Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all. I am a part-time college student majoring in Electrical Engineering
Technology. I have been trying to learn as much as I can on my own since I was twelve; about ten years now. The earliest material I found was in books and experience in taking things apart. I learned that electrons flowed out of the negative terminal of the battery, through the circuit components, and back into the positive terminal. Hence, I have always designed my projects around a positive ground point. No problems there. Well for the past year I have finally gotten into the hardcore electronics-related classes at the college. Some material is familiar, but most of it is new. I am doing well however I have difficulty with the fact that the modern textbooks are showing the circuits using a negative ground. This seems backwards. I know the circuit will still work the same way, but it's hard to get myself to think in the negative-ground sense. If I look at a positive-grounded circuit, I can envision the electrons and make calculations without difficulty, but it's a different story with negative ground for me. What is anyone else's takes on this? Ernie |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-06-19, Ernie Werbel wrote:
Hi all. I am a part-time college student majoring in Electrical Engineering Technology. I have been trying to learn as much as I can on my own since I was twelve; about ten years now. The earliest material I found was in books and experience in taking things apart. I learned that electrons flowed out of the negative terminal of the battery, through the circuit components, and back into the positive terminal. Hence, I have always designed my projects around a positive ground point. No problems there. Well for the past year I have finally gotten into the hardcore electronics-related classes at the college. Some material is familiar, but most of it is new. I am doing well however I have difficulty with the fact that the modern textbooks are showing the circuits using a negative ground. This seems backwards. I know the circuit will still work the same way, but it's hard to get myself to think in the negative-ground sense. If I look at a positive-grounded circuit, I can envision the electrons and make calculations without difficulty, but it's a different story with negative ground for me. What is anyone else's takes on this? I hear the US armed forces tecnician training programmes use electron flow in their course material. I guess you need to learn to read circuit diagrams upside-down ![]() Bye. Jasen |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 03:42:29 GMT, "Ernie Werbel"
wrote: Hi all. I am a part-time college student majoring in Electrical Engineering Technology. I have been trying to learn as much as I can on my own since I was twelve; about ten years now. The earliest material I found was in books and experience in taking things apart. I learned that electrons flowed out of the negative terminal of the battery, through the circuit components, and back into the positive terminal. Hence, I have always designed my projects around a positive ground point. No problems there. Well for the past year I have finally gotten into the hardcore electronics-related classes at the college. Some material is familiar, but most of it is new. I am doing well however I have difficulty with the fact that the modern textbooks are showing the circuits using a negative ground. This seems backwards. I know the circuit will still work the same way, but it's hard to get myself to think in the negative-ground sense. If I look at a positive-grounded circuit, I can envision the electrons and make calculations without difficulty, but it's a different story with negative ground for me. What is anyone else's takes on this? Ernie Can't you just assume they go from positive to negative, for the purpose of reading the schematics easier? Frankly I don't see what the difference is - I know the trons come from ground but that information isn't relevant to designing stuff. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ernie Werbel" wrote in message
news:F2plg.250$ia6.94@trndny09 Ernie, You, like all EE students that have gone before you, will just have to accept the way +, - and the positve direction for current are defined. Once you recognize that it is arbitrary and doesn't really matter so long as you are consistent, it gets a good bit easier. The definition of the positive and negative in an electrical circuit was originally done by Ben Franklin long before the electron was discovered. At that time he and others understood like charged objects were repelled, unlike charged objects were attracted and something flowed when they allowed unlike charged objects to touch. They also understood that there was an excess of something on one of the objects that was equalized when you allowed objects to touch. With a 50-50 shot at getting it right, he just picked wrong when assigning the + and -. By the time that electons were discovered and found to be the primary current carrier in wires, it was far too late to re-define + and -. Now, just wait until you start learning about semiconductor theory and hole flow. -- James T. White |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Einre, Einre, Einre!!!
