SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

The Striped Shirts took 14 and possibly 21 points away from the Seattle
Seahawks early in the game.
The Superbowl may well have been a run away by the Seahawks had the
officiating been neutral!
Myself and my brother were complaining about those calls during the game.
Those calls spoiled the game for us and we were neutral Superbowl
football fans!
I was a fan of both teams. Was the money on the game by relatives or
friends of the officials?

According to ESPN - RUNDOWN, the officials got 6 or 7 calls wrong that
all went against Seattle!
I video taped those ESPN comments!
That might be evidence of officiating bias! (?)

ESPN - "Around the Horn and the Rundown too," agreed with us! -
udarrell - Darrell

--
Free Dish Network Satellite System TV Certificate to promote your business opportunities! You can call your friends and give them the GIFT of a FREE SATELLITE TV SYSTEM. The Certificate number is good anywhere in the United States, and it is good as many times as anyone wants to give it! New Page Refresh or Reload it.
http://www.udarrell.com/free_dish_di...ellite_tv.html

"udarrell" wrote in message
...
SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

According to ESPN - RUNDOWN, the officials got 6 or 7 calls wrong that all
went against Seattle!
I video taped those ESPN comments!
That might be evidence of officiating bias! (?)

ESPN - "Around the Horn and the Rundown too," agreed with us! -
darrell - Darrell


Yeah, now there's an authoritative source-- ESPN commentators. Six ex-jock
Neanderthals with steroid-fried brains that haven't got 480 IQ points
between them ;-)

Edw.

Special Ed wrote:

"udarrell" wrote in message
...


SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

According to ESPN - RUNDOWN, the officials got 6 or 7 calls wrong that all
went against Seattle!
I video taped those ESPN comments!
That might be evidence of officiating bias! (?)

ESPN - "Around the Horn and the Rundown too," agreed with us! -
darrell - Darrell



Yeah, now there's an authoritative source-- ESPN commentators. Six ex-jock
Neanderthals with steroid-fried brains that haven't got 480 IQ points
between them ;-) Edw.


There is general consensus among many news sources and others within
football circles concerning the wrongful biased Superbowl officiating calls.
What happened was criminal! I was neutral, but can not stand it when a
game is taken away from any team in football, basketball, or you name
the sport!
- udarrell - Darrell

--
Free Dish Network Satellite System TV Certificate to promote your business opportunities! You can call your friends and give them the GIFT of a FREE SATELLITE TV SYSTEM. The Certificate number is good anywhere in the United States, and it is good as many times as anyone wants to give it! New Page Refresh or Reload it.
http://www.udarrell.com/free_dish_di...ellite_tv.html

"udarrell" wrote in message
...
Special Ed wrote:

"udarrell" wrote in message
...

SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

According to ESPN - RUNDOWN, the officials got 6 or 7 calls wrong that
all went against Seattle!
I video taped those ESPN comments!
That might be evidence of officiating bias! (?)

ESPN - "Around the Horn and the Rundown too," agreed with us! -
arrell - Darrell


Yeah, now there's an authoritative source-- ESPN commentators. Six ex-jock
Neanderthals with steroid-fried brains that haven't got 480 IQ points
between them ;-) Edw.
There is general consensus among many news sources and others within
football circles concerning the wrongful biased Superbowl officiating
calls.
What happened was criminal! I was neutral, but can not stand it when a
game is taken away from any team in football, basketball, or you name the
sport!
- udarrell - Darrell


That may be so-- but your post cited the ESPN knuckleheads...

Edw.

udarrell, 2/7/2006,5:48:39 PM, wrote:

SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

Any person who plays sports accepts the element of bad calls or bad
luck as part of the game. The same can be said for good luck and good
calls. In the end those things even out for all involved. Another
aspect to consider is perhaps there were calls that went their way to
get them all the way to the Super Bowl. Did you even consider that?

