100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm

1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance?
E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In
1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base
upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to
energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the
inconsistency?

The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to
obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not
derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein
earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then
Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is
true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a
significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical
derivation and not on speculation.

3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct?

The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions
only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous
possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so
he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid
values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in
nature.

4. What are contradictory results?

Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation
blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have
scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than
this in science.

5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?

Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto
published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904,
two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its
experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.

6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here?

Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions
only.
For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g.
number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle
at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just
took handpicked values of variables.
If general values of variables are
taken then results are contradictory to experiments.
Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only
without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein
replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2.

7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )?

I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple
calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality
like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.

Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

8. How do you compare these two equations?

Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical
derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter
truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its
special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or
more than predicted by E=mc2.

9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?

In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be
explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in
astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.

10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?

Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.

11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific
community?

The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work
published in peer review international journals and conferences. My
research papers are either published in international journals from
America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation
from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have
presented my research in international conferences in USA, England,
Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy
to present my work this year.
[b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics
Essays giving the facts e.g.

What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905
paper
How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
All the references are given below for the purpose.
There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to
write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas
work is incorrectly published.

12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?

Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and
England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE WORK.

13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in
you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the
logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the
irresponsible critics, as they dont exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.

14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2?

This book will be published in Dec. 2006
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts.
The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after
PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences
..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic
science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos
Dialogue have in science.
Book Link :
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email


References of Einsteins work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharmas work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past, present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Email
0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546

AJAY SHARMA wrote:
snip

Are you still here?

SECURITY!

AJAY SHARMA wrote:
100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm

1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance?
E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In
1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base
upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to
energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the
inconsistency?

The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to
obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not
derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein
earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then
Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is
true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a
significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical
derivation and not on speculation.

3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct?

The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions
only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous
possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so
he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid
values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in
nature.

4. What are contradictory results?

Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation
blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have
scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than
this in science.

5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?

Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto
published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904,
two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its
experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.

6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here?

Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions
only.
For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g.
number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle
at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just
took handpicked values of variables.
If general values of variables are
taken then results are contradictory to experiments.
Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only
without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein
replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2.

7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )?

I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple
calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality
like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.

Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

8. How do you compare these two equations?

Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical
derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter
truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its
special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or
more than predicted by E=mc2.

9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?

In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be
explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in
astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.

10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?

Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.

11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific
community?

The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work
published in peer review international journals and conferences. My
research papers are either published in international journals from
America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation
from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have
presented my research in international conferences in USA, England,
Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy
to present my work this year.
[b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics
Essays giving the facts e.g.

What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905
paper
How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
All the references are given below for the purpose.
There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to
write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas
work is incorrectly published.

12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?

Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and
England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE WORK.

13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in
you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the
logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the
irresponsible critics, as they dont exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.

14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2?

This book will be published in Dec. 2006
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts.
The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after
PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences
.The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic
science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos
Dialogue have in science.
Book Link :
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email


References of Einsteins work
.
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharmas work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past, present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Email
0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)


http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm

1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance?
E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In
1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base
upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to
energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the
inconsistency?

The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to
obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not
derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein
earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then
Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is
true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a
significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical
derivation and not on speculation.

3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct?

The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions
only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous
possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so
he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid
values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in
nature.

4. What are contradictory results?

Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation
blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have
scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than
this in science.

5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?

Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto
published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904,
two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its
experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.

6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here?

Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions
only.
For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g.
number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle
at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just
took handpicked values of variables.
If general values of variables are
taken then results are contradictory to experiments.
Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only
without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein
replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2.

7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )?

I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple
calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality
like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.

Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

8. How do you compare these two equations?

Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical
derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter
truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its
special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or
more than predicted by E=mc2.

9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?

In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be
explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in
astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.

10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?

Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.

11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific
community?

The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work
published in peer review international journals and conferences. My
research papers are either published in international journals from
America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation
from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have
presented my research in international conferences in USA, England,
Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy
to present my work this year.
[b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics
Essays giving the facts e.g.

What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905
paper
How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
All the references are given below for the purpose.
There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to
write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas
work is incorrectly published.

12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?

Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and
England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE WORK.

13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in
you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the
logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the
irresponsible critics, as they dont exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.

14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2?

