Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have both. in the fence and I built a pvc shroud that grabs what it
can from the shaft of the motor. When cutting grooves this does the best job below the table. When cutting with the bit in the fence then the normal fence mounted works best. Neither is perfect. Some will still get kicked out the side. On 12/19/2010 4:59 PM, SBH wrote: I'm midway to finishing my router table and I'm contemplating the placement of the Dust Collection connector hose. I've noticed most tables have the hose attached to the rear of the table (behind the router) but saw a limited few which had the attachment on the bottom (under the router), thus, making me wonder if one has the advantage over the other. Part of my thought leans towards the bottom placement due to the gravity effect. The other part thinks it may not make a difference with a powerful DC system. Therefore, what's the consensus amongst the group? Thanks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question Table Saw Switch Placement | Woodworking | |||
Router table placement choices | Woodworking | |||
Router table placement choices | Woodworking | |||
Router table placement choices | Woodworking | |||
Router table placement choices | Woodworking |