| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
100 Years of E=mc2
100 Years of E=mc2
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance? E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass. Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ 2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency? The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation. 3. Is Einsteins derivation of L =mc2 correct? The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature. 4. What are contradictory results? Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einsteins 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science. 5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein? Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics. 6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here? Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. For examples there are many variables in Einsteins derivation e.g. number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just took handpicked values of variables. If general values of variables are taken then results are contradictory to experiments. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2. 7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )? I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable. Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf 8. How do you compare these two equations? Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2. 9. How did you justify your equation experimentally? In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful. 10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community? Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals. 11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community? The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year. 12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges? Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK. 13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way? Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they dont exist. The critics when understand the things become my supporters. 14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2? This book is being published soon. It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. Science today is not the same in 16th or 17th century. We should aim at 22nd or 23rd century scientific scenarios. Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email References of Einsteins work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharmas work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 |
|
#2
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
|
100 Years of E=mc2
So whats your point?
"einnew" wrote in message oups.com... 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance? E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass. Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ 2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency? The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation. 3. Is Einstein's derivation of L =mc2 correct? The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature. 4. What are contradictory results? Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einstein's 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science. 5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein? Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics. 6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here? Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. For examples there are many variables in Einstein's derivation e.g. number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just took handpicked values of variables. If general values of variables are taken then results are contradictory to experiments. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2. 7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )? I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable. Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf 8. How do you compare these two equations? Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2. 9. How did you justify your equation experimentally? In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful. 10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community? Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals. 11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community? The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year. 12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges? Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK. 13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way? Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they don't exist. The critics when understand the things become my supporters. 14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2? This book is being published soon. It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. Science today is not the same in 16th or 17th century. We should aim at 22nd or 23rd century scientific scenarios. Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email References of Einstein's work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma's work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. "The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ?E = Ac2 ?M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology". http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper "The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ?E = Ac2 ?M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology". is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 |
|
#3
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
|
100 Years of E=mc2
Scott Lane wrote: So whats your point? "einnew" wrote in message oups.com... 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance? E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass. Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ 2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency? The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation. 3. Is Einstein's derivation of L =mc2 correct? The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature. 4. What are contradictory results? Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einstein's 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science. 5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein? Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics. 6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here? Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. For examples there are many variables in Einstein's derivation e.g. number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just took handpicked values of variables. If general values of variables are taken then results are contradictory to experiments. