Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
Awl --
Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Who uses what and when? -- EA |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
On 11/12/2009 7:07 PM Existential Angst spake thus:
Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Yes and yes. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. Only missing strands if one cuts them off. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. Not an issue. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. You seem to have pretty well covered all the properties and pros and cons of solid vs. stranded. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Solid only. No need to snake the wires through anything, so no need for stranded wire here. Who uses what and when? You pretty well said it yourself: o Use stranded wire when pulling through conduit. o Use solid wire otherwise. -- Who needs a junta or a dictatorship when you have a Congress blowing Wall Street, using the media as a condom? - harvested from Usenet |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:04:14 -0800, David Nebenzahl
wrote: On 11/12/2009 7:07 PM Existential Angst spake thus: Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Yes and yes. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. Only missing strands if one cuts them off. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. Not an issue. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. You seem to have pretty well covered all the properties and pros and cons of solid vs. stranded. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Solid only. No need to snake the wires through anything, so no need for stranded wire here. Actually CMPCT-CU conductors in aluminum flex (BX ) cable IS available. CMPCT-CU is otherwize known as compact copper, or stranded wire. as per ASTM b-8 Who uses what and when? The stranded stuff is used where flexability is required - or where vibration is a problem. You won't find it at the "borg" but I do have some in my garage. You pretty well said it yourself: o Use stranded wire when pulling through conduit. o Use solid wire otherwise. |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:04:14 -0800, David Nebenzahl
wrote: On 11/12/2009 7:07 PM Existential Angst spake thus: Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Yes and yes. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. Only missing strands if one cuts them off. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. Not an issue. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. You seem to have pretty well covered all the properties and pros and cons of solid vs. stranded. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Solid only. No need to snake the wires through anything, so no need for stranded wire here. Who uses what and when? You pretty well said it yourself: o Use stranded wire when pulling through conduit. o Use solid wire otherwise. Stranded wire "BX" is available from "Northern Cable" in TC90, MC-THHN and AC-THH flavours. Google it. |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
On Nov 12, 10:07*pm, "Existential Angst"
wrote: But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc.. The contact area of solid wire under the screw will be several times the cross-sectional area of the wire. Nothing to be gained from more contact area than that. Stranded also has a tendency to squeeze out from under the screw and loosen up. Other than that, I think you covered most of it. |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
Existential Angst wrote:
Awl -- Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Who uses what and when? I don't recall solid conductors in an automobile. Stranded wire is less subject to metal fatigue from bending or vibration. The smaller a conductor is, the farther it can flex without bending the metal. Stuff with 7 or 19 strands is usually classified as Rigid Stranded Wire. Flexible Stranded Wire usually has 49 strands or more. I'd hate to try to connect the flexible stuff with a wire nut. Until recently, the NEC required crimping for it. Now there's an approved screw terminal. |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
On Nov 12, 10:07�pm, "Existential Angst"
wrote: Awl -- Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? �#14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc.. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: �$25 to $30, and $40 to $45. BX/romex comes which way? �Both? Who uses what and when? -- EA I know most of you are talking for home use, but never use solid where where are a lot of vibrations such as cars, boats and planes. Solid will break, whereas stranded won't. Hank |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
On Nov 13, 5:44*am, "Hustlin' Hank" wrote:
On Nov 12, 10:07 pm, "Existential Angst" wrote: Awl -- Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Who uses what and when? -- EA I know most of you are talking for home use, but never use solid where where are a lot of vibrations such as cars, boats and planes. Solid will break, whereas stranded won't. Hank No one mentioned the fact that stranded wire, at the same diameter, can carry more current. And you could tin the ends of stranded for termination. bob_v |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
In article , Bob Villa wrote:
No one mentioned the fact that stranded wire, at the same diameter, can carry more current. In residential applications -- nonsense. First of all, the NEC doesn't make a distinction between solid and stranded in the limits it places on the ampacity of a conductor. The only factor is size. Second, presumably you're referring to the "skin effect" -- which at 60Hz is completely negligible. The frequency needs to be a *lot* higher than that before there's any noticeable effect. |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
"Doug Miller" wrote in message
... In article , Bob Villa wrote: No one mentioned the fact that stranded wire, at the same diameter, can carry more current. In residential applications -- nonsense. First of all, the NEC doesn't make a distinction between solid and stranded in the limits it places on the ampacity of a conductor. The only factor is size. Second, presumably you're referring to the "skin effect" -- which at 60Hz is completely negligible. The frequency needs to be a *lot* higher than that before there's any noticeable effect. I was going to bring this up as well. It depends on how the NEC defines gauge of a wire. If it accurately sums the cross sectional area of each strand, so that this sum is equal to the CSA of solid, then the ampacity should be very nearly equal. But the diameter of the stranded would be slightly bigger -- because of the inherent inefficient of "packing circles" -- ie, gaps between non-touching parts of a circle. If the NEC determines gauge based on diameter, then stranded will have less ampacity than solid, for the same circle-packing reason -- less net CSA of copper. So, how DOES the NEC define "gauge"? -- EA |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
Existential Angst wrote:
It depends on how the NEC defines gauge of a wire. If it accurately sums the cross sectional area of each strand, so that this sum is equal to the CSA of solid, then the ampacity should be very nearly equal. But the diameter of the stranded would be slightly bigger -- because of the inherent inefficient of "packing circles" -- ie, gaps between non-touching parts of a circle. If the NEC determines gauge based on diameter, then stranded will have less ampacity than solid, for the same circle-packing reason -- less net CSA of copper. So, how DOES the NEC define "gauge"? I believe the NEC uses AWG, which uses total cross section. |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
Existential Angst wrote:
.... So, how DOES the NEC define "gauge"? It references AWG which is wire area for either. -- |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
Bob Villa wrote:
On Nov 13, 5:44 am, "Hustlin' Hank" wrote: On Nov 12, 10:07 pm, "Existential Angst" wrote: Awl -- Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Who uses what and when? -- EA I know most of you are talking for home use, but never use solid where where are a lot of vibrations such as cars, boats and planes. Solid will break, whereas stranded won't. Hank No one mentioned the fact that stranded wire, at the same diameter, can carry more current. I won't get into that. And you could tin the ends of stranded for termination. By doing so you take away flexibility of the stranded wire so right at your connection it is more likely to fail. As much as I hate crimped on wire connectors and always believed soldered was better than connectors, where there is a lot of vibration they do last much longer than soldered on wires. Can someone check with NASA? |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
"Tony" wrote in message
... Bob Villa wrote: On Nov 13, 5:44 am, "Hustlin' Hank" wrote: On Nov 12, 10:07 pm, "Existential Angst" wrote: Awl -- Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Who uses what and when? -- EA I know most of you are talking for home use, but never use solid where where are a lot of vibrations such as cars, boats and planes. Solid will break, whereas stranded won't. Hank No one mentioned the fact that stranded wire, at the same diameter, can carry more current. I won't get into that. And you could tin the ends of stranded for termination. By doing so you take away flexibility of the stranded wire so right at your connection it is more likely to fail. As much as I hate crimped on wire connectors and always believed soldered was better than connectors, where there is a lot of vibration they do last much longer than soldered on wires. Can someone check with NASA? If a correctly designed crimp tool is used, crimp connectors are extremely secure. Unfortunately, it's practically impossible to find a correctly designed crimp tool in big box stores or local hardware stores. |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
