Upscale wrote:
"Jack Stein" wrote in message
manage to change our system to one like yours the bad news is then our
system will suck as bad as yours, but the good news is, you will not be
able to get any better treatment here than you do in Canada.

I happen to like our medical system. And believe me, I use it so I know
about it. Obviously, you thinking it sucks means that you're opinion is
based solely on hearsay without any practical experience.

Yes, I've heard lots about it, long waits to MRI's, higher death rates
from all sorts of things. Add to that my first and second hand
experiences with government ****ing up every thing they touch and
it doesn't take much thought to see why Americans are happy with what
they have rather than getting what you have.

Not surprisingly,
you're opinion is popular among most of the people in the US who happen to
like your system. And just as obviously, that opinion is carried by those
who can afford your system. It most certainly isn't 85% if the population,
not even close to it.

Well it is 85% of the population. In fact, I doubt you could find more
than 85% of the population liking anything. Doesn't matter to you
though, you have your socialized medicine, and thats fine by me. Just
so our super successful system is improved upon, and not dragged down to
your level by some ****ed up socialist regime.


--
Jack
Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/
http://jbstein.com

"FrozenNorth" wrote in message
Government ****ing things up? Want to looks at banks or Enron, the
government doesn't have an exclusive right to make a mess of things. I
submit any big institution can make a mess of things.

Which is backed up by the fact that they already have. Jack can rail all he
wants about what he perceives to be deficiencies in some Canadian system,
but no where, no time in world history has there been bigger financial
screws ups than what has happened during the last year or so in the US.

Deal with it Jack. You live in a country that largely precipitated the worst
of the worst ever in money matter fiascos.

"Jack Stein" wrote:

snip a continuing litany of complaints as seen thru the eyes of one
afflicted with a severe case of analitis

Perhaps some oral sex might help, but then again maybe just some
Ex-Lax.

Lew

Upscale wrote:
"Jack Stein" wrote in message
Yes, I've heard lots about it, long waits to MRI's, higher death rates
from all sorts of things.

Yes, you've heard second, third and fourth hand, but know ****.

So there are not long waits for MRI's? The death rate for say prostrate
cancer is not higher in Canada than the US? Do I have to move to your
socialist utopia rather than get my information from 2nd hand sources?
I hope not. I will say this, I don't see your country getting invaded
by millions of aliens breaking down the borders to share your wealth, or
your health care.

Let me introduce you to Tim Daneliuk.

Who?

Your responses and replies are the frothing at the mouth version his
mindset.

I like froth....

Just like him, you excel in whining and complaining about
government taking you to the poor house.

Well you do a lot of it but you certainly don't excel at it... rather
stink at it if you must know.

That's what happens to people like
you. Enjoy!

People like me? What are you, a wordsmith? Enjoy what? WTF?

--
Jack
Got Change: General Motors ====== Government Motors!
http://jbstein.com

Lew Hodgett wrote:
"Jack Stein" wrote:

snip a continuing litany of complaints as seen thru the eyes of one
afflicted with a severe case of analitis

Perhaps some oral sex might help, but then again maybe just some
Ex-Lax.

Perhaps you should be talking to Barney Frank... You have a much better
change with him than me...

--
Jack
Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/
http://jbstein.com

On Sep 21, 4:32*pm, FrozenNorth
wrote:
Jack Stein wrote:
Upscale wrote:
"Jack Stein" wrote in message
manage to change our system to one like yours the bad news is then our
system will suck as bad as yours, but the good news is, you will not be
able to get any better treatment here than you do in Canada.

I happen to like our medical system. And believe me, I use it so I know
about it. Obviously, you thinking it sucks means that you're opinion is
based solely on hearsay without any practical experience.

Yes, I've heard lots about it, long waits to MRI's, higher death rates
from all sorts of things. *

Not sure about Upscale's experiences, but I needed an MRI once, took
less that 12 hours in Canada (Toronto area). *Exceptional service I
don't know. * As to the death rates, there are studies that go both ways.