It's called conventional current flow, get used to it because nearly eveything you do in EE will assume convention flow. Diodes, transistors, SPICE models, etc are all oriented to convential flow...hey that's why they call it conventional. Think a second, if electrons are flowing one direction positve "holes" are flowing the other way otherwise a charge would build up in the wire--can't happen mister. Things actually get much easier to understand with conventional flow. e.g. if you want to know how to turn a transistor on, you can try talking sexy to it, or if you are serious, just look at the emitter arrow, flow conventional "positve" current in the direction the arrow points and you'll get lucky!!! EE work often requires, upside down, backwards, sidewise, sometimes even smoke and mirrors to figure things out. Don't get caught up in a limited thinking pattern. Now to really confuse you, who says electrons are negatively charged anyway? or are protons positively charged? this is just a naming convention, all you can really say is the particles are oppositely charged. We could have said electrons are positve and protons negative, absolutely nothing would be different in how the universe works. Do you know about positive and negative logic, knowing both is the secret to perfect, fast, and easy logic design....? DR "Ernie Werbel" wrote in message news:F2plg.250$ia6.94@trndny09... Hi all. I am a part-time college student majoring in Electrical Engineering Technology. I have been trying to learn as much as I can on my own since I was twelve; about ten years now. The earliest material I found was in books and experience in taking things apart. I learned that electrons flowed out of the negative terminal of the battery, through the circuit components, and back into the positive terminal. Hence, I have always designed my projects around a positive ground point. No problems there. Well for the past year I have finally gotten into the hardcore electronics-related classes at the college. Some material is familiar, but most of it is new. I am doing well however I have difficulty with the fact that the modern textbooks are showing the circuits using a negative ground. This seems backwards. I know the circuit will still work the same way, but it's hard to get myself to think in the negative-ground sense. If I look at a positive-grounded circuit, I can envision the electrons and make calculations without difficulty, but it's a different story with negative ground for me. What is anyone else's takes on this? Ernie |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ernie Werbel wrote: Hi all. I am a part-time college student majoring in Electrical Engineering Technology. I have been trying to learn as much as I can on my own since I was twelve; about ten years now. The earliest material I found was in books and experience in taking things apart. I learned that electrons flowed out of the negative terminal of the battery, through the circuit components, and back into the positive terminal. Hence, I have always designed my projects around a positive ground point. No problems there. Well for the past year I have finally gotten into the hardcore electronics-related classes at the college. Some material is familiar, but most of it is new. I am doing well however I have difficulty with the fact that the modern textbooks are showing the circuits using a negative ground. This seems backwards. I know the circuit will still work the same way, but it's hard to get myself to think in the negative-ground sense. If I look at a positive-grounded circuit, I can envision the electrons and make calculations without difficulty, but it's a different story with negative ground for me. What is anyone else's takes on this? Ernie The assumed current flow and ground are really 2 different issues. As the others have stated, the direction of current flow is by standard convention from + to - Ground is a reference point for measuring other voltages and has nothing to do with the direction of current flow. It is the zero voltage point so the if a measurement is -12V it is 12 volts more negative than ground. If it is +5V it is 5 volts more positive than ground. there is no reference to current flow in these measurements In the early days of transistor logic NPN transistors were used and it was easier to design when the logic levels were 0 and -12V. With the advent of integrated circuits it was more convenient to make the logic levels 0 and +5V or now 0 and +3V I had an engineer that worked for me and always drew his diodes backwards because he had learned electron flow in the military and never was able to completely switch his brain to conventional current flow. Dan |
#7
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Forget the word ground, and use the word reference- referenced to zero
volts. Electrons do flow from negative to positive. Current goes from positive to negative. Why? Blame the man on the $100 bill! The way you did ur analysis before, instead of say having a battery of 12-0, you have battery of 0- -12v, according to the universal convention. The potential difference is still the same though. solve some ciruits, you'll get used to it. "Ernie Werbel" wrote in message news:F2plg.250$ia6.94@trndny09... Hi all. I am a part-time college student majoring in Electrical Engineering Technology. I have been trying to learn as much as I can on my own since I was twelve; about ten years now. The earliest material I found was in books and experience in taking things apart. I learned that electrons flowed out of the negative terminal of the battery, through the circuit components, and back into the positive terminal. Hence, I have always designed my projects around a positive ground point. No problems there. Well for the past year I have finally gotten into the hardcore electronics-related classes at the college. Some material is familiar, but most of it is new. I am doing well however I have difficulty with the fact that the modern textbooks are showing the circuits using a negative ground. This seems backwards. I know the circuit will still work the same way, but it's hard to get myself to think in the negative-ground sense. If I look at a positive-grounded circuit, I can envision the electrons and make calculations without difficulty, but it's a different story with negative ground for me. What is anyone else's takes on this? Ernie |
#8
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ernie Werbel wrote:
Hi all. I am a part-time college student majoring in Electrical Engineering Technology. I have been trying to learn as much as I can on my own since I was twelve; about ten years now. The earliest material I found was in books and experience in taking things apart. I learned that electrons flowed out of the negative terminal of the battery, through the circuit components, and back into the positive terminal. Hence, I have always designed my projects around a positive ground point. No problems there. Well for the past year I have finally gotten into the hardcore electronics-related classes at the college. Some material is familiar, but most of it is new. I am doing well however I have difficulty with the fact that the modern textbooks are showing the circuits using a negative ground. This seems backwards. I know the circuit will still work the same way, but it's hard to get myself to think in the negative-ground sense. If I look at a positive-grounded circuit, I can envision the electrons and make calculations without difficulty, but it's a different story with negative ground for me. What is anyone else's takes on this? Ernie There is no standard that says negative is ground. Circuits can be built with either or no polarity grounded. There are reasons for one particular grounding scheme in some circumstances to do with metal migration and corrosion (telephone exchange/cables), but that is not relevant in general electronics. Current flow is positive to negative - that is the convention by which directional components are described and illustrated. Electrons actually travel from neg to pos, but that is irrelevant. This has nothing to do with 'ground'. Just forget about electron flow direction, it will just distract you. geoff |
#9
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff wrote:
Ernie Werbel wrote: Hi all. I am a part-time college student majoring in Electrical Engineering Technology. I have been trying to learn as much as I can on my own since I was twelve; about ten years now. The earliest material I found was in books and experience in taking things apart. I learned that electrons flowed out of the negative terminal of the battery, through the circuit components, and back into the positive terminal. Hence, I have always designed my projects around a positive ground point. No problems there. Well for the past year I have finally gotten into the hardcore electronics-related classes at the college. Some material is familiar, but most of it is new. I am doing well however I have difficulty with the fact that the modern textbooks are showing the circuits using a negative ground. This seems backwards. I know the circuit will still work the same way, but it's hard to get myself to think in the negative-ground sense. If I look at a positive-grounded circuit, I can envision the electrons and make calculations without difficulty, but it's a different story with negative ground for me. What is anyone else's takes on this? Ernie There is no standard that says negative is ground. Circuits can be built with either or no polarity grounded. There are reasons for one particular grounding scheme in some circumstances to do with metal migration and corrosion (telephone exchange/cables), but that is not relevant in general electronics. What you mean to say is "Conventional Current flow is positive to negative...." Current flow is positive to negative - that is the convention by which directional components are described and illustrated. When I did my basic electronics training, "Electron Current Flow" was the method used, except for about two minute mention of Conventional current flow! Electrons actually travel from neg to pos, but that is irrelevant. This has nothing to do with 'ground'. Just forget about electron flow direction, it will just distract you. Big call, Geoff, to forget Electron Current flow. geoff Daniel -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#10
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Daniel wrote:
What you mean to say is "Conventional Current flow is positive to negative...." Yes. Current flow is positive to negative - that is the convention by which directional components are described and illustrated. When I did my basic electronics training, "Electron Current Flow" was the method used, except for about two minute mention of Conventional current flow! So you were taught to mentally rotate all the arrows on transistors and diodes ? Sounds like hard work to me. Electrons actually travel from neg to pos, but that is irrelevant. This has nothing to do with 'ground'. Just forget about electron flow direction, it will just distract you. Big call, Geoff, to forget Electron Current flow. No. Not unless you are designing semiconductors. geoff |
#11
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff wrote:
Daniel wrote: What you mean to say is "Conventional Current flow is positive to negative...." Yes. Current flow is positive to negative - that is the convention by which directional components are described and illustrated. When I did my basic electronics training, "Electron Current Flow" was the method used, except for about two minute mention of Conventional current flow! So you were taught to mentally rotate all the arrows on transistors and diodes ? Sounds like hard work to me. Why would you want me to mentally rotate all the arrows? The arrows always pointed to the N type material, so you knew how to set up your supplies! Perhaps the problem here is that I'm talking actual circuit operation where as you seem to be talking circuit analysis, Thevans, Norton, that type of stuff. Electrons actually travel from neg to pos, but that is irrelevant. This has nothing to do with 'ground'. Just forget about electron flow direction, it will just distract you. Big call, Geoff, to forget Electron Current flow. No. Not unless you are designing semiconductor circuits geoff Daniel -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#12
![]()
Posted to alt.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-07-14, Ernie Werbel wrote:
Ok so if I understand correctly all this it's not the way the electronic go that's important it's the voltage potentials? So -12V to zero is the same as zero to +12V? same distance, same direction, only difference is the end points. But then why do you need ground? It's justa voltage reference, right? pretty much, or does it serve some other purpose as a convenient connection point (less wires if they go to the chassis)? that too, especially in automobiles. Bye. Jasen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to upgrade outlets and switches | Home Repair | |||
electrical interruption | Home Repair | |||
2- vs. 3-prong outlets | Home Repair | |||
Bond all grounds together? | Home Repair | |||
Grounding Rod Info | Home Repair |