I am not a fan of either team. I like the Redskins and may have even
favored the Seahawks to win since they beat the Redskins. But the
better teams find a way to shake off bad calls and make things happen
on their own.

Maybe if the Seahawks had taken advantage of the opportunities they did
have (like the goal line interception they gave up) then the story may
have been different. The many dropped passes, abandoned running game,
poor clock management, and bad call playing ultimately doomed Seattle.
So stop acting like a poor loser and put the blame of the loss where it
belongs -- on the Seattle Seahawks themselves.

I am a Steeler's fan.

But the officials made mistakes.

They were not "bad calls", but plain and simple mistakes. They got it
WRONG.

My team won, but they had the officials on their side.

Seattle did not get a fair shake from the officials, and I think some
investigating needs to be done.

The whole event was tainted by bad officiating. Someone mustn't care, or
they must have a big money interest in who wins.

Know whut ah mean, Vern?

Steve

"badgolferman" wrote in message
...
udarrell, 2/7/2006,5:48:39 PM, wrote:

SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

Any person who plays sports accepts the element of bad calls or bad
luck as part of the game. The same can be said for good luck and good
calls. In the end those things even out for all involved. Another
aspect to consider is perhaps there were calls that went their way to
get them all the way to the Super Bowl. Did you even consider that?

I am not a fan of either team. I like the Redskins and may have even
favored the Seahawks to win since they beat the Redskins. But the
better teams find a way to shake off bad calls and make things happen
on their own.

Maybe if the Seahawks had taken advantage of the opportunities they did
have (like the goal line interception they gave up) then the story may
have been different. The many dropped passes, abandoned running game,
poor clock management, and bad call playing ultimately doomed Seattle.
So stop acting like a poor loser and put the blame of the loss where it
belongs -- on the Seattle Seahawks themselves.

You, sir are a moron who must have not watched the game. Anyone who watched
the game (even the blind) could have seen that Seattle was robbed of a lot
of points by bad officiating.

Yes, there are all kinds of questionable calls that happen all year. But
when you get to the end, you expect everything to be the best. They have
all manner of replays from every angle, so there is no reason NOT to get it
right.

And yet they got it wrong. I was for Pittsburgh, but I wanted them to win
fair and square.

They didn't.

And how do you "shake off" having that many points shaved from your team's
score?

Steve

badgolferman wrote:

udarrell, 2/7/2006,5:48:39 PM, wrote:



SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!



Any person who plays sports accepts the element of bad calls or bad
luck as part of the game. The same can be said for good luck and good
calls. In the end those things even out for all involved. Another
aspect to consider is perhaps there were calls that went their way to
get them all the way to the Super Bowl. Did you even consider that?

I am not a fan of either team. I like the Redskins and may have even
favored the Seahawks to win since they beat the Redskins. But the
better teams find a way to shake off bad calls and make things happen
on their own.

Maybe if the Seahawks had taken advantage of the opportunities they did
have (like the goal line interception they gave up) then the story may
have been different. The many dropped passes, abandoned running game,
poor clock management, and bad call playing ultimately doomed Seattle.
So stop acting like a poor loser and put the blame of the loss where it
belongs -- on the Seattle Seahawks themselves.


Sorry but that old alibi won't fly.
Like many on ESPN said, the Seahawks might have been up by 21 points
early, and the Steeler' QB admitted he was scared throughout the whole game.
That lead would have tanked the Steelers'.
The Steeler's were emotionally down when the bad holding call, that took
away the first and goal for another increased scoring lead.
The Seahawks were controlling the game and out play the Steelers' by a
country mile in the first Quarter.
I believe, a big halftime lead by the Seahawks would have put the
Steeler's in a mistake ridden second half. - udarrell

--
Free Dish Network Satellite System TV Certificate to promote your business opportunities! You can call your friends and give them the GIFT of a FREE SATELLITE TV SYSTEM. The Certificate number is good anywhere in the United States, and it is good as many times as anyone wants to give it! New Page Refresh or Reload it.
http://www.udarrell.com/free_dish_di...ellite_tv.html

In article , udarrell wrote:
SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

The Striped Shirts took 14 and possibly 21 points away from the Seattle
Seahawks early in the game.

