Will you stay or will you go?

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.

On 06/23/2016 05:39 AM, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.


Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The ship's
name will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to say that was
an example of letting morons vote.

After serious thinking rbowman wrote :
On 06/23/2016 05:39 AM, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.


Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The ship's name
will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to say that was an example
of letting morons vote.

What's the name of the remote vehicle?

On 23/06/2016 14:39, rbowman wrote:
On 06/23/2016 05:39 AM, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.


Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The ship's
name will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to say that was
an example of letting morons vote.

Untrue, no Americans were voting ;-)

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:58:41 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 14:39, rbowman wrote:
On 06/23/2016 05:39 AM, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.


Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The ship's
name will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to say that was
an example of letting morons vote.

Untrue, no Americans were voting ;-)

A can't defend US voters, We have Trump.

So stay or go?

On 23/06/2016 15:22, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:58:41 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 14:39, rbowman wrote:
On 06/23/2016 05:39 AM, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.


Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The ship's
name will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to say that was
an example of letting morons vote.

Untrue, no Americans were voting ;-)

A can't defend US voters, We have Trump.

So stay or go?

I want out.

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:10 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 15:22, wrote:

So stay or go?

I want out.

It is an interesting question. You were smart enough to keep the pound
when you got in so this is not as big a problem as it could have been.
I have listened to both sides and I see both views. Over here the best
view I have seen comes from the New Zealand news. They are far enough
away to show both sides in depth without too much opinion and close
enough to UK to care.
I know the Germans and French have their panties in a wad about it.
I bet most Americans think Brexit is a breath mint or some new drug
with 3 pages of side effects. We really are nor hearing a lot about
it. They tell us more about what Kate is wearing this week.

On 23/06/2016 15:32, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:10 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 15:22, wrote:

So stay or go?

I want out.

It is an interesting question. You were smart enough to keep the pound
when you got in so this is not as big a problem as it could have been.
I have listened to both sides and I see both views. Over here the best
view I have seen comes from the New Zealand news. They are far enough
away to show both sides in depth without too much opinion and close
enough to UK to care.
I know the Germans and French have their panties in a wad about it.
I bet most Americans think Brexit is a breath mint or some new drug
with 3 pages of side effects. We really are nor hearing a lot about
it. They tell us more about what Kate is wearing this week.

Aye :-)
Let's put it this way; I'm damn sure that USA Americans wouldn't allow,
say, South America or any other group of countries to tell them what to
do and what laws they *have* to abide by, plus how they *must* spend
their money.....agreed ?
The UK is and has always was able to sort itself out before the
unelected Brussels Beaurocrats came along.

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:58:41 +0100
Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 14:39, rbowman wrote:
On 06/23/2016 05:39 AM, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.


Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The
ship's name will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to
say that was an example of letting morons vote.

Untrue, no Americans were voting ;-)

Proof?

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:32:15 -0400
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:10 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 15:22, wrote:

So stay or go?

I want out.

It is an interesting question. You were smart enough to keep the pound
when you got in so this is not as big a problem as it could have been.
I have listened to both sides and I see both views. Over here the best
view I have seen comes from the New Zealand news. They are far enough
away to show both sides in depth without too much opinion and close
enough to UK to care.
I know the Germans and French have their panties in a wad about it.
I bet most Americans think Brexit is a breath mint or some new drug
with 3 pages of side effects. We really are nor hearing a lot about
it. They tell us more about what Kate is wearing this week.

What Kate wears is what most blokes are interested in.
The rest of the time the subjects just does they are told.

On 6/23/2016 10:32 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:10 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 15:22, wrote:

So stay or go?

I want out.

It is an interesting question. You were smart enough to keep the pound
when you got in so this is not as big a problem as it could have been.
I have listened to both sides and I see both views. Over here the best
view I have seen comes from the New Zealand news. They are far enough
away to show both sides in depth without too much opinion and close
enough to UK to care.
I know the Germans and French have their panties in a wad about it.
I bet most Americans think Brexit is a breath mint or some new drug
with 3 pages of side effects. We really are nor hearing a lot about
it. They tell us more about what Kate is wearing this week.


If I were a Brit, I'd vote to get out. Commerce is one thing and can
continue but when it interferes with society identity and other things,
I would not want it.

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:26:15 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 15:32, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:10 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 15:22, wrote:

So stay or go?

I want out.

