Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Personel preferences...
As I was looking at the router bit sets (CMT at this time), I am learning more... I like the OGEE style for the stile and COVE style for the raised panel. There are three raised panel styles I found myself: OGEE, COVE, and FLAT (I just call it "flat" since there isn't a name for it?). My brother-in- law has both ogee for the stiles and panels, I didn't like it. So, if I had moola to spend right now, I would buy CMT 800.517.11 (that would be ogee stile and cove panel). The reason I am bringing this up in here is because I am trying to look for a "match" for smaller style, like CMT 800.524.11. I am trying to find something to do a (total) 5" wide door (technically it won't be a door) that would match the rest of the other doors. Or am I making a big deal out of this? CMT 800.524.11 has FLAT panel and ROUNDOVER stile CMT 800.517.11 has COVE panel and OGEE stile I know I could buy individual bits, which will require a credit card. BTW, how come some panel cutter do not have a "back cutter"? Is it another personel preferences? That means the panel will stick out more while a "back cutter" will produce more even stile/panel? That's the reason? I have to yet buy (or make?) panel template (I like Roman style, maybe will consider Cathedral for a kitchen). Who knows, I might change what I like with bit styles, just that the bits are expensive. Chuck |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Best modern Router table Router? | Woodworking | |||
An Ultimate Router Table - Part I: A Short Story | Woodworking | |||
Plunge or non-plunge router better under table? | Woodworking | |||
Review of the new Porter Cable 895PK- Part 1 | Woodworking | |||
Anyone _not_ like routers? | Woodworking |