Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Lots of folks here have a router in their pocket, a router on their tool
belt, a router in their backpack, a router in the table, and a spare router under the bench. Many of you just seem to absolutely *love* these things. I just cut my first dovetails today. I did them by hand, with an X-acto razor saw. They came out pretty well, considering it was my first try, and it occurs to me that I have no desire to buy the jig and the bit and futz around with the setup in order to save myself time by doing these with a machine some day. I'm finding the more I do with chisels and hand planes, the less I'm interested in using a router to do things. I've never used my router for much anyway. It's a bad router, granted, but even if it didn't have the problems it does, I don't think I'd like it. Seems like you have to spend forever changing bits, changing depths, changing bases, setting up templates or jigs or hold-downs or fences or some damn thing in order to use the thing for three minutes and save yourself a little physical labor. True, I do this all the time on the drill press. I spend 15 minutes changing the setup to make one hole in one piece sometimes, then turn around and do it again. I love playing with my drill press, and I don't mind the setup time. Yet when faced with the same problem on another machine, I can rarely be bothered to get it out and futz with it. My router table usually serves as a temporary holding area for stuff I need to put away. It's totally paradoxical. Am I nuts? How is it that this most marvelous and alluring tool does not excite me? Just wondering if I'm the only one, I guess. I think I'm turning into a Neander. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
In article , Silvan
wrote: Lots of folks here have a router in their pocket, a router on their tool belt, a router in their backpack, a router in the table, and a spare router under the bench. Many of you just seem to absolutely *love* these things. That's because it's such a flexible tool. It's not always the best tool for a given job, but if you don't happen to own the best took for your job, there's a pretty good chance that a router can fill in. And there are some jobs that a router does better than any other tool. But because it's such a flexible tool, it's often necessary to build jigs that adapt it to a task, perhaps by holding it in a fixed position or by limiting it's motion to a particular range. I just cut my first dovetails today. I did them by hand, with an X-acto razor saw. They came out pretty well, considering it was my first try, and it occurs to me that I have no desire to buy the jig and the bit and futz around with the setup in order to save myself time by doing these with a machine some day. That's great! I doubt anyone here would laugh at you for spending the time to learn to cut dovetails by hand. It's absolutely a good skill to have, and if you continue to develop that skill it'll serve you well. Likewise, cutting dovetails with a router is a good skill to have, and one that requires a certain amount of practice. It may not be important for the work that you choose, and that's fine. On the other hand, if you needed to build a kitchen full of cabinets including a dozen or two drawers, being skilled with router and dovetail jig would be very important. It's not that you couldn't do them by hand, just that you could do them faster and cheaper with router and jig. I'm finding the more I do with chisels and hand planes, the less I'm interested in using a router to do things. I've never used my router for much anyway. It's a bad router, granted, but even if it didn't have the problems it does, I don't think I'd like it. Seems like you have to spend forever changing bits, changing depths, changing bases, setting up templates or jigs or hold-downs or fences or some damn thing in order to use the thing for three minutes and save yourself a little physical labor. That sounds a little self-defeating. You've never really learned to use your router, and yet you don't think you'd like it? A router is like any other tool, from a table saw to a hand plane... you need to understand it, and you need to think about how to use it efficiently. Ideally, you want to set up for a job once, and then cut every part of your project that needs that setup at the same time. This will not only speed your work, but make it more accurate as well. (The same goes for any tool, particularly the table saw.) You also need to get to know your particular router. Example: I've heard people complain that it's very difficult to remove the motor from a Porter Cable 693 plunge base because it's so hard to remove the little allen screw that tightens the base around the motor. Well, it sure is difficult to remove that screw, but you're not supposed to remove it. You just loosen it, and the motor slides right out. There's no need to make life difficult by not bothering to understand your tool. Now, maybe your router really is a crappy one that performs badly and is difficult to use. If that's the case, don't fall into the trap of thinking that all routers are equally disappointing. But before you discount it, spend some time thinking about the problems you have with it and whether there might be good solutions, or whether they really are inherent in the machine. If the latter, sell it and go get a demo of a better model. True, I do this all the time on the drill press. I spend 15 minutes changing the setup to make one hole in one piece sometimes, then turn around and do it again. I love playing with my drill press, and I don't mind the setup time. Yet when faced with the same problem on another machine, I can rarely be bothered to get it out and futz with it. My router table usually serves as a temporary holding area for stuff I need to put away. It's totally paradoxical. So there's another self-defeating behavior. You don't use your router table because it's "too much bother," yet you make it too much bother by making it difficult to get to. Honestly, putting a bit in your router and setting the bit depth shouldn't take more than two or three minutes, even