It's only a game. Your boys lost. So what? Life goes on. Get over it.

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.

Face it!

You are a whiney Seahawks fan that can't stand to lose.

The outcome of the game will not change no matter how much you **** and moan
so shut the **** up.....



"udarrell" wrote in message
...
SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

The Striped Shirts took 14 and possibly 21 points away from the Seattle
Seahawks early in the game.
The Superbowl may well have been a run away by the Seahawks had the
officiating been neutral!
Myself and my brother were complaining about those calls during the game.
Those calls spoiled the game for us and we were neutral Superbowl football
fans!
I was a fan of both teams. Was the money on the game by relatives or
friends of the officials?

According to ESPN - RUNDOWN, the officials got 6 or 7 calls wrong that all
went against Seattle!
I video taped those ESPN comments!
That might be evidence of officiating bias! (?)

ESPN - "Around the Horn and the Rundown too," agreed with us! -
darrell - Darrell

--
Free Dish Network Satellite System TV Certificate to promote your business
opportunities! You can call your friends and give them the GIFT of a FREE
SATELLITE TV SYSTEM. The Certificate number is good anywhere in the United
States, and it is good as many times as anyone wants to give it! New Page
Refresh or Reload it.
http://www.udarrell.com/free_dish_di...ellite_tv.html

Holding call was questionable, Ben's rushing td was ?-able, below-the
belt block by Seattle was wrong.

That interference call on Seattle was perfect, the receiver got a clear
advantage in getting to the ball and in preventing the Pittsburgh guy
from getting there. Freaking obvious.

I expected a lot more out of Seattle !

On 07 Feb 2006 23:43:44 GMT, "badgolferman"
wrote:

udarrell, 2/7/2006,5:48:39 PM, wrote:

SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

Any person who plays sports accepts the element of bad calls or bad
luck as part of the game. The same can be said for good luck and good
calls. In the end those things even out for all involved. Another
aspect to consider is perhaps there were calls that went their way to
get them all the way to the Super Bowl. Did you even consider that?

I am not a fan of either team. I like the Redskins and may have even
favored the Seahawks to win since they beat the Redskins. But the
better teams find a way to shake off bad calls and make things happen
on their own.

Maybe if the Seahawks had taken advantage of the opportunities they did
have (like the goal line interception they gave up) then the story may
have been different. The many dropped passes, abandoned running game,
poor clock management, and bad call playing ultimately doomed Seattle.
So stop acting like a poor loser and put the blame of the loss where it
belongs -- on the Seattle Seahawks themselves.


I agree!



.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

udarrell, 2/7/2006,7:07:02 PM, wrote:

badgolferman wrote:

udarrell, 2/7/2006,5:48:39 PM, wrote:


SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against
the Seahawks!


Any person who plays sports accepts the element of bad calls or bad
luck as part of the game. The same can be said for good luck and
good calls. In the end those things even out for all involved.
Another aspect to consider is perhaps there were calls that went
their way to get them all the way to the Super Bowl. Did you even
consider that?

I am not a fan of either team. I like the Redskins and may have
even favored the Seahawks to win since they beat the Redskins. But
the better teams find a way to shake off bad calls and make things
happen on their own.

Maybe if the Seahawks had taken advantage of the opportunities they
did have (like the goal line interception they gave up) then the
story may have been different. The many dropped passes, abandoned
running game, poor clock management, and bad call playing
ultimately doomed Seattle. So stop acting like a poor loser and
put the blame of the loss where it belongs -- on the Seattle
Seahawks themselves.

