Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to alt.politics,misc.consumers.house,soc.rights.human
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower income bracketsunder passive surveillance?
Ever notice that most apartment buildings have managers and that they
come in to do inspections, repairs, etc. Notice also that most people who have to rent are usually in the lower income brackets? The gov't raising property taxes and values over the past century are part of the reason why home prices are so high. Is something built years ago which is little more than a pile of wood otherwise really worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars or even the 10s of thousands that they go for? What about the land that no human had any hand in creating? I don't usually wear the in foil hat but I smell a rat here |
#2
Posted to alt.politics,misc.consumers.house,soc.rights.human,misc.consumers.house.homeowner-assn
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower incomebrackets under passive surveillance?
On Jul 10, 3:20*pm, zeez wrote:
*Ever notice that most apartment buildings have managers and that they come in to do inspections, repairs, etc. Notice also that most people who have to rent are usually in the lower income brackets? *The gov't raising property taxes and values over the past century are part of the reason why home prices are so high. Is something built years ago which is little more than a pile of wood otherwise really worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars or even the 10s of thousands that they go for? What about the land that no human had any hand in creating? I don't usually wear the in foil hat but I smell a rat here Come to think of it, most mcMansion development come with a homeowners association that encourages people to snitch on each other. Surveillance would be a tiny step after this, |
#3
Posted to alt.politics,misc.consumers.house,soc.rights.human
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower income brackets under passive surveillance?
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:20:18 -0700 (PDT), zeez
wrote: Ever notice that most apartment buildings have managers and that they come in to do inspections, repairs, etc. Notice also that most people who have to rent are usually in the lower income brackets? The gov't raising property taxes and values over the past century are part of the reason why home prices are so high. Home prices are pretty much at an all-time LOW. Do you have any idea what you're talking about? Is something built years ago which is little more than a pile of wood otherwise really worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars or even the 10s of thousands that they go for? Depends. I know of a quarter-acre nearby, the house was condemned years ago and had since collapsed on itself, and they wanted $400,000 for it but settled for $375,000. What about the land that no human had any hand in creating? I don't usually wear the in foil hat but I smell a rat here Just say "No" to drugs... |
#4
Posted to alt.politics,misc.consumers.house,soc.rights.human
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower incomebrackets under passive surveillance?
On Jul 10, 6:20*pm, zeez wrote:
*Ever notice that most apartment buildings have managers and that they come in to do inspections, repairs, etc. Notice also that most people who have to rent are usually in the lower income brackets? *The gov't raising property taxes and values over the past century are part of the reason why home prices are so high. Is something built years ago which is little more than a pile of wood otherwise really worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars or even the 10s of thousands that they go for? What about the land that no human had any hand in creating? I don't usually wear the in foil hat but I smell a rat here Housing prices are based on what people are willing to pay. People with money are willing to pay a lot for houses. Therefore, those piles of wood (or, in my case, concrete) are worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. This is usually called the "free market". Oh, and rising property taxes don't drive housing prices up. If anything, they drive housing prices down (a little), because people can afford less house if they have to pay more property tax. Go ahead, put on the tin foil hat. I think you need it. |
#5
Posted to alt.politics,misc.consumers.house,soc.rights.human
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower income brackets under passive surveillance?
"zeez" wrote in message ... Ever notice that most apartment buildings have managers and that they come in to do inspections, repairs, etc. No. I never had a manager come into my apartment either to do inspections, except when I was about to move out of the apartment. In which case they inspected the apartment to make sure I did not trash the place. And yes, one would hope that someone came into my apartment if I needed something that needed to be repaired, why wouldn't I want that to happen? Notice also that most people who have to rent are usually in the lower income brackets? Well yes. If you cannot buy a place of your own, you will be renting a place. What did you expect? And the poorer you are the less likely you are to be able to own a home. The gov't raising property taxes and values over the past century are part of the reason why home prices are so high. Well, yes. Property taxes is one way that governement gets the money that they want to spend. If they do not get it from property taxes, the will get it from some other source. Is something built years ago which is little more than a pile of wood otherwise really worth the hundreds of thousands of dollars or even the 10s of thousands that they go for? Its worth is dependent on what you can sell it for. What about the land that no human had any hand in creating? I don't usually wear the in foil hat but I smell a rat here So? We dd not create water or air either? |
#6
Posted to alt.politics,misc.consumers.house,soc.rights.human
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower income brackets under passive surveillance?