on a two-wrench model like the PC 690. Also, as with any tool, keep in mind that time you spend in setting up an operation ensures that you do the job right. And again, a lot of the payoff for the time you spend setting up comes when you can easily and accurately repeat the operation using the same setup for multiple workpieces. If I'm making box joints on either the table saw or the router table, I usually take more time setting up than I do cutting both ends of all four sides of the box. Overall, I end up saving time and doing a better job compared to what I personally am able to achieve with a hand saw. Am I nuts? How is it that this most marvelous and alluring tool does not excite me? Sounds like a matter of personal preference combined with lack of training and possibly a cheap tool. If you're interested in giving the router a chance, pick up a book such as "Woodworking With the Router: Professional Router Techniques and Jigs Any Woodworker Can Use" by Hylton and Matlack. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 01:07:02 -0400, Silvan
wrote: Many of you just seem to absolutely *love* these things. I love mine. Spends most of its time in the table. These http://www.livejournal.com/users/que...10.html#cutid1 are just three layers of stacked MDF, bandsawn to a profile and then run over a chamfer bit. Easy to do, and most of all - quick ! I just cut my first dovetails today. Congratulations. I don't use a router for mine, I hand cut them. The dovetail isn't the appropriate joint for most purposes. It's slow to cut (biscuits are quickest), not as strong as a finger joint with modern adhesives, and awkward to assemble. However they're still the signature joint for quality work, and they'll hold together in 100 years, after hide glue has failed. So if you're going to do dovetails, do good ones ! Get the proprotions to be attractive, and that still means hand-cutting them. -- Die Gotterspammerung - Junkmail of the Gods |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 09:08:14 -0400, Trent©
wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 01:07:02 -0400, Silvan wrote: Am I nuts? How is it that this most marvelous and alluring tool does not excite me? I sort of feel the same way. However, if there are several drawers that need dovetails, especially half-blind dovetails, I will use my router. Otherwise The Red Sox will have won the World Series before I finish the project! Also, there's no other really decent way to make nice edges on table- and cabinet-tops. One does need a little deep masochism for when the beast slips, though! James |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Silvan wrote: snip Am I nuts? How is it that this most marvelous and alluring tool does not excite me? Just wondering if I'm the only one, I guess. I think I'm turning into a Neander. It sounds like your woodworking may be as much about the journey as the destination. If you truly enjoy the process of woodowrking, your projects will as enjoyable to do as hey are to complete. The whole Generation X expectation of immediate gratification, combined with equipment manufacturers pushing the sale of hardware, has made turning out projects more important than actually working on them. At some point you will decide which show you like better:T he Woodright's Shop or The New Yankee Workshop... Tim |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Caleb Strockbine wrote:
to build a kitchen full of cabinets including a dozen or two drawers, being skilled with router and dovetail jig would be very important. It's not that you couldn't do them by hand, just that you could do them faster and cheaper with router and jig. Faster maybe. Cheaper is a hard case to make, since I'm already cutting dovetails without buying anything new. I'll get better at it, so I expect to waste a lot less wood in the future. I take your meaning though, and I'd probably feel differently if I were working on a huge project with lots of similar parts, or if my shop time had any monetary value. That sounds a little self-defeating. You've never really learned to use your router, and yet you don't think you'd like it? A router is like any Well, that's not quite right. I've never really *bothered* to use my router. It's slightly different. I tried a lot of things when I first got it, and I have several of those "50,000,001 Inspiring Router Ideas" books, but over the course of time the thing has definitely collected more sawdust than it has made, and most of the "inspiring" ideas have gone untried. I won't say I mastered any of the techniques, but neither did I do such a bad job that I was disappointed and discouraged beyond hope. A better router would definitely make some things easier, but I keep pushing it to the bottom of my priority list. It isn't really defeat so much as ambivalence. I find I don't really care whether I get a better router some day or not. There's just not much allure there. I guess that's what it comes down to. For a one-off, or a two-off, the router is more of a PITA than it's worth to me. The jigs, the setup, the noise, the mess. (A DC is something else on the list ahead of a new router.) I don't mass-produce things, don't make *big* things, and repeatability is no big concern. Everything is a one-off, and I'm not in a hurry. My shop time is a lot more relaxing and enjoyable when I don't flip on the banshee. So there's another self-defeating behavior. You don't use your router table because it's "too much bother," yet you make it too much bother by making it difficult to get to. Honestly, putting a bit in your router and Nah, it isn't that. I have stuff there because I rarely use it, not the other way around. All of my horizontal surfaces become item collectors at some point. The difference with the router is I almost never have a need to move stuff off of it. Anyway, I'm not really looking to figure out what's "wrong" with me. I'm comfortable being me. I've just been mulling over some thoughts, and I was wondering if I'm the only one to realize one day that he doesn't find routers particularly magical. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Dovetails on a drill press?
