Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
One of my many goals in life is learning
how to finish a woodworking project without making myself completely crazy. In order to further this goal, learning how to shoot a finish with a spray gun ranks waaay up there. I know a few of the folks on the list own and use turbines of various flavors and I have noticed a slight decline in the cost of turbine outfits. I found a low-end Turbinaire unit for $569 and a slighly better one for $697. I might even find a used unit on Ebay... who knows ??? I have a large air compressor but after doing a fair amount of research, these turbine packages seem to be a much better solution. There is no concern of air quality, no moisture issues, no junk in the air lines, no concern of air quanity, large CFM numbers, etc,etc. The overspray even seems to be a non-problem with the HVLP technology. Is this all hype or is this turbine the real answer to getting a decent finish with a spray gun ??? I also assume a fairly stiff learning curve on spraying. |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
Pat Barber wrote:
Is this all hype or is this turbine the real answer to getting a decent finish with a spray gun ??? Not hype at all. I also assume a fairly stiff learning curve on spraying. Depends on the finish, but not as stiff as you'd think. Many of the basic techniques apply regardless of gun, and even apply to spray can finishing. Can you get a good finish with a can? I use a Fuji Mini Mite 4. This is exactly the same turbine as a Q4, four stage unit, minus noise reduction features for a very reasonable price. This guy is great to deal with: http://www.phelpsrefinishing.com/MM4.html and useful for the tech support that places like Amazon can't even begin to provide. |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
I'm 'fair" with a can, but I'm getting better.
There is very little info out there on spray finishing, so it appears to be a D.I.Y. for most folks. I see a lot of info on the Fuji systems. Turbinaire also seems to get a lot of press. I assume they are all "very" similar in operation and costs. B A R R Y wrote: Depends on the finish, but not as stiff as you'd think. Many of the basic techniques apply regardless of gun, and even apply to spray can finishing. Can you get a good finish with a can? I use a Fuji Mini Mite 4. This is exactly the same turbine as a Q4, four stage unit, minus noise reduction features for a very reasonable price. This guy is great to deal with: http://www.phelpsrefinishing.com/MM4.html and useful for the tech support that places like Amazon can't even begin to provide. |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
On Mar 3, 1:15*pm, Pat Barber wrote:
One of my many goals in life is learning how to finish a woodworking *project without making myself completely crazy. In order to further this goal, learning how to shoot a finish with a spray gun ranks waaay up there. I know a few of the folks on the list own and use turbines of various flavors and I have noticed a slight decline in the cost of turbine outfits. I found a low-end Turbinaire unit for $569 and a slighly better one for $697. I might even find a used unit on Ebay... who knows ??? I have a large air compressor but after doing a fair amount of research, these turbine packages seem to be a much better solution. There is no concern of air quality, no moisture issues, no junk in the air lines, no concern of air quanity, large CFM numbers, etc,etc. The overspray even seems to be a non-problem with the HVLP technology. Is this all hype or is this turbine the real answer to getting a decent finish with a spray gun ??? I also assume a fairly stiff learning curve on spraying. I have a turbine HVLP spray unit. It leaves a beautiful finish, and it's easy to use. But I only drag it out for really big finish projects. It's so much trouble to clean up that I use wipe-on finishes for smaller projects. DonkeyHody "We can't all be heros because somebody has to sit on the curb and clap as they go by." - Will Rogers |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
On Mar 3, 3:06 pm, Pat Barber wrote:
I'm 'fair" with a can, but I'm getting better. Personally, I still use rattle cans if the job calls for it. The only two things I don't like about them is less than 30% material transfer on target (which makes them cost much more than you might think!) and the low quality nozzles they put on most cans. There is very little info out there on spray finishing, so it appears to be a D.I.Y. for most folks. Not at all. There is a lot of info online, and there is a lot of information in print by different finishers. (Google "hvlp technique", "hvlp application", "hvlp method", etc.) There are some good softback books out there that appear from time to time in Barnes and Noble, and at some of the used book stores. You can also search this group through Google and find a lot of information on technique, thinning protocols, material usage, etc. I see a lot of info on the Fuji systems. Excellent system. Like Barry, I have one of the Fuji "X"4 systems. I have the Q4. I have used it a lot, and it is pretty bullet proof. When I bought mine, the Mini Mites weren't being widely sold or I might have bought that one as it is more affordable. I shoot stains, dyes, enamels, polyurethanes, and lacquers with it. This unit will put out a lot of cfms making sure you can apply just about any coating, even more