OT you know what else is stupid?

That all the news cares about wrt horse racing is whether the horse will
win the triple crown.

Each race is worth watching and enjoying and each winning horse is worth
praise, whether or not the same horse wins all three.

What difference does it make in my life or even the life of a
horse-racing fan, an owner, a trainer, or anyone, (other than the owner
etc. of the winning horse) if a horse wins the triple crown.

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

That all the news cares about wrt horse racing is whether the horse will
win the triple crown.

Each race is worth watching and enjoying and each winning horse is worth
praise, whether or not the same horse wins all three.

What difference does it make in my life or even the life of a
horse-racing fan, an owner, a trainer, or anyone, (other than the owner
etc. of the winning horse) if a horse wins the triple crown.

It's all about money. Stud fees would be astronomical. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Horse Monster

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you? You didn't need to repeat your title?

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

....you *are* getting fat!

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 5:09:34 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Plastic surgery? o_O

[8~{} Uncle Ugly Monster

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Maybe he should dismount from high horse... surgery can fix only
external ugliness to un-nautral good looking, LOL!

On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:38:38 -0600, Tony Hwang
wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Maybe he should dismount from high horse... surgery can fix only
external ugliness to un-nautral good looking, LOL!

But, he can't fix stupid!

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:38:38 -0600, Tony Hwang
wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Maybe he should dismount from high horse... surgery can fix only
external ugliness to un-nautral good looking, LOL!

But, he can't fix stupid!

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 7:50:36 PM UTC-5, Tony Hwang wrote:
Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:38:38 -0600, Tony Hwang
wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Maybe he should dismount from high horse... surgery can fix only
external ugliness to un-nautral good looking, LOL!

But, he can't fix stupid!


I can see you need help too!

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 7:46:11 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:38:38 -0600, Tony Hwang
wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Maybe he should dismount from high horse... surgery can fix only
external ugliness to un-nautral good looking, LOL!

But, he can't fix stupid!

....not only unoriginal, but redundant.

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 19:12:41 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 7:50:36 PM UTC-5, Tony Hwang wrote:
Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:38:38 -0600, Tony Hwang
wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Maybe he should dismount from high horse... surgery can fix only
external ugliness to un-nautral good looking, LOL!

But, he can't fix stupid!


I can see you need help too!

See! Tony is smarter than you.

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 19:14:15 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 7:46:11 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:38:38 -0600, Tony Hwang
wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Maybe he should dismount from high horse... surgery can fix only
external ugliness to un-nautral good looking, LOL!

But, he can't fix stupid!

...not only unoriginal, but redundant.

Try again dummy. The facts remain the same.

You are not terribly smart. huh?

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 9:21:51 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 19:14:15 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 7:46:11 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:38:38 -0600, Tony Hwang
wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Maybe he should dismount from high horse... surgery can fix only
external ugliness to un-nautral good looking, LOL!

But, he can't fix stupid!

...not only unoriginal, but redundant.

Try again dummy. The facts remain the same.

You are not terribly smart. huh?

The fact that you respond unintelligibly proves my point.

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 19:32:43 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

You are not terribly smart. huh?

The fact that you respond unintelligibly proves my point.

The big dummy replies to me, trying to comment on intelligence. You
really are a dummy. Come back when you can make a point.

Micky, Trader, Stormy and me can discern how silly you are. It ****es
you off when you have no facts to support your dumbness.

bob_villa wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 7:46:11 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:38:38 -0600, Tony Hwang
wrote:

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Maybe he should dismount from high horse... surgery can fix only
external ugliness to un-nautral good looking, LOL!

But, he can't fix stupid!

...not only unoriginal, but redundant.

Not only unoriginal = Original, Eh?

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 9:54:56 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:

The big dummy replies to me, trying to comment on intelligence. You
really are a dummy. Come back when you can make a point.

Micky, Trader, Stormy and me can discern how silly you are. It ****es
you off when you have no facts to support your dumbness.

....let's see, you use the form of "dumb" 3 times...and you talk about intelligence? "hey dummy, you big dummy, you are really dumb...you dummy!"

Oren posted for all of us...



On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Can't fix stupid...

--
Tekkie *Please post a follow-up*

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:10:04 -0400, Tekkie®
wrote:

Oren posted for all of us...



On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:47:11 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 2:06:01 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:43:15 -0400, micky
wrote:

On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 06:04:12 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:08:09 AM UTC-5, micky wrote:
OT you know what else is stupid?

Perhaps you?

You manage to be civil some of the time, but then you revert. You call
someone stupid for repeating the Subject line? Not that you deserve to
know, but I do this for people like me who go from post to post without
looking at the toc and without reading the subject lines.

You didn't need to repeat your title?

And even if you were 100% right, you didn't need to make a nitpicking
remark. What are you, the world's dustman?

I've had enough. Kerplunk.

+ 10

...you *are* getting fat!

Maybe. I can go on a diet. How do you fix your ugliness?!

Can't fix stupid...

See. That is the crux of his conundrums.

On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 5:42:48 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:

See. That is the crux of his conundrum(s*).

I'm your favorite conundrum...

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:18:10 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 5:42:48 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:

See. That is the crux of his conundrum(s*).

I'm your favorite conundrum...

Maybe in your wildest dreams. All you are to me is a gadfly.

I'll be your worst nightmare.

On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 7:27:25 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:

Maybe in your wildest dreams. All you are to me is a gadfly.

I'll be your worst nightmare.

You make less sense as you proceed in your lunacy...who could fear an old wimpsicle like yourself?

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:41:17 -0700 (PDT), bob_villa
wrote:

On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 7:27:25 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:

Maybe in your wildest dreams. All you are to me is a gadfly.

I'll be your worst nightmare.

You make less sense as you proceed in your lunacy...who could fear an old wimpsicle like yourself?

I made a good living dealing with meaner *******s than you. Try me.
Oh, and have nice dreams.