Tony wrote:
Bob Villa wrote: And you could tin the ends of stranded for termination. By doing so you take away flexibility of the stranded wire so right at your connection it is more likely to fail. As much as I hate crimped on wire connectors and always believed soldered was better than connectors, where there is a lot of vibration they do last much longer than soldered on wires. Can someone check with NASA? Suppose I wanted to replace an 18-gage lamp cord. If it had 19 strands of 30-gage, like much automotive wire, it would probably screw down to the socket pretty well. But 18-gage lamp cord may have 41 strands of 34-gage. Twelve-gage zip cord could be worse; it might have 65 strands. It can be hard to get wire with a lot of strands to stay under a screw. What would be wrong with tinning? Within the lamp, strain and vibration shouldn't be problems. If instead of a screw terminal, I wanted to use a wire nut on zip cord with a lot of strands, I might try tinning if I had trouble. I wonder if that would violate the NEC. (Some wire nuts will screw down far enough to clamp the insulated part of a cord.) |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
E Z Peaces wrote:
Tony wrote: Bob Villa wrote: And you could tin the ends of stranded for termination. By doing so you take away flexibility of the stranded wire so right at your connection it is more likely to fail. As much as I hate crimped on wire connectors and always believed soldered was better than connectors, where there is a lot of vibration they do last much longer than soldered on wires. Can someone check with NASA? Suppose I wanted to replace an 18-gage lamp cord. If it had 19 strands of 30-gage, like much automotive wire, it would probably screw down to the socket pretty well. But 18-gage lamp cord may have 41 strands of 34-gage. Twelve-gage zip cord could be worse; it might have 65 strands. It can be hard to get wire with a lot of strands to stay under a screw. What would be wrong with tinning? Within the lamp, strain and vibration shouldn't be problems. If there isn't a vibration or strain problem, then there is no problem that I see. If instead of a screw terminal, I wanted to use a wire nut on zip cord with a lot of strands, I might try tinning if I had trouble. I wonder if that would violate the NEC. (Some wire nuts will screw down far enough to clamp the insulated part of a cord.) If I am joining zip cord, or stranded wire in a light fixture to 14 solid, I just strip the stranded wire longer than the solid wire and twist it around the solid wire first, then add the wire nut. It's always worked _great_ for me. I do make sure there is more of the stranded wire toward the end of the solid, it's just how I found it to work the best. Maybe it's not code if I strip the stranded wire longer than the strip gauge? I don't know. I do know that it works very well code or no code. Give it a try and you won't have to worry about tinning. |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:18:22 -0500, E Z Peaces
wrote: Tony wrote: Bob Villa wrote: And you could tin the ends of stranded for termination. By doing so you take away flexibility of the stranded wire so right at your connection it is more likely to fail. As much as I hate crimped on wire connectors and always believed soldered was better than connectors, where there is a lot of vibration they do last much longer than soldered on wires. Can someone check with NASA? Suppose I wanted to replace an 18-gage lamp cord. If it had 19 strands of 30-gage, like much automotive wire, it would probably screw down to the socket pretty well. But 18-gage lamp cord may have 41 strands of 34-gage. Twelve-gage zip cord could be worse; it might have 65 strands. It can be hard to get wire with a lot of strands to stay under a screw. What would be wrong with tinning? Within the lamp, strain and vibration shouldn't be problems. If instead of a screw terminal, I wanted to use a wire nut on zip cord with a lot of strands, I might try tinning if I had trouble. I wonder if that would violate the NEC. (Some wire nuts will screw down far enough to clamp the insulated part of a cord.) Just "hard twist" the wire and you are usually OK. IF you solder the end, make sure there is a strain relief close to the connection to prevent flexing of the wire near the soldered end. |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
Existential Angst wrote: Awl -- Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Who uses what and when? -- EA Like everyone else said, stranded for flexibility pulling through conduit and whatnot. For termination at receptacles and the like, get the back wire type devices, not to be confused with the push wire type which suck. The back wire have a hole you stick the wire in and then tighten the screw which clamps the wire solidly. This is similar to terminals in plugs and works well with stranded wire. |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