than other 4 stage units. I don't know how, because something like 90% of all actual turbine assemblies for serious hvlp systems are made by the same company. The kicker is the support for the product. The link Barry posted is where I got mine a couple of years ago, and Roger knows that product frontwards and backwards, and you can call him anytime. He won't teach you how to spray or apply, but he can tell you immediately if your problems are in product or machine. Turbinaire also seems to get a lot of press. I almost bought the Turbinaire because of the gun. Well made, balanced in the hand, and great fit and finish. It has is the only true turbine hvlp gun that has a fully adjustable pattern (not just a fixed detent position aircap) that works just like a high pressure paint spray gun. That is because it IS a converted paint spray gun. I went to a Benjamin Moore sponsored event a couple of years ago to try this gun out (OK... and eat some barbecue) along with some other guns. I really liked the overall system, but Fuji won hands down on product support and consumables affordability. You can buy everything from Roger. And when I needed to speak to Roger, I found he always answered his phone, one time while walking his dog. I have this thing about support after the sale since I have been drilled pretty hard a couple of times. After I got the info from Turbinaire at the demo, I went around the corner and called customer service on the phone. No one could answer my questions about cfms, using a whip (extension) on the hose, or where to get the unit fixed when it broke. After I bought a Fuji system from Roger, I needed another aircap to spray some really thin material. When I received a rusty aircap/needle assembly from Roger, I was REALLY ****ed as I needed it to finish some cabinets immediately after receipt. Roger used to be a finisher himself, so he knew what was riding on the deal. He sent me a new aircap via 2 day FedEx at his cost. All I had to do was to email him a picture of the rust on the aircap. When I called make sure he got the picture, he had already had the package picked up and it was on its way. I assume they are all "very" similar in operation and costs. Probably true. Some of the guns are really different though, and that makes all the difference in the world on your final finish. You need one that is comfortable in your hand, has a variety of AFFORDABLE aircaps, filters, one way valves, etc. readily available for it. It should be easy to break down and clean. Fit and finish is important as well as the rougher finished guns tend to be harder to clean. Depending on what kind of spraying you do and where you do it, you may want a non bleeder or bleeder gun. I have both and prefer the non bleeder, although the bleeder is just fine for 99% of my needs. Good luck on your purchase. Robert |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
DonkeyHody wrote:
On Mar 3, 1:15 pm, Pat Barber wrote: One of my many goals in life is learning how to finish a woodworking project without making myself completely crazy. In order to further this goal, learning how to shoot a finish with a spray gun ranks waaay up there. I know a few of the folks on the list own and use turbines of various flavors and I have noticed a slight decline in the cost of turbine outfits. I found a low-end Turbinaire unit for $569 and a slighly better one for $697. I might even find a used unit on Ebay... who knows ??? I have a large air compressor but after doing a fair amount of research, these turbine packages seem to be a much better solution. There is no concern of air quality, no moisture issues, no junk in the air lines, no concern of air quanity, large CFM numbers, etc,etc. The overspray even seems to be a non-problem with the HVLP technology. Is this all hype or is this turbine the real answer to getting a decent finish with a spray gun ??? I also assume a fairly stiff learning curve on spraying. I have a turbine HVLP spray unit. It leaves a beautiful finish, and it's easy to use. But I only drag it out for really big finish projects. It's so much trouble to clean up that I use wipe-on finishes for smaller projects. DonkeyHody "We can't all be heros because somebody has to sit on the curb and clap as they go by." - Will Rogers Hmm... I found a well used unit a a flea market for $65US. Works great (lucky me), but the cleanup couldn't be easier. Rinse out the cup, run water through the tube thingy, and clean the little guide thingy that screws on the front. Takes 5 minutes. I guess different ones are made differently. I would definitely pay attention to what is needed to clean it. Harvey |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
Hello,
