Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Laguna finally came out with their new line of jointers. The higher end 8" helical jointer looks nice but at $2750, I think it's out of my range. Interestingly, all of the Laguna jointers are parallogram. There are no more dovetail jointers in their lineup. They have 54 cutters, like Powermatic. The lower end 8" jointer is very similar (1.5HP vs 1.75HP WOW!) but only has 20 cutters and goes for $2000. 20 cutters, really? There is a picture of the cutter head. It looks like a kid missing half its teeth. https://lagunatools.com/classic/jointers/jx8-eco/ Click on the plus sign on the safety cover. It's very different than either the Jet or Powermatic so it's a tough call. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:17:02 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote: On 3/12/2021 4:28 PM, wrote: Laguna finally came out with their new line of jointers. The higher end 8" helical jointer looks nice but at $2750, I think it's out of my range. Interestingly, all of the Laguna jointers are parallogram. There are no more dovetail jointers in their lineup. They have 54 cutters, like Powermatic. The lower end 8" jointer is very similar (1.5HP vs 1.75HP WOW!) but only has 20 cutters and goes for $2000. 20 cutters, really? There is a picture of the cutter head. It looks like a kid missing half its teeth. https://lagunatools.com/classic/jointers/jx8-eco/ Click on the plus sign on the safety cover. It's very different than either the Jet or Powermatic so it's a tough call. Well the lower end jointer appears to have gone up to $2250 already. So both jointers look pretty good but you are paying for the extra teeth on the more costly one. And it seems the cutter heads may be from different manufacturers. They are called different names. Money being no object.... More teeth and larger motor (3HP vs. 1.75HP). I'd rather not run another 220 line but perhaps wouldn't need it because the chances of it running full-tilt for any time is zero. I have one 20A line run for the DC and another for all of the tools (TS, BS, and lathe). I *really* don't want to run 10-2 across the basement. The Laguna is a parallelogram jointer, where the others have dovetail ways. I don't know how significant that is, really, but I understand that adjusting tables on a dovetail machine is one RPITA. I would like to see a video showing the importance or advantage/disadvantage of the extendable infeed roller. It seems that the end of the board would drop down in the void between the roller and the infeed table if the board crowned up in the middle. And having said that why no outfeed roller. And I am seeing the more expensive one with 3 HP. vs 1.75. I did not see a 1.5 version. I must have been thinking about the 6". Given the length of the tables, I was surprised to see that they are relatively light weight. 300 lb unpacked. Is the Jet that light too? My Jet jointer/planer comes in at about 500lb IIRC. 600lb packed. 500lbs packed. 380lbs net. The Jet has cheaper boxes (450#/380#). Then Powermatic is almost 500lbs shipped, and a little over 400lbs net. And the last thing to consider, the warranty. Jet may be 5 times longer. 5 years. I don't know anything about Jet customer service but Laguna's reputation isn't great. I've only contacted them a couple of times but was reasonably satisfied. As you may remember, the light mount (part of the lathe) was tapped wrong. After *finally* getting the right number, they sent out a replacement part, no charge (I'd have been ****ed otherwise). Small problem. They sent the flange for the 15/24 and I have the 18/36. When called again, they sent the right casting and I had it in a couple of days. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:17:02 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote: ... I would like to see a video showing the importance or advantage/disadvantage of the extendable infeed roller. It seems that the end of the board would drop down in the void between the roller and the infeed table if the board crowned up in the middle. And having said that why no outfeed roller. Agreed. An extra 8" on a 72" bed doesn't seem like it's worth much and could be a real problem. I marked that up to the design marketeering department. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message ...
Agreed. An extra 8" on a 72" bed doesn't seem like it's worth much and could be a real problem. I marked that up to the design marketeering department. I've been thinking about that roller and also about some of the boards I've run through my DJ-20. The beds on the DJ-20 are 76.5" and I've run 12'-16' stock through it. The wood drags on the edge of the infeed table as it's fed. I'm thinking that the roller would likely reduce or even eliminate that friction and make it easier to feed the wood. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/12/2021 10:39 PM, John Grossbohlin wrote:
wrote in message ... Agreed.Â* An extra 8" on a 72" bed doesn't seem like it's worth much and could be a real problem.Â* I marked that up to the design marketeering department. I've been thinking about that roller and also about some of the boards I've run through my DJ-20. The beds on the DJ-20 are 76.5" and I've run 12'-16' stock through it. The wood drags on the edge of the infeed table as it's fed. I'm thinking that the roller would likely reduce or even eliminate that friction and make it easier to feed the wood. Yes. But when the end of the board clears the roller it falls and drags on the end of the in feed table.... ESPECIALLY on boards less than 8' long. Eliminating that friction or drag would be temporary with every board that is longer than the in feed table. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Leon" wrote in message