Add to that my first and second hand
experiences with government ****ing up every thing they touch and
it doesn't take much thought to see why Americans are happy with what
they have rather than getting what you have.

Government ****ing things up? *Want to looks at banks or Enron, the
government doesn't have an exclusive right to make a mess of things. *I
submit any big institution can make a mess of things.

--
Froz...

He sounds like the guys around here who write in to the papers
insisting that the feds should have left the car business to the car
guys and the banks to the bankers.

Given cost and all else, I'll take my VA medical care over my wife's
civilian care any day.

And I do love people who say things like ...Americans are happy with
what they have..." which is obvious bull**** to describe a system that
is a mess and getting worse.

Charlie Self wrote:
\
Given cost and all else, I'll take my VA medical care over my wife's
civilian care any day.

Ditto ... although it has noticeably changed, for the worse IMO, in the
past twenty years, with the class/quality of employees slipping
drastically. Although it may be regional, around here you would now
swear you were in a f*cking US Post Office.

I've also noticed lately that the facilities at the DeBakey VA Medical
Center here in Houston, supposedly of the most modern, are showing
definite signs of being ill maintained. The actual medical care still
seems to be good to excellent, which is all that counts, but
surroundings generally portend the future ...

And I do love people who say things like ...Americans are happy with
what they have..." which is obvious bull**** to describe a system that
is a mess and getting worse.

With regard to insurance, that should probably be: "happy/lucky to have
what they got" ...

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 10/22/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

"Charlie Self" wrote in message
And I do love people who say things like ...Americans are happy with
what they have..." which is obvious bull**** to describe a system that
is a mess and getting worse.
**************************************************

That should read "some" Americans. I'm very happy with mine, but I know I'm
better off than most with our plan.

We definitely need some changes, but my concern is what the changes will be
and how much it will really cost us. The government track record for
efficiency is not the best.

Also, if there are going to be Death Panels, where do we send a list of
nominations for ah, shall we say "award recipients"?

Charlie Self wrote:
He sounds like the guys around here who write in to the papers
insisting that the feds should have left the car business to the car
guys and the banks to the bankers.

Yes, thats how it works in a capitalist society.

Given cost and all else, I'll take my VA medical care over my wife's
civilian care any day.

Your wife must have some really nasty medical care. I guess it might be
a regional thing, but in Pittsburgh, the last hospital anyone wants to
go to is the VA.

And I do love people who say things like ...Americans are happy with
what they have..." which is obvious bull**** to describe a system that
is a mess and getting worse.

Thats why so many Americans run to Canada and England for medical care,
right?

--
Jack
Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/
http://jbstein.com

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:43:10 -0700, Charlie Self wrote:

Given cost and all else, I'll take my VA medical care over my wife's
civilian care any day.

I'll have to agree with that. I've got Medicare with a supplement and my
wife has a high-deductible catastrophic only private plan (till next
year, hurray). She pays over twice what I do and gets only a discount on
some things. Just had to take her to the emergency room for a yellow
jacket sting and the bill, after discount, was about $700. I went in for
a suspected mini-stroke a couple of years ago and the bill was over
$10,000. I didn't have to pay a cent. OK, I paid for it in taxes back
when I was working, but I could afford it then.

One caveat. I tried one of the MedAdvantage plans for a couple of years
and found it as restrictive as being in an HMO. I went back to original
Medicare.



--
Intelligence is an experiment that failed - G. B. Shaw

"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message
...

"Charlie Self" wrote in message
And I do love people who say things like ...Americans are happy with
what they have..." which is obvious bull**** to describe a system that
is a mess and getting worse.
**************************************************

That should read "some" Americans. I'm very happy with mine, but I know
I'm better off than most with our plan.

We definitely need some changes, but my concern is what the changes will
be and how much it will really cost us. The government track record for
efficiency is not the best.

