Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

I agree. Make the area a sheet of glass.

On Oct 17, 5:04 am, wrote:
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

there would be a great market for glass drills and diamond blades there.


"DAC" wrote in message
oups.com...
I agree. Make the area a sheet of glass.

On Oct 17, 5:04 am, wrote:
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

In article ,
"bill allemann" wrote:

there would be a great market for glass drills and diamond blades there.

This glass thing is so messy. Just turn it into a parking lot and
send in the Marines to paint the stripes. This could be done with
conventional weapons.

Ok, that'll work! I'm in.


Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
"bill allemann" wrote:

there would be a great market for glass drills and diamond blades there.

This glass thing is so messy. Just turn it into a parking lot and
send in the Marines to paint the stripes. This could be done with
conventional weapons.

Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East

sounds nice arabs gone.......

you prepared for the after results a large amount of nuclear bombs
means more cancer worldwide including the US.

truly is this what you want? fathers sons kids dying of cancer....

my wife is a onclogy nurse its a bad way to go

This glass thing is so messy. Just turn it into a parking lot and
send in the Marines to paint the stripes. This could be done with
conventional weapons.

Apparently not, we hit Afghanistan with our best shot, and we
discovered something interesting; it is really hard to bomb people
living in the stone age back into the stone age.

if you quit the west coast method of waging a war, it isn't that difficult
to get the job done.


"Eric in North TX" wrote in message
ups.com...
Apparently not, we hit Afghanistan with our best shot, and we
discovered something interesting; it is really hard to bomb people
living in the stone age back into the stone age.

In article . com,
"Eric in North TX" wrote:

This glass thing is so messy. Just turn it into a parking lot and
send in the Marines to paint the stripes. This could be done with
conventional weapons.

Apparently not, we hit Afghanistan with our best shot, and we
discovered something interesting; it is really hard to bomb people
living in the stone age back into the stone age.

Afghan was hardly our best shot from a kill them all and let god
sort them out kinda policy. We tried to keep a lot of it one piece. See
what happens when we try to finesse thigns?

On 17 Oct 2006 06:36:07 -0700, "Eric in North TX"
wrote:

This glass thing is so messy. Just turn it into a parking lot and
send in the Marines to paint the stripes. This could be done with
conventional weapons.

Apparently not, we hit Afghanistan with our best shot, and we
discovered something interesting; it is really hard to bomb people
living in the stone age back into the stone age.

Not really. If we were willing to kill everyone and
everything in the entire territory, and make the area
uninhabitable, (which, of course, we're not) It would
be a fairly simple, if expensive, proposition. It's a
big project, but not especially complex or difficult.
What's hard is when you're trying to kill your enemies
without killing to many of your notional allies or
"civilians", and without wrecking too much of the landscape.

--Goedjn

then we could market special tires for traction on glass, like with the
little squeegee things on boat shoe soles.


"Kurt Ullman" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"bill allemann" wrote:

there would be a great market for glass drills and diamond blades there.

This glass thing is so messy. Just turn it into a parking lot and
send in the Marines to paint the stripes. This could be done with
conventional weapons.

In article ,
"bill allemann" wrote:

then we could market special tires for traction on glass, like with the
little squeegee things on boat shoe soles.


I am sure that Halliburton or one of the oil companies already owns
the patent so we don't want to unnecessarily get the conspiracy
theorists wound up.

"Kurt Ullman" wrote in message
..
.
In article ,
"bill allemann" wrote:

there would be a great market for glass drills and diamond blades there.

This glass thing is so messy. Just turn it into a parking lot and
send in the Marines to paint the stripes. This could be done with
conventional weapons.

wrote:
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

We can't do that, the oil companies would never allow it, and after all
they are running the country.

--
Joseph Meehan

Dia duit

It is probably inevitable, but will only happen after a major crater is
created in downtown, London, NYC, Los Angeles, wherever.


wrote in message
...
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

You have a great understanding of world politics and should be
congratulated.

I am seeing nuclear war perhaps by the end of this year. It might be a
few weeks or a few months, but Israel must respond to Iran. Iran's plan
is to nuke Tel Aviv, London, and NY simultaneously.

Meanwhile, sleeper cells embedded in our country have targeted 7-8
cities. They will use suit case nuclear bombs or dirty bombs again
simultaneously. At this point, the Pentagon will implement its plan to
nuke 8 countries worldwide.