It is an interesting question. You were smart enough to keep the pound
when you got in so this is not as big a problem as it could have been.
I have listened to both sides and I see both views. Over here the best
view I have seen comes from the New Zealand news. They are far enough
away to show both sides in depth without too much opinion and close
enough to UK to care.
I know the Germans and French have their panties in a wad about it.
I bet most Americans think Brexit is a breath mint or some new drug
with 3 pages of side effects. We really are nor hearing a lot about
it. They tell us more about what Kate is wearing this week.

Aye :-)
Let's put it this way; I'm damn sure that USA Americans wouldn't allow,
say, South America or any other group of countries to tell them what to
do and what laws they *have* to abide by, plus how they *must* spend
their money.....agreed ?
The UK is and has always was able to sort itself out before the
unelected Brussels Beaurocrats came along.

There are plenty of Americans who feel that way about NAFTA, GATT and
the TPP. It all comes down to nationalism vs globalism I guess.

On 06/23/2016 07:50 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
After serious thinking rbowman wrote :
On 06/23/2016 05:39 AM, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.


Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The ship's
name will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to say that was
an example of letting morons vote.

What's the name of the remote vehicle?

Yeah, well they threw the voters a fish... Considering it's a submarine
drone, out of sight out of mind applies.

On 06/23/2016 07:58 AM, Bod wrote:
On 23/06/2016 14:39, rbowman wrote:
On 06/23/2016 05:39 AM, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.


Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The ship's
name will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to say that was
an example of letting morons vote.

Untrue, no Americans were voting ;-)

Hey, I would have voted for Attenborough. His stuff is one of the few
decent programs that come out of Britain. You can keep Doc Martin and
Downton Abbey, thank you.

On 06/23/2016 08:22 AM, wrote:
A can't defend US voters, We have Trump.

and Clinton... You know there's a problem when Jill Stein looks like the
only adult running.

On 06/23/2016 08:32 AM, wrote:
I know the Germans and French have their panties in a wad about it.

I haven't checked the Danish news sites lately. The only reason the
Danes joined was because Britain was going to. Then when DeGaulle vetoed
Britain's membership they felt a little abused. Then Britain got in and
they were happy. If Britain leaves, they may follow. They kept their own
currency too although their standing is different than Britain's.

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:21:48 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

On 06/23/2016 08:22 AM, wrote:
A can't defend US voters, We have Trump.

and Clinton... You know there's a problem when Jill Stein looks like the
only adult running.

It is amazing that the two presumptive candidates both have
unfavorable ratings and trust issues with 60-70% of the people.

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:27:37 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

On 06/23/2016 08:32 AM, wrote:
I know the Germans and French have their panties in a wad about it.

I haven't checked the Danish news sites lately. The only reason the
Danes joined was because Britain was going to. Then when DeGaulle vetoed
Britain's membership they felt a little abused. Then Britain got in and
they were happy. If Britain leaves, they may follow. They kept their own
currency too although their standing is different than Britain's.

CNN is reporting "Leave" won. Now (MP) Finch is on TV talking about
other EU members wanting a referendum. Is this the end of the EU?
My Dutch friend says it would not break his heart if they could divest
themselves of southern Europe.

On 24/06/2016 05:20, rbowman wrote:
On 06/23/2016 07:58 AM, Bod wrote:
On 23/06/2016 14:39, rbowman wrote:
On 06/23/2016 05:39 AM, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.


Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The ship's
name will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to say that was
an example of letting morons vote.

Untrue, no Americans were voting ;-)

Hey, I would have voted for Attenborough. His stuff is one of the few
decent programs that come out of Britain. You can keep Doc Martin and
Downton Abbey, thank you.


I agree with you there.

rbowman expressed precisely :
On 06/23/2016 07:50 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
After serious thinking rbowman wrote :
On 06/23/2016 05:39 AM, burfordTjustice wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 01:51:25 -0400
wrote:

Will you stay or will you go?

They will stay, the vote is for show only.
If vote to leave, it will be over ridden.


Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The ship's
name will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to say that was
an example of letting morons vote.

What's the name of the remote vehicle?

Yeah, well they threw the voters a fish... Considering it's a submarine
drone, out of sight out of mind applies.

It appears that moron votes count here in the US as well, we'll soon
see how much.

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 6:06:14 AM UTC-7, FromTheRafters wrote:

It appears that moron votes count here in the US as well, we'll soon
see how much.

Yep.
We gotz lotz o' morons, idiots, brain-dead Faux Noise watchers, bible-thumpers and right wing nutters here

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 6:06:14 AM UTC-7, FromTheRafters wrote:

It appears that moron votes count here in the US as well, we'll soon
see how much.

Yep.
We gotz lotz o' morons, fools, idiots, gun-nutters, bible-thumpers, brain-dead Faux Noise watchers, and right wing nutters here!