... On 3/12/2021 10:39 PM, John Grossbohlin wrote: I've been thinking about that roller and also about some of the boards I've run through my DJ-20. The beds on the DJ-20 are 76.5" and I've run 12'-16' stock through it. The wood drags on the edge of the infeed table as it's fed. I'm thinking that the roller would likely reduce or even eliminate that friction and make it easier to feed the wood. Yes. But when the end of the board clears the roller it falls and drags on the end of the in feed table.... ESPECIALLY on boards less than 8' long. Eliminating that friction or drag would be temporary with every board that is longer than the in feed table. Yes, it's temporary. However, when you have 12-16' boards in play the last thing you need is more friction while you've got all that wood hanging out there! By the time the end of the board reaches the roller it's a non-issue. This as the problem of the board drooping, even a little, over the end of the infeed and dragging is all but gone by then... The feed pressure is on the outfeed table within a foot or two of feeding and that generally controls the cut. When face jointing, if a board is so bowed or twisted that more than droop is creating a lot of friction at the end of the infeed table I'd think it should be cut to shorter lengths. This as there might be nothing left by the time it's flat! Likewise, for edge jointing, if the crook is real bad it should either be straight line ripped or cut into shorter lengths. Me... bow/twist/crook assessments take place before the wood gets to the jointer and if they are bad enough a saw will be involved before the jointer is used. It's the droop induced friction on the long boards that would be nice to moderate and a roller could help do that. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 23:39:34 -0500, "John Grossbohlin"
wrote: wrote in message ... Agreed. An extra 8" on a 72" bed doesn't seem like it's worth much and could be a real problem. I marked that up to the design marketeering department. I've been thinking about that roller and also about some of the boards I've run through my DJ-20. The beds on the DJ-20 are 76.5" and I've run 12'-16' stock through it. The wood drags on the edge of the infeed table as it's fed. I'm thinking that the roller would likely reduce or even eliminate that friction and make it easier to feed the wood. But it also has to be perfectly coplanar with the table. Another possible nightmare, IMO. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:01:36 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote: On 3/12/2021 5:56 PM, wrote: On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:17:02 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: ... I would like to see a video showing the importance or advantage/disadvantage of the extendable infeed roller. It seems that the end of the board would drop down in the void between the roller and the infeed table if the board crowned up in the middle. And having said that why no outfeed roller. Agreed. An extra 8" on a 72" bed doesn't seem like it's worth much and could be a real problem. I marked that up to the design marketeering department. LOL exactly. Hammer offers an extension but is solid iron with no big gap. I would be more concerned with the gap, on the Laguna, than the short addition. After all, you run boards through a jointer because they are not straight or flat. Certainly when the end of the board falls between the in feed table and the roller the board will lift up on the out feed side. It may not be an issue but I would have to try it out before I was convinced that is is a feature and not a problem issue. I don't see that as a problem so much as the roller not being coplanar with the table. Bending the board (either up or down) going through the knives doesn't seem to be a good idea. I guess it's better than hanging off the end but it's still only 8". Maybe if it makes it easier for rollers, it might be worth it. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 4:28:38 PM UTC-6, wrote:
Laguna finally came out with their new line of jointers. The higher end 8" helical jointer looks nice but at $2750, I think it's out of my range. Interestingly, all of the Laguna jointers are parallogram. There are no more dovetail jointers in their lineup. They have 54 cutters, like Powermatic. The lower end 8" jointer is very similar (1.5HP vs 1.75HP WOW!) but only has 20 cutters and goes for $2000. 20 cutters, really? There is a picture of the cutter head. It looks like a kid missing half its teeth. https://lagunatools.com/classic/jointers/jx8-eco/ Click on the plus sign on the safety cover. It's very different than either the Jet or Powermatic so it's a tough call. Is HP really much of a concern with jointers? I think its kind of like a drill press. HP isn't really a factor in deciding which drill press to buy. With a jointer you will be taking off more wood the wider the jointer is. But you can and do adjust the depth of cut so you are only taking off a tiny tiny tiny amount of wood. And you sneak up on taking off the wood. You don't start taking off a full cut. Now I'm not saying you want an underpowered jointer. But once you get enough HP, its enough. You can then ignore that spec. |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 09:25:32 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:
On 3/12/2021 4:28 PM, wrote: Laguna finally came out with their new line of jointers. The higher end 8" helical jointer looks nice but at $2750, I think it's out of my range. Interestingly, all of the Laguna jointers are parallogram. There are no more dovetail jointers in their lineup. They have 54 cutters, like Powermatic. The lower end 8" jointer is very similar (1.5HP vs 1.75HP WOW!) but only has 20 cutters and goes for $2000. 20 cutters, really? There is a picture of the cutter head. It looks like a kid missing half its teeth. https://lagunatools.com/classic/jointers/jx8-eco/ Click on the plus sign on the safety cover. It's very different than either the Jet or Powermatic so it's a tough call. So! Now you can get a 100th Anniversary Powermatic. Comes in Black with Gold highlights! When sexy is a consideration, this might be it! ;~) It's not quite as ugly as the 99th anniversary Powermatic. There isn't an 8" model, either. So, it's either wait, wait, or wait. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anyone know *anything* about Vega jointers? | Woodworking | |||
Fixed blade POWERED jointers. | Woodworking | |||
6" jointers: Jet 6CSX vs. Delta 37-275X? | Woodworking | |||
book review - Jointers and Planers: How to Choose, Use and Maintain Them (Rick Peters) | Woodworking | |||
Planers versus jointers | Woodworking |