Now you just hit on a marvelous idea! Why CAN't we do dovetails on a
drill press? On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 01:07:02 -0400, Silvan wrote: Lots of folks here have a router in their pocket, a router on their tool belt, a router in their backpack, a router in the table, and a spare router under the bench. Many of you just seem to absolutely *love* these things. I just cut my first dovetails today. I did them by hand, with an X-acto razor saw. They came out pretty well, considering it was my first try, and it occurs to me that I have no desire to buy the jig and the bit and futz around with the setup in order to save myself time by doing these with a machine some day. I'm finding the more I do with chisels and hand planes, the less I'm interested in using a router to do things. I've never used my router for much anyway. It's a bad router, granted, but even if it didn't have the problems it does, I don't think I'd like it. Seems like you have to spend forever changing bits, changing depths, changing bases, setting up templates or jigs or hold-downs or fences or some damn thing in order to use the thing for three minutes and save yourself a little physical labor. True, I do this all the time on the drill press. I spend 15 minutes changing the setup to make one hole in one piece sometimes, then turn around and do it again. I love playing with my drill press, and I don't mind the setup time. Yet when faced with the same problem on another machine, I can rarely be bothered to get it out and futz with it. My router table usually serves as a temporary holding area for stuff I need to put away. It's totally paradoxical. Am I nuts? How is it that this most marvelous and alluring tool does not excite me? Just wondering if I'm the only one, I guess. I think I'm turning into a Neander. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
I like routers better in the router table--less noise, less dust. I
use them for round-overs, cutting dutchmen, hinge mortising, or decorative moldings. I used to make dovetail joints with routers, but now I prefer cutting dovetails by hand. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Dovetails on a drill press?
"Lawrence A. Ramsey" wrote in message ... Now you just hit on a marvelous idea! Why CAN't we do dovetails on a drill press? On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 01:07:02 -0400, Silvan wrote: Lots of folks here have a router in their pocket, a router on their tool belt, a router in their backpack, a router in the table, and a spare router under the bench. Many of you just seem to absolutely *love* these things. I just cut my first dovetails today. I did them by hand, with an X-acto razor saw. They came out pretty well, considering it was my first try, and it occurs to me that I have no desire to buy the jig and the bit and futz around with the setup in order to save myself time by doing these with a machine some day. I'm finding the more I do with chisels and hand planes, the less I'm interested in using a router to do things. I've never used my router for much anyway. It's a bad router, granted, but even if it didn't have the problems it does, I don't think I'd like it. Seems like you have to spend forever changing bits, changing depths, changing bases, setting up templates or jigs or hold-downs or fences or some damn thing in order to use the thing for three minutes and save yourself a little physical labor. True, I do this all the time on the drill press. I spend 15 minutes changing the setup to make one hole in one piece sometimes, then turn around and do it again. I love playing with my drill press, and I don't mind the setup time. Yet when faced with the same problem on another machine, I can rarely be bothered to get it out and futz with it. My router table usually serves as a temporary holding area for stuff I need to put away. It's totally paradoxical. Am I nuts? How is it that this most marvelous and alluring tool does not excite me? Just wondering if I'm the only one, I guess. I think I'm turning into a Neander. Anything less than a industrial strength drill press will have their bearings destroyed in very short order. They are not designed to take high side loads. -- Jim in NC |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 01:07:02 -0400, Silvan
pixelated: Lots of folks here have a router in their pocket, a router on their tool belt, a router in their backpack, a router in the table, and a spare router under the bench. Many of you just seem to absolutely *love* these things. Many of these guys use poly, too, so there's no accounting for taste. Am I nuts? How is it that this most marvelous and alluring tool does not excite me? You call a bloody 98DB shrieker "alluring"? Shirley, ewe jest. Just wondering if I'm the only one, I guess. Newp. I think I'm turning into a Neander. Bueno, bwana. ------------------------------------------------------------- give me The Luxuries Of Life * http://www.diversify.com i can live without the necessities * 2 Tee collections online ------------------------------------------------------------- |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Fac it, Silvan. Most of these young-ones on this newsgroup like to
