Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:59:52 -0700, SBH wrote
(in article ): I'm midway to finishing my router table and I'm contemplating the placement of the Dust Collection connector hose. I've noticed most tables have the hose attached to the rear of the table (behind the router) but saw a limited few which had the attachment on the bottom (under the router), thus, making me wonder if one has the advantage over the other. Part of my thought leans towards the bottom placement due to the gravity effect. The other part thinks it may not make a difference with a powerful DC system. Therefore, what's the consensus amongst the group? Thanks In my opinion it's is probably more a mater of convention. Rear connection is easier to access and less prone to falling off. Also, with a router table/cabinet a bottom connection would eat up a chunk of drawer storage. -Bruce |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question Table Saw Switch Placement | Woodworking | |||
Router table placement choices | Woodworking | |||
Router table placement choices | Woodworking | |||
Router table placement choices | Woodworking | |||
Router table placement choices | Woodworking |