Do they still use teflon, or is there a better type of material on the
soleplate of steam irons?

On Sep 7, 5:50*pm, Home@Home. (Mary) wrote:
Do they still use teflon, or is there a better type of material on the
soleplate of steam irons?

http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/465816

R

"Mary" Home@Home. wrote in message ...
Do they still use teflon, or is there a better type of material on the
soleplate of steam irons?


If you need anything but shiny metal, it means you're doing something wrong
before the clothes even reach the iron.

1) Too much detergent and whatever goop you add along with it, like fabric
softener.

2) Too many clothes per load, which makes #1 even worse since the substances
are harder to rinse out.

3) Washing in cold water, with a machine which isn't designed to add a bit
of hot water to keep the cold water at a temperature where rinsing will be
effective. My washer does this. I have no idea how common the feature is in
other models.

The factors above will leave residue in the clothing and it can end up on
the sole plate of the iron.

Finally:
4) Too high a temperature when using the iron.

"Mary" Home@Home. wrote in message ...
Do they still use teflon, or is there a better type of material on the
soleplate of steam irons?

They use various non-stick materials. Some Teflon, I'm not sure about
others.

I buy four irons at a time to use for sealing plastic bags used in our shop.
Over the years, I've found Black & Decker to have the best quality
non-stick, although the present models are not as good as the ones from 10
years ago. Our use is industrial so I don't know how that compares with
ironing your laundry.

As a side note, I've never had an iron burn out from use and some are in use
16 to 24 hours a day. They get dropped and stop though.

In article ,
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote:

"Mary" Home@Home. wrote in message ...
Do they still use teflon, or is there a better type of material on the
soleplate of steam irons?

They use various non-stick materials. Some Teflon, I'm not sure about
others.

I buy four irons at a time to use for sealing plastic bags used in our shop.
Over the years, I've found Black & Decker to have the best quality
non-stick, although the present models are not as good as the ones from 10
years ago. Our use is industrial so I don't know how that compares with
ironing your laundry.

As a side note, I've never had an iron burn out from use and some are in use
16 to 24 hours a day. They get dropped and stop though.

You seal plastic bags with an iron? OK, I gotta ask, why don't you use a
bag sealer?

"Smitty Two" wrote
You seal plastic bags with an iron? OK, I gotta ask, why don't you use a
bag sealer?

They don't make bag sealers that will take bags anywhere up to 24" X 30 X
48" and hold up to 45 pounds. This is not the typical little parts bag you
are thinking of, they hold large bulky items of various sizes. The top end
is folded much like you'd wrap a gift box, then the flaps folded in place.
I buy 4 sizes of bags (largest is 77" deep), but we pack probably 100
different items in them of various finished sizes. To give you an idea of
size, one of the items takes 96 bags to fill a 53' trailer leaving only a
couple of inches at the top and back.

"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message
...

"Smitty Two" wrote
You seal plastic bags with an iron? OK, I gotta ask, why don't you use a
bag sealer?

They don't make bag sealers that will take bags anywhere up to 24" X 30 X
48" and hold up to 45 pounds. This is not the typical little parts bag
you are thinking of, they hold large bulky items of various sizes. The
top end is folded much like you'd wrap a gift box, then the flaps folded
in place. I buy 4 sizes of bags (largest is 77" deep), but we pack
probably 100 different items in them of various finished sizes. To give
you an idea of size, one of the items takes 96 bags to fill a 53' trailer
leaving only a couple of inches at the top and back.


You're bagging pot, aren't you? :-)

In article ,
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote:

They don't make bag sealers that will take bags anywhere up to 24" X 30 X
48" and hold up to 45 pounds.

Of course they do. You think you're the only guy with big bags? Here's
just one company I found by googling for "industrial bag sealers."

http://www.alinesys.com/heavy-duty-h...se-sealers.htm

This page shows a variety of sealers with capabilities up to 300" long.
That's, um, uh, oh yeah, 25 feet.

Might be a little spendier than an iron, but my money's on faster and
neater anyway.

"Smitty Two" wrote in message
news
In article ,
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote:

They don't make bag sealers that will take bags anywhere up to 24" X 30 X
48" and hold up to 45 pounds.

