| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
"R.H." wrote in
: http://microphotos.blogspot.com/ 14: Cassette tape. 15: Mechanical pencil. --Glenn Lyford |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
R.H. wrote:
Just added some new photos and answers to the last set: http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/ 219: Battery (cell) terminal (+) 222: Hog-ring plier? For crimping and re-opening a ring clip 223: Pointing tool? Dave |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
R.H. wrote: It's a bullet but I'm not sure what type, calling it a maxi or mini "ball" seems like an odd name for it. Not sure about a "Maxi" ball, but a "Minnie" (not "mini" ball is named after the inventor. A projectile used in the Civil war era to [ ... ] I had already suggested a bullet with a Minnie ball as a possibility, and the way to tell is to look at the bottom. If it is flat, it was a more recent cast lead bullet. If it has a significant cavity in the base, it is more likely to be a Minnie ball, though I believe that the outer surface is normally smoothly curved, not stepped as this one is. Thanks for the information, I'll have to do some research on this one. I added another photo showing the bottom, it is hollow and about 1/2" deep: http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/ O.K. with that deep a cavity, the behavior should be quite similar to a Minnie ball, though the exterior shape is somewhat unusual for one. But I have not seen many (either original or replicas), so it could be common in some areas or calibers. Enjoy, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
R.H. wrote: If anyone is interested, I added a few more microscope photos: http://microphotos.blogspot.com/ 11) Don't know 12) Some kind of string (cord) adjacent to perhaps a dyed toothpick? 13) uninsulated crimp terminal or splice -- unused. 14) Audio cassette tape running past the felt pressure pad which assures contact with the head. 15) Collet of some kind. Quite small, but it does not look like one from a Dremel. Perhaps from an old-fashioned dental drill? Enjoy, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 00:00:09 GMT, "R.H." wrote:
If anyone is interested, I added a few more microscope photos: http://microphotos.blogspot.com/ #11: Edge-on view of quarters #12: Don't know #13: Don't Know #14: Cassette tape #15: Mechanical pencil end |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://microphotos.blogspot.com/
11. A tap, edge-on. Either at three points, or at the same point of a taper, plug, bottom set. --Glenn Lyford |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:39:35 GMT, "R.H." wrote:
It's a bullet but I'm not sure what type, calling it a maxi or mini "ball" seems like an odd name for it. Not sure about a "Maxi" ball, but a "Minnie" (not "mini" ball is named after the inventor. A projectile used in the Civil war era to replace the previous bullets, which were round balls. The term "ball" continued for some time after that, even applying to 38 special revolver cartridges and 45 ACP cartridges during WWII. The Minnie ball (it really needs an accent somewhere which I am not prepared to add) had a hollow base. It was easily slid down on top of the power with the ramrod, and when fired, it expanded to grip the rifling more firmly. I had already suggested a bullet with a Minnie ball as a possibility, and the way to tell is to look at the bottom. If it is flat, it was a more recent cast lead bullet. If it has a significant cavity in the base, it is more likely to be a Minnie ball, though I believe that the outer surface is normally smoothly curved, not stepped as this one is. Thanks for the information, I'll have to do some research on this one. I added another photo showing the bottom, it is hollow and about 1/2" deep: http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/ If its hollow, its a Minni'e. Or a Paradox..G Gunner "To be civilized is to restrain the ability to commit mayhem. To be incapable of committing mayhem is not the mark of the civilized, merely the domesticated." - Trefor Thomas |
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Gunner" wrote in message ... On 18 Dec 2004 20:37:50 -0500, (DoN. Nichols) wrote: Thanks for the information, I'll have to do some research on this one. I added another photo showing the bottom, it is hollow and about 1/2" deep: http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/ O.K. with that deep a cavity, the behavior should be quite similar to a Minnie ball, though the exterior shape is somewhat unusual for one. But I have not seen many (either original or replicas), so it could be common in some areas or calibers. Enjoy, DoN. I finally got around to looking at the photo. Thats a Heath/ Keith style Semiwad cutter, and is likely to have come from a Henseley and Gibbs mould with a second choice being Ideal. What is the diameter of the second band? If its .429-.433, its likely for the 44 Special and if its .452-.455, its for the .45 ACP, both rounds to be fired typically from a target revolver. Hollow base bullets were very common in the 30s-70s for Bullseye shooters who were shooting light to medium loads at paper targets. The most common such today are 38 Special hollow base bullets, which typically have a totally blunt nose with no ogive. Thanks for the info, and also to everyone else who responded to this one, the diameter at the base is .5625 (9/16"), the other bands appear to be the same. |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Glenn Lyford" wrote in message 7... "R.H." wrote in : http://microphotos.blogspot.com/ 14: Cassette tape. 15: Mechanical pencil. Both of these are correct. |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mark & Juanita" wrote in message ... On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 00:00:09 GMT, "R.H." wrote: If anyone is interested, I added a few more microscope photos: http://microphotos.blogspot.com/ #11: Edge-on view of quarters #12: Don't know #13: Don't Know #14: Cassette tape #15: Mechanical pencil end These answers are all correct. