Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Transfer Tool
Hey:
I need help with the entire concept of a "transfer tool". I've currently got a Lenk L25TT 25 Watt transfer tool. Nothing transfers. I think I'm doing it right. I print out my design on my laser printer, which uses dry toner, put the drawing face down on wood and, after the tool has had time to heat up, I press it on the design. I've tried moving the tool fast, slow, agonizingly slow and even standing it in one place, but if any transfer occurs (and I stress the IF) it's small isolated patches that do me no good. I even tried a desperate move and dug an old electric clothes iron out of my closet and tried that on a variety of settings, up to scorching the paper. I tried plywood and, just in case the texture made a difference, I also tried a piece of pine that had been sanded. The results were identical. Am I doing something wrong or is the entire concept flawed? Thanks in advance |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The paper you use can make or break this technique. Some bond paper will
just not give up the toner. In particular I think paper with higher recycled content holds the toner too tight. I like to use vellum instead. The toner tends to lay on the surface of cotton based vellum and releases will. If you can find erasable vellum, that is even better but I don't bother with that. I just use a yard sale clothes iron, set for cotton. -- Bill Pounds http://www.billpounds.com/woodshop "MarcColten" wrote in message ... Hey: I need help with the entire concept of a "transfer tool". I've currently got a Lenk L25TT 25 Watt transfer tool. Nothing transfers. I think I'm doing it right. I print out my design on my laser printer, which uses dry toner, put the drawing face down on wood and, after the tool has had time to heat up, I press it on the design. I've tried moving the tool fast, slow, agonizingly slow and even standing it in one place, but if any transfer occurs (and I stress the IF) it's small isolated patches that do me no good. I even tried a desperate move and dug an old electric clothes iron out of my closet and tried that on a variety of settings, up to scorching the paper. I tried plywood and, just in case the texture made a difference, I also tried a piece of pine that had been sanded. The results were identical. Am I doing something wrong or is the entire concept flawed? Thanks in advance |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:02:35 -0500, (J T)
wrote: Fri, Nov 26, 2004, 2:22am (EST+5) (MarcColten) pleads: Hey: I need help with the entire concept snip I've tried it, didn't like it. Now, I either fasten paper patterns down to the wood, draw right on the wood, or cut using a wood pattern. Less fuss, less muss, faster, easier. JOAT Measure twice, cut once, swear repeatedly. That works for some things and not for others. If you have to reapply the pattern repeatedly it is a huge pain. For that matter it's a large pain if the pattern is particularly inticrate. Heat transfers are a lot faster. --RC Sleep? Isn't that a totally inadequate substitute for caffine? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:11:33 -0500, (J T)
wrote: Sat, Nov 27, 2004, 2:37pm (EST+5) claims: That works for some things and not for others. If you have to reapply the pattern repeatedly it is a huge pain. For that matter it's a large pain if the pattern is particularly inticrate. Heat transfers are a lot faster. Works for all I've tried so far. Make multiple copies. No prob. It is if you have to keep re-tracing from those multiple copies. Especially if you're only tracing part of the pattern on succeeding copies. Intricate patterns, no prob, some of mine have quite fine detail, come out quite clear. When I say 'intricate' I mean things like pictures of wildlife posterized from photographs. That's an awful lot of drawing. The heat transfer patterns I've tried only worked half-way decently, one time each. As I say, there's a skill to making making heat transfer patterns and it's learned by experience. So, you'd need multiple. Yep, and you run multiple copies when you make your copies. Easy enough. And, again, faster and more accurate than trying to transfer with carbon paper or something. Plus, they never showed up that great, Show up fine for me. As I say, you have to get the surface flat for heat transfers to work. I don't think that's at all a bad thing to begin with so I don't see that as extra work. especially on darker wood. I suppose you could use a color laser printer and print the pattern in white or yellow toner, but I'll give you that one. I use dressmakers' carbon paper in white or yellow and then go back and touch up with something like a whiteout pen. Something of a PITA, but it works. Only have to do it on woods like walnut. Even brown oak has enough contrast. The paper patterns work as fast, or faster, for me; but, even if they didn't, I'm not doing this for a living, so am not terribly concerned. Yep. YMMV and that's what makes horse races. Not everyone is going to like doing heat transfers, but for them that do, there are things you need to do to get a good pattern. --RC (who's getting ready to transfer some patterns for relief carved signs right now.) JOAT Measure twice, cut once, swear repeatedly. Sleep? Isn't that a totally inadequate substitute for caffine? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:15:59 -0500, (J T)
wrote: Sun, Nov 28, 2004, 12:59am (EST+5) mumbles: It is if you have to keep re-tracing from those multiple copies. Especially if you're only tracing part of the pattern on succeeding copies. I don't re-trace anything. Photo copies. Works just as good on part of the pattern. Okay, now you've got me confused. Do you mean you don't transfer the pattern at all but rather glue down the photocopy on the wood? For a lot of the stuff I do that doesn't work worth a damn. Try carving through a pattern like that and you'll see what I mean. But if that's not what you're doing, could you explain your technique to me? --RC Sleep? Isn't that a totally inadequate substitute for caffine? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Iscar Parting Tool and Tool Block Question... | Metalworking | |||
How do you adjust the cutter bit on Aloris Tool Holders | Metalworking | |||
Musings on Tool Sets (Apologies to Arch) | Woodturning |