This book will be published in Dec. 2006
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts.
The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after
PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences
..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic
science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos
Dialogue have in science.
Book Link :
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email


References of Einsteins work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharmas work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past, present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Email
0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546

In article .com,
says...
100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,

Answer the question, or go away! No, on second thought, just go
away! No one cares about your claptrap.

--
Keith

krw wrote:
In article .com,
says...
100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,

Answer the question, or go away! No, on second thought, just go
away! No one cares about your claptrap.

--
Keith
------------------------here is the answer, read
carefully-----------------------------------------
100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm

1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance?
E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In
1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base
upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to
energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the
inconsistency?

The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to
obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not
derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein
earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then
Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is
true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a
significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical
derivation and not on speculation.

3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct?

The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions
only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous
possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so
he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid
values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in
nature.

4. What are contradictory results?

Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation
blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have
scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than
this in science.

5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?

Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto
published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904,
two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its
experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.

6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here?

Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions
only.
For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g.
number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle
at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just
took handpicked values of variables.
If general values of variables are
taken then results are contradictory to experiments.
Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only
without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein
replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2.

7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )?

I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple
calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality
like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.

Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

8. How do you compare these two equations?

Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical
derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter
truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its
special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or
more than predicted by E=mc2.

9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?

In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be
explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in
astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.

10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?

Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.

11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific
community?

The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work
published in peer review international journals and conferences. My
research papers are either published in international journals from
America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation
from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have
presented my research in international conferences in USA, England,
Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy
to present my work this year.
[b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics
Essays giving the facts e.g.

What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905
paper
How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
All the references are given below for the purpose.
There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to
write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas
work is incorrectly published.

12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?

Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and
England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE WORK.

13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in
you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the
logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the
irresponsible critics, as they dont exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.

14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2?

This book will be published in Dec. 2006
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts.
The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after
PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences
..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic
science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos
Dialogue have in science.
Book Link :
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email


References of Einsteins work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharmas work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past, present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Email
0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546

In article . com,
says...

krw wrote:
In article .com,
says...
100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,

Answer the question, or go away! No, on second thought, just go
away! No one cares about your claptrap.

--
Keith
------------------------here is the answer, read
carefully-----------------------------------------

No it's not. Just go away.

--
Keith

krw wrote:
In article . com,
says...

krw wrote:
In article .com,
says...
100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,

Answer the question, or go away! No, on second thought, just go
away! No one cares about your claptrap.

--
Keith
------------------------here is the answer, read
carefully-----------------------------------------

No it's not. Just go away.

--
Keith
------------------------here is the answer, read
carefully-----------------------------------------
100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm

1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance?
E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In
1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base
upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to
energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the
inconsistency?

The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to
obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not
derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein
earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then
Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is
true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a
significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical
derivation and not on speculation.

3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct?

The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions
only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous
possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so
he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid
values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in
nature.

4. What are contradictory results?

Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation
blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have
scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than
this in science.

5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?

Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto
published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904,
two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its
experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.

6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here?

Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions
only.
For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g.
number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle
at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just
took handpicked values of variables.
If general values of variables are
taken then results are contradictory to experiments.
Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only
without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein
replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2.

7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )?

I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple
calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality
like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.

Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

8. How do you compare these two equations?

Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical
derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter
truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its
special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or
more than predicted by E=mc2.

9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?

In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be
explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in
astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.

10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?

Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.

11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific
community?

The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work
published in peer review international journals and conferences. My
research papers are either published in international journals from
America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation
from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have
presented my research in international conferences in USA, England,
Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy
to present my work this year.
[b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics
Essays giving the facts e.g.

What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905
paper
How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
All the references are given below for the purpose.
There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to
write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas
work is incorrectly published.

12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?

Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and
England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE WORK.

13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in
you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the
logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the
irresponsible critics, as they dont exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.

14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2?

This book will be published in Dec. 2006
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts.
The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after
PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences
..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic
science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos
Dialogue have in science.
Book Link :
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email


References of Einsteins work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharmas work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past, present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Email
0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546

On 7 Nov 2006 19:05:53 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)


More SPAM Sharma?

On 8 Nov 2006 05:50:51 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)


Well, anyone interested, Sharma did admit (see my post in his other
SPAM thread) he did pay to have his book published.