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2. 7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )? I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable. Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf 8. How do you compare these two equations? Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2. 9. How did you justify your equation experimentally? In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful. 10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community? Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals. 11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community? The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year. 12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges? Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK. 13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way? Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they don't exist. The critics when understand the things become my supporters. 14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2? This book is being published soon. It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. Science today is not the same in 16th or 17th century. We should aim at 22nd or 23rd century scientific scenarios. Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email References of Einstein's work . A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma's work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. "The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ?E = Ac2 ?M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology". http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper "The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ?E = Ac2 ?M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology". is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ---------------------------------------Ajay Sharma respond----------- The point that in view of theretical and experimental situations, Einstein;s E=mc2 mut be EXTENDED to dE=Ac2dm AJAY SHARMA |
|
#4
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
|
100 Years of E=mc2
"einnew" wrote in message ups.com... Scott Lane wrote: So whats your point? "einnew" wrote in message oups.com... 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 1. What is E=mc2? What is its importance? E=mc2 is the most wonderful and significant equation is physics. In 1945 the explosion of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were base upon this equation. According to this mass (m) can be converted to energy (E) and energy can be converted to mass. Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ 2. This equation is doing well since past 100 years then where is the inconsistency? The inconsistency lies in its mathematical derivation (a method to obtain a mathematical equation). In his 1905 paper Einstein did not derive it mathematically but in true sense speculated it. Einstein earlier derived L = mc2 (light energy mass conversion equation). Then Einstein speculated that what is true for light energy (L) the same is true for every energy (E). This speculation results in E=mc2, such a significant equation must be based upon a specific mathematical derivation and not on speculation. 3. Is Einstein's derivation of L =mc2 correct? The derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or true in special conditions only. Einstein took just handpicked parameters out of numerous possible, to obtain the equation. Einstein was aware of the reality so he left in midway after getting the desired result. If all valid values of parameters are taken, then results are contradictory in nature. 4. What are contradictory results? Some UNDISCUSSED predictions of Einstein's 29 Sep. 1905 derivation blatantly contradict Law of Conservation of Matter. I have scientifically confirmed the same. No limitation can be bigger than this in science. 5. Was E=mc2 or similar ideas existed before Einstein? Yes, E=mc2 existed before Einstein. An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=mc2 in valid scientific journal Lettere ed Atti, Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein. But Pretto died in 1921, before its experimental confirmation in nuclear physics. 6. Einstein speculated E=mc2 from L=mc2. What is the problem here? Firstly derivation of L=mc2 is incomplete or under special conditions only. For examples there are many variables in Einstein's derivation e.g. number of light waves emitted by body, magnitude of light energy, angle at which light energy is emitted and relative velocity v. Einstein just took handpicked values of variables. If general values of variables are taken then results are contradictory to experiments. Secondly Einstein originated E=mc2 on the basis of speculation only without any conceptual and mathematical basis. Basically Einstein replaced L by E in equation L=mc2 to get E=mc2. 7. Then how did you derive new equation, dE =Ac2dm (or DE = Ac2 DM )? I have derived new equation between mass-energy conservation by simple calculus method. In dE =Ac2dm, A is a co-efficient of proportionality like numerous others in science. It is dimensionless variable. Sharma June 2004 paper is available http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf 8. How do you compare these two equations? Firstly dE =Ac2dm is based upon a conceptual and mathematical derivation. On the other hand E=mc2 is a speculation, it is bitter truth. Secondly dE =Ac2dm is a general equation and E=mc2 is its special case. Energy emitted by new equation can be less, equal to or more than predicted by E=mc2. 9. How did you justify your equation experimentally? In Nuclear Physics there are some anomalous results which cannot be explained by E=mc2 . Like this there are some instances in astrophysics where my equation is extremely useful. 10. Is your work recognized by international scientific community? Yes, it is completely recognized, as published in peer review journals. 11 Have you got any recognition certificate from the scientific community? The only way to get scientific recognition is that to get the work published in peer review international journals and conferences. My research papers are either published in international journals from America, England and Canada or being published. I have got invitation from at least 55 International Conferences to present my work. I have presented my research in international conferences in USA, England, Germany, Taiwan Ukraine etc. I have invitation from France and Italy to present my work this year. 12. Can this work be introduced in Schools and colleges? Yes my wok is scientifically approved in journal in USA, CANADA and England. Hence it can be so done by any country. IT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORK. 13. How do you counter the opposition of the people which has come in you your way? Science is the international language. For this, I take seriously the logical conclusions of the critics. I completely ignore the irresponsible critics, as they don't exist. The critics when understand the things become my supporters. 