Also, if there are going to be Death Panels, where do we send a list of
nominations for ah, shall we say "award recipients"?


Are we thinking "Mother-In-Law?" )

Dave in Houston

On Sep 16, 8:01*am, "HeyBub" wrote:
Lew Hodgett wrote:
"DGDevin" wrote:

Since these are the same people who are convinced the govt. wants to
set up death panels to decide when everyone will be allowed to die,
and give away free health care to illegal aliens (the clear language
of the bill notwithstanding) and for that matter that President
Obama's birth certificate is a forgery, I'm not too concerned with
what they believe. Anyone who shows up at a town hall meeting to
screech that they don't want the govt. getting involved with their
Medicare is frankly too dumb to be taken seriously. *It saddens me
that the Republican Party has been reduced to appealing to the fears
of ill-informed yahoos, but that's what it has come to.

Bottom line.....................................

It's "Whitey" based demagogy playing the race card.

Just look at who is playing the "Stop Obama" game.

Yeah, just like the leftists who complained about Colin Powell's and Condi
Rice's support of the Iraq kerfluffel. Those who criticized were nothing but
a bunch of dirt-bag racists who looked only at color of the proponents and
not at the merits of the plan.

Powell pulled his support as soon as he discovered he'd been lied to.
I tend to believe Rice had the hots for Georgie Boy...check out any
photo or video of thems tanding close together and watch her moon
eyeing him.

On Sep 17, 12:03*pm, Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:35:03 -0700, Mark & Juanita wrote:
*Seems like that is shrinking government
and government control of property and transferring it to private hands,
the exact opposite of socialism. The government did not take that land
from someone else to give it to another.

Tell that to the Indians :-).


Who took it from a group preceding them. None of us popped up here
owning the land.

On Sep 20, 8:19*am, "HeyBub" wrote:
Upscale wrote:
"Jack Stein" wrote in message
dollars? * Now, add in the rest of the country and you don't need
much imagination to see *that the 80-85% that are happy with their
current

I don't believe that 85% bull**** for one second, but just for the
sake of argument, let's assume it's true. The US has a population of
300 million. That leaves 45 million people that are unsatisfied with
your healthcare setup. That's a god awful lot of people who feel
they're not receiving adequate healthcare.

45 million. Use a little perspective will you?

The ~85% figure of people being "satisfied" with their health insurance (not
care) is correct. There have been at least three large surveys that all come
up with about the same figure.

Still, there's a difference between "feeling" the health care was inadequate
and not actually receiving proper health care. Probably that percentage of
folks are just malcontents who, upon receiving a free bar of gold, would
complain that it wasn't in a box. In other words, the patient's impression
is not the best metric for deciding "proper."

I might be hopping mad over a leg amputation, but medically it may have been
the proper treatment.

Who did they survey? You're telling us to believe that the 15% of
people without health insurance are likely to be the only ones
dissatisfied with health insurance in this country? Plain and simple
horse****.

If the figures baffle you, as clear thought seems to, 45 million
Americans are without health insurance. There are about 300 million
Americans. Forty-five million is 15% of 300 million.

On Sep 24, 12:09*pm, Jack Stein wrote:
Charlie Self wrote:
He sounds like the guys around here who write in to the papers
insisting that the feds should have left the car business to the car
guys and the banks to the bankers.

Yes, thats how it works in a capitalist society.

Given cost and all else, I'll take my VA medical care over my wife's
civilian care any day.

Your wife must have some really nasty medical care. *I guess it might be
a regional thing, but in Pittsburgh, the last hospital anyone wants to
go to is the VA.

And I do love people who say things like ...Americans are happy with
what they have..." which is obvious bull**** to describe a system that
is a mess and getting worse.

Thats why so many Americans run to Canada and England for medical care,
right?


In Pittsburgh? Wow. I did realize the physical plant was battered all
to hell when I was there about seven years ago, but the care was
outstanding.