PeterD wrote:
On 7 Nov 2006 19:05:53 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)


More SPAM Sharma?

=== Peter, do know the manner how to ask information ?.============
Why you want to know this?
If you have some of understanding the answer is here,
Read , understand , everything is here.

100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm


1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance?
E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In
1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base
upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to
energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass.
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the
inconsistency?

The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to
obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not
derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein
earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then
Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is
true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a
significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical
derivation and not on speculation.

3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct?

The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions
only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous
possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so
he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid
values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in
nature.

4. What are contradictory results?

Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation
blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have
scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than
this in science.

5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein?

Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto
published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904,
two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its
experimental confirmation in nuclear physics.

6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here?

Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions
only.
For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g.
number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle
at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just
took handpicked values of variables.
If general values of variables are
taken then results are contradictory to experiments.
Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only
without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein
replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2.

7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )?

I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple
calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality
like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable.

Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

8. How do you compare these two equations?

Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical
derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter
truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its
special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or
more than predicted by E=mc2.

9. How did you justify your equation experimentally?

In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be
explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in
astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful.

10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community?

Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals.

11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific
community?

The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work
published in peer review international journals and conferences. My
research papers are either published in international journals from
America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation
from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have
presented my research in international conferences in USA, England,
Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy
to present my work this year.
[b]Still there ANYONE is welcome to COMMENT on the work in Physics
Essays giving the facts e.g.

What is Einsteins Sep 1905 paper ?
What are conditions under which it is derived?
Under what conditions experimentally it holds good?
How to generalize it under all conditions?
What is Ajay Sharmas Interpretation?
How Ajay Sharmas paper is different from Einsteins Sep 1905
paper
How Ajay Sharmas interpretation is incorrect (if it)?
What are the correct interpretations?
I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS.
If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your
interpretation and published the paper it is OK.
All the references are given below for the purpose.
There may be back door critics but none of the scientists have dared to
write to scientific bodies or journals Editors , that Ajay Sharmas
work is incorrectly published.

12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges?

Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and
England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE
OF THE WORK.

13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in
you your way?
Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the
logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the
irresponsible critics, as they dont exist.
The critics when understand the things become my supporters.

14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2?

This book will be published in Dec. 2006
It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts.
The contents of book are already approved by expert scientists after
PEER REVIEW and published in international journals and conferences
..The book is meant for general public who is interested in basic
science. This book will status as Newtons Principia or Galileos
Dialogue have in science.
Book Link :
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email


References of Einsteins work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

PartII
References of Ajay Sharmas work

My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf

For details
100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA

2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.

3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,

10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND

4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND

5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.

6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past, present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554


Email
0091 94183 09989, 0091 177 2804546

On 8 Nov 2006 07:24:00 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:


PeterD wrote:
On 7 Nov 2006 19:05:53 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)


More SPAM Sharma?

=== Peter, do know the manner how to ask information ?.============
Why you want to know this?
If you have some of understanding the answer is here,
Read , understand , everything is here.

Yes, it is... All there... A good solid confirmation that you are a
trolling, spamming, clueless looser with some odd delusions about the
way things are!

Gee Sharma, don't you get it? We're all (ALL) laughing at you. You're
so funny that it is worth the bandwidth just to bait you on.. This is
not a battle of wits-I (and none of the others here) would ever fight
with an unarmed man!

I do hear your publisher is getting a bit worried-seems they are
implicated in your spam effort, and well, since they are a US firm are
subject to a number of US anti-spam laws.

Hey, think about this: I printed your message (including the
spam/troll) and gave it to my dog. He's a 100 lb (about 40 kg) German
Shepard. Not terribly bright, but he got it right the first time. He
read it (looked that way to me) and promptly dug a hole and buried it!
Then he looks up to me and smiled (yes, Sharma, dogs smile) as if to
say: "there, now that is where it belongs!"

PeterD
Part I

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm
WHAT IS YOUR ADDRESS ?
You could not raise a single scientific objection in many posts, so
you call it spamming.
It is not spamming,
You call that thing spamming, WHICH YOU DONT LIKE.IT IS SPAMMING.
You laugh or weep it is your sweet will.
I know how deal with disgruntled people. I have interacted with people
all over world regarding this work in past 24 years both personally
and by mail
IF INSTEIN IS MODIFIED THEN IT IS SPAMMING.
Sue me for this ( about 100 Years of E=mc2) I will reply ?
Call at 0091 177 94183 09989, I will give my address.

