) has a distinctive smell, not the same as bad combustion. Tim -- "California is the breakfast state: fruits, nuts and flakes." Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Tim Williams" wrote in message ... "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:2g4ue.70816$HI.26770@edtnps84... but it seems reasonable to attribute at least some of the result to the fact there's v little or no sulphur in methanol. Modern gasoline also has very little if any sulfur AFAIK, in fact all burning oils these days are low, IIRC. Them ol' emissions regulations and such. Diesel's still pretty high - until 2006 and USLD that is. Besides, sulfur (as H2S or SO2/SO3) has a distinctive smell, not the same as bad combustion. Come to think of it, the smell I notice is not "sulfurey" - probably mainly incomplete combustion as you suggest. Laurie Forbes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:r0fue.55380$wr.14585@clgrps12... "Tim Williams" wrote in message ... "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:2g4ue.70816$HI.26770@edtnps84... but it seems reasonable to attribute at least some of the result to the fact there's v little or no sulphur in methanol. Modern gasoline also has very little if any sulfur AFAIK, in fact all burning oils these days are low, IIRC. Them ol' emissions regulations and such. Diesel's still pretty high - until 2006 and USLD that is. But your mower doesn't use diesel. Apples to apples... Besides, sulfur (as H2S or SO2/SO3) has a distinctive smell, not the same as bad combustion. Come to think of it, the smell I notice is not "sulfurey" - probably mainly incomplete combustion as you suggest. Which is a function of engine condition, not type of fuel. -Carl |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
There is not enough adjustment in any carburetor that I've ever worked
on, to allow you to just "adjust" for methanol by turning a mixture screw... normally jets & passages need to be drilled out to allow enough flow. Personally, I think you're trolling for an answer you already have in mind... your story doesn't hold water. David "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:mUWte.73269$on1.15303@clgrps13... David Courtney wrote in message ... If you're a ChemE then you should know that there's no way in hell that your engine will run on methanol if was set-up for gasoline and working properly. True but irrelevant since it did not run well initially (stalling and surging under load; choke had to be partially engaged until engine completely warmed up). Same with my walkbehind mower (which I converted to meth first). Since your engine does run well on methanol, you know that there's something seriously wrong with the carburetor... and the fact that it would have been running about 40% too rich on gasoline probably accounts for the original problem... excess gasoline making fumes that bother you. That's possible but not likely as I adjusted the mixture screw shortly after buying the machine due to the fumes and percieved high fuel consumption.. I doubt in any case that was ever 40% rich as there was never any visible carbon in the exhaust. You may have missed the part where I said I had to adjust the mixture screw (outwards; richer) to get it to run properly on meth (still however have to leave it partially choked, longer than with gasoline, until engine gets good and warm). When we purge the methanol out of our carbs with gasoline... it's almost impossible to keep the engine running because all of the jets and passages have been opened up to accommodate the extra flow required for running on methanol. Running straight methanol in an engine that's properly tuned for gasoline would probably result in engine damage... if it ran at all, it would be very lean. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:r5gue.19308$fa3.1838@trndny01... "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:r0fue.55380$wr.14585@clgrps12... "Tim Williams" wrote in message ... "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:2g4ue.70816$HI.26770@edtnps84... but it seems reasonable to attribute at least some of the result to the fact there's v little or no sulphur in methanol. Modern gasoline also has very little if any sulfur AFAIK, in fact all burning oils these days are low, IIRC. Them ol' emissions regulations and such. Diesel's still pretty high - until 2006 and USLD that is. But your mower doesn't use diesel. Apples to apples... You certainly are a nitpicker (I was referring to the "all burning oils these days are low"). Besides, sulfur (as H2S or SO2/SO3) has a distinctive smell, not the same as bad combustion. Come to think of it, the smell I notice is not "sulfurey" - probably mainly incomplete combustion as you suggest. Which is a function of engine condition, not type of fuel. And also an inherant property of an internal combustion engine, new or old. Why do you suppose catalytic converters are required (even for new engines)? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"David Courtney" wrote in message ... There is not enough adjustment in any carburetor that I've ever worked on, to allow you to just "adjust" for methanol by turning a mixture screw... normally jets & passages need to be drilled out to allow enough flow. Personally, I think you're trolling for an answer you already have in mind... your story doesn't hold water. David This is a good example of what's wrong with public internet forums, particualrly Newsgroups. You ask a simple straightforward question and sometimes get constructive responses. You also too frequently get nagged by nitwits and busybodies. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:55:51 GMT, Laurie Forbes wrote:
"David Courtney" wrote in message ... There is not enough adjustment in any carburetor that I've ever worked on, to allow you to just "adjust" for methanol by turning a mixture screw... normally jets & passages need to be drilled out to allow enough flow. This is a good example of what's wrong with public internet forums, particualrly Newsgroups. You ask a simple straightforward question and sometimes get constructive responses. You also too frequently get nagged by nitwits and busybodies. Oh, I dunno, looks to me like his observation is accurate. Maybe he's just not telling you what you want to hear? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Hinz" wrote in message ... On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:55:51 GMT, Laurie Forbes wrote: "David Courtney" wrote in message ... There is not enough adjustment in any carburetor that I've ever worked on, to allow you to just "adjust" for methanol by turning a mixture screw... normally jets & passages need to be drilled out to allow enough flow. This is a good example of what's wrong with public internet forums, particualrly Newsgroups. You ask a simple straightforward question and sometimes get constructive responses. You also too frequently get nagged by nitwits and busybodies. Oh, I dunno, looks to me like his observation is accurate. Maybe he's just not telling you what you want to hear? Right - what I'd like to hear is constructive response, not that I'm considered a troll. Maybe you and he did not notice I mentioned in a previous post that I've found it necessary to choke it more than with gas - I never claimed that adjusting the carb mixture screw would itself produce the optimum mixture. Maybe you also didn't notice my original question was related to possible seal and tubing damage, not whether or not the mixture would be great (and not BTW whether or not my insurance agent would be pleased). Like I said, .......... |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:58:36 GMT, "Carl Byrns"
wrote: "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:uBMte.70019$HI.39070@edtnps84... "Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:m1Lte.17416$fa3.9647@trndny01... All of which has nothing to do with my case (as OP) as my lawn tractor is at least 15 yrs old. Which means it's worn out. Even the best air cooled engine (and most garden tractors do not use the best grade engine) won't last that long. Things like the valve guides, camshaft gear wear, crankshaft bushing/bearing wear, throttle bushing wear (and air leaks) and more all have some degree of influence on combustion efficiency and exhaust quality. Not to mention that the methanol will do a dandy job of cleaning 15+ years of accumulated crud right out of the fuel system and dumping it into the most expensive and delicate part- the carburetor. Or that unburned fuel will leak past the rings and into the crankcase where it can wreak all kinds of havoc. Well, I have an old Pro lawn mower made by some guys down around Schreveport LA in the late sixties/early seventies with a Briggs and Stratton engine that has never been apart and it's still running great. Carb has been replaced, but it doesn't smoke or burn oil yet. Takes an hour to mow my grass, about10 times a year. I've ownmed it about 15 years, and it was far from unused when I got it. Which begs the question to the OP "If gasoline exhaust bothers you, why doesn't alcohol (which is far worse)?" Who says it's "far worse". I notice little or no fumes at all. And, is it not methanol that is typically used with fondue heaters (usually indoors no less)? Fondue heaters typically are not pressurized-combustion engines, nor do they introduce lube oil into the exhaust, nor do they burn their fuel at anything near as high a temperature. Alcohol, as someone else pointed out, forms formaldehyde during combustion. Surely that smells worse than gasoline engine exhaust. Still more assumptions. If that "nutjob" you haughtily refer to is me, No assumptions- someone without your degree of training might try this with spectacular results. Do ask your agent about this and prove me wrong. BTW, I'm also a Chem Eng so I think I can handle it.......... So was my dad (electrochemist, lots of patents) but he had a rather fuzzy idea how machinery worked. Speaking of assumptions, you are assuming that your 15 year old engine is in perfect condition and the reason the exhaust smells is the fuel when it could very well be something else. Without _knowing_ that the engine is in good mechanical condition or adjusted properly you cannot generate any meaningful data- actually it sounds like you are making the experiment fit the desired results. But, hey, it's your money- have at it. -Carl |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:51:51 -0500, "Tim Williams"