Actually, Americans seem to be running to Costa Rica and India and
similar places for some kinds of super-costly (in the U.S.) elective
medical care. I don't doubt quite a few in the northern areas head to
Canada for care, too. England is too costly to get to, I'd think, if
you're looking for low cost medical care.

If you thought as quickly as you rattle off bull****, you might be
slightly more believable.

On Sep 24, 12:09*pm, Jack Stein wrote:
Charlie Self wrote:
He sounds like the guys around here who write in to the papers
insisting that the feds should have left the car business to the car
guys and the banks to the bankers.

Yes, thats how it works in a capitalist society.

Given cost and all else, I'll take my VA medical care over my wife's
civilian care any day.

Your wife must have some really nasty medical care. *I guess it might be
a regional thing, but in Pittsburgh, the last hospital anyone wants to
go to is the VA.

And I do love people who say things like ...Americans are happy with
what they have..." which is obvious bull**** to describe a system that
is a mess and getting worse.

Thats why so many Americans run to Canada and England for medical care,
right?

--
Jack
Using FREE News Server:http://www.eternal-september.org/http://jbstein.com

Another note: Frances's health care wasn't nasty, it was just
borderline competent and very, very costly. We finally had to push for
her GP to recommend she go upstate to UVa Medical Center, which ain't
cheap either.

On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:25:29 -0700 (PDT), Charlie Self
wrote:


If you thought as quickly as you rattle off bull****, you might be
slightly more believable.


It's good to see the old Klownhammer unsheathed and judiciously
applied. You've managed to nail two bull****ters in one sitting.

I wonder what the bag limit is?


sigh...




Regards,

Tom Watson
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/

Charlie Self wrote:
On Sep 16, 8:01 am, "HeyBub" wrote:
Lew Hodgett wrote:
"DGDevin" wrote:

Since these are the same people who are convinced the govt. wants
to set up death panels to decide when everyone will be allowed to
die, and give away free health care to illegal aliens (the clear
language of the bill notwithstanding) and for that matter that
President Obama's birth certificate is a forgery, I'm not too
concerned with what they believe. Anyone who shows up at a town
hall meeting to screech that they don't want the govt. getting
involved with their Medicare is frankly too dumb to be taken
seriously. It saddens me that the Republican Party has been
reduced to appealing to the fears of ill-informed yahoos, but
that's what it has come to.

Bottom line.....................................

It's "Whitey" based demagogy playing the race card.

Just look at who is playing the "Stop Obama" game.

Yeah, just like the leftists who complained about Colin Powell's and
Condi Rice's support of the Iraq kerfluffel. Those who criticized
were nothing but a bunch of dirt-bag racists who looked only at
color of the proponents and not at the merits of the plan.

Powell pulled his support as soon as he discovered he'd been lied to.
I tend to believe Rice had the hots for Georgie Boy...check out any
photo or video of thems tanding close together and watch her moon
eyeing him.

Another alternate-universe person

"I'm well aware of the role I played. My role has been very, very
straightforward. I wanted to avoid a war. The president agreed with me. We
tried to do that. We couldn't get it through the U.N. and when the president
made the decision, I supported that decision. And I've never blinked from
that. I've never said I didn't support a decision to go to war." Colin
Powell, interview with CNN, Oct 19, 2008.

As for Condi Rice and George Bush, at least Laura didn't have to intercede,
as did Michelle Obama recently when some blonde kept rubbing up against her
husband. I believe her exact words we "Chris Matthews! Back off!"

Charlie Self wrote:
On Sep 20, 8:19 am, "HeyBub" wrote:
Upscale wrote:
"Jack Stein" wrote in message
dollars? Now, add in the rest of the country and you don't need
much imagination to see that the 80-85% that are happy with their
current

I don't believe that 85% bull**** for one second, but just for the
sake of argument, let's assume it's true. The US has a population of
300 million. That leaves 45 million people that are unsatisfied with
your healthcare setup. That's a god awful lot of people who feel
they're not receiving adequate healthcare.