Of course they do. You think you're the only guy with big bags? Here's
just one company I found by googling for "industrial bag sealers."

http://www.alinesys.com/heavy-duty-h...se-sealers.htm

This page shows a variety of sealers with capabilities up to 300" long.
That's, um, uh, oh yeah, 25 feet.

Might be a little spendier than an iron, but my money's on faster and
neater anyway.

Nice, but they won't work for us. That type of sealer makes a "flap" on the
end, not a flat surface like we have. It would make the bags more difficult
to handle, stack, load.

Visualize wrapping a Christmas gift package. Now try to use that type of
sealer to hold the ends together and seal them. While your money is on
faster and neater, it will be slower and messier. I, and others in the same
industry, have looked for a better method for decades. We all still use
household irons.

In article ,
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote:

"Smitty Two" wrote in message
news
In article ,
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote:

They don't make bag sealers that will take bags anywhere up to 24" X 30 X
48" and hold up to 45 pounds.

Of course they do. You think you're the only guy with big bags? Here's
just one company I found by googling for "industrial bag sealers."

http://www.alinesys.com/heavy-duty-h...se-sealers.htm

This page shows a variety of sealers with capabilities up to 300" long.
That's, um, uh, oh yeah, 25 feet.

Might be a little spendier than an iron, but my money's on faster and
neater anyway.

Nice, but they won't work for us. That type of sealer makes a "flap" on the
end, not a flat surface like we have. It would make the bags more difficult
to handle, stack, load.

Visualize wrapping a Christmas gift package. Now try to use that type of
sealer to hold the ends together and seal them. While your money is on
faster and neater, it will be slower and messier. I, and others in the same
industry, have looked for a better method for decades. We all still use
household irons.

Well, the typical sealer can be adjusted to either leave a flap or sever
it. But now I'm curious about your gift package. One of the less boring
parts of my work is doing industrial design. If there's a whole industry
out there using household irons, maybe it's time for someone to build a
better mousetrap. Tell me more, if you're inclined.

"Smitty Two" wrote in message

Well, the typical sealer can be adjusted to either leave a flap or sever
it. But now I'm curious about your gift package. One of the less boring
parts of my work is doing industrial design. If there's a whole industry
out there using household irons, maybe it's time for someone to build a
better mousetrap. Tell me more, if you're inclined.

I just sent you a photo if your email works.

Here is the challenge. We use maybe 4 or 5 irons at a time. I spend about
$120 to $180 a year on irons. Over five years, that is $540.
With a five year payback you have to build five machines with a cost of no
more than $540 total for the five. They must be portable, take various
sizes, operated easily by one person, meet UL or any OSHA standards
required. The iron works, you have to show improvement.

Given that an iron is less than $20, I'd say you have a tight budget. .
We don't need a $1000 solution to a $20 problem.

In article ,
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote:

"Smitty Two" wrote in message

Well, the typical sealer can be adjusted to either leave a flap or sever
it. But now I'm curious about your gift package. One of the less boring
parts of my work is doing industrial design. If there's a whole industry
out there using household irons, maybe it's time for someone to build a
better mousetrap. Tell me more, if you're inclined.

I just sent you a photo if your email works.

Here is the challenge. We use maybe 4 or 5 irons at a time. I spend about
$120 to $180 a year on irons. Over five years, that is $540.
With a five year payback you have to build five machines with a cost of no
more than $540 total for the five. They must be portable, take various
sizes, operated easily by one person, meet UL or any OSHA standards
required. The iron works, you have to show improvement.

Given that an iron is less than $20, I'd say you have a tight budget. .
We don't need a $1000 solution to a $20 problem.

My email is munged. But apparently I misunderstood this: "I, and others
in the same industry, have looked for a better method for decades." It
seems that you're actually quite happy with what you have.

"Smitty Two" wrote


My email is munged. But apparently I misunderstood this: "I, and others
in the same industry, have looked for a better method for decades." It
seems that you're actually quite happy with what you have.