We will have no choice. Of course, the muslim problem is all our fault.
oh, and we deserve it oh and 9-11 too.

For the post who estutely observed that Jimmie Carter is the worst
president in US history: KUDOS! Carter makes my skin crawl. Then,
there's Clinton. I just lost breakfast.


bill allemann wrote:
It is probably inevitable, but will only happen after a major crater is
created in downtown, London, NYC, Los Angeles, wherever.


wrote in message
...
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

In article . com,
"MRS. CLEAN" wrote:


We will have no choice. Of course, the muslim problem is all our fault.
oh, and we deserve it oh and 9-11 too.
To certain factions of Islam, religion has been a blood sport since
the beginning. You can trace similar behavior back for millenia. Why is
this suddenly our fault?

MRS. CLEAN wrote:

We will have no choice. Of course, the muslim problem is all our fault.
oh, and we deserve it oh and 9-11 too.

For the post who estutely observed that Jimmie Carter is the worst
president in US history: KUDOS! Carter makes my skin crawl. Then,
there's Clinton. I just lost breakfast.

That's not all you've lost...

In article . com,
"z" wrote:

MRS. CLEAN wrote:

We will have no choice. Of course, the muslim problem is all our fault.
oh, and we deserve it oh and 9-11 too.

For the post who estutely observed that Jimmie Carter is the worst
president in US history: KUDOS! Carter makes my skin crawl. Then,
there's Clinton. I just lost breakfast.

That's not all you've lost...

H ecould have invaded Iran at the time and solved all these problems.

Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article . com,
"z" wrote:

MRS. CLEAN wrote:

We will have no choice. Of course, the muslim problem is all our fault.
oh, and we deserve it oh and 9-11 too.

For the post who estutely observed that Jimmie Carter is the worst
president in US history: KUDOS! Carter makes my skin crawl. Then,
there's Clinton. I just lost breakfast.

That's not all you've lost...

H ecould have invaded Iran at the time and solved all these problems.

In case you haven't noticed, we can't even "solve" Iraq, which is a
pipsqueak next to Iran.

This post belongs elsewhere.
Are there moderators for this group??

This is an "off topic" post and should be removed immedeatly.


wrote:
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

Ron wrote:
This post belongs elsewhere.
Are there moderators for this group??

This is an "off topic" post and should be removed immediately.

I don't know Ron, couldn't removing the Mideast threat technically be
home improvement?

Ron wrote:
This post belongs elsewhere.
Are there moderators for this group??

This is an "off topic" post and should be removed immedeatly.


wrote:
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

group is unmoderated other than spam and illegal activities like kiddie
porn.......

if you dont like a thread dont read it or respond.

the threat and situation effects each and every one of us at the gas
pumps daily.......

bush has taken his party down the sewer for no good reason, he will
spend the last 2 years of his term being investigated with a fine tooth
comb.

king bush is about to be dethroned..........

In article .com, " wrote:


king bush is about to be dethroned..........

How do you figure that? He's not running for re-election... he can't.

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.

"Doug Miller" wrote in message
.. .
In article .com,
" wrote:


king bush is about to be dethroned..........

How do you figure that? He's not running for re-election... he can't.

But he can be impeached.

Bob

In article ,
"Bob F" wrote:

"Doug Miller" wrote in message
.. .
In article .com,
" wrote:


king bush is about to be dethroned..........

How do you figure that? He's not running for re-election... he can't.

But he can be impeached.

He won't be. The Dems learned not use that willie nillie (so to speak)
when the GOP went after Clinton. Especially since there is no way they
are going to get conviction.Dems aren't going to shoot themselves in the
foot for the next pres election by doing anything that dumb.. well
maybe.

Bob F wrote:

But he can be impeached.

And make Cheney president?
Why?

wrote:

Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.
Hmmm,
How about yourself?

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 05:04:41 -0500,
wrote:

Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.


Ok and save one bomb for N. Korea too.

Bombs wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 05:04:41 -0500,
wrote:

Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

Ok and save one bomb for N. Korea too.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
..
A slightly different viewpoint folks.

Few really think that this 'Shoot first. Ask afterwards'. Blow
everything to bits approach will solve anything.

And for those who even mutter 'Pre-emptive strike', think! Japan tried
that and look what happened? Hitler too when he tried to take on all
Europe, Britain Russia.

