Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
Going thru my pile of old batteries, I discovered 3 1995 Polaroid pola-
pack batteries. They still read above 7.2 V. I think they were 7.5V when new. Whatever chemistry they used has held up for 16 years. I am wondering what the chemistry of these batteries is that they haven't self-discharged after this long period of time. Does anyone know for sure what Polaroid used? |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:37:04 -0800 (PST), "
wrote: Going thru my pile of old batteries, I discovered 3 1995 Polaroid pola- pack batteries. They still read above 7.2 V. I think they were 7.5V when new. Whatever chemistry they used has held up for 16 years. I am wondering what the chemistry of these batteries is that they haven't self-discharged after this long period of time. Does anyone know for sure what Polaroid used? Google for "Polaroid Polapulse Battery" and you'll find plenty of photos and references. The P80 and P100 are 6V at 250ma-hr and Zinc-Manganese dioxide. The P500 are 6V at 1400ma-hr and Lithium-Manganese dioxide. Note that they can be recharged successfully a few times. http://users.rcn.com/fcohen/Polaroid.htm Still available for sale: http://users.rcn.com/fcohen/ -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831-336-2558 # http://802.11junk.com # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS |
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
wrote in message
... Going thru my pile of old batteries, I discovered 3 1995 Polaroid pola- pack batteries. They still read above 7.2 V. I think they were 7.5V when new. Whatever chemistry they used has held up for 16 years. I am wondering what the chemistry of these batteries is that they haven't self-discharged after this long period of time. Does anyone know for sure what Polaroid used? what do they read with say 1Kohm over them ? |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
Going thru my pile of old batteries, I discovered 3 1995 Polaroid pola-
pack batteries. They still read above 7.2 V. I think they were 7.5V when new. Whatever chemistry they used has held up for 16 years. I'm wondering what the chemistry of these batteries is that they haven't self-discharged after this long period of time. Does anyone know for sure what Polaroid used? Just because the voltage hasn't dropped much, doesn't mean the cell hasn't deteriorated. It might have lost a lot of its capacity. Google for "Polaroid Polapulse Battery" and you'll find plenty of photos and references. The P80 and P100 are 6V at 250mAh and Zinc-Manganese dioxide. The P500 are 6V at 1400mAh and Lithium-Manganese dioxide. Note that they can be recharged successfully a few times. Thanks for the update. My understanding was that they were originally carbon-zinc. They were designed and made by Ray-O-Vac, but when they turned out to be unreliable, failing unexpectedly (I had one fail when I left the camera in a warm -- but not hot -- car), Polaroid redesigned and manufactured them itself. Polaroid gave away a cheap AM/FM radio powered by the battery in a discarded film pack, to take advantage of what would otherwise have been wasted energy. It's unfortunate there are no standardized rechargeable battery packs for portable devices. This might have been doable when they were powered by AA and C cells, but modern devices are so small, and the battery is so tightly mechanically integrated, it isn't possible. I recently replaced the battery in my Palm T3 PDA, after seven years of service. I was surprised at how easy it was to do; I expected a fuss-fest. |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:11:07 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
wrote: It's unfortunate there are no standardized rechargeable battery packs for portable devices. This might have been doable when they were powered by AA and C cells, but modern devices are so small, and the battery is so tightly mechanically integrated, it isn't possible. There's a reason why nobody standardizes on battery packs. Battery packs are a major profit center. It's the razor blade model. Give away the razors, and sell lots of blades. For example, Motorola makes it policy of requiring a new battery, microphone, antenna, charger, and other accessories with every new model handheld radio and cell phone. Even models that are very similar, have intentional lumps and holes to make the previous generation of accessories incompatible. Same with some HP LaserJet cartridges. There's some hope with the ITU standardizing on the microUSB battery charger connector for portable devices: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Mobile_Terminal_Platform http://www.wacapps.net which are slowly being "embraced", which is doublespeak for being shoved down the manufacturers throats by various regulatory agencies. Way back in the early 1990's, there was some effort to standardize on a single laptop battery. Mallory and others invented a ten C cell package that just slid into the side of the laptop. It was popular for a short while, until laptops shrank below the size where it would fit. Nice try. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
It's unfortunate there are no standardized rechargeable battery