There is two inherent problems with HVLP andfirst is the air is warm to hot which is problematic because the heat makes the finish cure faster then if the air was 70 degrees and 50 RH. The finish will not flow out like it should. It will be acceptable but not as good as conventional air spray. Some guy/gals will tell you that they get it to flow and the finish is good or great, but more often then not for the average guy/gal the finish is okay fair to middle compared with conventional. And when shooting water base it's most likely going to need to be reduced to get it to spray and then this problem really becomes apparent ( runs and sags or lots of coats) and when spraying lacquer you need to dump retarder in it to stop the blush and dry spray appearance.The second problem is that the cup is not pressurized and it relies on suction to pull the material up and out of the cup the problem is pressure is what makes the suction so when you reduce the pressure like HVLP LP meaning low pressure you reduce suction. to compensate you need to reduce the material and with some materials ( like water base ) to the point of making crap out of it. There is a solution which is a HVLP CONVERSION and I know you are concerned with cfm requirements but there are guns out there that only use 5 or 6 cfm and have nozzle pressure of 21 psi. they have pressurized cups and tanks and cost less then 500.00 bucks, as far as water and crap in the lines that is easily remedy with a in line filter or dryer filter on you compressor or both and with practice you will not believe the finish, piano quality lacquer not a problem. Here is a link to homestead finishing they sell Astro as well as others take a look at these and see if you might rethink HVLP turbine. http://www.homesteadfinishing.com/htdocs/asturo3.htm Give these people a call they are a wealth of information. I am sure they will get you on the right track. ( no I am not affiliated with them just passing on experience) Donald Grudeski President of Brush Boy Painting Company "Pat Barber" wrote in message ... One of my many goals in life is learning how to finish a woodworking project without making myself completely crazy. In order to further this goal, learning how to shoot a finish with a spray gun ranks waaay up there. I know a few of the folks on the list own and use turbines of various flavors and I have noticed a slight decline in the cost of turbine outfits. I found a low-end Turbinaire unit for $569 and a slighly better one for $697. I might even find a used unit on Ebay... who knows ??? I have a large air compressor but after doing a fair amount of research, these turbine packages seem to be a much better solution. There is no concern of air quality, no moisture issues, no junk in the air lines, no concern of air quanity, large CFM numbers, etc,etc. The overspray even seems to be a non-problem with the HVLP technology. Is this all hype or is this turbine the real answer to getting a decent finish with a spray gun ??? I also assume a fairly stiff learning curve on spraying. |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
wrote: snipped, refer to his post. On Mar 3, 3:06 pm, Pat Barber wrote: I'm 'fair" with a can, but I'm getting better. I see a lot of info on the Fuji systems. I concur completely with Robert (nailshooter41) I have that Fuji Q4 and have had great results. I sprayed this recent project with it and my gold colored pick-up was less than 20 feet away....no overspray on the truck. http://tinyurl.com/3duj9t Max |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
"Pat Barber" wrote: In order to further this goal, learning how to shoot a finish with a spray gun ranks waaay up there. If you can supply 15 SCFM, may have something of interest. Contact me off list for details. Lew |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
I know you are concerned with cfm requirements but there are guns out
there that only use 5 or 6 cfm and have nozzle pressure of 21 psi. they have pressurized cups and tanks and cost less then 500.00 bucks I made a mistake it is 21 psi at the gun inlet and 10 at the nozzle Donald Grudeski President Brush Boy Painting Company |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
On Mar 3, 4:51 pm, "Donald Grudeski" wrote:
Hello, There is two inherent problems with HVLP andfirst is the air is warm to hot which is problematic because the heat makes the finish cure faster then if the air was 70 degrees and 50 RH. The finish will not flow out like it should. It will be acceptable but not as good as conventional air spray. SNIP Wow. If I had all those problems, I wouldn't do my own finishing. I think of all the cabinets, trim, entryways, etc., I have finished over the years, and I haven't run into all the things you describe. I miss high pressure application because of the ease of application. But I like saving material. I don't miss the drift. Check out Max's post above. I had problems getting started with hvlp because I wanted to set the gun up and use the system like high pressure. Its like learning any other system, and investment in time and materials must be made. Once ironed out, I never looked back. Robert |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
On Mar 3, 5:01 pm, "Max" wrote:
I have that Fuji Q4 and have had great results. I sprayed this recent project with it and my gold colored pick-up was less than 20 feet away....no overspray on the truck.http://tinyurl.com/3duj9t NICE looking router cabinet there, sir. Are you going in the cabinet business or the finishing business? I looked at the other photos. Good work all around. Was that a Freud 17xx router I spied under that top? If so, do you like using it? Robert |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