Britain really appreciated US help then; and the US inspired and
far-seeing Marshall Plan after WWII helped rebuild shattered countries
which now, more or less, despite two generations later, are allies of
the USA.

Isn't it odd that today the most heavily armed (and nuclear equipped)
country in the world; with weapons that can be deployed for thousand of
miles can be so easily targeted by the simplest of weapons?

viz.

US scheduled airline planes loaded and fuelled in the US flown across
the US by non-professional pilots briefly trained at US air schools!
Nothing intercontinental or nuclear about that!
And how long was it before those multi million dollar jet fighters were
scrambled; and if they were what was the plan?

A hole blown in the side of a warship and 17 US servicemen killed! By a
single simple boat?

IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices) that seemingly have replaced WMDs
and explosive filled vehicles have killed how many in Afghanistan and
Iraq?

US Marine barracks blown up ...... etc. etc. by a truck/car bomb.

Huge miltary and civilian losses in Iraq from guerilla tactics.

And then we have the stupid Abou Greib scandal etc. Things which in our
more open societies must be investigated, reported and cured. But which
merely help to propagandise that our 'Western' societies are bad and
corrupt and do not respect an individual's rights!

Although things such as Enron, Sen. Foley's behaviour and publicity
seeking 'stars' prancing around flaunting their promiscuities in public
in front of the paparazzi whenever there is an opportunity, don't help
either! At least many societies keep their indiscretions under wraps;
literally!

While US paranoia is to some extent undestandable; it reveals the need
to understand 'why' the USA is viewed so suspiciously in parts of the
world.

So it is not surprising that there a few outside the US who would say;
"Build those damn border fences around US" and 'Yankees stay home"!

Not that I agreee with that sentiment at all. A 'Fortress America'
(Them and us) attitude coupled with the idea we can swagger in
militarily anywhere we want or feel we need to, depreciates the value
and worth of all other human beings/nations.

World influence has always been assocated with 'economics' and trade
and organisation. At one time it was, say, the Romans. Later the
British Empire. More recently the US after wnning and strongly
influencing WWII. With, nowadays, China and India coming up strongly.

The Euro complex is also doing OK and expanding and the Japanese, not
too inscrutably, trade strongly, as they must due to the limited
natural resources of their islands.

Also many nations have survived over the centuries despite losses of
huge portions of their populations.

Think carefully; a death rate of only 10% of the US population would be
around 31 million souls. That's you, me maybe, your aunt, nieces,
nephews ................. children, grandchildren etc. And if the
conflict was nuclear in only a few US areas a significant percentage of
CONUS would be unusable/uninhabitable; for 10,000+ years? The Chernobyl
reactor accident would be insignificant by comparison!

Sermon ends! Lets all keep our heads! Now back to that schematic and
something practical and immediate .......

terry wrote:
Bombs wrote:

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 05:04:41 -0500,
wrote:


Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

Ok and save one bomb for N. Korea too.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
A slightly different viewpoint folks.

Few really think that this 'Shoot first. Ask afterwards'. Blow
everything to bits approach will solve anything.

And for those who even mutter 'Pre-emptive strike', think! Japan tried
that and look what happened? Hitler too when he tried to take on all
Europe, Britain Russia.

Britain really appreciated US help then; and the US inspired and
far-seeing Marshall Plan after WWII helped rebuild shattered countries
which now, more or less, despite two generations later, are allies of
the USA.

Isn't it odd that today the most heavily armed (and nuclear equipped)
country in the world; with weapons that can be deployed for thousand of
miles can be so easily targeted by the simplest of weapons?

viz.

US scheduled airline planes loaded and fuelled in the US flown across
the US by non-professional pilots briefly trained at US air schools!
Nothing intercontinental or nuclear about that!
And how long was it before those multi million dollar jet fighters were
scrambled; and if they were what was the plan?

A hole blown in the side of a warship and 17 US servicemen killed! By a
single simple boat?

IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices) that seemingly have replaced WMDs
and explosive filled vehicles have killed how many in Afghanistan and
Iraq?

US Marine barracks blown up ...... etc. etc. by a truck/car bomb.

Huge miltary and civilian losses in Iraq from guerilla tactics.

And then we have the stupid Abou Greib scandal etc. Things which in our
more open societies must be investigated, reported and cured. But which
merely help to propagandise that our 'Western' societies are bad and
corrupt and do not respect an individual's rights!