Sorry but that old alibi won't fly.
Like many on ESPN said, the Seahawks might have been up by 21 points
early, and the Steeler' QB admitted he was scared throughout the
whole game. That lead would have tanked the Steelers'. The
Steeler's were emotionally down when the bad holding call, that took
away the first and goal for another increased scoring lead. The
Seahawks were controlling the game and out play the Steelers' by a
country mile in the first Quarter. I believe, a big halftime lead by
the Seahawks would have put the Steeler's in a mistake ridden second
half. - udarrell

If, if, if, if...

--
“An honest politician is one who, when he is bought, will stay bought.”
~ Simon Cameron

"udarrell" wrote in message Sorry but that old
alibi won't fly.
Like many on ESPN said, the Seahawks might have been up by 21 points
early, and the Steeler' QB admitted he was scared throughout the whole
game.
That lead would have tanked the Steelers'.
The Steeler's were emotionally down when the bad holding call, that took
away the first and goal for another increased scoring lead.
The Seahawks were controlling the game and out play the Steelers' by a
country mile in the first Quarter.
I believe, a big halftime lead by the Seahawks would have put the
Steeler's in a mistake ridden second half. - udarrell

So what calls were wrong?? The Seahawks receiver obviously pushed off. That
is a penalty. Roethlisberger may or may not have gotten the ball past the
goal line. On my 61 inch TV it appeared that the ball was just barely over
the front of the white on the goal line. Either way there was no conclusive
evidence to overturn it. The Seahawks receiver's right foot was obviously
out of bounds. The holding call was tough to see but how can you slow some
down from behind without holding. Probably the worst call was the call on
Hasselback for a block at the knees. He was just a quarterback trying to
make a tackle. Many of the calls could have gone either way, but none were
out and out blown calls. The Steelers had to fight through much worse calls
to beat the Colts. The Seahawks did outplay the Steelers for most of the
game, but the Steelers made the plays to score the points. Last time I
checked that's how you win.

udarrell wrote:
SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

The Striped Shirts took 14 and possibly 21 points away from the Seattle
Seahawks early in the game.
The Superbowl may well have been a run away by the Seahawks had the
officiating been neutral!
Myself and my brother were complaining about those calls during the game.
Those calls spoiled the game for us and we were neutral Superbowl
football fans!
I was a fan of both teams. Was the money on the game by relatives or
friends of the officials?

According to ESPN - RUNDOWN, the officials got 6 or 7 calls wrong that
all went against Seattle!
I video taped those ESPN comments!
That might be evidence of officiating bias! (?)

Just replace the washer and tighten those screws a little tighter and
that should stop the leak.
..
..
..
..
...
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..

The leak from your eyes called, tears, you f****ing crybaby.

Steve B, 2/7/2006,6:55:42 PM, wrote:


"badgolferman" wrote in message
...
udarrell, 2/7/2006,5:48:39 PM, wrote:

SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against
the Seahawks!

Any person who plays sports accepts the element of bad calls or bad
luck as part of the game. The same can be said for good luck and
good calls. In the end those things even out for all involved.
Another aspect to consider is perhaps there were calls that went
their way to get them all the way to the Super Bowl. Did you even
consider that?

I am not a fan of either team. I like the Redskins and may have
even favored the Seahawks to win since they beat the Redskins. But
the better teams find a way to shake off bad calls and make things
happen on their own.

Maybe if the Seahawks had taken advantage of the opportunities they
did have (like the goal line interception they gave up) then the
story may have been different. The many dropped passes, abandoned
running game, poor clock management, and bad call playing
ultimately doomed Seattle. So stop acting like a poor loser and
put the blame of the loss where it belongs -- on the Seattle
Seahawks themselves.

You, sir are a moron who must have not watched the game. Anyone who
watched the game (even the blind) could have seen that Seattle was
robbed of a lot of points by bad officiating.