We're always looking for something better, but have not found it. There are
more durable industrial irons, but they are too small to be effective for
what we do. The only problem we have is if someone drops and iron, it is
usually broke beyond simple repair. 20 years ago I used to pay $25+ for
one, now they are down to about $13. WalMart/China scenario.

On Sep 7, 10:50*pm, Home@Home. (Mary) wrote:
Do they still use teflon, or is there a better type of material on the
soleplate of steam irons?

Dunno if they still do in the USA, but in Europe it has been
discontinued due to it evolving poisonous gases when hot. Also in pans
etc.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/teflon.htm

On Sep 11, 12:39*am, harry wrote:
On Sep 7, 10:50*pm, Home@Home. (Mary) wrote:

Do they still use teflon, or is there a better type of material on the
soleplate of steam irons?

Dunno if they still do in the USA, but in Europe it has been
discontinued due to it evolving poisonous gases when hot. Also in pans
etc.http://www.apfn.org/apfn/teflon.htm

You got that right! I have zero "non-stick" pans in my kitchen. Am
amazed
that after all the recent publicity about the dangers involved, that
stores are
still selling them and people still going for the stupid "easier to
clean" marketing
that made them popular in the first place.

Makes you wonder just how out-of-touch most consumers are -- and not
just
the poor and ignorant, but those who should know better.

Piggy-backing on this topic: I have also gone to all-glass storage
containers,
away from plastic, which also exudes bad stuff, esp. when used to re-
heat food.

"Higgs Boson" wrote in message
...
On Sep 11, 12:39 am, harry wrote:
On Sep 7, 10:50 pm, Home@Home. (Mary) wrote:

Do they still use teflon, or is there a better type of material on the
soleplate of steam irons?

Dunno if they still do in the USA, but in Europe it has been
discontinued due to it evolving poisonous gases when hot. Also in pans
etc.http://www.apfn.org/apfn/teflon.htm

You got that right! I have zero "non-stick" pans in my kitchen. Am
amazed
that after all the recent publicity about the dangers involved, that
stores are
still selling them and people still going for the stupid "easier to
clean" marketing
that made them popular in the first place.

Makes you wonder just how out-of-touch most consumers are -- and not
just
the poor and ignorant, but those who should know better.
==============


If newsgroup denizens are any indication, roughly half the American public
reads absolutely nothing. They get their "news" from television. Some even
believe that TV news is much less biased than newspapers.

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:05:08 -0700 (PDT), Higgs Boson
wrote:

On Sep 11, 12:39*am, harry wrote:
On Sep 7, 10:50*pm, Home@Home. (Mary) wrote:

Do they still use teflon, or is there a better type of material on the
soleplate of steam irons?

Dunno if they still do in the USA, but in Europe it has been
discontinued due to it evolving poisonous gases when hot. Also in pans
etc.http://www.apfn.org/apfn/teflon.htm

You got that right! I have zero "non-stick" pans in my kitchen. Am
amazed
that after all the recent publicity about the dangers involved, that
stores are
still selling them and people still going for the stupid "easier to
clean" marketing
that made them popular in the first place.

They are *not* dangerous. We don't have them any longer but not because
they're dangerous. Good SS pans are just better.

You must be scared ****less of overhead power lines and cell phones.

Makes you wonder just how out-of-touch most consumers are -- and not
just
the poor and ignorant, but those who should know better.

You are the epitome of ignorant.

Piggy-backing on this topic: I have also gone to all-glass storage
containers,
away from plastic, which also exudes bad stuff, esp. when used to re-
heat food.

Yep. Pig-ignorant. You must not be able to sleep at night with all of those
evil business people after you.

wrote in message
...


Piggy-backing on this topic: I have also gone to all-glass storage
containers,
away from plastic, which also exudes bad stuff, esp. when used to re-
heat food.

Yep. Pig-ignorant. You must not be able to sleep at night with all of
those
evil business people after you.

Interesting. Are you saying that plastic products (sold for use with food &
drink)....

- Do not exude certain chemicals which might not be healthy

- Used to exude these chemicals, but not any more

- Never did exude certain chemicals which might not be healthy

???

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:00:39 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .


Piggy-backing on this topic: I have also gone to all-glass storage
containers,
away from plastic, which also exudes bad stuff, esp. when used to re-
heat food.

