Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Cable wiring
The house I'm living in has two cables that run from the outside wall
through the attic and into the living room and master bed room respectively. I'd like to add cable to three other bedrooms in the house. The question: Can I splice one of the cables within the attic, attach a four way cable splitter to it then run the wires (the fish tape aspect doesn't seem like fun but there is plenty of space in the attic so it seems doable) to the remaining bedrooms? Is it possible to estimate the signal loss going this route? I plan to run the 'in' from the outside wall to the 'in' on the splitter. then all four 'outs' will get routed to the four bedrooms. Thanks in advance |
#2
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Cable wiring
wrote...
The house I'm living in has two cables that run from the outside wall through the attic and into the living room and master bed room respectively. I'd like to add cable to three other bedrooms in the house. The question: Can I splice one of the cables within the attic, attach a four way cable splitter to it then run the wires (the fish tape aspect doesn't seem like fun but there is plenty of space in the attic so it seems doable) to the remaining bedrooms? Sure. That's what an installer might do. He might also do it outside the house, adding splitters as needed, and drill through the outside wall at each bedroom. Is it possible to estimate the signal loss going this route? I plan to run the 'in' from the outside wall to the 'in' on the splitter. then all four 'outs' will get routed to the four bedrooms. IIRC, the last cable installer told me about -7dBmV per splitter. If you have digital phone, that will suffer first, because it needs a cleaner signal. An in-line amplifier BEFORE the splitter may boost the signal enough to keep it clean if you need more. |
#3
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Cable wiring
The house I'm living in has two cables that run from the outside wall through the attic and into the living room and master bed room respectively. I'd like to add cable to three other bedrooms in the house. The question: Can I splice one of the cables within the attic, attach a four way cable splitter to it then run the wires (the fish tape aspect doesn't seem like fun but there is plenty of space in the attic so it seems doable) to the remaining bedrooms? Is it possible to estimate the signal loss going this route? I plan to run the 'in' from the outside wall to the 'in' on the splitter. then all four 'outs' will get routed to the four bedrooms. OK, you made me get my manual. The signal loss due to 75-ohm cable length will be 1.5-6.09 dB (37%-75%) for every 100 feet of cable, depending on channel frequency. 4dB is a good rule of thumb. But in your case, the length will be the same, you're just putting a splitter in the middle. The splitter is the killer. A two-way splitter has about a 4dB loss on each output (61%). For simplicity, assume the signal is cut in half. A four-way splitter is electronically the same as a two-way with another two-way on each output, so you get 8dB loss on each output, leaving you with only one-fourth the signal that went in. You also had a splitter outside the house that (two cables, remember) that cut the signal in half. The signal that reaches your bedrooms will be only 12.5% of the original signal, and even less because of the line loss. These signals are often too weak to work with digital equipment. I can tell you from experience that your cable modem needs a full-strength signal. Get a high-quality signal amplifier and install it before *any* of the splitters. Keep your runs as short as possible. -- Steve Bell New Life Home Improvement Arlington, TX USA |
#4
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Cable wiring
"SteveBell" wrote in
: OK, you made me get my manual. The signal loss due to 75-ohm cable length will be 1.5- 6.09 dB (37%-75%) for every 100 feet of cable, depending on channel frequency. 4dB is a good rule of thumb. But in your case, the length will be the same, you're just putting a splitter in the middle. The splitter is the killer. A two-way splitter has about a 4dB loss on each output (61%). For simplicity, assume the signal is cut in half. A four-way splitter is electronically the same as a two-way with another two-way on each output, so you get 8dB loss on each output, leaving you with only one-fourth the signal that went in. You also had a splitter outside the house that (two cables, remember) that cut the signal in half. The signal that reaches your bedrooms will be only 12.5% of the original signal, and even less because of the line loss. These signals are often too weak to work with digital equipment. I can tell you from experience that your cable modem needs a full-strength signal. Get a high-quality signal amplifier and install it before *any* of the splitters. Keep your runs as short as possible. In other words, if possible, lose the splitter outside the house and have only one line to the attic. Put a GOOD amp in the attic on the one remaining line. Then wire in a four- way splitter right