Yes, there are all kinds of questionable calls that happen all year.
But when you get to the end, you expect everything to be the best.
They have all manner of replays from every angle, so there is no
reason NOT to get it right.

And yet they got it wrong. I was for Pittsburgh, but I wanted them
to win fair and square.

They didn't.

And how do you "shake off" having that many points shaved from your
team's score?

Steve

How do you explain the fumble by the Seahawk receiver and recovered by
Steeler 43 that was called an incomplete pass? That was clearly a
fumble that would have put the game away sooner.

The first touchdown by Pittsburgh? It was too close to overrule since
there was no irrefutable evidence to show he hadn't crossed the white
line.

The phantom holding calls? The blocking below the knees by Hasselbeck?
The pass interference by Jackson? Those were all calls not reviewable
by the referee.

In the beginning, middle, and end of the game there were all sorts of
indications the Seahawks were out of sync and they blew whatever
chances they had to take over the game. Holmgren put the game on
Hasselbeck's shoulders and almost forgot about Alexander. When he did
use him the fella produced yardage for him.

Your sense of guilt will not make up for the lousy game Sunday night.
The team that deserved to win did just that. There was no conspiracy
by the officials and the NFL to make people feel good for the Steelers
and all their subplots. The only conspiracy lies in the sports media
trying to ensure their ratings remain high by playing up those calls.
If it wasn't those calls it would have been some other thing they would
have harped on for weeks.

Oh, I did watch the game.

--
"No poor ******* ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by
making other *******s die for their country." ~ George Smith Patton

"Doug Anderson" wrote in message
news:EYcGf.29291$H43.13178@trnddc08...

Roethlisberger may or may not have gotten the ball past the goal line.


David Letterman asked Roethlisberger on his show last night if he thought
the ball actually crossed the line, Roethlisberger replied, truthfully no.

It looked to me as if the ball was momentarily on the ground and he lifted
up for a second last stab and it just barley broke the line. I didn't have
any real favorites but thought the officiating to be as bad as I ever saw,
not what I would expect for a game as important as this. RM~

Doug Anderson wrote:

"udarrell" wrote in message Sorry but that old
alibi won't fly.


Like many on ESPN said, the Seahawks might have been up by 21 points
early, and the Steeler' QB admitted he was scared throughout the whole
game.
That lead would have tanked the Steelers'.
The Steeler's were emotionally down when the bad holding call, that took
away the first and goal for another increased scoring lead.
The Seahawks were controlling the game and out play the Steelers' by a
country mile in the first Quarter.
I believe, a big halftime lead by the Seahawks would have put the
Steeler's in a mistake ridden second half. - udarrell



So what calls were wrong?? The Seahawks receiver obviously pushed off. That
is a penalty.

Wrong, when the QB is out of the pocket it is NOT a penalty. According
to the TV reporters that was NOT an infraction of the rules. We need a
copy of the NFL Rules. http://www.nfl.com/features/rulebook Click and
study the NFL Rules concerning penalties. - udarrell.com
1

Roethlisberger may or may not have gotten the ball past the
goal line. On my 61 inch TV it appeared that the ball was just barely over
the front of the white on the goal line. Either way there was no conclusive
evidence to overturn it.

From the sidelines the official could NOT have positively determined
that the football touched the goal line.
Therefore, he would be required to spot the ball short, if the review
provided positive evidence then the call could be overturned.
There was no positive evidence, and the announcers said he ran in to
spot the ball and when Roethlisberger moved it from a foot or more short
to over the line the official then called it a touchdown. Hasselbeck
would NOT have gotten a TD called on that identical play by those officials.
The reporters said there were 6 or 7 wrong calls all against the Seahawks.
There were 7 penalties on the Seahawks for 70 yards and only 3 penalties
on the Steelers for I believe it was 30 yards. Check the season record
of Seahawks' verses the Steelers' regarding penalties. any of the
penalties took points away from the Seahawks.