take the easy way out. They are too cheap to spend money on quality gear, and too lazy to do things the hard way. "Life aint nothin' but twinks and chinks!" (Sexy gay young men and Chinese food!) -JOAT (Jerk-Off All Twinks) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
I love routers and I love the act of routering! I've got 2 PC's; one in
a Woodpecker table with the Precision Router Lift, a marvelous tool, and one for the occasional free routering job! The router table does a great job on anything I've thrown at it. It's fun to feed a piece of wood into it and get a shaped, useful part out the other side. I don't care to labor over things excessively or obsessively. I just want to get the job down with a minimum of fuss, and a maximum of enjoyment. For me that would only include a minimum of "Neandering", as I don't like wasting time. I like the "building" of things, but not to the extent that some guys carry things to the extreme by doing EVERYTHING by hand. By that I mean jointing, rabetting, dovetails, everything done by hand. That's just not my bag. Neanders are surely more talented than I, but then again, I'm not comparing myself to anyone. All I care about is the end result, having fun doing it, and not wasting time. (I know, I know, I said that before.) I DO cut my crown molding with a coping saw! That should count as my concession to Neandering. Mill file, rattail file, sanding block: all Neander stuff. Then when I put the crown up, I use my PC finish nailer! Back to the modern world. I carry a small plane; not a router in my pocket... dave Silvan wrote: Lots of folks here have a router in their pocket, a router on their tool belt, a router in their backpack, a router in the table, and a spare router under the bench. Many of you just seem to absolutely *love* these things. I just cut my first dovetails today. I did them by hand, with an X-acto razor saw. They came out pretty well, considering it was my first try, and it occurs to me that I have no desire to buy the jig and the bit and futz around with the setup in order to save myself time by doing these with a machine some day. I'm finding the more I do with chisels and hand planes, the less I'm interested in using a router to do things. I've never used my router for much anyway. It's a bad router, granted, but even if it didn't have the problems it does, I don't think I'd like it. Seems like you have to spend forever changing bits, changing depths, changing bases, setting up templates or jigs or hold-downs or fences or some damn thing in order to use the thing for three minutes and save yourself a little physical labor. True, I do this all the time on the drill press. I spend 15 minutes changing the setup to make one hole in one piece sometimes, then turn around and do it again. I love playing with my drill press, and I don't mind the setup time. Yet when faced with the same problem on another machine, I can rarely be bothered to get it out and futz with it. My router table usually serves as a temporary holding area for stuff I need to put away. It's totally paradoxical. Am I nuts? How is it that this most marvelous and alluring tool does not excite me? Just wondering if I'm the only one, I guess. I think I'm turning into a Neander. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
I like the router also. It doesn't take a lot of effort to dress up a
board. I regularly show my customers that edge treatments are the difference between a plain old board and a great looking shelf (or whatever). For some reason, that particular line of reasoning works. Michael |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Ya know, a drill press acts a lot like an overarm router.
Phil |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Dovetails on a drill press?
OK, I need to respond to this. It's a fairly common myth with some basis in
fact. This is only the case older or very, very cheap DPs that use sleeve bearings. I think the last decent one to do that was dropped in the early '80s. The vast majority of drill presses over the years use regular sealed or shielded ball bearings for the spindle. If you run the bearing numbers, you'll find that they're the same ones used on many motors, shapers, grinders, and a zillion other things that take radial loads. No problem taking the stress of routing or sanding. The real problem with doing anything other than drilling on a DP is the chuck taper. the Jacobs Tapers are designed for axial loads and not radial. Putting a high side loaded can, and frequently does cause the chuck to fly off and carom around the room. That's why some DPs used to come with locking collars--so you could rout safely. Using Locksite "Secures Gears" (a cylindrical locker adhesive) will keep your chuck from flying off, but you'll never been able to change it again. GTO(John) Anything less than a industrial strength drill press will have their bearings destroyed in very short order. They are not designed to take high side loads. -- Jim in NC |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Dovetails on a drill press?