45 million. Use a little perspective will you?

The ~85% figure of people being "satisfied" with their health
insurance (not care) is correct. There have been at least three
large surveys that all come up with about the same figure.

Still, there's a difference between "feeling" the health care was
inadequate and not actually receiving proper health care. Probably
that percentage of folks are just malcontents who, upon receiving a
free bar of gold, would complain that it wasn't in a box. In other
words, the patient's impression is not the best metric for deciding
"proper."

I might be hopping mad over a leg amputation, but medically it may
have been the proper treatment.

Who did they survey? You're telling us to believe that the 15% of
people without health insurance are likely to be the only ones
dissatisfied with health insurance in this country? Plain and simple
horse****.

If the figures baffle you, as clear thought seems to, 45 million
Americans are without health insurance. There are about 300 million
Americans. Forty-five million is 15% of 300 million.

Harris survey, satisfied with health insurance, grades A, B, or C = 85%
(Table 1A)
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/NEW...asp?NewsID=781

Kaiser poll September, 2009: Health plan rated Excellent or Good - 90%
http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/7979.pdf

Greenberg-Quinian (Democratic pollsters) 71% satisfied with existing health
plan
CBS-NYT: 50% satisfied
ABC-Washington Post: 54% satisfied
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...ance-coverage/

From just today (9/28/2009)
"Just 41% of voters nationwide now favor the health care reform proposed by
President Obama and congressional Democrats. ...56% are opposed to the
plan."
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...th_care_reform

On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:45:45 -0500, "HeyBub"
wrote:


ABC-Washington Post: 54% satisfied

"Just 41% of voters nationwide now favor the health care reform proposed by
President Obama and congressional Democrats. ...56% are opposed to the
plan."

Something else to consider

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...928?hub=Health

On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:32:10 -0500, "HeyBub"
wrote: More bull****. Just like he does on:


alt.home.repair

alt.support.depression

alt.activism

alt.politics.immigration

dfw.politics

nyc.politics

talk.politics.guns

or.politics

alt.mexico

soc.retirement

alt.guns

misc.rural

alt.security.alarms

tx.general

alt.cobol

news.admin.net-abuse.email

news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting



With all of these playgrounds open to you, do you really need to
peddle more of your bull**** on the wreck?















Regards,

Tom Watson
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/

Jack Stein wrote:

Makes little difference if someone posts in one conference, or in a
thousand conferences. All that matters is what he says in the group we
are reading... What on earth does this nonsense have to do with
anything, other than you have way too much time on your hands stocking
what HeyBub does with his time. If you think for a second this makes
anything he says here more, or less bull****, you have a screw that
needs tightening...

Especially when he probably doesn't read all of them, probably got
caught in a few crossposts in there somewhere.

--
Froz...

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:43:25 -0500, Jack Stein
wrote:

Makes little difference if someone posts in one conference, or in a
thousand conferences. All that matters is what he says in the group we
are reading...

Yeah, it does make a difference, a big difference. When you cross post
to a dozen different newsgroups, then there's a much greater chance of
attracting crude and off topic replies from all the flakes that are
particular to any given newsgroup.

Figured you were a little smarter than that. However, considering that
YOU are one of those flakes, what I've said is obviously true.

Now you can reply with your run of the mill blast of profanity and
crescendo of attack rhetoric. After all, it's all you know how to do
online, especially so considering the newgroups you inhabit.

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:43:25 -0500, Jack Stein
wrote:


Makes little difference if someone posts in one conference, or in a
thousand conferences. All that matters is what he says in the group we
are reading... What on earth does this nonsense have to do with
anything, other than you have way too much time on your hands stocking
what HeyBub does with his time. If you think for a second this makes
anything he says here more, or less bull****, you have a screw that
needs tightening...


If you're not from Mckees Rocks, you could be.