The Seahawks receiver's right foot was obviously
out of bounds. The holding call was tough to see but how can you slow some
down from behind without holding. Probably the worst call was the call on
Hasselback for a block at the knees. He was just a quarterback trying to
make a tackle. Many of the calls could have gone either way, but none were
out and out blown calls. The Steelers had to fight through much worse calls
to beat the Colts. The Seahawks did outplay the Steelers for most of the
game, but the Steelers made the plays to score the points. Last time I
checked that's how you win.


Wrong on all counts. The announcers including Hall of Fame John Madden,
even stated on the holding replay that they saw NO holding to call.
They know how the rules read on these penalty calls.
The block on the knees is nullified because he was in the process of a
tackle on the ball carrier; again verified by the game announcers.
The Seahawks could very well have been up at least 21 points by halftime
instead of being down by four. Some announcers on ESPN said it might
have been a blow out for the Seahawks if the bad calls had not been made
on key Seahawk plays.
I did not care which team won, but bad officiating just might be a
crime, only a thorough investigation could reveal that! - udarrell

--
Free Dish Network Satellite System TV Certificate to promote your business opportunities! You can call your friends and give them the GIFT of a FREE SATELLITE TV SYSTEM. The Certificate number is good anywhere in the United States, and it is good as many times as anyone wants to give it! New Page Refresh or Reload it.
http://www.udarrell.com/free_dish_di...ellite_tv.html

On 08 Feb 2006 02:58:36 GMT, "badgolferman"
wrote:



The first touchdown by Pittsburgh? It was too close to overrule since
there was no irrefutable evidence to show he hadn't crossed the white
line.

I thought that one was clear. While the ball was short of the line
when the player got up, before that the ball was over the first edge
of the white line. It only has to pass the plane that arises
vertically from the inside edge of the goal line, and on the
videotape, it certainly did.


Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let
me know if you have posted also.

Doug Miller wrote:

In article , udarrell wrote:


SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

The Striped Shirts took 14 and possibly 21 points away from the Seattle
Seahawks early in the game.



It's only a game. Your boys lost. So what? Life goes on. Get over it.


There was also a ton of money bet on this Superbowl game, and that also
calls for a thorough investigation of why there were so many bad calls
that literally turned the game around so that the Steelers' could win. -
udarrell

--
Free Dish Network Satellite System TV Certificate to promote your business opportunities! You can call your friends and give them the GIFT of a FREE SATELLITE TV SYSTEM. The Certificate number is good anywhere in the United States, and it is good as many times as anyone wants to give it! New Page Refresh or Reload it.
http://www.udarrell.com/free_dish_di...ellite_tv.html

If I have the teams backwards, please reverse them:

I did wonder about the Seahawks 74 yard return on the interception
right near the goal line.

A Pittsburgh player was close to him after he was 60 or 70 yards down,
and a Seahawk player just pushed him from behind on his shoulders and
knocked him down. How is that legal?

(Another Pittsburgh player tackled the guy and a couple plays later,
Seattle scored, so it didn't affect the score, but how was it legal to
push him from behind???

Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let
me know if you have posted also.

Ron wrote:

udarrell wrote:


SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

The Striped Shirts took 14 and possibly 21 points away from the Seattle
Seahawks early in the game.
The Superbowl may well have been a run away by the Seahawks had the
officiating been neutral!
Myself and my brother were complaining about those calls during the game.
Those calls spoiled the game for us and we were neutral Superbowl
football fans!
I was a fan of both teams. Was the money on the game by relatives or
friends of the officials?

According to ESPN - RUNDOWN, the officials got 6 or 7 calls wrong that
all went against Seattle!
I video taped those ESPN comments!
That might be evidence of officiating bias! (?)



Just replace the washer and tighten those screws a little tighter and
that should stop the leak.

The leak from your eyes called, tears, you f****ing crybaby.