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Glenn Lyford" wrote in message 7... http://microphotos.blogspot.com/ 11. A tap, edge-on. Either at three points, or at the same point of a taper, plug, bottom set. --Glenn Lyford This one isn't a tap. |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Bell" wrote in message . .. R.H. wrote: Just added some new photos and answers to the last set: http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/ 219: Battery (cell) terminal (+) Correct. 222: Hog-ring plier? For crimping and re-opening a ring clip Nope 223: Pointing tool? I don't think it's a pointing tool |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tom Quackenbush" wrote in message news  R.H. wrote: snip It is similar to Lyman #20098 as seen on the page below, though it's not quite an exact match. I would guess that these would be solid and not hollow on the bottom. http://www.black-powder.com/BPC%20su...ulletMolds.htm Closer to the Lyman 575494 Minie, I think: http://www.thunder-ridge-muzzleloadi...yman_molds.htm Can you check the diameter? The diameter is just a little larger than 9/16" so it looks like you're right, it's probably a Lyman 575494, thanks for the link. |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Fred R "spam wrote: Very Good! I always enjoy your answers more than the real ones - just what the doctor ordered for Friday evening. (: Good! I was starting to wonder if I was amusing anyone or simply being annoying. -- B.B. --I am not a goat! thegoat4 at airmail dot net http://web2.airmail.net/thegoat4/ |
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"R.H." wrote: 15) Collet of some kind. Quite small, but it does not look like one from a Dremel. Perhaps from an old-fashioned dental drill? It's not from a drill or Dremel. Mechanical pencil. Umm...of DOOM! There, sounds better now. -- B.B. --I am not a goat! thegoat4 at airmail dot net http://web2.airmail.net/thegoat4/ |
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
"B.B." u wrote in message news  In article , "R.H." wrote: 15) Collet of some kind. Quite small, but it does not look like one from a Dremel. Perhaps from an old-fashioned dental drill? It's not from a drill or Dremel. Mechanical pencil. Umm...of DOOM! There, sounds better now. Correct |
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
11. Some type of gear teeth, probably watch related. 12 A pencil next to a rope/twine reference. 13. The detent on an SDS hammer drill bit. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Keep the whole world singing . . . . DanG (remove the sevens) "R.H." wrote in message ... If anyone is interested, I added a few more microscope photos: http://microphotos.blogspot.com/ |
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
"DanG" wrote in message news:7Aixd.244$ZL.183@okepread03... 11. Some type of gear teeth, probably watch related. These aren't gear teeth, it's actually three separate objects next to each other. 12 A pencil next to a rope/twine reference. This one isn't a pencil, nor rope/twine. 13. The detent on an SDS hammer drill bit. Nope. |
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:33:06 GMT, Tom Quackenbush
wrote: R.H. wrote: snip It is similar to Lyman #20098 as seen on the page below, though it's not quite an exact match. I would guess that these would be solid and not hollow on the bottom. http://www.black-powder.com/BPC%20su...ulletMolds.htm Closer to the Lyman 575494 Minie, I think: http://www.thunder-ridge-muzzleloadi...yman_molds.htm Can you check the diameter? OOOH!! I didnt know Lyman made that mould. Very nice! Gunner "To be civilized is to restrain the ability to commit mayhem. To be incapable of committing mayhem is not the mark of the civilized, merely the domesticated." - Trefor Thomas |
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
R.H. wrote: Closer to the Lyman 575494 Minie, I think: http://www.thunder-ridge-muzzleloadi...yman_molds.htm Can you check the diameter? The diameter is just a little larger than 9/16" so it looks like you're right, it's probably a Lyman 575494, thanks for the link. Shame they don't have a .6 (.596 true bore) to suit my commercial hunting snyder.... |
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Gunner wrote: Thats a Heath/ Keith style Semiwad cutter, and is likely to have come from a Henseley and Gibbs mould with a second choice being Ideal. What is the diameter of the second band? If its .429-.433, its likely for the 44 Special and if its .452-.455, its for the .45 ACP, both rounds to be fired typically from a target revolver. Hollow base bullets were very common in the 30s-70s for Bullseye shooters who were shooting light to medium loads at paper targets. The most common such today are 38 Special hollow base bullets, which typically have a totally blunt nose with no ogive. What's with the grooves? I haven't seen them in modern cartridges, though Minies had them. Were these for black-powder revolvers? |