Morgans wrote:
Now you just hit on a marvelous idea! Why CAN't we do dovetails on a drill press? Might be useful for removing some of the waste maybe. I don't think I'd try spinning a dovetail bit with it. 3,100 RPM vs. 25,000 RPM... I doubt it would do a good job. Anything less than a industrial strength drill press will have their bearings destroyed in very short order. They are not designed to take high side loads. That's why I'm getting a JET mini lathe from Santa SWMBO this year. She's pretty upset at having to spend my entire budget on one thing instead of getting the joy of shopping to buy me a bunch of useless crap, but I'm getting a great deal on a great machine, and I can stop torturing my drill press. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
brocpuffs wrote:
Also, there's no other really decent way to make nice edges on table- and cabinet-tops. I'm thinking about getting a shaper. I don't use my router for any of the things a router can do that a shaper can't, and I think a shaper would be a better shaper than a router. It's still really low down though. Need a replacement sander, then a bandsaw, then maybe a router or shaper, maybe, but probably not. There will be something else in between. There always is. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Larry Jaques wrote:
Many of these guys use poly, too, so there's no accounting for taste. cough Um. Yeah, I hate guys who use poly. I hate guys who make stuff out of pine too. looks in mirror I'd better shut up now. You call a bloody 98DB shrieker "alluring"? Shirley, ewe jest. I've taken to calling it the Banshee. I think I'm turning into a Neander. Bueno, bwana. I'm going to get some shellac one of these days. The stuff I'm getting into is screaming for shellac. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
The Guy wrote:
It sounds like your woodworking may be as much about the journey as the destination. If you truly enjoy the process of woodowrking, your projects will as enjoyable to do as hey are to complete. There's definitely something to that. I could sit here for an hour thinking out loud, but I guess I'll spare everyone. In the end, I can leave all the self analysis at the door and just consider that if I'm content, that's really all I need to worry about. turning out projects more important than actually working on them. At some point you will decide which show you like better:T he Woodright's Shop or The New Yankee Workshop... I used to watch both when I watched them, but that was many years before I ever touched a tool or a piece of wood that wasn't bound for the fireplace. I don't think I've seen either show since I got out of high school. I've always admired Roy, but I don't quite want to give up *all* power. For one thing, I've just ordered a lathe, and I really do want to get a bandsaw soon. I could resaw these oak 6x6s with a hand saw for less money, but I guess I'm not *that* much of a Neander. At least not yet... -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 01:56:25 -0400, Silvan
wrote: Larry Jaques wrote: Many of these guys use poly, too, so there's no accounting for taste. cough Um. Yeah, I hate guys who use poly. I hate guys who make stuff out of pine too. I really like pine furniture, but it makes a total mess out of the cutters and it's a POA to stain and seeps resins as the piece ages. Unlike other types of wood, a pine piece doesn't weigh a ton after it's completed. Too bad we got the chestnut blight--it is truly a beautiful wood. looks in mirror I'd better shut up now. You call a bloody 98DB shrieker "alluring"? Shirley, ewe jest. I've taken to calling it the Banshee. I think I'm turning into a Neander. Bueno, bwana. I'm going to get some shellac one of these days. The stuff I'm getting into is screaming for shellac. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Hey! I LIKE poly! Shiny, easy, bulletproof--what's not to like?
Just because shellac is edible doesn't mean you should use it. -Phil Crow |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Dovetails on a drill press?
But a dovetail would be a straight load. And I know about side-thrust
because I got blasted for it a few weeks ago on here. On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:27:59 -0400, "Morgans" wrote: "Lawrence A. Ramsey" wrote in message .. . Now you just hit on a marvelous idea! Why CAN't we do dovetails on a drill press? On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 01:07:02 -0400, Silvan wrote: Lots of folks here have a router in their pocket, a router on their tool belt, a router in their backpack, a router in the table, and a spare router under the bench. Many of you just seem to absolutely *love* these things. I just cut my first dovetails today. I did them by hand, with an X-acto razor saw. They came out pretty well, considering it was my first try, and it occurs to me that I have no desire to buy the jig and the bit and futz around with the setup in order to save myself time by doing these with a machine some day. I'm finding the more I do with chisels and hand planes, the less I'm interested in using a router to do things. I've never used my router for much anyway. It's a bad router, granted, but even if it didn't have the problems it does, I don't think I'd like it. Seems like you have to spend forever changing bits, changing depths, changing bases, setting up templates or jigs or hold-downs or fences or some damn thing in order to use the thing for three minutes and save yourself a little physical labor. True, I do this all the time on the drill press. I spend 15 minutes changing the setup to make one hole in one piece sometimes, then turn around and do it again. I love playing with my drill press, and I don't mind the setup time. Yet when faced with the same problem on another machine, I can rarely be bothered to get it out and futz with it. My router table usually serves as a temporary holding area for stuff I need to put away. It's totally paradoxical. Am I nuts? How is it that this most marvelous and alluring tool does not excite me? Just wondering if I'm the only one, I guess. I think I'm turning into a Neander. Anything less than a industrial strength drill press will have their bearings destroyed in very short order. They are not designed to take high side loads. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Silvan wrote:
Seems like you have to spend forever changing bits, changing depths, changing bases, setting up templates or jigs or hold-downs or fences or some damn thing in order to use the thing for three minutes and save yourself a little physical labor. I think I'm turning into a Neander. Once you've made a full complement of moulding planes you'll see that it's a bit more than a "little" physical labor. Ken Muldrew (remove all letters after y in the alphabet) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Andy Dingley wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 01:07:02 -0400, Silvan wrote: Many of you just seem to absolutely *love* these things. I love mine. Spends most of its time in the table. These http://www.livejournal.com/users/que...10.html#cutid1 are just three layers of stacked MDF, bandsawn to a profile and then run over a chamfer bit. Easy to do, and most of all - quick ! Beautiful gothic arches! Could I have some of the plans or source material for it? I wanted to build some into a baby's crib for my baby-to-be instead of prison-bars slats. Hasan |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Bay Area Dave wrote in message y.com...