Why are you worried WHO IS PAYING FOR BOOK ?.
How are you concerned with this.
This book is proposed to published in many languages.
Come on scientific terms. Have you caliber to understand this. YOU ARE
FREE TO CONTRADICT THE CONTENST IN INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS AND
CONFERENCES.
Part II

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm

Ajay Sharma will reply the questions as long they raised on this GOOGLE
FORUM.
If you don't like then write to GOOGLE then stop my account. There
is provision for this.
I quote the references of all my papers published in international
journals and conferences.
I feel you are sensible enough, when a paper is published in journal ,
then IT IS PEER REVIEWED by expert in the field.
So this work is published.
Einstein's work has SERIOUS UNSEEN limitations, hence it published in
conferences and journals all over the WORLD.
Now let me know , what do you want ?
Also mention you AFFILIATIONS completely here. So that I may take
further step.
Again further you want ( for spamming)
Sue me for this ( about 100 Years of E=mc2) I will reply ?
Call at 0091 177 94183 09989, I will give my address.

AJAY SHARMA Nov. 9, 2006

http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blog/...-postulate.htm

PeterD wrote:
On 8 Nov 2006 07:24:00 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

PeterD wrote:
On 7 Nov 2006 19:05:53 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)

More SPAM Sharma?
=== Peter, do know the manner how to ask information ?.============
Why you want to know this?
If you have some of understanding the answer is here,
Read , understand , everything is here.

Yes, it is... All there... A good solid confirmation that you are a
trolling, spamming, clueless looser with some odd delusions about the
way things are!

Gee Sharma, don't you get it? We're all (ALL) laughing at you. You're
so funny that it is worth the bandwidth just to bait you on.. This is
not a battle of wits-I (and none of the others here) would ever fight
with an unarmed man!

I do hear your publisher is getting a bit worried-seems they are
implicated in your spam effort, and well, since they are a US firm are
subject to a number of US anti-spam laws.

Hey, think about this: I printed your message (including the
spam/troll) and gave it to my dog. He's a 100 lb (about 40 kg) German
Shepard. Not terribly bright, but he got it right the first time. He
read it (looked that way to me) and promptly dug a hole and buried it!
Then he looks up to me and smiled (yes, Sharma, dogs smile) as if to
say: "there, now that is where it belongs!"


Hey, Peter, is your dog just smart or is he very smart? Did he just
cover it with dirt, or did he cover it with doggie "dirt" first??

Daniel

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Daniel wrote:
PeterD wrote:
On 8 Nov 2006 07:24:00 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

PeterD wrote:
On 7 Nov 2006 19:05:53 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)

More SPAM Sharma?
=== Peter, do know the manner how to ask information ?.============
Why you want to know this?
If you have some of understanding the answer is here,
Read , understand , everything is here.

Yes, it is... All there... A good solid confirmation that you are a
trolling, spamming, clueless looser with some odd delusions about the
way things are!

Gee Sharma, don't you get it? We're all (ALL) laughing at you. You're
so funny that it is worth the bandwidth just to bait you on.. This is
not a battle of wits-I (and none of the others here) would ever fight
with an unarmed man!

I do hear your publisher is getting a bit worried-seems they are
implicated in your spam effort, and well, since they are a US firm are
subject to a number of US anti-spam laws.

Hey, think about this: I printed your message (including the
spam/troll) and gave it to my dog. He's a 100 lb (about 40 kg) German
Shepard. Not terribly bright, but he got it right the first time. He
read it (looked that way to me) and promptly dug a hole and buried it!
Then he looks up to me and smiled (yes, Sharma, dogs smile) as if to
say: "there, now that is where it belongs!"


Hey, Peter, is your dog just smart or is he very smart? Did he just
cover it with dirt, or did he cover it with doggie "dirt" first??

Daniel

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


that is nice, one should keep dog clean from filth and dirt.

On 9 Nov 2006 06:21:20 -0800, "dockiers" wrote:


Daniel wrote:
PeterD wrote:
On 8 Nov 2006 07:24:00 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

PeterD wrote:
On 7 Nov 2006 19:05:53 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

100 Years of E=mc2
(Book will be published in Dec. 2006 , By NOVA Science, New York,
USA)

More SPAM Sharma?
=== Peter, do know the manner how to ask information ?.============
Why you want to know this?
If you have some of understanding the answer is here,
Read , understand , everything is here.

