Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Very Interesting questions.
More questions, and this time some_good_ questions. While some have little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: *_What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ? So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later? *And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? *The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one. *Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20? A : Yes, by his own admission. *Q: What passport did he travel under? A: There are only three possibilities. 1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesian passport. Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981? A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981. Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport, that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967. Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.. Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better. __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4243 (20090714) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
On Jul 14, 5:21*pm, "Joe" wrote:
Very Interesting questions. Interesting? really?? Joe, you're a nut-job. |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Check out this site........
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/passport.asp Joe wrote: Very Interesting questions. More questions, and this time some_good_ questions. |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
"Joe" wrote: Very Interesting questions. Don't give up what ever it is you are smoking and/or drinking. Lew |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
On Jul 14, 6:29*pm, "Lew Hodgett" wrote:
"Joe" wrote: Very Interesting questions. Don't give up what ever it is you are smoking and/or drinking. Lew Lew, you know people can get plenty high without losing their reasoning ability. Don't encourage the guy to destroy that last brain cell. R |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
"RicodJour" wrote:
Lew, you know people can get plenty high without losing their reasoning ability. Don't encourage the guy to destroy that last brain cell. You mean there is one left? Lew |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Joe wrote:
Very Interesting questions. More questions, and this time some_good_ questions. While some have little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: *_What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ? So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later? *And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? *The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one. *Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20? A : Yes, by his own admission. *Q: What passport did he travel under? A: There are only three possibilities. 1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesian passport. Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981? A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981. Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport, that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967. Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.. Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better. __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4243 (20090714) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com I agree with you. Many things that are being done are not authorized by the Constitution. Ex. over 30 Czars not authorized by Congress and being paid with our tax dollars. I think he knows his days are numbered as President and that's why he is pushing so much through. I hope we can undo the things he and Pelosi have managed to get passed. Nuff said! |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:21:12 -0500, "Joe" wrote:
Very Interesting questions. My personal life does not evolve around Obama, but he fits the "tax and spend" model perfectly. |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
"Phisherman" wrote in message ... On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:21:12 -0500, "Joe" wrote: Very Interesting questions. My personal life does not evolve around Obama, but he fits the "tax and spend" model perfectly. You get a tax break and he had to spend to clean up Bush's mess maybe you should pay more attention. |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
"Rusty" wrote in message ... "Phisherman" wrote in message ... On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:21:12 -0500, "Joe" wrote: Very Interesting questions. My personal life does not evolve around Obama, but he fits the "tax and spend" model perfectly. You get a tax break and he had to spend to clean up Bush's mess maybe you should pay more attention. Hmmm.... Tax and spend dems, where you get services for what is spent or tax and give it away repubs, where you get nothing for what is spent. The choice is clear to me. Ed |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
"Joe" writes:
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981? A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981. Incorrect. It was an Advisory, regrading new Visa requirements, not a "no travel" ban. http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/travel...kistan1981.pdf |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:09:07 -0700, "Rusty" wrote:
You get a tax break and he had to spend to clean up Bush's mess maybe you should pay more attention. Maybe YOU should pay more attention. Ask yourself these questions: If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky? If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip? If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment? If George W. Bush had misspelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as “proof” of what a dunce he is? If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on “Earth Day,” would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite? If George W. Bush’s administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually “get” what happened on 9-11? If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he is inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes? If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence? If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of=2 0a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved? If GeorgeW. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved? So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 5 months -- so you'll have three years and seven months to come up with an answer. G.S. |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