"Pete C." wrote in message
ster.com... Existential Angst wrote: Awl -- Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Who uses what and when? -- EA Like everyone else said, stranded for flexibility pulling through conduit and whatnot. For termination at receptacles and the like, get the back wire type devices, not to be confused with the push wire type which suck. The back wire have a hole you stick the wire in and then tighten the screw which clamps the wire solidly. This is similar to terminals in plugs and works well with stranded wire. Those are fantastic outlets/switches! I don't know if HD carries these -- do they? I'm sure they are much more expensive than yer 50c HD stuff. The few I've seen looked really high quality. -- EA |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
Existential Angst wrote: "Pete C." wrote in message ster.com... Existential Angst wrote: Awl -- Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Who uses what and when? -- EA Like everyone else said, stranded for flexibility pulling through conduit and whatnot. For termination at receptacles and the like, get the back wire type devices, not to be confused with the push wire type which suck. The back wire have a hole you stick the wire in and then tighten the screw which clamps the wire solidly. This is similar to terminals in plugs and works well with stranded wire. Those are fantastic outlets/switches! I don't know if HD carries these -- do they? I'm sure they are much more expensive than yer 50c HD stuff. The few I've seen looked really high quality. -- EA Yes, you can find them at 'Depot / Lowe's. They are typically the "Spec" grade devices and a few dollars each vs. under a dollar. The entire construction is better than the cheapos, better terminals, better receptacle contact area and pressure and better more durable body. For a given project the better receptacles will cost you and extra $20-$30, pretty negligible for the significantly better parts. |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
"Pete C." wrote in message
ster.com... Existential Angst wrote: "Pete C." wrote in message ster.com... Existential Angst wrote: Awl -- Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Stranded is more flexible, an advantage if you have to pull long runs in bends in EMT, but I find it a pain when connecting outlets, etc. Stranded can be dicey-er with nicks, missing strands. But, stranded might give more contact area under screws, in breakers, etc. At HD, stranded is $5 more on 500 ft coil of 14 and 12: $25 to $30, and $40 to $45. BX/romex comes which way? Both? Who uses what and when? -- EA Like everyone else said, stranded for flexibility pulling through conduit and whatnot. For termination at receptacles and the like, get the back wire type devices, not to be confused with the push wire type which suck. The back wire have a hole you stick the wire in and then tighten the screw which clamps the wire solidly. This is similar to terminals in plugs and works well with stranded wire. Those are fantastic outlets/switches! I don't know if HD carries these -- do they? I'm sure they are much more expensive than yer 50c HD stuff. The few I've seen looked really high quality. -- EA Yes, you can find them at 'Depot / Lowe's. They are typically the "Spec" grade devices and a few dollars each vs. under a dollar. The entire construction is better than the cheapos, better terminals, better receptacle contact area and pressure and better more durable body. For a given project the better receptacles will cost you and extra $20-$30, pretty negligible for the significantly better parts. AND, easier to attach a wire to, and a more reliable attachment. Proly actually cheaper, from a net cost (labor) pov. Push-wire devices ought to be made illegal. Fires waiting to happen, imo. Esp. push-wire devices used with stranded! That *has* to be illegal, no? -- EA |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
Existential Angst wrote:
Push-wire devices ought to be made illegal. Fires waiting to happen, imo. Esp. push-wire devices used with stranded! That *has* to be illegal, no? UL: "14 AWG solid copper wire only." -- bud-- |
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
Pete C. wrote:
Like everyone else said, stranded for flexibility pulling through conduit and whatnot. For termination at receptacles and the like, get the back wire type devices, not to be confused with the push wire type which suck. The back wire have a hole you stick the wire in and then tighten the screw which clamps the wire solidly. This is similar to terminals in plugs and works well with stranded wire. Very good advice. |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
On 11/13/2009 6:39 AM Pete C. spake thus:
Existential Angst wrote: Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Like everyone else said, stranded for flexibility pulling through conduit and whatnot. For termination at receptacles and the like, get the back wire type devices, not to be confused with the push wire type which suck. The back wire have a hole you stick the wire in and then tighten the screw which clamps the wire solidly. This is similar to terminals in plugs and works well with stranded wire. You've made a convert out of me. From now on I'm going to use those receptacles, instead of the el cheapo wrap-the-wire-around-the-screw types. -- Who needs a junta or a dictatorship when you have a Congress blowing Wall Street, using the media as a condom? - harvested from Usenet |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
In article ,
David Nebenzahl wrote: On 11/13/2009 6:39 AM Pete C. spake thus: Existential Angst wrote: Apropos of the recent thread on wire nutting stranded with solid, are there any inherent advantages of one over the other? #14-#10. Like everyone else said, stranded for flexibility pulling through conduit and whatnot. For termination at receptacles and the like, get the back wire type devices, not to be confused with the push wire type which suck. The back wire have a hole you stick the wire in and then tighten the screw which clamps the wire solidly. This is similar to terminals in plugs and works well with stranded wire. You've made a convert out of me. From now on I'm going to use those receptacles, instead of the el cheapo wrap-the-wire-around-the-screw types. Yeah, they're OK, but be forewarned: For solid wire, you have to torque the living **** out of that clamp screw if you want to end up with a connection that's more reliable than the infamous backstab. I installed several of those in my g.f.'s old house, and the mere folding of the wires as I pushed the receptacle back into their boxes readily loosened several, even when I thought I had the clamps plenty tight. |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
On 11/13/2009 5:51 PM Smitty Two spake thus:
In article , David Nebenzahl wrote: You've made a convert out of me. From now on I'm going to use those receptacles, instead of the el cheapo wrap-the-wire-around-the-screw types. Yeah, they're OK, but be forewarned: For solid wire, you have to torque the living **** out of that clamp screw if you want to end up with a connection that's more reliable than the infamous backstab. I installed several of those in my g.f.'s old house, and the mere folding of the wires as I pushed the receptacle back into their boxes readily loosened several, even when I thought I had the clamps plenty tight. So are they really more reliable? Sounds like they might not be. (Or perhaps not without the required torque screwdriver?) -- Who needs a junta or a dictatorship when you have a Congress blowing Wall Street, using the media as a condom? - harvested from Usenet |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
David Nebenzahl wrote: On 11/13/2009 5:51 PM Smitty Two spake thus: In article , David Nebenzahl wrote: You've made a convert out of me. From now on I'm going to use those receptacles, instead of the el cheapo wrap-the-wire-around-the-screw types. Yeah, they're OK, but be forewarned: For solid wire, you have to torque the living **** out of that clamp screw if you want to end up with a connection that's more reliable than the infamous backstab. I installed several of those in my g.f.'s old house, and the mere folding of the wires as I pushed the receptacle back into their boxes readily loosened several, even when I thought I had the clamps plenty tight. So are they really more reliable? Sounds like they might not be. (Or perhaps not without the required torque screwdriver?) The trick here, when using them with solid wire, is to wiggle the wire a bit while tightening to ensure that it is seated at the far edge of the clamp. What happened in the example, is that the wire was initially clamped in near the screw and with the clamp plate at a bit of an angle, the wire wiggled out to the wider edge area. If you endure it has settled to that area when you are clamping it there isn't a looser area for it to shift to. You can see the same thing happen if you try clamping a solid wire in a plug that has the contacts visible. |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Stranded vs solid wire
we are factory since 1983. if you need cable making machine,like laying-up machime. take-up and pay-off equipment, pls tell me.cablemachinery at 126 dot com
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Green Stranded Wire for Outlet Ground? | Home Repair | |||
Residential use of pvc conduit: wire colour, stranded vs solid thhn,other questions... | Home Repair | |||
New Household Wiring - Stranded or Solid?? | Home Repair | |||
How to connect #12 stranded to #10 solid | Home Repair | |||
? Stranded wire OK for grounding electrical boxes? | Home Repair |