Yep. Pig-ignorant. You must not be able to sleep at night with all of
those
evil business people after you.

Interesting. Are you saying that plastic products (sold for use with food &
drink)....

- Do not exude certain chemicals which might not be healthy

"exude", "certain", "chemicals", might. Yep, we've found another delusional
paranoid idiot.

- Used to exude these chemicals, but not any more

- Never did exude certain chemicals which might not be healthy

"Higgs Boson" wrote
You got that right! I have zero "non-stick" pans in my kitchen. Am
amazed
that after all the recent publicity about the dangers involved, that
stores are
still selling them and people still going for the stupid "easier to
clean" marketing
that made them popular in the first place.

Makes you wonder just how out-of-touch most consumers are -- and not
just
the poor and ignorant, but those who should know better.

I have two and will continue to use them for years to come. I don't over
heat them. I like them for certain cooking One of those pans is a "Woll
and it ranks right up with my Falk copper pans for cooking ability. The
other is a cheapie and I fry my egg in it most mornings.

When properly used, no danger has been proven.

On Sep 11, 8:36*pm, "
wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:05:08 -0700 (PDT), Higgs Boson
wrote:





On Sep 11, 12:39*am, harry wrote:
On Sep 7, 10:50*pm, Home@Home. (Mary) wrote:

Do they still use teflon, or is there a better type of material on the
soleplate of steam irons?

Dunno if they still do in the USA, but in Europe it has been
discontinued due to it evolving poisonous gases when hot. Also in pans
etc.http://www.apfn.org/apfn/teflon.htm

You got that right! * I have zero "non-stick" pans in my kitchen. Am
amazed
that after all the recent publicity about the dangers involved, that
stores are
still selling them and people still going for the stupid "easier to
clean" marketing
that made them popular in the first place.

They are *not* dangerous. *We don't have them any longer but not because
they're dangerous. *Good SS pans are just better. *

You must be scared ****less of overhead power lines and cell phones.

Makes you wonder just how out-of-touch most consumers are -- and not
just
the poor and ignorant, but those who should know better.

You are the epitome of ignorant.

Piggy-backing on this topic: *I have also gone to all-glass storage
containers,
away from plastic, which also exudes bad stuff, esp. when used to re-
heat food.

Yep. Pig-ignorant. *You must not be able to sleep at night with all of those
evil business people after you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dangers of PTFE. Many sources some American.
http://uk.ask.com/web?q=dangers+of+p...=dir&sit eid=

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:00:39 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..


Piggy-backing on this topic: I have also gone to all-glass storage
containers,
away from plastic, which also exudes bad stuff, esp. when used to re-
heat food.

Yep. Pig-ignorant. You must not be able to sleep at night with all of
those
evil business people after you.

Interesting. Are you saying that plastic products (sold for use with food
&
drink)....

- Do not exude certain chemicals which might not be healthy

"exude", "certain", "chemicals", might. Yep, we've found another
delusional
paranoid idiot.


You've just confessed to reading almost nothing, and getting 99% of your
news from television. You should be ashamed, but that would require that you
be smart.

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:06:50 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:00:39 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
...


Piggy-backing on this topic: I have also gone to all-glass storage
containers,
away from plastic, which also exudes bad stuff, esp. when used to re-
heat food.

Yep. Pig-ignorant. You must not be able to sleep at night with all of
those
evil business people after you.

Interesting. Are you saying that plastic products (sold for use with food
&
drink)....

- Do not exude certain chemicals which might not be healthy

"exude", "certain", "chemicals", might. Yep, we've found another
delusional
paranoid idiot.


You've just confessed to reading almost nothing, and getting 99% of your
news from television. You should be ashamed, but that would require that you
be smart.

Says the idiot who believes "CBS News" and "60 Minutes" have something to do
with reality.

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:06:50 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:00:39 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...


Piggy-backing on this topic: I have also gone to all-glass storage
containers,
away from plastic, which also exudes bad stuff, esp. when used to re-
heat food.

Yep. Pig-ignorant. You must not be able to sleep at night with all of
those
evil business people after you.