wrote in message ... On Mar 3, 3:06 pm, Pat Barber wrote: I'm 'fair" with a can, but I'm getting better. Personally, I still use rattle cans if the job calls for it. The only two things I don't like about them is less than 30% material transfer on target (which makes them cost much more than you might think!) and the low quality nozzles they put on most cans. There is very little info out there on spray finishing, so it appears to be a D.I.Y. for most folks. Not at all. There is a lot of info online, and there is a lot of information in print by different finishers. (Google "hvlp technique", "hvlp application", "hvlp method", etc.) There are some good softback books out there that appear from time to time in Barnes and Noble, and at some of the used book stores. You can also search this group through Google and find a lot of information on technique, thinning protocols, material usage, etc. I see a lot of info on the Fuji systems. Excellent system. Like Barry, I have one of the Fuji "X"4 systems. I have the Q4. I have used it a lot, and it is pretty bullet proof. When I bought mine, the Mini Mites weren't being widely sold or I might have bought that one as it is more affordable. I shoot stains, dyes, enamels, polyurethanes, and lacquers with it. This unit will put out a lot of cfms making sure you can apply just about any coating, even more than other 4 stage units. I don't know how, because something like 90% of all actual turbine assemblies for serious hvlp systems are made by the same company. The kicker is the support for the product. The link Barry posted is where I got mine a couple of years ago, and Roger knows that product frontwards and backwards, and you can call him anytime. He won't teach you how to spray or apply, but he can tell you immediately if your problems are in product or machine. Turbinaire also seems to get a lot of press. I almost bought the Turbinaire because of the gun. Well made, balanced in the hand, and great fit and finish. It has is the only true turbine hvlp gun that has a fully adjustable pattern (not just a fixed detent position aircap) that works just like a high pressure paint spray gun. That is because it IS a converted paint spray gun. I went to a Benjamin Moore sponsored event a couple of years ago to try this gun out (OK... and eat some barbecue) along with some other guns. I really liked the overall system, but Fuji won hands down on product support and consumables affordability. You can buy everything from Roger. And when I needed to speak to Roger, I found he always answered his phone, one time while walking his dog. I have this thing about support after the sale since I have been drilled pretty hard a couple of times. After I got the info from Turbinaire at the demo, I went around the corner and called customer service on the phone. No one could answer my questions about cfms, using a whip (extension) on the hose, or where to get the unit fixed when it broke. After I bought a Fuji system from Roger, I needed another aircap to spray some really thin material. When I received a rusty aircap/needle assembly from Roger, I was REALLY ****ed as I needed it to finish some cabinets immediately after receipt. Roger used to be a finisher himself, so he knew what was riding on the deal. He sent me a new aircap via 2 day FedEx at his cost. All I had to do was to email him a picture of the rust on the aircap. When I called make sure he got the picture, he had already had the package picked up and it was on its way. I assume they are all "very" similar in operation and costs. Probably true. Some of the guns are really different though, and that makes all the difference in the world on your final finish. You need one that is comfortable in your hand, has a variety of AFFORDABLE aircaps, filters, one way valves, etc. readily available for it. It should be easy to break down and clean. Fit and finish is important as well as the rougher finished guns tend to be harder to clean. Depending on what kind of spraying you do and where you do it, you may want a non bleeder or bleeder gun. I have both and prefer the non bleeder, although the bleeder is just fine for 99% of my needs. Good luck on your purchase. Robert Robert, I picked up the Apollo 4 stage for a relative bargain, but haven't had the time to fiddle with it yet. Do you have any experience with it? How does it stack up against your fuji? I'm going to follow up on a couple of your info suggestions. I really need to get on the learning curve on this thing with the end goal of an off-the-gun finish. jc |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
"Max" wrote in message t... wrote: snipped, refer to his post. On Mar 3, 3:06 pm, Pat Barber wrote: I'm 'fair" with a can, but I'm getting better. I see a lot of info on the Fuji systems. I concur completely with Robert (nailshooter41) I have that Fuji Q4 and have had great results. I sprayed this recent project with it and my gold colored pick-up was less than 20 feet away....no overspray on the truck. http://tinyurl.com/3duj9t Max Oh. My. God. You used pvc for dust collection?? Don't you know your shop is going to EXPLODE?!?!?! just kidding. Very nice job. jc |
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
On Mar 3, 6:46 pm, "joe" wrote:
Robert, I picked up the Apollo 4 stage for a relative bargain, but haven't had the time to fiddle with it yet. Do you have any experience with it? How does it stack up against your fuji? I liked the Apollo a lot. At the time though, I had it in my mind that bleeder guns were not a good thing, and at that time that was all Apollo had. The fit and finish were a little bit better than the same on my Fuji, and they delivered an excellent finish. I was sure though, that the bleeder function of the gun would get me in trouble. I had this picture of spraying away and laying down a nice coat then moving the gun to one side and kicking up some dust. Apollo has their following and I think they are a top notch system. I wouldn't concern myself with the air bleed aspect of the gun. Just be careful where you point it! I was interested in them since they have been around forever and always get really solid reviews. All I did was demo one, though. I listened to the saleman's pitch and he let me spray as much as I wanted to. It layed out a nice finish with no problem at all, and I was spraying unthinned latex enamel paint! I haven't done a kitchen or anything like that. But my opinion is you will probably love it. I might be able to help you if you are talking about spraying paint, enamel, poly or lacquers, all solvent based stuff. For the water borne products, "ping" Barry and see if he is around. I'm going to follow up on a couple of your info suggestions. I really need to get on the learning curve on this thing with the end goal of an off-the-gun finish. jc - that's where it's at. Speed, dash and accuracy win the day in finishing. ALL of my finishing is 'off the gun' unless it is for me, or they clients are paying to have it rubbed out. Keep a good journal of what you are doing, including temps, material, amount of air to the gun, etc. Like high pressure spraying, yo u will need to thin from time to time, so don't forget to include that in your notes. For me, one of the hardest things to do was to turn down the pressure/air flow. You can literally shoot as much material and make as much drift as a high pressure gun if you don't have it adjusted right. I finally got the hang of it by turning the pressure to the gun OFF. Completely. Then I opened up the valve a half turn until it sprayed the way I wanted (then I wrote that down) and started from there when I sprayed that finish. Feel free to post any questions here as there are a lot of experienced finishers on this ng. Robert |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
I bought a used turbine rig about three years ago and at time had done very
little spraying with a compressor gun. I use my turbine almost once a week now and wonder how I lived without it. I find it easier to use than the conventional gun compressor set up. cm "Pat Barber" wrote in message ... One of my many goals in life is learning how to finish a woodworking project without making myself completely crazy. In order to further this goal, learning how to shoot a finish with a spray gun ranks waaay up there. I know a few of the folks on the list own and use turbines of various flavors and I have noticed a slight decline in the cost of turbine outfits. I found a low-end Turbinaire unit for $569 and a slighly better one for $697. I might even find a used unit on Ebay... who knows ??? I have a large air compressor but after doing a fair amount of research, these turbine packages seem to be a much better solution. There is no concern of air quality, no moisture issues, no junk in the air lines, no concern of air quanity, large CFM numbers, etc,etc. The overspray even seems to be a non-problem with the HVLP technology. Is this all hype or is this turbine the real answer to getting a decent finish with a spray gun ??? I also assume a fairly stiff learning curve on spraying. |
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
I spray a lot of waterbased acrylic. I have 10 Gallons sitting in my shop
waiting to be applied.....Yup 10 gallons. I have no problem with runs and sags when I spray and I don't think three coats is "lots of coats"? Just my experience. cm "Donald Grudeski" wrote in message ... Hello, There is two inherent problems with HVLP andfirst is the air is warm to hot which is problematic because the heat makes the finish cure faster then if the air was 70 degrees and 50 RH. The finish will not flow out like it should. It will be acceptable but not as good as conventional air spray. Some guy/gals will tell you that they get it to flow and the finish is good or great, but more often then not for the average guy/gal the finish is okay fair to middle compared with conventional. And when shooting water base it's most likely going to need to be reduced to get it to spray and then this problem really becomes apparent ( runs and sags or lots of coats) and when spraying lacquer you need to dump retarder in it to stop the blush and dry spray appearance.The second problem is that the cup is not pressurized and it relies on suction to pull the material up and out of the cup the problem is pressure is what makes the suction so when you reduce the pressure like HVLP LP meaning low pressure you reduce suction. to compensate you need to reduce the material and with some materials ( like water base ) to the point of making crap out of it. There is a solution which is a HVLP CONVERSION and I know you are concerned with cfm requirements but there are guns out there that only use 5 or 6 cfm and have nozzle pressure of 21 psi. they have pressurized cups and tanks and cost less then 500.00 bucks, as far as water and crap in the lines that is easily remedy with a in line filter or dryer filter on you compressor or both and with practice you will not believe the finish, piano quality lacquer not a problem. Here is a link to homestead finishing they sell Astro as well as others take a look at these and see if you might rethink HVLP turbine. http://www.homesteadfinishing.com/htdocs/asturo3.htm Give these people a call they are a wealth of information. I am sure they will get you on the right