14. What about your book, 100 Years of E=mc2? This book is being published soon. It will bring clear and unbiased picture of the facts. Science today is not the same in 16th or 17th century. We should aim at 22nd or 23rd century scientific scenarios. Book Link : https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Interviewer Rajesh Thakoor Email References of Einstein's work . A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma's work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. "The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ?E = Ac2 ?M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology". http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper "The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ?E = Ac2 ?M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology". is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ---------------------------------------Ajay Sharma respond----------- The point that in view of theretical and experimental situations, Einstein;s E=mc2 mut be EXTENDED to dE=Ac2dm AJAY SHARMA Very good. Thank you. Scott |
|
#5
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.morons
|
|||
|
|||
|
100 Years of E=mc2
Your theory is crap, starting at eq (13) section (1.3.1).
When light quanta are emitted the mass DECREASES by L/c^2. Does not INCREASE as claimed in your **** paper. If your theory was worth anything, you wouldn't have spammed the whole www with your ****: http://killdevilhill.com/philosophyf...?searchid=3494 http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blogs...aspx?cid=51500 http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/comment...aspx?cid=35367 http://www.adamauton.com/cgi-bin/mb/view.pl But you theory is worthless, this is why you keep spamming. Because you have been found to be in error by many people on many forums |
|
#7
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.morons
|
|||
|
|||
|
nAmELeSS : [email protected] put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
wrote: Your theory is crap, starting at eq (13) section (1.3.1). When light quanta are emitted the mass DECREASES by L/c^2. Does not INCREASE as claimed in your **** paper. If your theory was worth anything, you wouldn't have spammed the whole www with your ****: http://killdevilhill.com/philosophyf...?searchid=3494 http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blogs...aspx?cid=51500 http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/comment...aspx?cid=35367 http://www.adamauton.com/cgi-bin/mb/view.pl But you theory is worthless, this is why you keep spamming. Because you have been found to be in error by many people on many forums ------------------------------ =====Ajay Sharma responds to NAMELESS, PLACELESS, .==== AJAY Sharma responds to . Donkey, where did you put angle phi 89 in your post. Shame on you , Shame on you. Shame of you. DONKEY put values and TELL WORLD , I will stop posting. CRETIN. Cretin .....There is no error in published papers. These approved by expert for publication, only then published. BLIND CRETIN , YOU HAVE PUT VALUE OF PHI 89 , you telling lies , SHAME ON YOU Have you any IDENTITY ? Your this post IS Orphan. Do you HAVE some NAME? Do you some HAVE Qualifications? Do you HAVE some place where work? Do have any identity? Then put on this post. Tell the World who are you? People feel you are cheater , abusing like thief WITHOUT SHOWING YOUR IDENTITY. In this post you have shown folly that you dont understand meaning of terms i.e. Ki, Hi, and Ei used in Einsteins Sep 1905 paper. Also you have shown folly how to write simple equations dealing with CONSERVATION OF ENERGY, as used in Einstein's paper and in mine. Earlier in 100s post you incorrectly applied Law of Conservation of Momentum ( Taught in 11TH Class), thanks this mistake Is not in this ORPHAN post Part I You have not put value of angle phi 89 in eq.(1.6) Your new NOTE is without name and address. Your eq.(1.6) is KI-K0 = -L/c2v2 +LγβcosΦ I have asked you to do 100s times. Do you think everyone except you FOOL or ILLETERATE, you are only the WISE. Understand Einstein's derivation. Understand Einstein's derivation. Understand Einstein's derivation your other explanation is baseless. IT IS NOT REQUIRED , SIMPLY PUT ANGLE 89 and proceed as Einstein has done and change difference in KEs to ˆ†m Part II Solve your equations (putting value of angle 89), in terms of difference in mass. You reach at EQ.(13) in my paper ˆ†m = -LcosΦ/cv + L/c2 = Or Δ m = €“ 0.03490L/cv + L/c2 (cos Φ =Cos89) (13) Both the terms follow cohesively from law of conservation of energy as taken in account by Einstein. These are correctly taken in account. ( understand meaning of Ki , Hi and Ei). Put value of angle 89 degree in eq.(1.6). It will end all this. You have NO right ABUSE others work for your OWN limitations. AJAY SHARMA 24 Sep 2005. REFRENCES OF THE WORK References of Einsteins work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharmas work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 |
|
#8
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.morons
|
|||
|
|||
|
nAmELeSS : [email protected] put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
Actually, e=mc2 is not the full formulae,
its e=mc2 ^3 (cubed) They didnt want to publish the full formula for security reasons, later the proper formula was discussed but not published. Look it up! einnew wrote: wrote: Your theory is crap, starting at eq (13) section (1.3.1). When light quanta are emitted the mass DECREASES by L/c^2. Does not INCREASE as claimed in your **** paper. If your theory was worth anything, you wouldn't have spammed the whole www with your ****: http://killdevilhill.com/philosophyf...?searchid=3494 http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blogs...aspx?cid=51500 http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/comment...aspx?cid=35367 http://www.adamauton.com/cgi-bin/mb/view.pl But you theory is worthless, this is why you keep spamming. Because you have been found to be in error by many people on many forums ------------------------------ =====Ajay Sharma responds to NAMELESS, PLACELESS, .