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Matthew Russotto wrote: In article , Gunner wrote: Thats a Heath/ Keith style Semiwad cutter, and is likely to have come from a Henseley and Gibbs mould with a second choice being Ideal. What is the diameter of the second band? If its .429-.433, its likely for the 44 Special and if its .452-.455, its for the .45 ACP, both rounds to be fired typically from a target revolver. Hollow base bullets were very common in the 30s-70s for Bullseye shooters who were shooting light to medium loads at paper targets. The most common such today are 38 Special hollow base bullets, which typically have a totally blunt nose with no ogive. What's with the grooves? I haven't seen them in modern cartridges, though Minies had them. Were these for black-powder revolvers? They (in cast bullets) are to carry lube into the bore, so you don't get as much lead fouling. Not too common in jacketed revolver bullets (which is what I usually shoot), though some rifle bullets have a groove for the case mouth crimp, so the bullet is not either driven deeper or partially pulled by recoil in the weapon -- or even worse, by the stack of bullets in a tubular magazine. (There, you *really* want a blunt nose, so it does not set of the primer of the next cartridge above it in the magazine. :-) Out of curiosity -- since this is so heavily cross-posted, why don't we put an indicator as to which newsgroup we are posting from? I'm posting from rec.crafts.metalworking, FWIW. Enjoy, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
Grooves in cast lead bullets are for the addition of a lubricant in
those grooves to help keep bore fouling to a minimum. John On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 15:20:22 -0600, (Matthew Russotto) wrote: In article , Gunner wrote: Thats a Heath/ Keith style Semiwad cutter, and is likely to have come from a Henseley and Gibbs mould with a second choice being Ideal. What is the diameter of the second band? If its .429-.433, its likely for the 44 Special and if its .452-.455, its for the .45 ACP, both rounds to be fired typically from a target revolver. Hollow base bullets were very common in the 30s-70s for Bullseye shooters who were shooting light to medium loads at paper targets. The most common such today are 38 Special hollow base bullets, which typically have a totally blunt nose with no ogive. What's with the grooves? I haven't seen them in modern cartridges, though Minies had them. Were these for black-powder revolvers? |
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 20:57:11 GMT, Badger
wrote: R.H. wrote: Closer to the Lyman 575494 Minie, I think: http://www.thunder-ridge-muzzleloadi...yman_molds.htm Can you check the diameter? The diameter is just a little larger than 9/16" so it looks like you're right, it's probably a Lyman 575494, thanks for the link. Shame they don't have a .6 (.596 true bore) to suit my commercial hunting snyder.... Got a lathe? Its quite easy to make your own mould , or even the bullets themselves. Gunner "To be civilized is to restrain the ability to commit mayhem. To be incapable of committing mayhem is not the mark of the civilized, merely the domesticated." - Trefor Thomas |
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Tom Quackenbush wrote: DoN. Nichols wrote: [ ... ] I think that "Maxi" is a Thompson Center creation. I think the correct spelling is "Minie", with an accent over the "e". O.K. I knew that the accent was missing, but wasn't sure whether it should be one or two 'n's. I could post it using extended ASCII, but I don't think that my 8-bit ASCII is the same as everyone else's 8-bit ASCII. As an aside, is there a UNIX/WENIX/Linux standard for 8-bit ASCII? Sure -- how many do you want? :-) The one which I have selected on my Solaris 8 machine is: ISO8859-15 but the Solaris 2.6 machines don't go beyond: ISO8859-1 and no -- I don't know what the actual difference is. :-) There were about twenty to choose from when I installed the OS, and this one is probably the best bet overall. Some of them don't handle American English very well -- being optimized for other languages. And some are totally confusing (the ones which implement the Japanese Kanji for example. :-) I haven't really explored which ones my OpenBSD systems offer -- both the ones on Intel CPUs and the ones on Sun SPARCs. But, when you don't know what will be reading what you post, plain 7-bit ASCII is the safest. :-) Enjoy, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
|
DoN. Nichols wrote:
Tom Quackenbush wrote: snip As an aside, is there a UNIX/WENIX/Linux standard for 8-bit ASCII? Sure -- how many do you want? :-) The one which I have selected on my Solaris 8 machine is: ISO8859-15 but the Solaris 2.6 machines don't go beyond: ISO8859-1 and no -- I don't know what the actual difference is. :-) There were about twenty to choose from when I installed the OS, and this one is probably the best bet overall. Some of them don't handle American English very well -- being optimized for other languages. And some are totally confusing (the ones which implement the Japanese Kanji for example. :-) I haven't really explored which ones my OpenBSD systems offer -- both the ones on Intel CPUs and the ones on Sun SPARCs. But, when you don't know what will be reading what you post, plain 7-bit ASCII is the safest. :-) Wow - ain't standards great? And so many to choose from! Thanks for the info. R, Tom Q. |