Although things such as Enron, Sen. Foley's behaviour and publicity
seeking 'stars' prancing around flaunting their promiscuities in public
in front of the paparazzi whenever there is an opportunity, don't help
either! At least many societies keep their indiscretions under wraps;
literally!

While US paranoia is to some extent undestandable; it reveals the need
to understand 'why' the USA is viewed so suspiciously in parts of the
world.

So it is not surprising that there a few outside the US who would say;
"Build those damn border fences around US" and 'Yankees stay home"!

Not that I agreee with that sentiment at all. A 'Fortress America'
(Them and us) attitude coupled with the idea we can swagger in
militarily anywhere we want or feel we need to, depreciates the value
and worth of all other human beings/nations.

World influence has always been assocated with 'economics' and trade
and organisation. At one time it was, say, the Romans. Later the
British Empire. More recently the US after wnning and strongly
influencing WWII. With, nowadays, China and India coming up strongly.

The Euro complex is also doing OK and expanding and the Japanese, not
too inscrutably, trade strongly, as they must due to the limited
natural resources of their islands.

Also many nations have survived over the centuries despite losses of
huge portions of their populations.

Think carefully; a death rate of only 10% of the US population would be
around 31 million souls. That's you, me maybe, your aunt, nieces,
nephews ................. children, grandchildren etc. And if the
conflict was nuclear in only a few US areas a significant percentage of
CONUS would be unusable/uninhabitable; for 10,000+ years? The Chernobyl
reactor accident would be insignificant by comparison!

Sermon ends! Lets all keep our heads! Now back to that schematic and
something practical and immediate .......

Well said Terry.

.
A slightly different viewpoint folks.

Few really think that this 'Shoot first. Ask afterwards'. Blow
everything to bits approach will solve anything.

"Killing people never solves anything. But keeps them
out of your hair while you think about what to do."
--VLad Taltos. (Brust)
It would solve the immediate problem. The reaction of the REST
of the world might become an issue at that point, but the reaction
of the target country would cease to be of anything but academic
interest.

And for those who even mutter 'Pre-emptive strike', think! Japan tried
that and look what happened? Hitler too when he tried to take on all
Europe, Britain Russia.

Not an analogous situation. Japan didn't ever have the capacity
to actually conquer the the US. The best they could hope for
was driving us out of the pacific and back from the pacific seaboard,
and then good terms. The US *DOES* have the capacity to
completely destroy the long-range warmaking capacity of
any of the nations in question in fairly short order.
The US really DOES have the military and technological capacity
to actually kill well over 50% of the population of any
of the countries in question. What we lack is the wish to
do so.

Britain really appreciated US help then; and the US inspired and
far-seeing Marshall Plan after WWII helped rebuild shattered countries
which now, more or less, despite two generations later, are allies of
the USA.

WWII was a conflict between nation-states. This isn't.


much garbage deleted

A war of total annihalation doesn't leave
a lot of people left to drive truck bombs.


Also many nations have survived over the centuries despite losses of
huge portions of their populations.

And a lot of nations didn't. The utter destruction of
a people as a people isn't really all that hard, if you're
willing to do it. Timur the Lame managed it. The Romans
managed it. Arguably the catholic church managed it. The
Aztecs did a pretty good job, and there's not much left
of the cherokee nation as a geoplitical entity.

And in none of those cases did the destroying side have
the kind of technological and military advantage the US
has over, say, North Korea, or Iran.

Think carefully; a death rate of only 10% of the US population would be
around 31 million souls. That's you, me maybe, your aunt, nieces,
nephews ................. children, grandchildren etc. And if the
conflict was nuclear in only a few US areas a significant percentage of
CONUS would be unusable/uninhabitable; for 10,000+ years? The Chernobyl
reactor accident would be insignificant by comparison!

Sermon ends! Lets all keep our heads! Now back to that schematic and
something practical and immediate .......

Well said Terry.

Crap. There are a lot of reasons why a war of total annihalation
in the middle-east or southeast asia isn't a good idea, but that
it can't be made to work isn't one of them. Because it can.

--Goedjn

wrote in message
...
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

Why don't we just nuke ourselves? It would end all our problems with the
rest of the world.

Bob

wrote in message
...
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

It is ignorant people like you who compound the problem. Study. Read. You
DO know how to do that, don't you?