wrote: "Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:2g4ue.70816$HI.26770@edtnps84... but it seems reasonable to attribute at least some of the result to the fact there's v little or no sulphur in methanol. Modern gasoline also has very little if any sulfur AFAIK, in fact all burning oils these days are low, IIRC. Them ol' emissions regulations and such. Besides, sulfur (as H2S or SO2/SO3) has a distinctive smell, not the same as bad combustion. Tim Up here in Ontario, gasoline is still quite high in sulphur. Really stinks if you run rich with a cat. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:34:48 GMT, Laurie Forbes wrote:
"Dave Hinz" wrote in message ... Oh, I dunno, looks to me like his observation is accurate. Maybe he's just not telling you what you want to hear? Right - what I'd like to hear is constructive response, not that I'm considered a troll. Um, how was "you'd have to re-jet the carb, not just adjust it" not a constructive response? And, based on your responses, it does seem your mind is already made up regardless of facts. I don't agree that that makes you a _troll_, specifically, though. Maybe you and he did not notice I mentioned in a previous post that I've found it necessary to choke it more than with gas - I never claimed that adjusting the carb mixture screw would itself produce the optimum mixture. That's never a good way to get the mixture right, and is showing that you need to re-jet your carb. Maybe you also didn't notice my original question was related to possible seal and tubing damage, not whether or not the mixture would be great (and not BTW whether or not my insurance agent would be pleased). OK, well, the thing is, when you ask "I want to do (unwise thing), how do I (subtle detail of unwise thing)", sometimes the answer is "That is unwise for (reason, reason, and reason), and you should consider doing (other thing) instead". Like I said, .......... Right. Welcome to Usenet. Double your money back if you don't like the free advice you asked for. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"Laurie Forbes" wrote in message news:2g4ue.70816$HI.26770@edtnps84... "Carl Byrns" wrote in message news:gB3ue.655$Z.582@trndny05... More wrong assumptions - the engine runs just as well now as it did when I bought it (same gasoline fumes as when new; does not burn a drop of oil, rest of the mower is not quite so good though). You can remember what something from 15 years ago _smells_ like? I am impressed. "does not burn a drop of oil" is pure bull****- all engines use oil and small air cooled engines use more than their automotive cousins. While the crankcase *level* may not change much, it is only because unburned fuel and other by-products tend to keep the level even. .. Do ask your agent about this and prove me wrong. Still waiting... BTW, I'm also a Chem Eng so I think I can handle it.......... So was my dad (electrochemist, lots of patents) but he had a rather fuzzy idea how machinery worked. Funny you should mention that......... But I do know a bit about fuel systems and engines: I have both Honda and Ford fuel system certification (and all the prerequisites) and worked with EFI systems for over a decade. I'm not trying to generate data - all I know is that running on methanol produces far less fumes than gasoline (at least to my nose & eyes). I have no specific data but it seems reasonable to attribute at least some of the result to the fact there's v little or no sulphur in methanol. No data- just a gut feeling. Wow. Methanol also burns "cleaner", probably because it contains oxygen and has a much higher percentage of hydrogen vs carbon, (formalehyde formation notwithstanding). Probably? You mean you don't know? What kind of Chemical Engineer can't spell "formaldehyde" (or use a spel czecher)? actually it sounds like you are making the experiment fit the desired results. Huh?? You said that switching from gasoline to alcohol eliminated some exhaust property that "makes the clothes stink". You concluded that the fuel- and only the fuel- was the reason for this dramatic change. You reject out of hand any suggestion that the engine maybe- in all likelihood is- worn past service limits or is out of adjustment. You state you are a Chemical Engineer and yet you qualify your results with phrases like "all I know is... I have no specific data...but it seems reasonable...probably because..." You have made statements to this NG that fly in the face of experience and then whine when called on them. Frankly, you sound like a troll or a shill for some organization pushing alcohol as a motor fuel. -Carl |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