Cool it man, -- I did NOT care who won that game! I have always been a
Steeler fan from the years back when they legitimately won a sting of
Superbowls.
That was NOT a football game, that was an officiating farce. - udarrell

--
Free Dish Network Satellite System TV Certificate to promote your business opportunities! You can call your friends and give them the GIFT of a FREE SATELLITE TV SYSTEM. The Certificate number is good anywhere in the United States, and it is good as many times as anyone wants to give it! New Page Refresh or Reload it.
http://www.udarrell.com/free_dish_di...ellite_tv.html

"udarrell" wrote

Cool it man, -- I did NOT care who won that game! I have always been a
Steeler fan from the years back when they legitimately won a sting of
Superbowls.

Then shut......the.......****.....up!

"udarrell" wrote

There was also a ton of money bet on this Superbowl game, and that also
calls for a thorough investigation of why there were so many bad calls
that literally turned the game around so that the Steelers' could win. -
udarrell

So THERE'S the rub!!

You are such a big Steeler's fan that you bet against them and LOST
MONEY!!!!

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!! CALL THE POLICE! THE REFS CHEATED!!!!!

me tarzan, udarrell

udarrell, 2/8/2006,2:32:12 AM, wrote:

Doug Miller wrote:

In article , udarrell
wrote:

SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against
the Seahawks!

The Striped Shirts took 14 and possibly 21 points away from the
Seattle Seahawks early in the game.


It's only a game. Your boys lost. So what? Life goes on. Get over
it.

There was also a ton of money bet on this Superbowl game, and that
also calls for a thorough investigation of why there were so many bad
calls that literally turned the game around so that the Steelers'
could win. - udarrell

That is definetly not a good reason to have an investigation. The NFL
does not condone gambling and the greedy suckers who bet against
bookies have no recourse but to learn from this game that gambling is
risky and you have to accept bad luck sometimes.

--
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who
are willing to work and give to those who would not." ~ Thomas Jefferson

In article , udarrell wrote:
Doug Miller wrote:

In article , udarrell
wrote:


SUPERBOWL OFFICIALS 21 SEAHAWKS 10 - Six or 7 Wrong Calls Against the
Seahawks!

The Striped Shirts took 14 and possibly 21 points away from the Seattle
Seahawks early in the game.



It's only a game. Your boys lost. So what? Life goes on. Get over it.


There was also a ton of money bet on this Superbowl game, and that also
calls for a thorough investigation of why there were so many bad calls
that literally turned the game around so that the Steelers' could win. -

It's only a game. Your boys lost. So what? Life goes on. Get over it.
udarrell


--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.

Red Neckerson wrote:

"udarrell" wrote


Cool it man, -- I did NOT care who won that game! I have always been a
Steeler fan from the years back when they legitimately won a sting of
Superbowls.



Then shut......the.......****.....up!

You need to accept the bad officiating reality and accept that there are
fans that want a fair and level officiating playing field.

If officiating is going to make NFL games a farce, then why watch them,
the games become totally meaningless!
Ask ABC announcer John Madden and others that know the game and the
rules and when penalties should and should not be called.

The better executing team got whipped by the officiating, and in my book
that is NOT okay.
I want the best team on the field to win, it appears you simply want
your team to win no matter how one-sided the officiating is.
However, they did NOT win on a level playing field they needed to
consistent bad calls of the officiating.
The officiating mess needs cleaning up according to most sports
broadcasters. - udarrell

--
Free Dish Network Satellite System TV Certificate to promote your business opportunities! You can call your friends and give them the GIFT of a FREE SATELLITE TV SYSTEM. The Certificate number is good anywhere in the United States, and it is good as many times as anyone wants to give it! New Page Refresh or Reload it.
http://www.udarrell.com/free_dish_di...ellite_tv.html

udarrell, 2/8/2006, 11:52:43 AM, wrote:

The officiating mess needs cleaning up according to most sports
broadcasters. - udarrell

Stop having sports broadcasters tell you what to think. Use your own
common sense and experiences.