At least you will learn how thousands of people came to hate America because
of Shah Rezlah Pahlavi, Savak, etc.

They hate us because of the actions of our government. You know, the people
we, the citizens, sent to Washington. You DO vote, don't you? You DO
understand the process don't you?

No?

sigh ....................

Steve

In article 0Y9Zg.1641$BC6.662@fed1read01,
"Steve B" wrote:


At least you will learn how thousands of people came to hate America because
of Shah Rezlah Pahlavi, Savak, etc.
Someone got ****ed at the US over a vulcan in Starfleet? How
absurb.



They hate us because of the actions of our government. You know, the people
we, the citizens, sent to Washington. You DO vote, don't you? You DO
understand the process don't you?


Yeah. that is why they picked on Clinton by bombing the Cole,
and the two African embassies among others. They also did not like
Carter, etc. etc. etc.

"Kurt Ullman" wrote in message
...
In article 0Y9Zg.1641$BC6.662@fed1read01,
"Steve B" wrote:


At least you will learn how thousands of people came to hate America
because
of Shah Rezlah Pahlavi, Savak, etc.
Someone got ****ed at the US over a vulcan in Starfleet? How
absurb.



They hate us because of the actions of our government. You know, the
people
we, the citizens, sent to Washington. You DO vote, don't you? You DO
understand the process don't you?


Yeah. that is why they picked on Clinton by bombing the Cole,
and the two African embassies among others. They also did not like
Carter, etc. etc. etc.

It's a little longer term problem than that. As your grandchildren will
see from Bush's occupation of Iraq.

Bob

Neutron bomb so we can get the oil quicker. They think they'll find 99
virgins.Lets help em find out

wrote:
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 05:04:41 -0500,
wrote:

Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

Then they will HAVE to nuke New England (see the movie "Fail Safe").

Something like this eh?

http://www.grendelcat.com/nuggets/pi...ugpic00692.htm

--
Steve


wrote in message
...
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East. All those people want
to do is cause wars. Not a one of them are civilized. They are all
useless people and need to be destroyed. I say the US should just
nuke the entire middle east and end all the fighting and threats.

On Oct 17, 5:04 am, wrote:
Why dont we just nuke the entire Middle East.

Awh, come on, why would we want to do that -- camels need luvin' too...
snicker

As much as I would enjoy seeing the entire Middle East a pile of molten
slag, I think a more fitting solution might be to find a cheap
replacement for oil so that they could go back to being the POOR camel
****in' Bedoins that they have been throughout history (vs the rich
camel ****in' Bedoins that they are *now*)...

Of course, if we nuke 'em, we'll get bad PR and the rest of the world
won't like us anymore... Uhhhh... And that's different that their
feelings towards us now, exactly how? Hmmmm... Oh well, nukes are
cheap, let's get it a try...

On 17 Oct 2006 22:21:20 -0700, wrote:

s much as I would enjoy seeing the entire Middle East a pile of molten
slag, I think a more fitting solution might be to find a cheap
replacement for oil so that they could go back to being the POOR camel
****in' Bedoins

Bedouins (sort of French spelling. The Israelis call them "Bedu".

that they have been throughout history (vs the rich
camel ****in' Bedoins that they are *now*)..

Our fault for letting them send their "royal" sons to Harvard. g
THEN they found out what the oil was really worth to the West!

Hey, have I got a "cheap replacement" for you!

Hemp has been used for millennia, not only for clothing, ropes, sails,
tarps, etc.etc. The OIL from hemp seeds runs engines very well,
thank you! Why do you suppose environmental-minded consumers are
buying fuel from enterprises set up to recycle ****ing RESTAURANT
GREASE! While the oilionnaires running our govt try their best
to keep these outlets rare and isolated.

Hemp cannot be used to get high, like its cousin, marijuana.
But for nearly 100 years, U.S. drug policy (designed and passed
through Congress at the behest of the oil, tire, and automotive
industries) still outlaws it from being cultivated in the U.S.
Strong, durable Hemp clothing, e.g., has to be imported from Canada.

Your contributor is not a drug user of anything stronger than bread
and butter, so don't infer from the above that I am pushing pot.

I am merely suggesting that hemp, which grows like a weed on
the most inhospitable ground and reseeds itself prolifically, could be
a fantastic petroleum substitute on many engines/motors, if our govt
and those voters who are deluded by its propaganda, could get their
heads out of their ***.

Aspasia