==== AJAY Sharma responds to . Donkey, where did you put angle phi 89 in your post. Shame on you , Shame on you. Shame of you. DONKEY put values and TELL WORLD , I will stop posting. CRETIN. Cretin .....There is no error in published papers. These approved by expert for publication, only then published. BLIND CRETIN , YOU HAVE PUT VALUE OF PHI 89 , you telling lies , SHAME ON YOU Have you any IDENTITY ? Your this post IS Orphan. Do you HAVE some NAME? Do you some HAVE Qualifications? Do you HAVE some place where work? Do have any identity? Then put on this post. Tell the World who are you? People feel you are cheater , abusing like thief WITHOUT SHOWING YOUR IDENTITY. In this post you have shown folly that you dont understand meaning of terms i.e. Ki, Hi, and Ei used in Einsteins Sep 1905 paper. Also you have shown folly how to write simple equations dealing with CONSERVATION OF ENERGY, as used in Einstein's paper and in mine. Earlier in 100s post you incorrectly applied Law of Conservation of Momentum ( Taught in 11TH Class), thanks this mistake Is not in this ORPHAN post Part I You have not put value of angle phi 89 in eq.(1.6) Your new NOTE is without name and address. Your eq.(1.6) is KI-K0 = -L/c2v2 +LγβcosΦ I have asked you to do 100s times. Do you think everyone except you FOOL or ILLETERATE, you are only the WISE. Understand Einstein's derivation. Understand Einstein's derivation. Understand Einstein's derivation your other explanation is baseless. IT IS NOT REQUIRED , SIMPLY PUT ANGLE 89 and proceed as Einstein has done and change difference in KEs to ˆ†m Part II Solve your equations (putting value of angle 89), in terms of difference in mass. You reach at EQ.(13) in my paper ˆ†m = -LcosΦ/cv + L/c2 = Or Δ m = €“ 0.03490L/cv + L/c2 (cos Φ =Cos89) (13) Both the terms follow cohesively from law of conservation of energy as taken in account by Einstein. These are correctly taken in account. ( understand meaning of Ki , Hi and Ei). Put value of angle 89 degree in eq.(1.6). It will end all this. You have NO right ABUSE others work for your OWN limitations. AJAY SHARMA 24 Sep 2005. REFRENCES OF THE WORK References of Einsteins work . A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharmas work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 |
|
#9
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.morons
|
|||
|
|||
|
100 Years of E=mc2
wrote: Your theory is crap, starting at eq (13) section (1.3.1). When light quanta are emitted the mass DECREASES by L/c^2. Does not INCREASE as claimed in your **** paper. If your theory was worth anything, you wouldn't have spammed the whole www with your ****: http://killdevilhill.com/philosophyf...?searchid=3494 http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blogs...aspx?cid=51500 http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/comment...aspx?cid=35367 http://www.adamauton.com/cgi-bin/mb/view.pl But you theory is worthless, this is why you keep spamming. Because you have been found to be in error by many people on many forums ----------------------------------------------- ====Ajay Sharma respond to NAME LESS, , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here). ====== Coward, Shame on you, NAME LESS. What is your name? What is your father's name? Where do you work?. Have you any identity? This world is published in international journals AFTER PEER REVIEW. Who cares for such COWARD like you , who even cannot put the name with post. Part I You were thrashed as Dr Inpain of CERN at Wrap forum. (There you introduced yourself as Dr In pain of CERN) Then you became NAMELESS. You could not post your name, YOUR FATHERS Name at GOOGLE, the where you work? You stopped posting at GOOGLE and Wrap.. At Physics Banter also you are nameless? Part II I taught you 11TH CLASS PHYSICS, APPLICATION OF Conservation Of Momentum. Now you dont do this mistake. Now you are applying law of conservation of Energy incorrectly in Einsteins paper. More then 100 times I told you, put value of phi 89 in your eq.(1.5) , you will get the same result as I have got. God Bless you, COWARD Nameless, Placeless, Identity less. References of Einsteins work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharmas work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper €?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 |
|
#10
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.morons
|
|||
|
|||
|
100 Years of E=mc2
On 29 Sep 2006 10:57:34 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.n...s_id=4554 Geeze, Sharma, please take your crackpot ideas and thoughts and troll elsewhere. Uh, not in another NG but perhaps going to the local laundry migth be more fulfilling. Peter's Troll-o-meter Troll Not Troll 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 \ \ \ \ \ \ O (didn't move the needle at all!) |
|
#11
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.morons
|
|||
|
|||
|
100 Years of E=mc2
PeterD wrote: On 29 Sep 2006 10:57:34 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.n...s_id=4554 Geeze, Sharma, please take your crackpot ideas and thoughts and troll elsewhere. Uh, not in another NG but perhaps going to the local laundry migth be more fulfilling. Peter's Troll-o-meter Troll Not Troll 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 \ \ \ \ \ \ O (didn't move the needle at all!) -------------- This popst is not meant for you. There are many others in the group. |
|
#12
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.morons
|
|||
|
|||
|
100 Years of E=mc2
PeterD wrote: On 29 Sep 2006 10:57:34 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA" wrote: Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.n...s_id=4554 Geeze, Sharma, please take your crackpot ideas and thoughts and troll elsewhere. Uh, not in another NG but perhaps going to the local laundry migth be more fulfilling. Peter's Troll-o-meter Troll Not Troll 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 \ \ \ \ \ \ O (didn't move the needle at all!) post is not you. |
|
#13
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.morons
|
|||
|
|||
|
100 Years of E=mc2
On 30 Sep 2006 20:06:51 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: -------------- This popst is not meant for you. There are many others in the group. All of those many others don't want your drivel here either. I've yet to see ONE other person come to your defense. There's a reason--no one wants your ravings. |
|
#14
Posted to alt.electronics,alt.morons
|
|||
|
|||
|
100 Years of E=mc2
On 30 Sep 2006 20:07:20 -0700, "AJAY SHARMA"
wrote: post is not you. Uh, Sharma, care to say that in English? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Swimming Pool Fiberglass Coating? | Home Repair | |||
| Replace Hard Drive After 3.5 Years? | Electronics Repair | |||
| Replace Hard Drive After 3.5 Years | Electronics Repair | |||
| Frightening News - Dropping the "New Years Ball" | Home Repair | |||
| gas boiler thermocouple | UK diy | |||
Linear Mode