... Up here in Ontario, gasoline is still quite high in sulphur. Really stinks if you run rich with a cat. Eh, how can that be? Doesn't sulfur poison the cat? Or is that lead? Tim -- "California is the breakfast state: fruits, nuts and flakes." Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Laurie Forbes wrote:
Don Stauffer wrote in message ... Laurie Forbes wrote: Which begs the question to the OP "If gasoline exhaust bothers you, why doesn't alcohol (which is far worse)?" Who says it's "far worse". I notice little or no fumes at all. And, is it not methanol that is typically used with fondue heaters (usually indoors no less)? Canned fuel burns at atmospheric pressure. Methanol in IC engines is burned at high temps and high compression ratios. Quite so but I still notice practically no fumes at all with the meth (maybe my nose is defective). Actually I find the smell appealing. I've been smelling it all my life. My dad was a race car driver, and all my life I flew model airplanes, which also burn methanol for fuel. To me it smells a bit like overcooked popcorn. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Laurie Forbes wrote:
incomplete combustion as you suggest. Which is a function of engine condition, not type of fuel. And also an inherant property of an internal combustion engine, new or old. Why do you suppose catalytic converters are required (even for new engines)? Lets put one myth to rest here, however. The efficiency of modern IC engines is in the 30-40% range. Many folks say this is because the majority of fuel inducted goes through unburned. This is not true. In a properly running car engine today, 99+% is burned. The loss of efficiency occurs AFTER the fuel is burned. Heat is generated, but only about a third of that heat creates mechanical work, about one third goes out the exhaust pipe as enthalpy of exhaust gases, and one third goes into cooling system and is lost through radiator or heater. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:58:36 GMT, "Carl Byrns" wrote: All of which has nothing to do with my case (as OP) as my lawn tractor is at least 15 yrs old. Which means it's worn out. Even the best air cooled engine (and most garden tractors do not use the best grade engine) won't last that long. .................. Well, I have an old Pro lawn mower made by some guys down around Schreveport LA in the late sixties/early seventies with a Briggs and Stratton engine that has never been apart and it's still running great. Carb has been replaced, but it doesn't smoke or burn oil yet. Takes an hour to mow my grass, about10 times a year. I've ownmed it about 15 years, and it was far from unused when I got it. I may have mentioned my walkbehind mower which is about 30 yo. It gets used every year, still starts easily, uses no apparent oil and, yes, has stinky exhaust fumes and always has had (just like my lawn tractor). It's pretty inane to claim a 15 yo engine must be "worn out" simply because of age (I suppose if it was run for only 1/2 hour every leap year, it would still be worn out). In any case, it's not relevant to my situation as I'm comparing the same engine in both the gasoline and methanol cases - the methanol case produces far less fumes (according to my nose and eye reaction) and *that* was the original intent of the exercise. BTW, both my engines are also B&S, a cheapie one lunger on the walkbehind and, a Vanguard V-twin on the lawn tractor which also BTW is by far the best part of the mower. I've always taken good care of them and not pushed them too hard - maybe that's one reason they have lasted so long. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Have you considered the age of your fuel? If the gas is really old, it
will not burn very well. All of the "good" volatiles dissappear and what you have left, while combustible, is far less than optimal. For reference, "really old" isn't that old in gasoline depending on storage. It could be as little as a month in the summer you have a vented tank. As for age of an engine, I think it was generally assumed that this was a machine that was being used regularly for the last X years, not something that has sat in storage. So to assume that it was worn is a fairly safe assumption. Service intervals and expected life of small engines is very low. General service about every 10 hrs of operation and overhaul after around 200 hrs. This all assumes proper storage and care of the machine in the off season. This can have a big effect. To bring this back to the original question- methanol is probably NOT good for your engine in the long run. It will clean out all of the varnish and what not built up in your fuel system attempting to run it through it and will ruin any rubber in your fuel system. JW |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"jw" wrote