For me that would only include a minimum of "Neandering", as I don't like wasting time. Some folks don't consider doing things by hand to be wasting time. Back to the original question: I'm in the camp of those who very rarely use a routah. When I bought my PC I spent all of my time trying to use it for everything possible (when the only tool you have is a hammer ...). As I developed my handtools skills and acquired various tools, I started to move away from it. After we moved into our current house, it stayed packed up for about two years. I finally got it out a few months ago when I was working on a flybox and later a fly-tying station, because it was the right tool for the job. Since then, it's been relegated to the back wall of shop where it will sit until needed again. I never enjoyed working with the thing. Carbide bits spinning at 21,000 r.p.m. right at crotch level just isn't my idea of fun. Plus the fact that it spews dust and chips all over the shop, and one slip can destroy a project (or a finger) in a millisecond. Naw, for the most part I prefer to "waste my time" with plow planes, molding planes, and scratch stocks. Chuck Vance |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
I just cut my first dovetails today. I did them by hand, with an X-acto
razor saw. They came out pretty well, considering it was my first try, and it occurs to me that I have no desire to buy the jig and the bit and futz around with the setup in order to save myself time by doing these with a machine some day. My Leigh jig is very easy to setup, no futzing necessary. There really isn't any trial and error. I made 4 drawers in about 90 minutes with it. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Thu, Oct 23, 2003, 6:55am (EDT-3) (Conan=A0the=A0Librarian)
claims: snip it spews dust and chips all over the shop snip You left out that they're noisy. Loud and messy, the perfect man's machine. Damn, that also describes kids, and probably 3/4s of the people here. Hmm, might have to rethink. LOL And, no, I'm not loud. JOAT Make my shorts. Eat my day. Life just ain't life without good music. - JOAT Web Page Update 21 Oct 2003. Some tunes I like. http://community-2.webtv.net/Jakofal...OMETUNESILIKE/ |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Chuck, I have one of my routers in a downdraft cabinet router table, so
dust AND noise is minimized. I can hook up my Fein shop vac to the fence, and the DC to the downdraft. That pretty much covers the mess. The cabinet muffles a lot of the noise, but because my ears are sensitive (actually ONE ear -- lost the hearing in the left to an acoustic neuroma a few years back) I wear ear protection. I spent several hours last night perusing the Lee Valley catalog where some things were jumping off the page, screaming for a home. Namely a Veritas low angle block plane, some gouges, and scraper. Which leads me to a question(s): There are scraper blades that you bend with your thumb, scraper handles almost like a spoke shave, and scraper inserts for a plane. Is one style more popular and useful, or does each style have it's proponents, OR is there a need for each type in one woodworkers arsenal? I work oak and will be working cherry and maybe maple. Conan the Librarian wrote: Bay Area Dave wrote in message y.com... For me that would only include a minimum of "Neandering", as I don't like wasting time. Some folks don't consider doing things by hand to be wasting time. Back to the original question: I'm in the camp of those who very rarely use a routah. When I bought my PC I spent all of my time trying to use it for everything possible (when the only tool you have is a hammer ...). As I developed my handtools skills and acquired various tools, I started to move away from it. After we moved into our current house, it stayed packed up for about two years. I finally got it out a few months ago when I was working on a flybox and later a fly-tying station, because it was the right tool for the job. Since then, it's been relegated to the back wall of shop where it will sit until needed again. I never enjoyed working with the thing. Carbide bits spinning at 21,000 r.p.m. right at crotch level just isn't my idea of fun. Plus the fact that it spews dust and chips all over the shop, and one slip can destroy a project (or a finger) in a millisecond. Naw, for the most part I prefer to "waste my time" with plow planes, molding planes, and scratch stocks. Chuck Vance |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:34:03 GMT, Hasdrubal Hamilcar
wrote: Beautiful gothic arches! Could I have some of the plans or source material for it? Thanks, I'll see what I can do. -- Die Gotterspammerung - Junkmail of the Gods |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Andy Dingley wrote: On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:34:03 GMT, Hasdrubal Hamilcar wrote: Beautiful gothic arches! Could I have some of the plans or source material for it? Thanks, I'll see what I can do. -- Die Gotterspammerung - Junkmail of the Gods Anything'll be fine, even a source for a picture you found useful. I am wondering what wood to use on the crib slats (for the side railing). I would love to use Balsa. Is it very expensive in Canada? thanks, Hasan |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Bay Area Dave wrote:
Chuck, I have one of my routers in a downdraft cabinet router table, so dust AND noise is minimized. I can hook up my Fein shop vac to the fence, and the DC to the downdraft. That pretty much covers the mess. The cabinet muffles a lot of the noise, but because my ears are sensitive (actually ONE ear -- lost the hearing in the left to an acoustic neuroma a few years back) I wear ear protection. And kevlar body armour? :-) I woodwork to relax, and all of the safety safety precuations necessary for using a routah don't make me feel very relaxed. I spent several hours last night perusing the Lee Valley catalog where some things were jumping off the page, screaming for a home. Namely a Veritas low angle block plane, some gouges, and scraper. Which leads me to a question(s): There are scraper blades that you bend with your thumb, scraper handles almost like a spoke shave, and scraper inserts for a plane. Is one style more popular and useful, or does each style have it's proponents, OR is there a need for each type in one woodworkers arsenal? I work oak and will be working cherry and maybe maple. Yes, except for the scraper insert. (I consider that one so far inferior to the other LV scraper variations that IMHO it's a waste of money.) The simple card scrapers are handy for spot work where you need to get rid of a bit of tearout. If you do curved work, buy a gooseneck one as well. (Personally, I keep about a half-dozen different profiles around the shop.) The one that looks like a spokeshave is their knockoff of the Stanley cabinet scraper (#80). It's an excellent tool, and has some definite improvements over the original Stanley. It's handy for larger surfaces, as the base gives you a good bearing surface that is lacking with the card scraper. But, my new personal favorite is their scraper plane. It's based on the Stanley #112, but once again, it has some definite improvements over that design. They've added a thinner blade with a thumbscrew arrangement that can flex the blade much like the #80 does. With the extra-large sole, comfortable tote and knob and flexibility of using either the thick or thin blade in the same plane, this will probably replace the #80 in my shop. For the woods you mention, a well-tuned smoother would probably handle most of your needs, but a scraper is always handy to have around. Chuck Vance |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
thanks for the info, Chuck. By "smoother" I guess you mean something
like a Veritas #4 Smooth Plane? How does a smoother differ from other planes of the same size? Is it the angle of the blade, or ?? Do I NEED to get a burnishing tool or can I use something that I might already have in my tool cabinet? I have a vague memory of reading somewhere that a common tool will serve as a burnisher... dave Conan The Librarian wrote: Bay Area Dave wrote: Chuck, I have one of my routers in a downdraft cabinet router table, so dust AND noise is minimized. I can hook up my Fein shop vac to the fence, and the DC to the downdraft. That pretty much covers the mess. The cabinet muffles a lot of the noise, but because my ears are sensitive (actually ONE ear -- lost the hearing in the left to an acoustic neuroma a few years back) I wear ear protection. And kevlar body armour? :-) I woodwork to relax, and all of the safety safety precuations necessary for using a routah don't make me feel very relaxed. I spent several hours last night perusing the Lee Valley catalog where some things were jumping off the page, screaming for a home. Namely a Veritas low angle block plane, some gouges, and scraper. Which leads me to a question(s): There are scraper blades that you bend with your thumb, scraper handles almost like a spoke shave, and scraper inserts for a plane. Is one style more popular and useful, or does each style have it's proponents, OR is there a need for each type in one woodworkers arsenal? I work oak and will be working cherry and maybe maple. Yes, except for the scraper insert. (I consider that one so far inferior to the other LV scraper variations that IMHO it's a waste of money.) The simple card scrapers are handy for spot work where you need to get rid of a bit of tearout. If you do curved work, buy a gooseneck one as well. (Personally, I keep about a half-dozen different profiles around the shop.) The one that looks like a spokeshave is their knockoff of the Stanley cabinet scraper (#80). It's an excellent tool, and has some definite improvements over the original Stanley. It's handy for larger surfaces, as the base gives you a good bearing surface that is lacking with the card scraper. But, my new personal favorite is their scraper plane. It's based on the Stanley #112, but once again, it has some definite improvements over that design. They've added a thinner blade with a thumbscrew arrangement that can flex the blade much like the #80 does. With the extra-large sole, comfortable tote and knob and flexibility of using either the thick or thin blade in the same plane, this will probably replace the #80 in my shop. For the woods you mention, a well-tuned smoother would probably handle most of your needs, but a scraper is always handy to have around. Chuck Vance |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:04:00 -0500, Conan The Librarian