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Tom Quackenbush wrote: As an aside, is there a UNIX/WENIX/Linux standard for 8-bit ASCII? ISO-8859-1 (ISO Latin 1) would be appropriate for this case; to do it right you'd have to include a charset header (I don't recall the exact format) in your post as well. |
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
|
I missed the staff meeting but the minutes show Gunner
wrote back on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:36:35 GMT in rec.crafts.metalworking : On 19 Dec 2004 16:50:29 -0500, (DoN. Nichols) wrote: In article , Matthew Russotto wrote: In article , Gunner wrote: Thats a Heath/ Keith style Semiwad cutter, and is likely to have come from a Henseley and Gibbs mould with a second choice being Ideal. What is the diameter of the second band? If its .429-.433, its likely for the 44 Special and if its .452-.455, its for the .45 ACP, both rounds to be fired typically from a target revolver. Hollow base bullets were very common in the 30s-70s for Bullseye shooters who were shooting light to medium loads at paper targets. The most common such today are 38 Special hollow base bullets, which typically have a totally blunt nose with no ogive. What's with the grooves? I haven't seen them in modern cartridges, though Minies had them. Were these for black-powder revolvers? They (in cast bullets) are to carry lube into the bore, so you don't get as much lead fouling. Not too common in jacketed revolver bullets (which is what I usually shoot), though some rifle bullets have a groove for the case mouth crimp, so the bullet is not either driven deeper or partially pulled by recoil in the weapon -- or even worse, by the stack of bullets in a tubular magazine. (There, you *really* want a blunt nose, so it does not set of the primer of the next cartridge above it in the magazine. :-) Out of curiosity -- since this is so heavily cross-posted, why don't we put an indicator as to which newsgroup we are posting from? I'm posting from rec.crafts.metalworking, FWIW. Enjoy, DoN. RCM as well Agent has that option, Optionsposting preferencesIntroductions, and put %newsgroups% in the appropriate line. As in "%from% wrote on %date% in %newsgroup% :" It helps me to keep track of where I was reading and responding to what. -- pyotr filipivich. as an explaination for the decline in the US's tech edge, James Niccol wrote "It used to be that the USA was pretty good at producing stuff teenaged boys could lose a finger or two playing with." |
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tom Quackenbush writes:
Tom Quackenbush wrote: snip As an aside, is there a UNIX/WENIX/Linux standard for 8-bit ASCII? WENIX = XENIX. ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange) is by definition 7-bit. The typical 8-bit character set on linux is ISO-8859-1 (Latin) which is based on 7-bit ASCII + a number of western european characters. Older unix may support 8-bit ascii, but the upper 128 bytes are not standardized between vendors. scott |
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barbara Bailey wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:48:36 GMT, "R.H." wrote: "Gerald Clough" wrote in message ... R.H. wrote: Just added some new photos and answers to the last set: http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/ 220 looks like a semi wadcutter pistol bullet. Somewhat unusual nose. Yes, it's a bullet but I'm not sure what particular type of weapon it's for. It's a Minie Ball, used in black-powder/muzzleloaders. I'd say it's about a .40 cal. I'd say it is a 45 wad cutter. Plenty are used on rifle and pistol ranges. If it slams into something - it pancakes nicely. Otherwise it punches a nice and well marked (dark lead ring) around the hole. Martin -- Martin Eastburn, Barbara Eastburn @ home at Lion's Lair with our computer NRA LOH, NRA Life NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Founder |
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scott Lurndal wrote:
Tom Quackenbush writes: Tom Quackenbush wrote: snip As an aside, is there a UNIX/WENIX/Linux standard for 8-bit ASCII? WENIX = XENIX. ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange) is by definition 7-bit. The typical 8-bit character set on linux is ISO-8859-1 (Latin) which is based on 7-bit ASCII + a number of western european characters. Older unix may support 8-bit ascii, but the upper 128 bytes are not standardized between vendors. scott ASCII has both 7 and 8 bit level codes. 7 is common on teletypes, while 8 is controlling other functions typically on electronic equipment. There is 5 & 6 level codes - Baudot and Trascii. 6 level code was needed for some bit slice machines. Only the 6 level (of the two) has ASCII roots. Martin [ has used all four ] -- Martin Eastburn, Barbara Eastburn @ home at Lion's Lair with our computer NRA LOH, NRA Life NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Founder |
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
|
Check out these Text files : specs!