packs for portable devices. This might have been doable when they were powered by AA and C cells, but modern devices are so small, and the battery is so tightly mechanically integrated, it isn't possible. There's a reason why nobody standardizes on battery packs. Battery packs are a major profit center. It's the razor blade model. Give away the razors, and sell lots of blades. For example, Motorola makes it policy of requiring a new battery, microphone, antenna, charger, and other accessories with every new model handheld radio and cell phone. Even models that are very similar, have intentional lumps and holes to make the previous generation of accessories incompatible. Same with some HP LaserJet cartridges. You can still get LaserJet series-4 cartridges with no problem. Oddly, companies /neglect/ to take advantage of profits they could make on batteries. Palm no longer provides parts or service for the Tungsten T3 -- which is illegal. Had they charged (no pun intended) $50 to replace the battery, I would have sent the T3 to them. I replaced it myself for $6. If it lasts two or three years -- and batteries are still available -- I'll be happy. "Unless and until" some "ultimate" battery technology is developed, it's unlikely there will ever be a universal battery system (or systems). |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:34:52 -0800, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:11:07 -0800, "William Sommerwerck" wrote: It's unfortunate there are no standardized rechargeable battery packs for portable devices. This might have been doable when they were powered by AA and C cells, but modern devices are so small, and the battery is so tightly mechanically integrated, it isn't possible. There's a reason why nobody standardizes on battery packs. Battery packs are a major profit center. It's the razor blade model. Give away the razors, and sell lots of blades. It's also the plumbing model. Ever replace a rubber washer or bad valve seat in a leaky faucet? WAY near the top of _my_ pet peeve list. Jonesy |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
On 1/20/2011 12:59 PM, William Sommerwerck wrote:
Palm no longer provides parts or service for the Tungsten T3 -- which is illegal. How so? Jeff |
#9
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
Palm no longer provides parts or service for
the Tungsten T3 -- which is illegal. How so? There are Federal laws that oblige companies to stock service parts for three to ten years after a product is discontinued. These laws appear to have been weakened, but it also seems the Federal government doesn't really care. I had a case where a company couldn't supply parts for a current-production product, and I had to threaten that I would go to the Federal Trade Commission. The Tungsten T3 is still manufacturerd, though not, apparently, sold by Palm. Palm is legally obliged to provide parts for it, but refuses to. Even if it weren't manufactured, it has been less than 10 years since it was discontinued, and Palm is obligated to provide electrical/electronic parts. |
#10
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
William Sommerwerck wrote:
The Tungsten T3 is still manufacturerd, though not, apparently, sold by Palm. Palm is legally obliged to provide parts for it, but refuses to. Even if it weren't manufactured, it has been less than 10 years since it was discontinued, and Palm is obligated to provide electrical/electronic parts. Those laws probably do not say anything about pricing, do they? What good is forcing compliance if they would say "Fine...How many batteries do you want? They're $1000 each?" |
#11
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
"Steve Kraus" wrote in message
m... William Sommerwerck wrote: The Tungsten T3 is still manufacturerd, though not, apparently, sold by Palm. Palm is legally obliged to provide parts for it, but refuses to. Even if it weren't manufactured, it has been less than 10 years since it was discontinued, and Palm is obligated to provide electrical/electronic parts. Those laws probably do not say anything about pricing, do they? What good is forcing compliance if they would say "Fine...How many batteries do you want? They're $1000 each?" In the two cases where I forced companies to provide service or service parts, they complied at a reasonable price. Manufacturers (or importers) often gouge on the price of service parts. But if they have the parts, they're not going to charge such a huge price that the item won't sell at all. In one case where I complained about the cost of a replacement headphone cable (about 60% of the retail price of the complete headphone!), the manufacturer was so upset by the ridiculousness of the price that they simply sent me the cable for free (without my asking)! It was the beginning of a beautiful friendship. |
#12
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Polaroid Pola-Pack battery chemistry
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:11:07 -0800, "William Sommerwerck" wrote: It's unfortunate there are no standardized rechargeable battery packs for portable devices. This might have been doable when they were powered by AA and C cells, but modern devices are so small, and the battery is so tightly mechanically integrated, it isn't possible. There's a reason why nobody standardizes on battery packs. Battery packs are a major profit center. It's the razor blade model. Give away the razors, and sell lots of blades. For example, Motorola makes it policy of requiring a new battery, microphone, antenna, charger, and other accessories with every new model handheld radio and cell phone. Even models that are very similar, have intentional lumps and holes to make the previous generation of accessories incompatible. Same with some HP LaserJet cartridges. There's some hope with the ITU standardizing on the microUSB battery charger connector for portable devices: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Mobile_Terminal_Platform http://www.wacapps.net which are slowly being "embraced", which is doublespeak for being shoved down the manufacturers throats by various regulatory agencies. Way back in the early 1990's, there was some effort to standardize on a single laptop battery. Mallory and others invented a ten C cell package that just slid into the side of the laptop. It was popular for a short while, until laptops shrank below the size where it would fit. Nice try. the rectangular lead acid batteries that were almost standard in video cameras was nice, while that lasted. I seem to recall some computer used those too. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Battery drill external battery pack | Metalworking | |||
Unused Li-ion battery pack | Electronics Repair | |||
Robomower Battery Pack | Home Repair | |||
Battery pack and charger. | UK diy | |||
Battery pack Siemens A35 | Electronics Repair |