wrote: And kevlar body armour? :-) I woodwork to relax, and all of the safety safety precuations necessary for using a routah don't make me feel very relaxed. New Kevlar routing sweater a friend of mine made 8-) http://codesmiths.com/dingbat/photos/picture.jpg ....and if you're going to look like an idiot while he fools with his new camera-phone, then stick the fireman's helmet on too and look like an unrecognisable idiot. Seriously though, I'm not out in the workshop right now because I crushed my foot this morning. 8-( Bounced a big slab of steel off it, then had to hobble off to casualty for a X-ray, using the workshop broom as a crutch. I didn't need the "Where's yer parrot" comments either. Not broken, but it's damned painful and I can't stand on it. Yes I _was_ wearing steel toecaps. If I hadn't been, I probably would have bust it properly. The slab hit the toe, then tilted over and bashed the top of the arch. Going a nice colour too. -- "When men die, their Maker may reward them for their efforts by allowing them to live again as male dogs. Thus freed from inhibition, they can spend a cheerful existence doing all those things they really wanted to do when they were men." Paneb, Foreman mason in the Valley of the Kings, circa 1190BC |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Andy Dingley wrote:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:04:00 -0500, Conan The Librarian wrote: And kevlar body armour? :-) I woodwork to relax, and all of the safety safety precuations necessary for using a routah don't make me feel very relaxed. New Kevlar routing sweater a friend of mine made 8-) http://codesmiths.com/dingbat/photos/picture.jpg ...and if you're going to look like an idiot while he fools with his new camera-phone, then stick the fireman's helmet on too and look like an unrecognisable idiot. Seriously though, I'm not out in the workshop right now because I crushed my foot this morning. 8-( Bounced a big slab of steel off it, then had to hobble off to casualty for a X-ray, using the workshop broom as a crutch. I didn't need the "Where's yer parrot" comments either. Damn, Do I miss Robert Newton. Hope it's nothing serious. Regards, Hank -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
Bay Area Dave wrote in message om...
thanks for the info, Chuck. By "smoother" I guess you mean something like a Veritas #4 Smooth Plane? How does a smoother differ from other planes of the same size? Is it the angle of the blade, or ?? A smoother is usually about 9" long, and is set up to take a very light cut and leave a surface ready for finishing. Veritas' #4 is a smoother based on the old Stanley design, but with some improvements. A standard smoother used for well-behaved woods usually has the blade set at a 45 degree bedding angle. There are specialty planes made that offer higher bedding angles (can be more effective on figured hardwoods) and lower bedding angles (can also be effective on figured hardwoods, strangely enough). Do I NEED to get a burnishing tool or can I use something that I might already have in my tool cabinet? I have a vague memory of reading somewhere that a common tool will serve as a burnisher... I'd go ahead and "splurge" for a burnishing tool. Some folks use screwdriver shafts, carbide router bit shafts, valve stems, etc., but the bottom line is you want something harder than the scraper and it needs to be polished smooth. FWIW, as a newbie to scrapers, you might want to consider the Lee Valley variable burnisher gizmo. It'll cost you about $25, but it will help you get a feel for what the edge/burr should feel like when it's turned properly. Chuck Vance |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone _not_ like routers?
thanks AGAIN, Chuck. SWMBO wants my Christmas list. I'm gonna wear out
the pages of the LV catalog, making out that list for her. I like having exactly the right tool for the job, so I think I should get a REAL burnisher if it will work better than a screwdriver shaft. Screwdrivers I own with round shafts, all have rough surfaces. dave Conan the Librarian wrote: Bay Area Dave wrote in message om... thanks for the info, Chuck. By "smoother" I guess you mean something like a Veritas #4 Smooth Plane? How does a smoother differ from other planes of the same size? Is it the angle of the blade, or ?? A smoother is usually about 9" long, and is set up to take a very light cut and leave a surface ready for finishing. Veritas' #4 is a smoother based on the old Stanley design, but with some improvements. A standard smoother used for well-behaved woods usually has the blade set at a 45 degree bedding angle. There are specialty planes made that offer higher bedding angles (can be more effective on figured hardwoods) and lower bedding angles (can also be effective on figured hardwoods, strangely enough). Do I NEED to get a burnishing tool or can I use something that I might already have in my tool cabinet? I have a vague memory of reading somewhere that a common tool will serve as a burnisher... I'd go ahead and "splurge" for a burnishing tool. Some folks use screwdriver shafts, carbide router bit shafts, valve stems, etc., but the bottom line is you want something harder than the scraper and it needs to be polished smooth. FWIW, as a newbie to scrapers, you might want to consider the Lee Valley variable burnisher gizmo. It'll cost you about $25, but it will help you get a feel for what the edge/burr should feel like when it's turned properly. Chuck Vance |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Value routers | UK diy | |||
Routers with badge labels | UK diy | |||
Workbench adapts to circular saw & routers | UK diy | |||
2 Bosch Routers broken in same place | Woodworking |