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:22:21 +0100, Bod wrote:


Interesting results in the US stock markets. The stocks are pretty
much all down except Raytheon that is up a buck 20.
I guess they see a good market for precision munitions and radar
systems.

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:39:06 -0400, wrote:

Interesting results in the US stock markets. The stocks are pretty
much all down except Raytheon that is up a buck 20.
I guess they see a good market for precision munitions and radar
systems.

During last night / this early morning, Gold jumped ~ $61. Guns will
have a better return.

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:10:43 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:39:06 -0400, wrote:

Interesting results in the US stock markets. The stocks are pretty
much all down except Raytheon that is up a buck 20.
I guess they see a good market for precision munitions and radar
systems.

During last night / this early morning, Gold jumped ~ $61. Guns will
have a better return.

Bulkammo.com still has stuff on sale

On 6/23/2016 10:26 AM, Bod wrote:
On 23/06/2016 15:32, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:10 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 15:22, wrote:

So stay or go?

I want out.

It is an interesting question. You were smart enough to keep the pound
when you got in so this is not as big a problem as it could have been.
I have listened to both sides and I see both views. Over here the best
view I have seen comes from the New Zealand news. They are far enough
away to show both sides in depth without too much opinion and close
enough to UK to care.
I know the Germans and French have their panties in a wad about it.
I bet most Americans think Brexit is a breath mint or some new drug
with 3 pages of side effects. We really are nor hearing a lot about
it. They tell us more about what Kate is wearing this week.

Aye :-)
Let's put it this way; I'm damn sure that USA Americans wouldn't allow,
say, South America or any other group of countries to tell them what to
do and what laws they *have* to abide by, plus how they *must* spend
their money.....agreed ?
The UK is and has always was able to sort itself out before the
unelected Brussels Beaurocrats came along.

I think it's a good thing your country decided to leave the EU.

--
Maggie

On 6/24/2016 4:10 PM, Oren wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 15:39:06 -0400, wrote:

Interesting results in the US stock markets. The stocks are pretty
much all down except Raytheon that is up a buck 20.
I guess they see a good market for precision munitions and radar
systems.

During last night / this early morning, Gold jumped ~ $61. Guns will
have a better return.

A son gave me a new Gun Digest for father's day and I was just looking
at prices. The Remington 1100 I bought many years ago for $150 now
costs over $1,000. Told my wife I should have put my money in guns.

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 3:47:59 PM UTC-7, Frank wrote:

A son gave me a new Gun Digest for father's day and I was just looking
at prices. The Remington 1100 I bought many years ago for $150 now
costs over $1,000. Told my wife I should have put my money in guns.

You should have bought a 1966 Shelby Mustang GT350 instead
Original Price: $2,765 - $3,190
Now $500,000 and up
http://www.hemmings.com/classifieds/...0/1797797.html

On 06/23/2016 08:26 AM, Bod wrote:
Let's put it this way; I'm damn sure that USA Americans wouldn't allow,
say, South America or any other group of countries to tell them what to
do and what laws they *have* to abide by, plus how they *must* spend
their money.....agreed ?
The UK is and has always was able to sort itself out before the
unelected Brussels Beaurocrats came along.

Hi Bod,

I love your exposition. I have always believed that the best
government is that which is closest to the people. We
will make you into an American Style Revolutionary (Conservative)
yet? Okay, not any time soon. :-)

You should here the whining and crying over here from the
elitists. Lose some power over other people's lives did we?
An ABSOLUTELY NOTHING horrible is going to happen to the
world over this.

With love and understanding, those "unelected Brussels Beaurocrats"
can be brought to do simple constructive tasks again.

Congratulations on your new Independence Day: 06/23/2016 !

Maybe we should celebrate it over here too. We already
celebrate Mexico's victory over the French at the Battle
of Puebla (Cinco de Mayo).

-T

Was that a typo or the British spelling of "Bureaucrat"?

On 06/23/2016 06:58 AM, Bod wrote:
Like the Boaty McBoatface vote? 'Thank you for your input. The ship's
name will be the Sir David Attenborough.' I will have to say that was
an example of letting morons vote.

Untrue, no Americans were voting ;-)

You are a funny bunny!

On 6/23/2016 8:26 AM, Bod wrote:
On 23/06/2016 15:32, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:10 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 15:22, wrote:

So stay or go?

I want out.

