Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A long metric/imperial thread on the Australian Woodworking forum
included a discussion on the best way of marking a metric tape. The fact the the marks at 5mm were slightly longer than the other 1mm marks (but shorter than the 10mm marks) was considered a plus point. I have just bought a Starrett 6"/150mm metric conbination square. I was surprised to find that there are four heights of marking (longest to shortest): 10mm, 5mm, (2,3,7,8)mm, (1,4,6,9)mm. Or, IOW, extra prominence is given to the markings at 2,3,7,8 mm position within 10mm. Anyone know why? I have the feeling that they would have preferred to have marked 2.5 and 7.5, following imperial practice! Even odder, two of the four edges have 1/2 mm as unit, so markings at 2.5 and 7.5 would have made some sense there! (and please, no wars. . .) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Metric Doors and Cat flaps | UK diy | |||
David Marks | Woodworking | |||
S2S lumber with planing marks | Woodworking | |||
Socket Drive Sizes - Metric yet? | Metalworking | |||
How to get metal marks off of ceramic tile. | Home Repair |