"Chuck" wrote in message ... I agree with you. Many things that are being done are not authorized by the Constitution. Ex. over 30 Czars not authorized by Congress and being paid with our tax dollars. I think he knows his days are numbered as President and that's why he is pushing so much through. I hope we can undo the things he and Pelosi have managed to get passed. Nuff said! You're right, his days are numbered. He has the rest of this term and all of the next. Chances are high that he will be reelected. By the time of the next election, the economy will have improved (which would happen whether he did anything or not). The people, being as wise as they generally are, will attribute the economic recovery to him and reelect him. |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Joe wrote:
Very Interesting questions. More questions, and this time some_good_ questions. While some have little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: *_What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ? So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later? *And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? *The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one. *Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20? A : Yes, by his own admission. *Q: What passport did he travel under? A: There are only three possibilities. 1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesian passport. Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981? A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981. Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport, that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967. No, it wouldn't. A Passport does not imply citizenship in the issuing country. Britain often issues "Passports of Convenience" and other countries will issue passports to descendents of their citizens through several generations back (Israel and Ireland are two examples). Further, it is possible to "buy" a passport of another country (actually by establishing residence and making a substantial "investment" in the country). Costa Rica and Belize are examples. I have two passports: one from the U.S. and one from another country. Actually I have a third - a fake passport from British Honduras and anyone can get one allegedly from Rhodesia, along with supporting documents such as a driver's license, library card, and other bits of paper. |
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
"Gordon Shumway" wrote If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved? No, but I didn't approve of his, "Bring it on" comment either. If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved? No, but I didn't think much of his comment, "You're doing a good job, Brownie" either. If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky? Are you sure that's what was on the Video? Just think of the laughs the Queen would have enjoyed watching a video of The Shrub's speeches. If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved? Nope. To my knowledge, none of America's presidents have ever bowed to foreign potentates. If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip? What language does Bush speak? If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved? Well, one thing about it; they were at least smart enough to do their own taxes, something not many in Bush's cabinet could claim. If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment? Are you sure it wasn't "Cinco de Mayo"? If George W. Bush had misspelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as "proof" of what a dunce he is? Well, duh ! If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on "Earth Day," would you have concluded he's a hypocrite? George Bush wouldn't have to do anything more than he has already to convince me that he's a hypocrite. If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually "get" what happened on 9-11? You haven't really kept up with the rest of that story, have you. If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he is inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes? If anyone ever needed a teleprompter to keep himself on message, to keep from mauling the English language and to keep from making an ass of himself, it has to be George Bush. If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence? What news sources are you depending on for your info? If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of=2 0a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved? Nope, and I don't approve of Obama's act either. If GeorgeW. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved? No. I don't approve of budget busting. If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved? You're being redundant. If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved? Oh, hell no! If George W. Bush had spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved? Damn right, she's a cutie. So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? In contrast to Bush? Uh...brains, education, ability. Too bad his political philosophy is just as far to the left as Bush's was to the right. Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 5 months -- so you'll have three years and seven months to come up with an answer. G.S. |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:09:07 -0700, "Rusty" wrote: You get a tax break and he had to spend to clean up Bush's mess maybe you should pay more attention. Maybe YOU should pay more attention. Ask yourself these questions: If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky? If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip? If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment? If George W. Bush had misspelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as “proof” of what a dunce he is? If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on “Earth Day,” would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite? If George W. Bush’s administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually “get” what happened on 9-11? If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he is inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes? If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence? If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of=2 0a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved? If GeorgeW. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved? So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 5 months -- so you'll have three years and seven months to come up with an answer. G.S. Well put........... |
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
He won get over it. the questions are now moot. G bush was and is a high
functioning mental defective and there is no question about that Len |
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
TexMax wrote:
"Gordon Shumway" wrote If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved? No, but I didn't approve of his, "Bring it on" comment either. Bit of a different horse there If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved? No, but I didn't think much of his comment, "You're doing a good job, Brownie" either. If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky? Are you sure that's what was on the Video? ... snip Well, given that it was the White House who disclosed what was on the iPod, I guess that is a good question. If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved? Nope. To my knowledge, none of America's presidents have ever bowed to foreign potentates. There is absolutely zero doubt that the current president did bow to the king of Saudi Arabia. The excuses given that he was bending because of height differences, etc. just don't stand up to scrutiny of the actual video. The current president of the US bowed to the leader of the House of Saud. If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip? What language does Bush speak? Interesting response. Pretty much answers the original question -- the meme was that Bush was an idiot, the current idiot in chief has made way more gaffes (All 57 states ...) and pretty much gets a pass. If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved? Well, one thing about it; they were at least smart enough to do their own taxes, something not many in Bush's cabinet could claim. Wow, this is fun. The fact is they were *NOT* smart enough to do their own taxes as evidenced by the fact that they did not do those taxes. If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment? Are you sure it wasn't "Cinco de Mayo"? Yep, your president is a pandering dunce. If George W. Bush had misspelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as "proof" of what a dunce he is? Well, duh ! Double standard much? If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on "Earth Day," would you have concluded he's a hypocrite? George Bush wouldn't have to do anything more than he has already to convince me that he's a hypocrite. ... and statists have the nerve to say that conservatives are biased. We at least had the temerity to disagree with Bush when he was wrong -- Medicare Drug Bill, Amnesty for Illegals. If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually "get" what happened on 9-11? You haven't really kept up with the rest of that story, have you. Oh, please enlighten us. How do you salvage this situation? Especially after the administration initially had planned to keep the pictures taken classified until the hue and cry became so great that they released ONE photo -- a photo that could just as easily been generated with Photoshop rather than the enormous waste of resources by flying the presidential plane and scaring the populace of NYC silly. Actually, it's kind of poetic justice since NYC contains a majority of Obama voters, so from that standpoint, it was kind of a win. If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he is inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes? If anyone ever needed a teleprompter to keep himself on message, to keep from mauling the English language and to keep from making an ass of himself, it has to be George Bush. Uhhh, umm it would cost ... uhhh about ummm, ahhh, hold-on I'm gonna get to it, uhhhh ahhhh ummmm it would cost about ..... [Hint, that wasn't GWB who stuttered that phrase] If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence? What news sources are you depending on for your info? If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of=2 0a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved? Nope, and I don't approve of Obama's act either. Well, there is some hope for you If GeorgeW. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved? No. I don't approve of budget busting. If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved? You're being redundant. If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved? Oh, hell no! OK, you've got some glimmer of hope, but then ... So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? In contrast to Bush? Uh...brains, education, ability. Too bad his political philosophy is just as far to the left as Bush's was to the right. Frankly, the guy is either heavily editing himself when talking, or is a bigger dunce than you ever thought Bush was. His actions and activities appear calculated to destroy the US economy and free market. You don't solve the previous budget deficit by tripling it (and that is by optimistic estimates). The man has never run anything in his life. The only thing he has done is campaign for the next highest office. He spent less than 144 days in the Senate before starting to run for POTUS and sponsored or pushed no major legislation, one can't point to a single accomplishment. I used to think that he memorized well and was able to regurgitate the teachings of his mentors (Ayers, Alinski, etc.). However, given his performance off-teleprompter, even that is questionable. If he succeeds in implementing his agenda, the US will not be the same country we grew up in. Even the Europeans are starting to see what their socialist utopia has wrought and they are just now starting to try to roll some of that back. This president on the other hand has his foot on the accelerator to push this country into that same flawed societal model. If you really listen to what he says, he's not cool, he's cold. Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 5 months -- so you'll have three years and seven months to come up with an answer. G.S. -- If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough |
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:09:07 -0700, "Rusty" wrote: You get a tax break and he had to spend to clean up Bush's mess maybe you should pay more attention. Maybe YOU should pay more attention. Ask yourself these questions: If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky? If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip? If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment? If George W. Bush had misspelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as “proof” of what a dunce he is? If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on “Earth Day,” would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite? If George W. Bush’s administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually “get” what happened on 9-11? If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he is inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes? If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence? If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of=2 0a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved? If GeorgeW. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved? So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 5 months -- so you'll have three years and seven months to come up with an answer. PERFECT!!!!!! Cant wait to hear an answer to the above! -- "You can lead them to LINUX but you can't make them THINK" Running Mandriva release 2008.0 free-i586 using KDE on i586 Website Address http://rentmyhusband.biz/ |
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Joe wrote:
Very Interesting questions. More questions, and this time some_good_ questions. While some have little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: *_What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ? So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later? *And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration? *The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one. *Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20? A : Yes, by his own admission. *Q: What passport did he travel under? A: There are only three possibilities. 1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesian passport. Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981? A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981. Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport, that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967. Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008.. Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better. It's very obvious to me this ASS knows exactly what he's doing to bring the US to it's knees and promote his big government socialist agenda. 1 trillion in deficits soon to go to 2 trillion by the end of the year. And he wants to raise taxes and push through a Cap and Tax global warming bull**** bill. And on top of that National Health Care. What the **** is this idiot thinking? Guess money does grow on trees. We are in deep ****!!! If you are working, you won't be in a year! - "You can lead them to LINUX but you can't make them THINK" Running Mandriva release 2008.0 free-i586 using KDE on i586 Website Address http://rentmyhusband.biz/ |
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Len wrote:
He won get over it. the questions are now moot. G bush was and is a high functioning mental defective and there is no question about that It doesn't matter if he eats babies for breakfast and farts cyanide, he no longer has any political power to speak of and if your life sucks it's Obama's job to fix it, so GET OVER BUSH. |
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
J. Clarke wrote:
Len wrote: He won get over it. the questions are now moot. G bush was and is a high functioning mental defective and there is no question about that It doesn't matter if he eats babies for breakfast and farts cyanide, he no longer has any political power to speak of and if your life sucks it's Obama's job to fix it, so GET OVER BUSH. They can't. On a second date with a lovely woman, I was sitting in her living room while she stretched a few more muskrat skins or whatever women do when they say "I'll be ready in just a minute," when I heard her screech: "That goddamn Bush should learn some history!" (evidently referring to something she heard on the TV news program). I replied: "Uh, he has a degree from Yale. In history." "That's a GODDAMN LIE!" was her retort. [tappity-tap-tap on her computer] "Ah, here it is," I said, pointing to the screen. "He also has an MBA from Harvard." "THE ****IN' REPUBLICANS HAVE TAKEN OVER THE INTERNET!!!" was her reasoned response as a muskrat skin hit the floor. Thinking quickly, I concocted a complicated, but believable, excuse for leaving. Something along the lines of: "I have to go." I learned three things: * Google is not necessarily your friend, * BDS is incurable and potentially fatal, and * Don't date a manic-depressive. I only hope a cure is found for BDS. It's for the muskrats. |
#23
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
On Jul 15, 6:25*am, "J. Clarke" wrote:
It doesn't matter if he eats babies for breakfast and farts cyanide, he no longer has any political power to speak of and if your life sucks it's Obama's job to fix it, so GET OVER BUSH. Personally, I would like to thank you for that. All the whining, teary eyed children that are still in therapy over the Bush years would do us all a favor by jumping off the nearest bridge into freeway traffic. Robert |
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
CHOKE ON IT, YA ******S! WAS: A lotta bulls*** from whiny losers
snip a lotta whining from a buncha losers
HA! Welcome to my last eight years, ya fuggin losers! Obama kicked your loser gop asses and we're gonna have years and years of a BLACK man telling you racist whiteys what to do! SUCK IT, BITCHES! ROTFLMAO I can't wait til the gubbermint is paying to KILL THE UNBORN! D'ohBoy |
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Gordon Shumway wrote:
Maybe YOU should pay more attention. Ask yourself these questions: Decent points except: If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved? The percentage of GM stock stolen by Obama and redistributed to Big Brother and the Unions is 100%. Any common stockholder that owned GM common stock lost 100% of it to the government and the unions. Also, a question you missed: If George W. Bush had mentioned, in public,(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws) that he had visited all 57 states, except Alaska and Hawaii, would you have called him dumb? Also begging the question is: If George W. Bush had attended David Dukes sermons every week for years where Dukes blamed blacks for everything plaguing us from Aids to Zebra breath, would you consider Bush a racist? Jack If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky? If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip? If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment? If George W. Bush had misspelled the word advice would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as “proof” of what a dunce he is? If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on “Earth Day,” would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite? If George W. Bush’s administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually “get” what happened on 9-11? If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he is inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes? If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence? If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of=2 0a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved? If GeorgeW. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved? If George W. Bush had spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved? So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 5 months -- so you'll have three years and seven months to come up with an answer. G.S. |
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
CHOKE ON IT, YA ******S! WAS: A lotta bulls*** from whiny losers
On Jul 15, 8:49*am, "D'ohBoy" wrote:
snip a lotta whining from a buncha losers HA! *Welcome to my last eight years, ya fuggin losers! Obama kicked your loser gop asses and we're gonna have years and years of a BLACK man telling you racist whiteys what to do! SUCK IT, BITCHES! ROTFLMAO I can't wait til the gubbermint is paying to KILL THE UNBORN! D'ohBoy Pwheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew...PLOP.....Whirrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr I think Joe nailed hisself a big fish.... well... not a 'really' big fish....smells like a fish though.....whirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Not too shabby for a beginner. |
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Jack Stein wrote:
The percentage of GM stock stolen by Obama and redistributed to Big Brother and the Unions is 100%. Any common stockholder that owned GM common stock lost 100% of it to the government and the unions. I must have my history confused. Didn't GM go to the government asking for bailouts? In a private jet, no less? During the Bush administration? If the government had refused that bailout, how much of the GM common stock would be lost? 100%. Creditors end up owning the company after a bankruptcy. Both the union and the government were major creditors. Nothing was stolen. I suspect it is going to be a lousy investment for the taxpayers, but that is a different subject. -- Doug |
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
CHOKE ON IT, YA ******S! WAS: A lotta bulls*** from whiny losers
On Jul 15, 10:00 am, Robatoy wrote:
On Jul 15, 8:49 am, "D'ohBoy" wrote: snip a lotta whining from a buncha losers HA! Welcome to my last eight years, ya fuggin losers! Obama kicked your loser gop asses and we're gonna have years and years of a BLACK man telling you racist whiteys what to do! SUCK IT, BITCHES! ROTFLMAO I can't wait til the gubbermint is paying to KILL THE UNBORN! D'ohBoy Pwheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew...PLOP.....Whirrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr I think Joe nailed hisself a big fish.... well... not a 'really' big fish....smells like a fish though.....whirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Not too shabby for a beginner. Bout 215 lb bottom feeder. That's pretty big. Little corn on a treble hook and bam! Yer trollin' is successful. D'ohBoy |
#29
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:12:55 -0700, Robatoy wrote:
On Jul 14, 5:21Â*pm, "Joe" wrote: Very Interesting questions. Interesting? really?? Joe, you're a nut-job. Was there a full moon last night? -- Intelligence is an experiment that failed - G. B. Shaw |
#30
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
On Jul 15, 4:09*pm, (Edward A. Falk) wrote:
In article , Phisherman wrote: My personal life does not evolve around Obama, but he fits the "tax and spend" model perfectly. I actually prefer that to the "borrow and spend" mentality the Republicans seem to favor. Then you aren't paying attention. |
#31
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Douglas Johnson wrote:
Jack Stein wrote: The percentage of GM stock stolen by Obama and redistributed to Big Brother and the Unions is 100%. Any common stockholder that owned GM common stock lost 100% of it to the government and the unions. I must have my history confused. Didn't GM go to the government asking for bailouts? In a private jet, no less? During the Bush administration? Seems to me that Obama fired the CEO of GM, exactly what any socialist dictator should have done, then redistributed the company to the government and the unions. If the government had refused that bailout, how much of the GM common stock would be lost? 100%. Who knows. Perhaps the court could have done what they do when a company goes into bankruptcy? Perhaps GM could have come back, or, gone out of business, or, been sold. I may have lost all my stock anyway, but thats far better than having a socialist dictator steal it from me and pretend the "taxpayers" own it. Give me a break. Creditors end up owning the company after a bankruptcy. Both the union and the government were major creditors. Nothing was stolen. In my opinion, the government stole it. The executive branch should not be firing anyone in a company I own. The government, in a capitalist economic system should not own ANY company. I suspect it is going to be a lousy investment for the taxpayers, but that is a different subject. Same subject. In a capitalist society, which we were at one time, private citizens owned companies, not the government, and if the business failed, it failed. Government buy outs is simply wrong. -- Jack Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/ http://jbstein.com |
#32
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Jack Stein wrote:
Seems to me that Obama fired the CEO of GM, exactly what any socialist dictator should have done, then redistributed the company to the government and the unions. He did. But let's abstract it for a minute. Consider the president of a bank, who inherits a $15 billion investment from his predecessor. The investment is going sour, with a $30.9 billion dollar loss and an auditor's statement that the company continuing survival is "in substantial doubt". What does he do? Firing the CEO, demanding a plan for continued viability, and taking the company into bankruptcy when the plan fails would be smart capitalism and protecting his investors. Same subject. In a capitalist society, which we were at one time, private citizens owned companies, not the government, and if the business failed, it failed. Government buy outs is simply wrong. I'm not happy with government bail outs, either. But remember, it was Bush that did it, not Obama. Obama was just cleaning up the mess the same way any investor of that magnitude could have and should have. -- Doug |
#33
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Douglas Johnson wrote:
I'm not happy with government bail outs, either. But remember, it was Bush that did it, not Obama. Obama was just cleaning up the mess the same way any investor of that magnitude could have and should have. -- Doug Actually, as I understand it, the Bush administration provided more of a 'bridge loan' than a bail-out. And the loan had no mandates for management reorganization or much of anything else. The talk was to 'kick the can down the road' in the sense of not obligating or limiting the new administration. |
#34
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
"HeyBub" wrote in message m... Douglas Johnson wrote: I'm not happy with government bail outs, either. But remember, it was Bush that did it, not Obama. Obama was just cleaning up the mess the same way any investor of that magnitude could have and should have. -- Doug Actually, as I understand it, the Bush administration provided more of a 'bridge loan' than a bail-out. And the loan had no mandates for management reorganization or much of anything else. The talk was to 'kick the can down the road' in the sense of not obligating or limiting the new administration. I saw it as just another Bush-to-the-rich give-away. First, make it possible to steal as much as they can and then throw some more their way after it's discovered that they overreached the bounds of their greed. All the right-wingers are quick to claim that Obama's bailout has done nothing for the economy but they never mention anything about the billions that Henry Paulsen handed out to his Wall Street buddies. Dave in Houston |
#35
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
CHOKE ON IT, YA ******S! WAS: A lotta bulls*** from whiny losers
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:00:02 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy
wrote: On Jul 15, 8:49*am, "D'ohBoy" wrote: snip a lotta whining from a buncha losers HA! *Welcome to my last eight years, ya fuggin losers! Obama kicked your loser gop asses and we're gonna have years and years of a BLACK man telling you racist whiteys what to do! SUCK IT, BITCHES! ROTFLMAO I can't wait til the gubbermint is paying to KILL THE UNBORN! D'ohBoy Pwheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew...PLOP.....Whirrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr I think Joe nailed hisself a big fish.... well... not a 'really' big fish....smells like a fish though.....whirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Not too shabby for a beginner. Yes, and subtle, too. Republican Slogans For Now And The Futu "Riding The Pine In 2009." "Sent To The Pen In 2010." "Kept Out Of Heaven In 2011." "The Party That's Shelved In 2012." Regards, Tom Watson http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/ |
#36
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Jack Stein wrote:
But remember, it was Bush that did it, not Obama. You are still in living in the abstract I see. Bush didn't do it ever. In fact when Enron asked Bush for a bailout, he laughed at them. Please get your facts straight. GM and Chrysler were granted $17.4 Billion in loans on December 19, 2008 by the Bush administration. See: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/20/bu...o.html?_r=1&hp. You can also see a more complete list of Bush bailouts at: http://bailout.propublica.org/main/timeline/index -- Doug |