in message oups.com... Have you considered the age of your fuel? If the gas is really old, it will not burn very well. All of the "good" volatiles dissappear and what you have left, while combustible, is far less than optimal. Now that's something I hadn't thought of. I don't buy gas that often and as well some of it sits in the tank over winter. For reference, "really old" isn't that old in gasoline depending on storage. It could be as little as a month in the summer you have a vented tank. As for age of an engine, I think it was generally assumed that this was a machine that was being used regularly for the last X years, not something that has sat in storage. So to assume that it was worn is a fairly safe assumption. Service intervals and expected life of small engines is very low. General service about every 10 hrs of operation and overhaul after around 200 hrs. This all assumes proper storage and care of the machine in the off season. This can have a big effect. The clock on the mower shows 173 hours which is getting up there by a 200 hour standard. As far as I can recall though, it still runs as well as when much newer (no knocks or oil burning, no loss of power, starts easily etc) so it can't be all that bad. That Vanguard V-twin really is a sweet engine IMO - as I mentioned before, far better than the rest of the mower. To bring this back to the original question- methanol is probably NOT good for your engine in the long run. It will clean out all of the varnish and what not built up in your fuel system attempting to run it through it and will ruin any rubber in your fuel system. Yes - those are my concerns. So far so good (only about five hours later however) but I am going to have to watch the fuel lines and maybe be prepared to overhaul the carb I guess if it starts running poorly. I suppose cleaning out the varnish runs the risk of carb plugging (or maybe other things?)?? BTW, if the engine has a mixture adjust screw, would it also have jet(s). IOWs is the mixture screw perhaps for idle adjustment only? I'm still a little uncertain about comments that the engine cannot run properly on methanol w/o larger jets while it seems to run as normal once fully warmed up (but it does require more choke to get to that point). |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"jw" wrote in message oups.com... Have you considered the age of your fuel? If the gas is really old, it will not burn very well. All of the "good" volatiles dissappear and what you have left, while combustible, is far less than optimal. Now that's something I hadn't thought of. I don't buy gas that often and as well some of it sits in the tank over winter. For reference, "really old" isn't that old in gasoline depending on storage. It could be as little as a month in the summer you have a vented tank. As for age of an engine, I think it was generally assumed that this was a machine that was being used regularly for the last X years, not something that has sat in storage. So to assume that it was worn is a fairly safe assumption. Service intervals and expected life of small engines is very low. General service about every 10 hrs of operation and overhaul after around 200 hrs. This all assumes proper storage and care of the machine in the off season. This can have a big effect. The clock on the mower shows 173 hours which is getting up there by a 200 hour standard. As far as I can recall though, it still runs as well as when much newer (no knocks or oil burning, no loss of power, starts easily etc) so it can't be all that bad. That Vanguard V-twin really is a sweet engine IMO - as I mentioned before, far better than the rest of the mower. To bring this back to the original question- methanol is probably NOT good for your engine in the long run. It will clean out all of the varnish and what not built up in your fuel system attempting to run it through it and will ruin any rubber in your fuel system. Yes - those are my concerns. So far so good (only about five hours later however) but I am going to have to watch the fuel lines and maybe be prepared to overhaul the carb I guess if it starts running poorly. I suppose cleaning out the varnish runs the risk of carb plugging (or maybe other things?)?? BTW, if the engine has a mixture adjust screw, would it also have jet(s). IOWs is the mixture screw perhaps for idle adjustment only? I'm still a little uncertain about comments that the engine cannot run properly on methanol w/o larger jets while it seems to run as normal once fully warmed up (but it does require more choke to get to that point). |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MTD lawn tractor design flaw? | Home Ownership | |||
Sears Lawn tractor won't start | Home Repair | |||
john deere 111 lawn tractor questions | Home Ownership | |||
Can my Craftsman 15.5 hp, 42 in. Deck Lawn Tractor use Craftsman 42 in. Deluxe Lawn Tractor Snow Thrower | Home Ownership | |||
White Gas, Coleman Fuel, and Unleaded Gasoline | Metalworking |