Does this mean you're speechless? I was when I read the bottom part of this
diatribe.

Don't feed the troll.

Anyone read the bottom of this diatirbe - below "[Ignore what follows]"

Is this guy just nuts or is it written in code?

Anyone read the bottom of this diatirbe - below "[Ignore what follows]"

Actually that was the only part that made sense...the kind of nattering that
eminates from padded cells. Illogical, short sighted and sad. Hope his shrink
can help him.

Joe

On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 11:19:49 -0600, "RonB" wrote:

Anyone read the bottom of this diatirbe - below "[Ignore what follows]"

Is this guy just nuts or is it written in code?


I'm pretty sure that it was computer-generated.

On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 17:12:15 GMT, Unisaw A100
wrote:

I was about to say that this was the best way to deal with whackos,
but it's not. The best is to not reply at all.

Please don't blank-post the trolls.

B.

On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 11:19:49 -0600, "RonB" wrote:

Don't feed the troll.

Anyone read the bottom of this diatirbe - below "[Ignore what follows]"

Is this guy just nuts or is it written in code?


Nope, it is a randomly generated series of nouns and verbs, designed to
defeat anti-spam filters and filters that eliminate massively cross-posted
garbage. That the OP was using a filter end-around should tell you
something.

Please give us a break-only 51% of us are stupid, ignorant, and/or superstitious.

"delbes" wrote in message
om...
Please give us a break-only 51% of us are stupid, ignorant, and/or
superstitious.

42% and the veep of Diebold?