Interesting. Are you saying that plastic products (sold for use with
food
&
drink)....

- Do not exude certain chemicals which might not be healthy

"exude", "certain", "chemicals", might. Yep, we've found another
delusional
paranoid idiot.


You've just confessed to reading almost nothing, and getting 99% of your
news from television. You should be ashamed, but that would require that
you
be smart.

Says the idiot who believes "CBS News" and "60 Minutes" have something to
do
with reality.


Nope. I never watch those source. I get little or no news from television.

You protest too much.

But I'm openminded, so I'm willing to consider information you may have.

You're so "open minded" that your brains fell out.

In a non-hysterical fashion,


Hahahahaha! That's funny!

tell me why you believe that no plastics release substances which may be harmful.

You're lying again.

Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are harmful. You made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with outrageous evidence.

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are harmful. You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or shut up. The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and that will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to put up or
shut up.

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or shut up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to put up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us, would you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from people who do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower toxicity than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to humans.

....not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be such.

In article ,
" wrote:

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or shut up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to put up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us, would you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from people who do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower toxicity than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to humans.

...not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be such.


Krw come over to Wreck.gardens. rec.gardens in time.

I use boric acid small amount in sugar to kill ants. I also use oil of
pennyroyal to deter the *******s.
Leftist loons got be scratching my right nut.

--
Bill S. Jersey USA zone 5 shade garden
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Q0JfdP36kI

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:ie0q86dl1mtloqver2fndtgd6ifovujnov@4ax. com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or shut
up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to put
up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us, would you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from people who
do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower toxicity
than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to humans.


So, you'd be OK ingesting synthetic pyrethroids.


...not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be such.




Leftist??? Where did you get THAT idea?

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:27:58 -0400, Bill who putters
wrote:

In article ,
" wrote:

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or shut up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to put up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us, would you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from people who do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower toxicity than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to humans.

...not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be such.


Krw come over to Wreck.gardens. rec.gardens in time.

There are enough loons here to keep me busy. ;-)

I use boric acid small amount in sugar to kill ants. I also use oil of
pennyroyal to deter the *******s.

Use it by the pound. It's safe enough. I douse the yard in anything that'll
kill the little buggers. I just noticed some more by the front door. I'll
put out 40# of ant killer tomorrow.

Leftist loons got be scratching my right nut.

What's the favored treatment for that? November 2?

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:29:01 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:ie0q86dl1mtloqver2fndtgd6ifovujnov@4ax .com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or shut
up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to put
up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us, would you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from people who
do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower toxicity
than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to humans.


So, you'd be OK ingesting synthetic pyrethroids.

You insist on being a total idiot.

...not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be such.




Leftist??? Where did you get THAT idea?

You, of course.

On Sep 12, 6:02*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
wrote in message

...





On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"

Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. *It's *your* job to back it up with outrageous
evidence.

Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. *Now, show us the evidence or shut up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and that will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to put up or
shut up.

Certain products kill bugs. We know they kill bugs. We can only extrapolate
from that and assume they will harm or kill humans. Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us, would you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Chlorine? You already do if you don't have a well.

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:05:40 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:29:01 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
om...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:kf1q86hcojbd4l5285d1kji02brhquhg4f@4ax .com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:ie0q86dl1mtloqver2fndtgd6ifovujnov@4 ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are
harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with
outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or shut
up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to put
up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us, would
you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from people
who
do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower toxicity
than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just
because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to humans.


So, you'd be OK ingesting synthetic pyrethroids.

You insist on being a total idiot.

...not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be such.




Leftist??? Where did you get THAT idea?

You, of course.


What *ABOUT* me gave you the idea that I'm a leftist? Be extremely specific.

Everything you've said here. I don't care to dig back through your posting
history. Once was enough.

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:05:40 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:29:01 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
news:3c2q86dg6oan85c002iie939bcf91rkptn@4ax. com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:kf1q86hcojbd4l5285d1kji02brhquhg4f@4a x.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:ie0q86dl1mtloqver2fndtgd6ifovujnov@ 4ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are
harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with
outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or
shut
up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and
that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like
lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to
put
up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us, would
you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from people
who
do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower toxicity
than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just
because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to
humans.