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:39:33 -1000, against all advice, something
compelled "Jerry Okamura" , to say: "zeez" wrote in message ... Ever notice that most apartment buildings have managers and that they come in to do inspections, repairs, etc. No. I never had a manager come into my apartment either to do inspections, except when I was about to move out of the apartment. In which case they inspected the apartment to make sure I did not trash the place. And yes, one would hope that someone came into my apartment if I needed something that needed to be repaired, why wouldn't I want that to happen? The one time I lived in a managed apartment complex, they gave twenty four hours notice and changed the air filters once a month. I imagine they had a quick look around at the same time. Notice also that most people who have to rent are usually in the lower income brackets? Well yes. If you cannot buy a place of your own, you will be renting a place. What did you expect? And the poorer you are the less likely you are to be able to own a home. It was transitional housing, as in when I transitioned from married to divorced. -- Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats. - Howard Aiken |
#7
Posted to alt.politics,misc.consumers.house,soc.rights.human
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower income brackets under passive surveillance?
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:53:24 -0700, Steve Daniels
wrote: On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:39:33 -1000, against all advice, something compelled "Jerry Okamura" , to say: "zeez" wrote in message ... Ever notice that most apartment buildings have managers and that they come in to do inspections, repairs, etc. No. I never had a manager come into my apartment either to do inspections, except when I was about to move out of the apartment. In which case they inspected the apartment to make sure I did not trash the place. And yes, one would hope that someone came into my apartment if I needed something that needed to be repaired, why wouldn't I want that to happen? The one time I lived in a managed apartment complex, they gave twenty four hours notice and changed the air filters once a month. I imagine they had a quick look around at the same time. Prpbably not. Their flunky probably didn't care enough. Notice also that most people who have to rent are usually in the lower income brackets? Well yes. If you cannot buy a place of your own, you will be renting a place. What did you expect? And the poorer you are the less likely you are to be able to own a home. It was transitional housing, as in when I transitioned from married to divorced. Well, you can't get much poorer than that. |
#8
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower income brackets under passive surveillance?
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:34:02 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
wrote: Housing prices are based on what people are willing to pay. People with money are willing to pay a lot for houses. Therefore, those piles of wood (or, in my case, concrete) are worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. No, it usually isn't people with money buying houses. It is people who can borrow money. If they had to pay the same money out of their own pockets, they would likely be a lot more careful about what was purchased. This is usually called the "free market". Oh, and rising property taxes don't drive housing prices up. If anything, they drive housing prices down (a little), because people can afford less house if they have to pay more property tax. Go ahead, put on the tin foil hat. I think you need it. |
#9
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower incomebrackets under passive surveillance?
On Jul 14, 10:22*pm, Chris Hill
wrote: On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:34:02 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton wrote: Housing prices are based on what people are willing to pay. *People with money are willing to pay a lot for houses. *Therefore, those piles of wood (or, in my case, concrete) are worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. No, it usually isn't people with money buying houses. *It is people who can borrow money. *If they had to pay the same money out of their own pockets, they would likely be a lot more careful about what was purchased. Typically, it's the same thing. Not so much lately, but it's always been the case that banks only lend money to people who have money. I have a mortgage. It is the same money (and more) out of my own pocket. We were quite careful each time we bought a house. (If only everyone were.) Still, there's no vast conspiracy to raise housing prices. Just the market at work. |
#10
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower income brackets under passive surveillance?
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
wrote: Typically, it's the same thing. Not so much lately, but it's always been the case that banks only lend money to people who have money. I have a mortgage. It is the same money (and more) out of my own pocket. We were quite careful each time we bought a house. (If only everyone were.) Not the same thing at all. Let's take a car example to make the point. If you were paying cash for a car, would you pay $1000 for a great stereo or would you say no way, the crummy am/fm will do just fine? When people can look at a feature as x dollars per month they get stupid. |
#11
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Are housing priced designed to keep those in lower incomebrackets under passive surveillance?
On Jul 15, 10:37*pm, Chris Hill
wrote: On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton wrote: Typically, it's the same thing. *Not so much lately, but it's always been the case that banks only lend money to people who have money. I have a mortgage. *It is the same money (and more) out of my own pocket. We were quite careful each time we bought a house. *(If only everyone were.) Not the same thing at all. *Let's take a car example to make the point. *If you were paying cash for a car, would you pay $1000 for a great stereo or would you say no way, the crummy am/fm will do just fine? *When people can look at a feature as x dollars per month they get stupid. It's the same thing. Suppose I'm looking at two different houses to buy. One is in a place where the taxes are 5 mills and the other 10 mills. I would not be able to afford as much house in the second place. If taxes were to jump suddenly while I was in the process of finding a house, then I wouldn't be able to afford as much house, either. I'd have to start looking at cheaper houses. Or, maybe people are just stupid. The bank was willing to lend me about twice what I felt comfortable borrowing. I'm sure many people would have taken the money and gotten into the McMansion instead of the 1200 square foot ranch. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Passive Housing | UK diy | |||
OT, lower priced nail gun recommendations | Metalworking |