Regards,

Tom Watson
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/

On Sep 29, 2:55*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:43:25 -0500, Jack Stein
wrote:

Makes little difference if someone posts in one conference, or in a
thousand conferences. *All that matters is what he says in the group we
are reading...

Yeah, it does make a difference, a big difference. When you cross post
to a dozen different newsgroups, then there's a much greater chance of
attracting crude and off topic replies from all the flakes that are
particular to any given newsgroup.

Figured you were a little smarter than that. However, considering that
YOU are one of those flakes, what I've said is obviously true.

Now you can reply with your run of the mill blast of profanity and
crescendo of attack rhetoric. After all, it's all you know how to do
online, especially so considering the newgroups you inhabit.

It's hard to believe anyone is as clueless as you demonstrate with
this post.

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:01:06 -0700 (PDT), "
It's hard to believe anyone is as clueless as you demonstrate with
this post.

Simpleton reply since you're incapable of explaining why cross posted
replies from other newsgroups are not needed or wanted here.

Well?

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:43:25 -0500, Jack Stein
wrote:

If you think for a second this makes
anything he says here more, or less bull****, you have a screw that
needs tightening...


Very sharp.

Like the sharpest knife in a gunfight.



Regards,

Tom Watson
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:25:56 -0400, Tom Watson
Very sharp.
Like the sharpest knife in a gunfight.

His knife wouldn't be for fighting. It would be for stabbing himself
when he realizes that he's outgunned again.

I imagine Jack has a lot of stab wounds.

Makes little difference if someone posts in one conference, or in a
thousand conferences. All that matters is what he says in the group we
are reading... What on earth does this nonsense have to do with
anything, other than you have way too much time on your hands stocking
what HeyBub does with his time. If you think for a second this makes
anything he says here more, or less bull****, you have a screw that
needs tightening...

--
Jack
Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/
http://jbstein.com

Tom Watson wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:32:10 -0500, "HeyBub"
wrote: More bull****. Just like he does on:


alt.home.repair

alt.support.depression

alt.activism

alt.politics.immigration

dfw.politics

nyc.politics

talk.politics.guns

or.politics

alt.mexico

soc.retirement

alt.guns

misc.rural

alt.security.alarms

tx.general

alt.cobol

news.admin.net-abuse.email

news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting



With all of these playgrounds open to you, do you really need to
peddle more of your bull**** on the wreck?















Regards,

Tom Watson
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/

On Sep 29, 3:05*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:01:06 -0700 (PDT), "

It's hard to believe anyone is as clueless as you demonstrate with
this post.

Simpleton reply since you're incapable of explaining why cross posted
replies from other newsgroups are not needed or wanted here.

Well?

Well? You *continue* to show your cluelessness. Try reading again,
this time for comprehension. ...if you can.

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:12:39 -0700 (PDT), "
Simpleton reply since you're incapable of explaining why cross posted
replies from other newsgroups are not needed or wanted here.

Well?

Well? You *continue* to show your cluelessness. Try reading again,
this time for comprehension. ...if you can.

Guess I'm too dumb then. And just as obviously you're full of ****
since you're incapable of explaining it to me.

On Sep 29, 6:13*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:12:39 -0700 (PDT), "
Simpleton reply since you're incapable of explaining why cross posted

replies from other newsgroups are not needed or wanted here.

Well?

Well? *You *continue* to show your cluelessness. *Try reading again,
this time for comprehension. *...if you can.

Guess I'm too dumb then.

You got that right!

And just as obviously you're full of ****
since you're incapable of explaining it to me.

Your single-digit IQ is not my problem.

wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:43:25 -0500, Jack Stein
wrote:

Makes little difference if someone posts in one conference, or in a
thousand conferences. All that matters is what he says in the group we
are reading...

Yeah, it does make a difference, a big difference.

No, it doesn't. Why would anyone care less what anyone does in groups
they don't read. There is nothing in HeyBubs posts that look like cross
postings.

