wrote:
Your theory is crap, starting at eq (13) section (1.3.1).
When light quanta are emitted the mass DECREASES by L/c^2. Does not
INCREASE as claimed in your **** paper.
If your theory was worth anything, you wouldn't have spammed the whole
www with your ****:
http://killdevilhill.com/philosophyf...?searchid=3494
http://physicsajay.sulekha.com/blogs...aspx?cid=51500
http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/comment...aspx?cid=35367
http://www.adamauton.com/cgi-bin/mb/view.pl
But you theory is worthless, this is why you keep spamming. Because you
have been found to be in error by many people on many forums
------------------------------
=====Ajay Sharma responds to NAMELESS, PLACELESS,
.====
AJAY Sharma responds to .
Donkey, where did you put angle phi 89 in your post.
Shame on you , Shame on you. Shame of you.
DONKEY put values and TELL WORLD ,
I will stop posting.
CRETIN.
Cretin .....There is no error in published papers.
These approved by expert for publication, only then published.
BLIND CRETIN , YOU HAVE PUT VALUE OF PHI 89 , you telling lies ,
SHAME ON YOU
Have you any IDENTITY ?
Your this post IS Orphan.
Do you HAVE some NAME? Do you some HAVE Qualifications?
Do you HAVE some place where work? Do have any identity?
Then put on this post. Tell the World who are you?
People feel you are cheater , abusing like thief WITHOUT SHOWING YOUR
IDENTITY.
In this post you have shown folly that you dont understand meaning
of terms i.e. Ki, Hi, and Ei used in Einsteins Sep 1905 paper.
Also you have shown folly how to write simple equations dealing with
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY, as used in Einstein's paper and in mine.
Earlier in 100s post you incorrectly applied Law of Conservation of
Momentum ( Taught in 11TH Class), thanks this mistake Is not in this
ORPHAN post
Part I
You have not put value of angle phi 89 in eq.(1.6)
Your new NOTE is without name and address.
Your eq.(1.6) is
KI-K0 = -L/c2v2 +LγβcosΦ
I have asked you to do 100s times.
Do you think everyone except you FOOL or ILLETERATE, you are only the
WISE.
Understand Einstein's derivation. Understand Einstein's derivation.
Understand Einstein's derivation
your other explanation is baseless. IT IS NOT REQUIRED , SIMPLY PUT
ANGLE 89 and proceed as Einstein has done and change difference in KEs
to ˆ†m
Part II
Solve your equations (putting value of angle 89), in terms of
difference in mass.
You reach at EQ.(13) in my paper
ˆ†m = -LcosΦ/cv + L/c2 =
Or Δ m = €“ 0.03490L/cv + L/c2 (cos Φ =Cos89)
(13)
Both the terms follow cohesively from law of conservation of energy as
taken in account by Einstein. These are correctly taken in account. (
understand meaning of Ki , Hi and Ei).
Put value of angle 89 degree in eq.(1.6).
It will end all this.
You have NO right ABUSE others work for your OWN limitations.
AJAY SHARMA 24 Sep 2005.
REFRENCES OF THE WORK
References of Einsteins work
..
A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641.
.. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
Weblink is
Einsteins 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
PartII
References of Ajay Sharmas work
My work is available at
A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222.
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554
International Conferences
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------few of them
1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA
2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems
(
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Warwick , ENGLAND
4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD
ENGLAND
5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
plus more
--------------------------------------
Journals
This paper
€?The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation ï?„E = Ac2 ï?„M; and
its applications in General physics and Cosmology€?.
is published in journal
Physics Essays , CANADA
www.physicsessays.com
The paper
The past ,present and future of E=mc2
will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
----------------------
Book 100 Years of E=mc2
For details
https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554