On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:49:17 -0800 (PST), the infamous whit3rd
scrawled the following:

On Nov 29, 2:09*pm, krw wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:10:57 -0600, -MIKE-
wrote:


Now, we're back to whatever post talked about a tablesaw stacked dado
being much better. *:-)

Now that I have a table saw, sure. *I still tend to use a router for
large panels. *I'm not very good at controlling sheets of stuff on the
table saw. *Moving the tool is easier.

Which is why another post was talking about a radial arm saw with
a dado stack; somewhat scary, of course, but much easier.
Small RAS don't have the right guards for a dado, that's a MAJOR
reason to buy a big 'un.

Wow, there are different _sizes_ of radio alarm saws?
Whoda thunk it?

--
Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints.

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:28:15 -0800, Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:49:17 -0800 (PST), the infamous whit3rd
scrawled the following:

On Nov 29, 2:09*pm, krw wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:10:57 -0600, -MIKE-
wrote:


Now, we're back to whatever post talked about a tablesaw stacked dado
being much better. *:-)

Now that I have a table saw, sure. *I still tend to use a router for
large panels. *I'm not very good at controlling sheets of stuff on the
table saw. *Moving the tool is easier.

Which is why another post was talking about a radial arm saw with
a dado stack; somewhat scary, of course, but much easier.
Small RAS don't have the right guards for a dado, that's a MAJOR
reason to buy a big 'un.

Wow, there are different _sizes_ of radio alarm saws?

Surely you don't think everyone saws the same sized logs? It takes a
bigger radio alarm for big logs.

Whoda thunk it?

What trunk?