track. ( no I am not affiliated with them just passing on experience) Donald Grudeski President of Brush Boy Painting Company "Pat Barber" wrote in message ... One of my many goals in life is learning how to finish a woodworking project without making myself completely crazy. In order to further this goal, learning how to shoot a finish with a spray gun ranks waaay up there. I know a few of the folks on the list own and use turbines of various flavors and I have noticed a slight decline in the cost of turbine outfits. I found a low-end Turbinaire unit for $569 and a slighly better one for $697. I might even find a used unit on Ebay... who knows ??? I have a large air compressor but after doing a fair amount of research, these turbine packages seem to be a much better solution. There is no concern of air quality, no moisture issues, no junk in the air lines, no concern of air quanity, large CFM numbers, etc,etc. The overspray even seems to be a non-problem with the HVLP technology. Is this all hype or is this turbine the real answer to getting a decent finish with a spray gun ??? I also assume a fairly stiff learning curve on spraying. |
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
Feel free to post any questions here as there are a lot of experienced
finishers on this ng. Robert Will do, thanks again for the help (so far ;-) ) joe |
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
wrote in message ... On Mar 3, 5:01 pm, "Max" wrote: I have that Fuji Q4 and have had great results. I sprayed this recent project with it and my gold colored pick-up was less than 20 feet away....no overspray on the truck.http://tinyurl.com/3duj9t NICE looking router cabinet there, sir. Are you going in the cabinet business or the finishing business? I looked at the other photos. Good work all around. Was that a Freud 17xx router I spied under that top? If so, do you like using it? Robert That's a Milwaukee 5625-20, 3 1/2 HP. It works grrreat!!. I also have 2 Hitachi M12V routers that I acquired well before the Milwaukee came on the market. I was pleased with them but the Milwaukee is even better. Now I can put a panel raising bit in the Mil., a rail bit in one Hit. and a stile bit in the other and really get after it on cabinet doors without changing bits. Max |
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
"joe" wrote in message news "Max" wrote in message t... wrote: snipped, refer to his post. On Mar 3, 3:06 pm, Pat Barber wrote: I'm 'fair" with a can, but I'm getting better. I see a lot of info on the Fuji systems. I concur completely with Robert (nailshooter41) I have that Fuji Q4 and have had great results. I sprayed this recent project with it and my gold colored pick-up was less than 20 feet away....no overspray on the truck. http://tinyurl.com/3duj9t Max Oh. My. God. You used pvc for dust collection?? Don't you know your shop is going to EXPLODE?!?!?! just kidding. Very nice job. jc Thank you, Sir. If I ever have an EXPLOSION, I will be one embarrassed dude. I'm a retired Deputy Fire Chief. Max |
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
"Max" wrote in message et... wrote in message ... On Mar 3, 5:01 pm, "Max" wrote: I have that Fuji Q4 and have had great results. I sprayed this recent project with it and my gold colored pick-up was less than 20 feet away....no overspray on the truck.http://tinyurl.com/3duj9t NICE looking router cabinet there, sir. Are you going in the cabinet business or the finishing business? I looked at the other photos. Good work all around. Was that a Freud 17xx router I spied under that top? If so, do you like using it? Robert That's a Milwaukee 5625-20, 3 1/2 HP. It works grrreat!!. I also have 2 Hitachi M12V routers that I acquired well before the Milwaukee came on the market. I was pleased with them but the Milwaukee is even better. Now I can put a panel raising bit in the Mil., a rail bit in one Hit. and a stile bit in the other and really get after it on cabinet doors without changing bits. Max Max, have you tried the Hitachi M12V2? Or were both of yours M12V's? Wondering if I should pick up the revamped version or something else. jc |
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
On Mar 3, 7:25 pm, "CM" wrote:
I spray a lot of waterbased acrylic. I have 10 Gallons sitting in my shop waiting to be applied.....Yup 10 gallons. I have no problem with runs and sags when I spray and I don't think three coats is "lots of coats"? Just my experience. While I don't spray water based clear coats with my hvlp (latex paint goes through the airless), I spray a fair amount of conversion lacquers. I am with you. 3 coats is nothing. At a three mil wet layer per coat, it takes a minimum of three coats to get a final thickness of 3 mil which is what just about all manufacturers recommend. Spraying CAB lacquers, a having good spraying conditions, you should be able to put on multiple coats easily in a day without problems. Shooting MLC Ultrastar (water borne), I know BARRY has noted multiple coats in a day as his norm. But, we all have different experiences. Robert |
#23
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