So, you'd be OK ingesting synthetic pyrethroids.

You insist on being a total idiot.

...not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be such.




Leftist??? Where did you get THAT idea?

You, of course.


What *ABOUT* me gave you the idea that I'm a leftist? Be extremely
specific.

Everything you've said here. I don't care to dig back through your
posting
history. Once was enough.


So in other words, you think if someone has concerns about the safety of
some substances, that person is automatically a leftist.

Are you sure you want to own that concept? It's pretty stupid, but that's
exactly what you're saying.

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:18:05 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:05:40 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:29:01 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
news:3c2q86dg6oan85c002iie939bcf91rkptn@4ax .com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:kf1q86hcojbd4l5285d1kji02brhquhg4f@4 ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:ie0q86dl1mtloqver2fndtgd6ifovujnov @4ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are
harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with
outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or
shut
up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and
that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like
lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to
put
up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us, would
you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from people
who
do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower toxicity
than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just
because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to
humans.


So, you'd be OK ingesting synthetic pyrethroids.

You insist on being a total idiot.

...not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be such.




Leftist??? Where did you get THAT idea?

You, of course.


What *ABOUT* me gave you the idea that I'm a leftist? Be extremely
specific.

Everything you've said here. I don't care to dig back through your
posting
history. Once was enough.


So in other words, you think if someone has concerns about the safety of
some substances, that person is automatically a leftist.

The total loons always are.

Are you sure you want to own that concept? It's pretty stupid, but that's
exactly what you're saying.

No, I'm saying that I've read enough of your rantings to file you in the
leftist loon box. You fit very well.

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:18:05 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:05:40 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:29:01 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:a5dq86pq2tj6co1sq0etirsejia48rrghr@4ax. com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
news:3c2q86dg6oan85c002iie939bcf91rkptn@4a x.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:kf1q86hcojbd4l5285d1kji02brhquhg4f@ 4ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:ie0q86dl1mtloqver2fndtgd6ifovujno ...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are
harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with
outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or
shut
up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and
that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like
lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to
put
up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or
kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us,
would
you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from
people
who
do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower
toxicity
than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just
because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to
humans.


So, you'd be OK ingesting synthetic pyrethroids.

You insist on being a total idiot.

...not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as
insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be such.




Leftist??? Where did you get THAT idea?

You, of course.


What *ABOUT* me gave you the idea that I'm a leftist? Be extremely
specific.

Everything you've said here. I don't care to dig back through your
posting
history. Once was enough.


So in other words, you think if someone has concerns about the safety of
some substances, that person is automatically a leftist.

The total loons always are.

Are you sure you want to own that concept? It's pretty stupid, but that's
exactly what you're saying.

No, I'm saying that I've read enough of your rantings to file you in the
leftist loon box. You fit very well.


You need a better script.

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:55:52 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:18:05 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:05:40 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
om...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:29:01 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:a5dq86pq2tj6co1sq0etirsejia48rrghr@4ax .com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
news:3c2q86dg6oan85c002iie939bcf91rkptn@4 ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:kf1q86hcojbd4l5285d1kji02brhquhg4f @4ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:ie0q86dl1mtloqver2fndtgd6ifovujn ...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are
harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with
outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or
shut
up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines, and
that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products like
lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you to
put
up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or
kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us,
would
you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from
people
who
do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower
toxicity
than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just
because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to
humans.


So, you'd be OK ingesting synthetic pyrethroids.

You insist on being a total idiot.

...not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as
insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be such.




Leftist??? Where did you get THAT idea?

You, of course.


What *ABOUT* me gave you the idea that I'm a leftist? Be extremely
specific.

Everything you've said here. I don't care to dig back through your
posting
history. Once was enough.


So in other words, you think if someone has concerns about the safety of
some substances, that person is automatically a leftist.

The total loons always are.

Are you sure you want to own that concept? It's pretty stupid, but that's
exactly what you're saying.

No, I'm saying that I've read enough of your rantings to file you in the
leftist loon box. You fit very well.


You need a better script.

*I* don't need a better "script". It's *your* script.