http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/ Martin Tom Quackenbush wrote: DoN. Nichols wrote: Tom Quackenbush wrote: snip As an aside, is there a UNIX/WENIX/Linux standard for 8-bit ASCII? Sure -- how many do you want? :-) The one which I have selected on my Solaris 8 machine is: ISO8859-15 but the Solaris 2.6 machines don't go beyond: ISO8859-1 and no -- I don't know what the actual difference is. :-) There were about twenty to choose from when I installed the OS, and this one is probably the best bet overall. Some of them don't handle American English very well -- being optimized for other languages. And some are totally confusing (the ones which implement the Japanese Kanji for example. :-) I haven't really explored which ones my OpenBSD systems offer -- both the ones on Intel CPUs and the ones on Sun SPARCs. But, when you don't know what will be reading what you post, plain 7-bit ASCII is the safest. :-) Wow - ain't standards great? And so many to choose from! Thanks for the info. R, Tom Q. -- Martin Eastburn, Barbara Eastburn @ home at Lion's Lair with our computer NRA LOH, NRA Life NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Founder |
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Martin H. Eastburn wrote: Check out these Text files : specs! http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/ Thanks! So -- there are some differences: 8bit 16bit 8859-1 8859-15 ================================================== ==================== 0xA4 0x00A4 # CURRENCY SIGN EURO SIGN 0xA6 0x00A6 # BROKEN BAR LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S WITH CARON 0xA8 0x00A8 # DIAERESIS LATIN SMALL LETTER S WITH CARON 0xB4 0x00B4 # ACUTE ACCENT LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z WITH CARON 0xB8 0x00B8 # CEDILLA LATIN SMALL LETTER Z WITH CARON 0xBC 0x00BC # VULGAR FRACTION ONE QUARTER LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE OE 0xBD 0x00BD # VULGAR FRACTION ONE HALF LATIN SMALL LIGATURE OE 0xBE 0x00BE # VULGAR FRACTION THREE QUARTERS LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH DIAERESIS 0xD0 0x00D0 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER The (Icelandic) LATIN CAPITAL LETTER The 0xDE 0x00DE # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER THORN (Icelandic) LATIN CAPITAL LETTER THORN 0xDF 0x00DF # LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S (German) LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S 0xF0 0x00F0 # LATIN SMALL LETTER ETH (Icelandic) LATIN SMALL LETTER ETH 0xFE 0x00FE # LATIN SMALL LETTER THORN (Icelandic) LATIN SMALL LETTER THORN Aside from everything from 0x81 through 0x9F being defined as control characters, which is how they are handled on my system. But I see postings from Windows boxen and from Macs which use characters in that range for something or other. Merry Christmas DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
|
224 is a chain repair link
225 is part of a tube flaring tool. The part you clamp the tube in is missing. 226 looks like a blackjack 227 is a bicycle spoke wrench 229 is a chain saw chain link |
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
|
R.H. wrote:
Just added some new photos and answers to the last set: http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/ 228. Looks like an angle gage. I've seen artists using something like that to get perspective correct. Fred |
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
|
"ff" wrote in message ... R.H. wrote: Just added some new photos and answers to the last set: http://puzzlephotos.blogspot.com/ 228. Looks like an angle gage. I've seen artists using something like that to get perspective correct. Thanks, I'll put this on my list of possible answers. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