On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:28:09 -0600, udarrell
wrote:


Roethlisberger may or may not have gotten the ball past the
goal line. On my 61 inch TV it appeared that the ball was just barely over
the front of the white on the goal line. Either way there was no conclusive
evidence to overturn it.

From the sidelines the official could NOT have positively determined
that the football touched the goal line.

It doesn't have to touch the goal line. It has to cross the plane of
the goal line, and that was visible from where the ref was, before he
finished reaching the ground.

Therefore, he would be required to spot the ball short, if the review

No. He saw that they had scored.

provided positive evidence then the call could be overturned.
There was no positive evidence, and the announcers said he ran in to
spot the ball and when Roethlisberger moved it from a foot or more short
to over the line the official then called it a touchdown. Hasselbeck
would NOT have gotten a TD called on that identical play by those officials.
The reporters said there were 6 or 7 wrong calls all against the Seahawks.
There were 7 penalties on the Seahawks for 70 yards and only 3 penalties
on the Steelers for I believe it was 30 yards. Check the season record
of Seahawks' verses the Steelers' regarding penalties. any of the
penalties took points away from the Seahawks.


Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let
me know if you have posted also.

badgolferman wrote:

udarrell, 2/8/2006, 11:52:43 AM, wrote:


The officiating mess needs cleaning up according to most sports
broadcasters. - udarrell



Stop having sports broadcasters tell you what to think. Use your own
common sense and experiences.


Nobody tells me what to think! No one else's opinion influences me.
Ask anyone that knows me. No use wasting time watching a "meaningless"
poorly officiated game!
- udarrell - udarrell.com

--
Free Dish Network Satellite System TV Certificate to promote your business opportunities! You can call your friends and give them the GIFT of a FREE SATELLITE TV SYSTEM. The Certificate number is good anywhere in the United States, and it is good as many times as anyone wants to give it! New Page Refresh or Reload it.
http://www.udarrell.com/free_dish_di...ellite_tv.html

"udarrell" wrote

Nobody tells me what to think! No one else's opinion influences me.
Ask anyone that knows me. No use wasting time watching a "meaningless"
poorly officiated game!

Yet you waste time arguing about it on here???!!!

****ing loser.


I'm not telling you what to think. Just DO this:

Shut the **** up......

Red Neckerson wrote:

"udarrell" wrote


Nobody tells me what to think! No one else's opinion influences me.
Ask anyone that knows me. No use wasting time watching a "meaningless"
poorly officiated game!



Yet you waste time arguing about it on here???!!!
****ing loser.
I'm not telling you what to think. Just DO this:
Shut the **** up......


The Seahawks did NOT lose, nor did I, nor did the Steelers' win! I know
that is sad but it is a reality you can not change.
I did not mean to hurt your feeling Red, all I want is for the better
playing team to be allowed to make their first downs and touch downs.
I guess that is just too much to ask, huh? Nobody tells me what to do or
think! - udarrell

--
Free Dish Network Satellite System TV Certificate to promote your business opportunities! You can call your friends and give them the GIFT of a FREE SATELLITE TV SYSTEM. The Certificate number is good anywhere in the United States, and it is good as many times as anyone wants to give it! Get your Local Network Stations, too.
http://www.udarrell.com/free_dish_di...ellite_tv.html

"Doug Miller" wrote in message
om...
In article , udarrell
wrote:


The Seahawks did NOT lose, nor did I, nor did the Steelers' win! I know
that is sad but it is a reality you can not change.

Get over it already. It's just a game. It's not life.

Yeah, I'll agree with you on that. It's as bad as people who say Bush stole
the last election: You don't have to like it, but all the bitching in the
world isn't going to change it.

When in doubt, listen to Don Henley, (Eagles musical group)

"Get Over It."

Maybe you can get a spot on Oprah or Dr. Phil.

Steve