next to it. Look around and find the best splitter you can. There is a big difference in internal losses between the cheap ones and the top-of-the- line. Forget Radion Shack - find a reputable cable/home entertainment installer and buy from them. If you can't find one, go to www.grainger.com and pick out the best there. Now, to make up for the feed you lost, find the two shortest runs of the five you want. Feed them from one of the outputs of the four-way splitter. That way the three longest runs, or the three drops that have phones/cable modems/etc. will get the most signal. Also, make sure you get the F-connectors that solder on. Any of the connectors that screw/crimp on and use the center conductor of the RG-6 cable as the center contact will have more loss and a higher likeleyhood of failure. And make sure you are using RG-6, not RG-59 or anything else. The few extra dollars spent here will be more than worth it. I know this is confusing if you haven't worked with it, but here is a nice little tutorial that should answer most of your questions. Ignore any of the parts about combiners and modulators, since you are not doing any of that. http://www.hometech.com/learn/video1.html If you have any other questions feel free to drop me a line directly. |
#5
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Cable wiring
In article , "JR Weiss" wrote:
wrote... The house I'm living in has two cables that run from the outside wall through the attic and into the living room and master bed room respectively. I'd like to add cable to three other bedrooms in the house. The question: Can I splice one of the cables within the attic, attach a four way cable splitter to it then run the wires (the fish tape aspect doesn't seem like fun but there is plenty of space in the attic so it seems doable) to the remaining bedrooms? Sure. That's what an installer might do. He might also do it outside the house, adding splitters as needed, and drill through the outside wall at each bedroom. Is it possible to estimate the signal loss going this route? I plan to run the 'in' from the outside wall to the 'in' on the splitter. then all four 'outs' will get routed to the four bedrooms. IIRC, the last cable installer told me about -7dBmV per splitter. If you have digital phone, that will suffer first, because it needs a cleaner signal. An in-line amplifier BEFORE the splitter may boost the signal enough to keep it clean if you need more. An amplifier in front of a modem has to be two way. I had one in the old house, but the cable guy took it off. Seems like it may have caused a proble, greg |
#6
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Cable wiring
In article , "JR Weiss" wrote: wrote... The house I'm living in has two cables that run from the outside wall through the attic and into the living room and master bed room respectively. I'd like to add cable to three other bedrooms in the house. The question: Can I splice one of the cables within the attic, attach a four way cable splitter to it then run the wires (the fish tape aspect doesn't seem like fun but there is plenty of space in the attic so it seems doable) to the remaining bedrooms? Sure. That's what an installer might do. He might also do it outside the house, adding splitters as needed, and drill through the outside wall at each bedroom. Is it possible to estimate the signal loss going this route? I plan to run the 'in' from the outside wall to the 'in' on the splitter. then all four 'outs' will get routed to the four bedrooms. IIRC, the last cable installer told me about -7dBmV per splitter. If you have digital phone, that will suffer first, because it needs a cleaner signal. An in-line amplifier BEFORE the splitter may boost the signal enough to keep it clean if you need more. An amplifier in front of a modem has to be two way. I had one in the old house, but the cable guy took it off. Seems like it may have caused a proble, Amplifiers increase the noise as much as the signal, or more if it's a cheap amplifier. Cable modems and other digital devices need to be connected to the strongest signal available. -- Steve Bell New Life Home Improvement Arlington, TX USA |
#7
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Cable wiring
"GregS" wrotete:
IIRC, the last cable installer told me about -7dBmV per splitter. If you have digital phone, that will suffer first, because it needs a cleaner signal. An in-line amplifier BEFORE the splitter may boost the signal enough to keep it clean if you need more. An amplifier in front of a modem has to be two way. I had one in the old house, but the cable guy took it off. Seems like it may have caused a proble, When Comcast re-installed my service to accommodate phone service, they put a new amp at the drop because of a low signal. A couple weeks later they repaired a bad splice at the pole, and the signal went WAY up. Amp is still there, though, and has caused no problems. |
#8
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Cable wiring
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:45:39 +0000 (UTC), "SteveBell"