It is an interesting question. You were smart enough to keep the pound
when you got in so this is not as big a problem as it could have been.
I have listened to both sides and I see both views. Over here the best
view I have seen comes from the New Zealand news. They are far enough
away to show both sides in depth without too much opinion and close
enough to UK to care.
I know the Germans and French have their panties in a wad about it.
I bet most Americans think Brexit is a breath mint or some new drug
with 3 pages of side effects. We really are nor hearing a lot about
it. They tell us more about what Kate is wearing this week.

Aye :-)
Let's put it this way; I'm damn sure that USA Americans wouldn't allow,
say, South America or any other group of countries to tell them what to
do and what laws they *have* to abide by, plus how they *must* spend
their money.....agreed ?
The UK is and has always was able to sort itself out before the
unelected Brussels Beaurocrats came along.


Why are you sure about that? We keep voting idiots into Washington to
run our local lives for us, and they keep trying to sign onto U.N. and
other distant organizations to help run our lives for us.

We need Washingtonexit.

In article ,
says...

On 6/23/2016 8:26 AM, Bod wrote:
On 23/06/2016 15:32, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:10 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 23/06/2016 15:22, wrote:

So stay or go?

I want out.

It is an interesting question. You were smart enough to keep the pound
when you got in so this is not as big a problem as it could have been.
I have listened to both sides and I see both views. Over here the best
view I have seen comes from the New Zealand news. They are far enough
away to show both sides in depth without too much opinion and close
enough to UK to care.
I know the Germans and French have their panties in a wad about it.
I bet most Americans think Brexit is a breath mint or some new drug
with 3 pages of side effects. We really are nor hearing a lot about
it. They tell us more about what Kate is wearing this week.

Aye :-)
Let's put it this way; I'm damn sure that USA Americans wouldn't allow,
say, South America or any other group of countries to tell them what to
do and what laws they *have* to abide by, plus how they *must* spend
their money.....agreed ?
The UK is and has always was able to sort itself out before the
unelected Brussels Beaurocrats came along.


Why are you sure about that? We keep voting idiots into Washington to
run our local lives for us, and they keep trying to sign onto U.N. and
other distant organizations to help run our lives for us.

We need Washingtonexit.

I'd settle for "Texit"! [g]

--
RonNNN

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:47:52 -0400, Frank "frank wrote:

A son gave me a new Gun Digest for father's day and I was just looking
at prices. The Remington 1100 I bought many years ago for $150 now
costs over $1,000. Told my wife I should have put my money in guns.

I bought a used Winchester semi auto 12 ga. with three chokes in '89.

$100.00 today is priceless.

See: http://www.gunpartscorp.com/

On 06/24/2016 05:02 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
We need Washingtonexit.

1+

On 6/23/16 12:51 AM, wrote:
Will you stay or will you go?

A U.K. motorcycle group has some commentary about it now that the
election
is over. u.k.rec.motorcycles

On 6/26/16 11:45 AM, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On 6/23/16 12:51 AM, wrote:
Will you stay or will you go?

A U.K. motorcycle group has some commentary about it now that the
election
is over. u.k.rec.motorcycles

Got it wrong. Should be uk.rec.motorcycles

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:45:53 -0500, Dean Hoffman
wrote:

On 6/23/16 12:51 AM, wrote:
Will you stay or will you go?

A U.K. motorcycle group has some commentary about it now that the
election
is over. u.k.rec.motorcycles

Suddenly this issue has been beat to death. They make it sound like
business is going to take a big hit but it will only be the hit
government brings on it. Companies can still trade if the government
would just get the hell out of the way. The people I hear talking from
"leave" really only seem to be concerned about unfettered immigration.

On 6/26/2016 6:20 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:45:53 -0500, Dean Hoffman
wrote:

On 6/23/16 12:51 AM, wrote:
Will you stay or will you go?

A U.K. motorcycle group has some commentary about it now that the
election
is over. u.k.rec.motorcycles

Suddenly this issue has been beat to death. They make it sound like
business is going to take a big hit but it will only be the hit
government brings on it. Companies can still trade if the government
would just get the hell out of the way. The people I hear talking from
"leave" really only seem to be concerned about unfettered immigration.

No and no, it's much more than that.
We want our sovereignty back, plus not to have restrictions on who we
can trade with in the rest of the world.
Also, would America give Brussels 20 odd billion dollars and then have
them tell you where they will spend it, oh and you'll only get half of
it back?

On 6/26/2016 1:32 PM, Bod wrote:

Also, would America give Brussels 20 odd billion dollars and then have
them tell you where they will spend it, oh and you'll only get half of
it back?


We give away billions anyway. $37 billion including military assistance
and we get nothing back.