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:55:52 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:18:05 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:05:40 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:hgfq86hu3n1ob8hvkk3e9i3r6acusti9ra@4ax. com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:29:01 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:a5dq86pq2tj6co1sq0etirsejia48rrghr@4a x.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:18:55 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:


wrote in message
news:3c2q86dg6oan85c002iie939bcf91rkptn@ 4ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:02:38 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:kf1q86hcojbd4l5285d1kji02brhquhg4 ...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:45:43 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
news:ie0q86dl1mtloqver2fndtgd6ifovuj ...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:13:34 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"


Please provide non-hysterical sources.

No, you're the one claiming that plastics used for food are
harmful.
You
made
the outrageous claim. It's *your* job to back it up with
outrageous
evidence.


Actually, no. I didn't make that claim.

You *ARE* supporting that claim. Now, show us the evidence or
shut
up.
The
fact is that you're talking though your ass, as usual.

Nobody can ever know if they're
harmful unless they're tested in the same way as medicines,
and
that
will
never be done, just as it will never be done with products
like
lawn
chemicals. All sentient adults know this.

It's impossible to demonstrate the negative so it's up to you
to
put
up
or
shut up.


Certain products kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We know they kill bugs.

Like baking soda (NaHCO3).

We can only extrapolate from that and assume they will harm or
kill
humans.

OMG, cookies will kill ya!

Because these products
can't be tested on humans to prove that they're harmful to us,
would
you
ingest products which kill bugs?

Yes or no?

I like cookies. Yum!

You're showing exactly how stupid you really are. Nice job!


You forgot to say "Salt is a chemical". Standard response from
people
who
do
not read.

I read, but you obviously can't. BTW, Boric Acid has a lower
toxicity
than
either salt or baking soda and *IS* used as an insecticide. Just
because
something is toxic to insects does *not* mean that it's toxic to
humans.


So, you'd be OK ingesting synthetic pyrethroids.

You insist on being a total idiot.

...not to mention that plastic containers aren't used as
insecticides.

Why did you parents forbid reading when you were growing up?

As all leftist loons you're a liar, and have been proven to be
such.




Leftist??? Where did you get THAT idea?

You, of course.


What *ABOUT* me gave you the idea that I'm a leftist? Be extremely
specific.

Everything you've said here. I don't care to dig back through your
posting
history. Once was enough.


So in other words, you think if someone has concerns about the safety of
some substances, that person is automatically a leftist.

The total loons always are.

Are you sure you want to own that concept? It's pretty stupid, but
that's
exactly what you're saying.

No, I'm saying that I've read enough of your rantings to file you in the
leftist loon box. You fit very well.


You need a better script.

*I* don't need a better "script". It's *your* script.


Exactly how did your parents cause you to hate science? Did they beat you?
Or, are you a member of a religious cult (any)?

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:11:54 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:55:52 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
...

snip

No, I'm saying that I've read enough of your rantings to file you in the
leftist loon box. You fit very well.


You need a better script.

*I* don't need a better "script". It's *your* script.


Exactly how did your parents cause you to hate science? Did they beat you?
Or, are you a member of a religious cult (any)?

Yep. You lie like a leftist, too. No surprises though; at least you're
consistent.

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:11:54 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"

Exactly how did your parents cause you to hate science? Did they beat you?
Or, are you a member of a religious cult (any)?

Yep. You lie like a leftist, too. No surprises though; at least you're
consistent.


Let's start over again. Are you denying that there

********COULD BE*********

harmful effects from plasticizers in food containers?

Yes or no? Are you denying it? One word response. Yes or no?

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:23:24 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:11:54 -0400, "JoeSpareBedroom"

Exactly how did your parents cause you to hate science? Did they beat you?
Or, are you a member of a religious cult (any)?

Yep. You lie like a leftist, too. No surprises though; at least you're
consistent.


Let's start over again. Are you denying that there

********COULD BE*********

harmful effects from plasticizers in food containers?

There ********COULD BE********* snow here tomorrow, but since it's 90F at
7:30PM, yes, but it's a long, long shot.

I could break a glass canister, step on a shard, and get blood poisoning, too.

Yes or no? Are you denying it? One word response. Yes or no?

Typical leftist.