wrote: In article , "JR Weiss" wrote: wrote... The house I'm living in has two cables that run from the outside wall through the attic and into the living room and master bed room respectively. I'd like to add cable to three other bedrooms in the house. The question: Can I splice one of the cables within the attic, attach a four way cable splitter to it then run the wires (the fish tape aspect doesn't seem like fun but there is plenty of space in the attic so it seems doable) to the remaining bedrooms? Sure. That's what an installer might do. He might also do it outside the house, adding splitters as needed, and drill through the outside wall at each bedroom. Is it possible to estimate the signal loss going this route? I plan to run the 'in' from the outside wall to the 'in' on the splitter. then all four 'outs' will get routed to the four bedrooms. IIRC, the last cable installer told me about -7dBmV per splitter. If you have digital phone, that will suffer first, because it needs a cleaner signal. An in-line amplifier BEFORE the splitter may boost the signal enough to keep it clean if you need more. An amplifier in front of a modem has to be two way. I had one in the old house, but the cable guy took it off. Seems like it may have caused a proble, Amplifiers increase the noise as much as the signal, or more if it's a cheap amplifier. Cable modems and other digital devices need to be connected to the strongest signal available. Right. Amplifiers are only good for making up for losses *after* the amplifier. |
#9
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Cable wiring
Lots of valuable info here. I'll make an attempt at getting this done
this weekend. Thanks alot |
#10
Posted to misc.consumers.house
|
|||
|
|||
Cable wiring
tim wrote:
"SteveBell" wrote in : OK, you made me get my manual. The signal loss due to 75-ohm cable length will be 1.5- 6.09 dB (37%-75%) for every 100 feet of cable, depending on channel frequency. 4dB is a good rule of thumb. But in your case, the length will be the same, you're just putting a splitter in the middle. The splitter is the killer. A two-way splitter has about a 4dB loss on each output (61%). For simplicity, assume the signal is cut in half. A four-way splitter is electronically the same as a two-way with another two-way on each output, so you get 8dB loss on each output, leaving you with only one-fourth the signal that went in. You also had a splitter outside the house that (two cables, remember) that cut the signal in half. The signal that reaches your bedrooms will be only 12.5% of the original signal, and even less because of the line loss. These signals are often too weak to work with digital equipment. I can tell you from experience that your cable modem needs a full-strength signal. Get a high-quality signal amplifier and install it before *any* of the splitters. Keep your runs as short as possible. In other words, if possible, lose the splitter outside the house and have only one line to the attic. Put a GOOD amp in the attic on the one remaining line. Then wire in a four- way splitter right next to it. Look around and find the best splitter you can. There is a big difference in internal losses between the cheap ones and the top-of-the- line. Forget Radion Shack - find a reputable cable/home entertainment installer and buy from them. If you can't find one, go to www.grainger.com and pick out the best there. Now, to make up for the feed you lost, find the two shortest runs of the five you want. Feed them from one of the outputs of the four-way splitter. That way the three longest runs, or the three drops that have phones/cable modems/etc. will get the most signal. Also, make sure you get the F-connectors that solder on. Any of the connectors that screw/crimp on and use the center conductor of the RG-6 cable as the center contact will have more loss and a higher likeleyhood of failure. And make sure you are using RG-6, not RG-59 or anything else. The few extra dollars spent here will be more than worth it. Amp goes as close to antenna as possible- even with high-quality cable, you will be amplifying noise as well as signal, if it is 50 feet away in the attic. In 40-some years of amateur cabling, I have never seen a solder-type Type F connector that goes on a cable end, much less one with a built-in pin. (not saying they don;t exist, but I have never seen one.) Your description sounds like the PL-259s we used to use in CB, back in stone age. Amphenol was the standard. We make Mil-Spec RG6q cables at work for 2-way satt systems. We use compression connectors, a higher quality version of what you can find at the Borg. ($200 tool, $5 connectors) They use the center conductor as the pin on the connection, but the thickness and quality of the conductor are better than retail cable. The plastic ring, pressed backwards into the connector from the cable end, holds and waterproofs as well as any soldered connection. -- aem sends... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cable TV Wiring | Home Repair | |||
wiring code - cable stackers | Home Repair | |||
cable width for wiring thermostat | UK diy | |||
Cable colours for 110v fixed wiring | UK diy | |||
cable trays for domestic electric wiring | UK diy |