#37
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Douglas Johnson wrote:
Jack Stein wrote: Seems to me that Obama fired the CEO of GM, exactly what any socialist dictator should have done, then redistributed the company to the government and the unions. He did. But let's abstract it for a minute. Abstracts are fun, but real life is where we are. Obama has no freaking business being in business, firing the head of MY company. I guess I shouldn't be too ****ed off, the bond holders really got reamed. Consider the president of a bank, who inherits a $15 billion investment from his predecessor. The investment is going sour, with a $30.9 billion dollar loss and an auditor's statement that the company continuing survival is "in substantial doubt". What does he do? Firing the CEO, demanding a plan for continued viability, and taking the company into bankruptcy when the plan fails would be smart capitalism and protecting his investors. Your point is? Same subject. In a capitalist society, which we were at one time, private citizens owned companies, not the government, and if the business failed, it failed. Government buy outs is simply wrong. I'm not happy with government bail outs, either. Nobody seems to be, yet, here we are. But remember, it was Bush that did it, not Obama. You are still in living in the abstract I see. Bush didn't do it ever. In fact when Enron asked Bush for a bailout, he laughed at them. Obama was just cleaning up the mess the same way any investor of that magnitude could have and should have. I guess you either live in Canada, or some other socialist country, or just moved here. In the US, the government is not supposed to be in business, period. In the past 50 years, government has taken over the transportation systems, gambling, sports stadiums, parking lots, car manufacturing, banking and the health industry is next. You can bet Big Brother will be taking away your guns, then free speech, freedom OF religion (I'm an atheist and still that ****es me off) and you, and the rest of the dumb asses will still be blaming Bush. Well, you might be dead by then, socialist dictators have a fat record of killing their own for the "good" of the collective. The only good thing going on in the US is when Robotoy crosses the boarder to get his triple bypass or prostate cancer treated, he will have to wait just as long as he does in Canada. Same with the Italy's Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi. Perhaps he will have to go to Canada to get his heart surgery. I guess there are other neat things about the direction Obama is taking the US. Soon, we will be invading Canada and Mexico looking for low pay jobs and free health care, and a "better" life in general. -- Jack Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/ http://jbstein.com |
#38
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting question
Dave in Houston wrote:
Actually, as I understand it, the Bush administration provided more of a 'bridge loan' than a bail-out. And the loan had no mandates for management reorganization or much of anything else. The talk was to 'kick the can down the road' in the sense of not obligating or limiting the new administration. I saw it as just another Bush-to-the-rich give-away. First, make it possible to steal as much as they can and then throw some more their way after it's discovered that they overreached the bounds of their greed. All the right-wingers are quick to claim that Obama's bailout has done nothing for the economy but they never mention anything about the billions that Henry Paulsen handed out to his Wall Street buddies. You wouldn't expect him to hand money to his ENEMIES, would you? As for Paulson having "Wall Street buddies," would you rather a farmer or airline pilot be Treasury Secretary? Don't forget that his three predecessors at Goldman-Sachs ( Jon Corzine, Stephen Friedman, and Robert Rubin) also went on to serve in the government (Rubin as Treasury Secretary under Clinton). And, since it's the rich that pay the bulk of the taxes anyway, I look at it more as a "tax rebate" than anything nefarious. There seem to be four possibilities on dispensing largesse: * Tax the poor and give to the rich (bad) * Tax the rich and give to the poor (bad) * Tax the rich and give to the rich (good) * Tax the poor and give to the poor (good) and a fifth, way-out, possibility: * Tax nobody and give to nobody |
#39
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
CHOKE ON IT, YA ******S! WAS: A lotta bulls*** from whiny losers
Tom Watson wrote:
Republican Slogans For Now And The Futu "Riding The Pine In 2009." "Sent To The Pen In 2010." "Kept Out Of Heaven In 2011." "The Party That's Shelved In 2012." I dunno. I kinda like: "Today we rescue a world from mysticism and tyranny and usher in a future brighter than anything we can imagine." But it's a little long for a bumper sticker. |
#40
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
CHOKE ON IT, YA ******S! WAS: A lotta bulls*** from whiny losers
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:19:16 -0500, "HeyBub"
wrote: Tom Watson wrote: Republican Slogans For Now And The Futu "Riding The Pine In 2009." "Sent To The Pen In 2010." "Kept Out Of Heaven In 2011." "The Party That's Shelved In 2012." I dunno. I kinda like: "Today we rescue a world from mysticism and tyranny and usher in a future brighter than anything we can imagine." But it's a little long for a bumper sticker. The last GOP slogan I could get behind was Bush the Elder's: "A Thousand Pints Of Lite." Regards, Tom Watson http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1/ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interesting ad | Metalworking | |||
Interesting....veddy interesting....OT of course. | Metalworking | |||
Interesting....veddy interesting....OT of course. | Metalworking | |||
OT - Interesting | Metalworking | |||
Interesting question for the TV techs... | Electronics Repair |