"joe" wrote Max, have you tried the Hitachi M12V2? Or were both of yours M12V's? Wondering if I should pick up the revamped version or something else. jc Those Hitachis are both the old style. I have heard/read some...uh.....unkind comments about the new style but I don't have any first hand experience with them. I can't say enough about that Milwaukee though. It has a "T" handle that allows height adjustment through the top of the table. No need for a "router lifter". It has power to spare. "2 wrench" collet. (some people don't care for that but I think it's easier to squeeze 2 wrenches together to tighten or loosen the collet instead of holding a shaft lock with one hand and a wrench in the other) Max |
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
On Mar 3, 10:50*pm, "Max" wrote:
I can't say enough about that Milwaukee though. *It has a *"T" handle that allows height adjustment through the top of the table. *No need for a "router lifter". It has power to spare. "2 wrench" collet. *(some people don't care for that but I think it's easier to squeeze 2 wrenches together to tighten or loosen the collet instead of holding a shaft lock with one hand and a wrench in the other) Nothing to talk about. Those Milwaukees rule! I much prefer the two-wrench set-up also. |
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
On Mar 3, 7:12 pm, "CM" wrote:
I bought a used turbine rig about three years ago and at time had done very little spraying with a compressor gun. I use my turbine almost once a week now and wonder how I lived without it. I find it easier to use than the conventional gun compressor set up. I think the thing I like the best about the hvlp turbine is its predictability. Once you get comfortable with it, it is much easier to work with for a range of finishes than a high pressure sprayer. No worries about driers, in line filters, contaminates, etc. as with high pressure. And the gun is no harder to clean than any other. But the best part of course is the lack of overspray. It is rare for the overspray to travel more than a few feet, and the atomized haze doesn't hang in the air for 30 minutes waiting to land on something. I sprayed out some bathroom and kitchen cabinets inside a house we remodeled, in the client's garage and all we did was hang some plastic up about 4 feet from the ground. No problems there and no complaints from the client. When it is a real tear out remodel of mine or one of my amigos, I don't have any problems throwing a piece of plastic over sawhorses and spraying in a living room or den. The over spray pretty much just falls to the ground. It is such a huge thing to not have to tape off a whole house, evacuate the living areas for hours while the drift settles, and to be able to be more flexible where you can actually spray. If I had known it worked this well I would have gotten on it earlier, regardless of the savings in material. To me, that's just icing on the cake. Robert |
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
Pat Barber wrote:
I assume they are all "very" similar in operation and costs. I think all of them use the same Ametek Lamb turbine. I learned some basic things from this book, like spraying into my own overspray: http://www.amazon.com/Spray-Finishing-Other-Techniques-Woodworking/dp/1561588296/ref=pd_bxgy_b_img_b My ML Campbell dealer gave me a printed copy of this: http://www.mlcampbell.com/secured/woodfinishprobs.pdf Jewitt has some tips in his general finishing books. Roger Phelps has some video on the Phelps site. I've learned lots from Robert (nailshooter) and Mike Marlow, right on this forum. The most difficult part for me was recognizing the different problems. After that, the Campbell document is a great resource to have handy. Even with spraying, some finishes need a light rub out. There are some differences in technique, depending on the product in use. For instance, some finishes need defects to dry before repair, but you can often wipe drips away with lacquer on the spot. Some finishes like a "tack coat", others like full, wet coats. When in doubt, _let the finish dry_, then troubleshoot. |
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
Donald Grudeski wrote:
Hello, There is two inherent problems with HVLP andfirst is the air is warm to hot which is problematic because the heat makes the finish cure faster then if the air was 70 degrees and 50 RH. The finish will not flow out like it should. Warm air is great with water base lacquer. The simple way to cool the air when warming is a problem is to add more hose. Shutting the turbine down when not in use (I use a dust collector remote) also helps. And when shooting water base it's most likely going to need to be reduced to get it to spray and then this problem really becomes apparent ( runs and sags or lots of coats) and when spraying lacquer you need to dump retarder in it to stop the blush and dry spray appearance. Not true at all, with my Fuji Q4, ML Cambell Ultrastar and ML Campbell NC Lacquer. I spray Ultrastar right from the can. The second problem is that the cup is not pressurized and it relies on suction to pull the material up and out of the cup the problem is pressure is what makes the suction so when you reduce the pressure like HVLP LP meaning low pressure you reduce suction. Not true on my Fuji siphon gun, it has a pressure line to the cup. Anybody who has opened the cup at the wrong time knows full well just how well it's pressurized! G I also have a 2 quart pressure pot that runs from a standard compressor. For my gravity feed gun, I go up a tip size. Are you sure you've used a good HVLP? |
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
|
#29
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
"Robatoy" wrote ...