Yes, it is... All there... A good solid confirmation that you are a
trolling, spamming, clueless looser with some odd delusions about the
way things are!

Gee Sharma, don't you get it? We're all (ALL) laughing at you. You're
so funny that it is worth the bandwidth just to bait you on.. This is
not a battle of wits-I (and none of the others here) would ever fight
with an unarmed man!

I do hear your publisher is getting a bit worried-seems they are
implicated in your spam effort, and well, since they are a US firm are
subject to a number of US anti-spam laws.

Hey, think about this: I printed your message (including the
spam/troll) and gave it to my dog. He's a 100 lb (about 40 kg) German
Shepard. Not terribly bright, but he got it right the first time. He
read it (looked that way to me) and promptly dug a hole and buried it!
Then he looks up to me and smiled (yes, Sharma, dogs smile) as if to
say: "there, now that is where it belongs!"


Hey, Peter, is your dog just smart or is he very smart? Did he just
cover it with dirt, or did he cover it with doggie "dirt" first??

Daniel

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


that is nice, one should keep dog clean from filth and dirt.

Ah, you've never lived on a farm with a dog, have you? bg Let's just
say, don't let a farm dog lick you in the face...

On 8 Nov 2006 19:19:54 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

You could not raise a single scientific objection in many posts, so
you call it spamming.
It is not spamming,

---
Yes, it is.

What you're trying to do is sell books, and how you're trying to do
that is by trying to start a brou-ha-ha about how, in your opinion,
Einstein made a mistake (or something like that) and you caught it
and, if the real truth needs to be found, it'll be in your book.

But, in order to gain access to the "truth" we need to buy your
book, and you're advertising it on technical newsgroups.

Doesn't that smack of SPAM to you?


--
JF

On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:44:31 -0600, John Fields
Gave us:

On 8 Nov 2006 19:19:54 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

You could not raise a single scientific objection in many posts, so
you call it spamming.
It is not spamming,

---
Yes, it is.

What you're trying to do is sell books, and how you're trying to do
that is by trying to start a brou-ha-ha about how, in your opinion,
Einstein made a mistake (or something like that) and you caught it
and, if the real truth needs to be found, it'll be in your book.

But, in order to gain access to the "truth" we need to buy your
book, and you're advertising it on technical newsgroups.

Doesn't that smack of SPAM to you?


He's had so many reality SMACKS that he likely wouldn't feel a tiny
spam smack

The fact that the retarded bat's turd started yet another thread
posting the SAME CRAP over and over again further proves it to be SPAM
and him to be a spammer!

I think the time for action is nigh! :-].

JoeBloe wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:44:31 -0600, John Fields
Gave us:

On 8 Nov 2006 19:19:54 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote:

You could not raise a single scientific objection in many posts, so
you call it spamming.
It is not spamming,

---
Yes, it is.

What you're trying to do is sell books, and how you're trying to do
that is by trying to start a brou-ha-ha about how, in your opinion,
Einstein made a mistake (or something like that) and you caught it
and, if the real truth needs to be found, it'll be in your book.

But, in order to gain access to the "truth" we need to buy your
book, and you're advertising it on technical newsgroups.

Doesn't that smack of SPAM to you?


He's had so many reality SMACKS that he likely wouldn't feel a tiny
spam smack

The fact that the retarded bat's turd started yet another thread
posting the SAME CRAP over and over again further proves it to be SPAM
and him to be a spammer!

I think the time for action is nigh! :-].
-----------------------------------------------------
For me there is no logic to continue , as no Theory of Relativity (
E=mc2) is being discussed.
I simply posted as members showed keen interest in Physics and Einstein
's work.

In article . com,
says...


For me there is no logic to continue

Good. We're all in agreement.

--
Keith

On 9 Nov 2006 22:52:02 -0800, "AJAY SHARMA" Gave
us:

For me there is no...

For you, there are no properly functioning, active neurons in your
entire skull cavity.

It appears that the publishers have removed the item?
Clicking on the link gives "Product not found!"
Anyone know somewhere else I can get a beam stop for my co2?

snip
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York ,
USA)

On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 13:15:30 GMT, "low gain medium"
wrote:

It appears that the publishers have removed the item?
Clicking on the link gives "Product not found!"
Anyone know somewhere else I can get a beam stop for my co2?

snip
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554

( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York ,
USA)


Humm, I wonder what happened... ROFL