When you cross post
to a dozen different newsgroups, then there's a much greater chance of
attracting crude and off topic replies from all the flakes that are
particular to any given newsgroup.

HeyBub's posts are just as appropriate as most every else's posts in
this group, and they are always relevant to the topic at hand, proof
that they are not a result of cross posting.

Figured you were a little smarter than that.

You must have run out of fingers and toes... your figuring sucks!

However, considering that
YOU are one of those flakes, what I've said is obviously true.

Obviously, if your are dumb as a rock!

Now you can reply with your run of the mill blast of profanity

Thanks for your permission..

There was not an ounce of profanity in the post you replied (attacked)
me from.

and crescendo of attack rhetoric. After all, it's all you know how to do
online, especially so considering the newgroups you inhabit.

Yeah, you are a flake... and a hypocrite, and in the words of my
favorite greedy capitalist pig, likely a douche-nozzle...

--
Jack
Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/
http://jbstein.com

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:45:47 -0700 (PDT), "

Your single-digit IQ is not my problem.

Maybe, but you're being full of **** is a big problem for you. Makes
one wonder how you face yourself in the mirror every morning.
Condolences!

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:25:41 -0500, Jack Stein
wrote:

No, it doesn't. Why would anyone care less what anyone does in groups
they don't read. There is nothing in HeyBubs posts that look like cross
postings.

Because when they reply, it gets cross posted here. I can guess with
relative certainty that's how people you came to be here and that
includes your lesser clone, Tim Daneliuk.

Flakes like you run around all day trying to get into arguments and
then you freak out when someone sticks it back to you.

Enjoy!

"Jack Stein" wrote in message
Hate to use your own words against you, but this sounds like a "run of

Insignificant little life you have. Congrats!

wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:45:47 -0700 (PDT), "
Your single-digit IQ is not my problem.

Maybe, but you're being full of **** is a big problem for you. Makes
one wonder how you face yourself in the mirror every morning.
Condolences!

Hate to use your own words against you, but this sounds like a "run of
the mill blast of profanity and crescendo of attack rhetoric." you speak
of... That, and nothing else, just a bunch of meaningless rhetoric.

--
Jack
Got Change: General Motors ====== Government Motors!
http://jbstein.com

On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:40:23 -0500, Jack Stein
wrote:

Both HeyBub and myself post plenty of on topic stuff in this conference.
I keep all posts for 2 weeks here, and you haven't posted anything
other than off topic, vitriolic attacks. Not one post, not one word.
Now I'm feeling like I've responded to a troll...

Did you notice by chance that 'sweetnothing' posts have only been the
past several days? Normally, my woodworking related posts are under a
different alias because of an ISP difficulty. And, they are
woodworking related. But, I don't have to explain myself to you.

wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:25:41 -0500, Jack Stein
wrote:

No, it doesn't. Why would anyone care less what anyone does in groups
they don't read. There is nothing in HeyBubs posts that look like cross
postings.

Because when they reply, it gets cross posted here.

Well, if the cross post is relevant to the post, so what?

I can guess with
relative certainty that's how people you came to be here and that
includes your lesser clone, Tim Daneliuk.

You can't even get things right when you're not guessing...

Flakes like you run around all day trying to get into arguments and
then you freak out when someone sticks it back to you.

Both HeyBub and myself post plenty of on topic stuff in this conference.
I keep all posts for 2 weeks here, and you haven't posted anything
other than off topic, vitriolic attacks. Not one post, not one word.
Now I'm feeling like I've responded to a troll...

Enjoy!

I do enjoy arguing with my fellow woodworkers, but not at all with
trolls, and I don't get bit often... if you are a troll, good job.

--
Jack
Got Change: Individualism ======= Socialism!
http://jbstein.com

Upscale wrote:

Congrats!

You're welcome!

--
Jack
Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/
http://jbstein.com