On Mar 3, 10:50 pm, "Max" wrote: I can't say enough about that Milwaukee though. It has a "T" handle that allows height adjustment through the top of the table. No need for a "router lifter". It has power to spare. "2 wrench" collet. (some people don't care for that but I think it's easier to squeeze 2 wrenches together to tighten or loosen the collet instead of holding a shaft lock with one hand and a wrench in the other) Nothing to talk about. Those Milwaukees rule! I much prefer the two-wrench set-up also. The only thing I don't like about the little Bosch Colt is the shaft lock .... the air turns blue every time I use it. All my other routers use two wrenches. (This thread has me dreaming about upgrading my HVLP ...) -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 12/14/07 KarlC@ (the obvious) |
#30
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
Swingman wrote:
The only thing I don't like about the little Bosch Colt is the shaft lock ... the air turns blue every time I use it. All my other routers use two wrenches. My older Bosch laminate trimmer also has a shaft lock. I definitely prefer two wrenches. |
#31
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
On Mar 4, 6:11 am, B A R R Y wrote:
*SNIP* of good information Not true at all, with my Fuji Q4, ML Cambell Ultrastar and ML Campbell NC Lacquer. I spray Ultrastar right from the can. When I demoed the Turbinaire unit, I almost bit on the spot as the guy opened a quart of really thick latex enamel in front of me, let me stir it to make sure there was no friggin' in the riggin', and he poured some directly in the cup and let me spray. That almost sold me as I thought "surely no other system can do that". But in truth I think most 4 stage systems from the big boys will, and some of the 3 stage machines will do that, too. I thin because of my shooting style and climate. If it is 65 - 70 degrees and about 50% relative humidity, I don't thin or mix anything with the clear coat. That actual day usually happens about twice a year around here. Are you sure you've used a good HVLP? LOL. You are definitely sturdier than I am. When I read that post there were so many things that were just completely wrong I deleted my original response. You just said it best and I think you hit the nail square on the head. Robert |
#32
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
"B A R R Y" wrote in message ... Swingman wrote: The only thing I don't like about the little Bosch Colt is the shaft lock ... the air turns blue every time I use it. All my other routers use two wrenches. My older Bosch laminate trimmer also has a shaft lock. I definitely prefer two wrenches. is that the bosch where you stick one end of one wrench in the top of the housing to lock the shaft? I have that one and I think I prefer it to a 'true' shaft lock. It's still two wrenches, just not two wrenches on the collet. Unfortunately, the plastic base on it cracked and getting it replaced is going to be almost as expensive as replacing the router :-( jc |
#33
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
This was the "only" negative comment I could find
about hvlp. I realize nobody who has ever bought a unit is likely to admit a problem, but most of the folks that are making comments have been around this group for a while. I just got to decide which flavor at this point. I am convinced it will be a good thing. wrote: Are you sure you've used a good HVLP? LOL. You are definitely sturdier than I am. When I read that post there were so many things that were just completely wrong I deleted my original response. You just said it best and I think you hit the nail square on the head. Robert |
#34
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
Pat Barber wrote:
I realize nobody who has ever bought a unit is likely to admit a problem, Please don't put me in that bucket. I'm more than happy to pan anything that doesn't meet my expectations, regardless of what I paid for it. I don't find sharing my negative experiences a with product or service as a reflection on myself. If I dropped $700 on spray equipment and I didn't get total satisfaction, this group would be the first to know. G |
#35
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
On Mar 4, 11:42 am, B A R R Y wrote:
Pat Barber wrote: I realize nobody who has ever bought a unit is likely to admit a problem, Please don't put me in that bucket. Or me. I will scream like a mashed cat when I am screwed by a tool maker. I don't care what it is. And the more money I spend, the louder I will be. This is one of the great aspects of an unmoderated, unsupported free- for-all atmosphere. You can tell it like it is, and while you may hurt some feelings you can certainly relate your experiences without worrying about having your post deleted or edited. With there only being a few large tool makers anymore that have tools readily available, I think it is important to share what you find out when you make a purchase. It saves the rest of us time, effort, money and heartburn. I don't know of any one tool maker (OK, Festool guys, maybe yours ;^) calm down...) that consistently makes great tools manufactured to exacting standards across their entire product line. Sharing information is without doubt the best part of the internet. Robert |
#36
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
Yep... you do seem to "voice" your concerns
with little regard to what the tool makers do or say. The open discussion has been the main reason I have hung out here for a right good while. I'm from the south and we have more "saying" than carter has liver pills, but I don't recall ever hearing the "mashed cat" version. Excellent. wrote: Or me. I will scream like a mashed cat when I am screwed by a tool maker. I don't care what it is. And the more money I spend, the louder I will be. |
#37
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
To Turbine or not to turbine
I have one of the smallest and oldest turbines out there which I purchased
used. The turbine I bought was manufactured in 1984. I am sure a bigger turbine or new gun technology might be even better, but I won't find out until mine finally dies. Until then I will enjoy the ease of spraying with my old TP turbine http://tinyurl.com/25vr5h . You will not regret your purchase. cm "Pat Barber" wrote in message ... Yep... you do seem to "voice" your concerns with little regard to what the tool makers do or say. The open discussion has been the main reason I have hung out here for a right good while. I'm from the south and we have more "saying" than carter has liver pills, but I don't recall ever hearing the "mashed cat" version. Excellent. wrote: Or me. I will scream like a mashed cat when I am screwed by a tool maker. I don't care what it is. And the more money I spend, the louder I will be. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Turbine in my furnace? | Home Repair | |||
Tesla Turbine | Metalworking | |||
Tesla Turbine | Metalworking | |||
tesla turbine #4 | Metalworking | |||
Tesla Turbine #3 | Metalworking |