Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking Plans and Photos (alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking) - Show off or just share photos of your hard work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone know much about PTT ?
If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sean" wrote in message ... Does anyone know much about PTT ? If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). Putting gravel around the post in a hole will help to let the water drain away from the post and hopefully prolong the life of the post. If Concrete is necessary the thought of using gravel is probably a moot point. The concrete tends to hold moisture and can aid in the premature failure of a post. Having proper drainage away from the post will benefit and help to prolong the post life. |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Leon" wrote in
t: "Sean" wrote in message ... Does anyone know much about PTT ? If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). Putting gravel around the post in a hole will help to let the water drain away from the post and hopefully prolong the life of the post. If Concrete is necessary the thought of using gravel is probably a moot point. The concrete tends to hold moisture and can aid in the premature failure of a post. Having proper drainage away from the post will benefit and help to prolong the post life. I can surmise from the language used, that Sean is from one of the UK- derived countries. What we do here in California may not work where you are, but we really don't have much of a standing water induced rotting problem here. The means of securing fence and foundation posts is governed by practice, what works, locally, and perhaps code, as well. I'd go talk with the lumber supplier, and find an older, talkative type clerk (or owner, if possible) and ask him. They'd also know what works best with the type of PTT being sold for his use. They vary now. Patriarch |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Sean" wrote: If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). From the point of view of the post, concrete tends to harm more than help - it traps water and encourages rot. I normally tar both ends of a post going in the ground (using roof-repair cold-patch tar). If you have a building code requirement to use concrete, you have to deal with it. Best practice as far as I know for concreting is to have the post extending below the concrete (so it does not sit in a pocket, but more of a ring - some potential to drain) and wrap the post with tar-paper (or tyvek or plastic) where the concrete will be against it. When backfilling and compacting, put in 3 inches of backfill and tamp (compact), before putting in 3 more inches and tamping...if you backfill all the way and then tamp, the lower parts don't get properly compacted. -- Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, ya got me confused now - tar both ends?
Bendy posts? "Ecnerwal" wrote in message ... In article , "Sean" wrote: If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). From the point of view of the post, concrete tends to harm more than help - it traps water and encourages rot. I normally tar both ends of a post going in the ground (using roof-repair cold-patch tar). If you have a building code requirement to use concrete, you have to deal with it. Best practice as far as I know for concreting is to have the post extending below the concrete (so it does not sit in a pocket, but more of a ring - some potential to drain) and wrap the post with tar-paper (or tyvek or plastic) where the concrete will be against it. When backfilling and compacting, put in 3 inches of backfill and tamp (compact), before putting in 3 more inches and tamping...if you backfill all the way and then tamp, the lower parts don't get properly compacted. -- Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Doug Brown" wrote: OK, ya got me confused now - tar both ends? Bendy posts? The end that sits down in the hole where the groundwater is, and the end that sticks up where it rains. May not make much difference, but doesn't take much time/effort, either. -- Cats, coffee, chocolate...vices to live by |
#7
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Ecnerwal wrote:
When backfilling and compacting, put in 3 inches of backfill and tamp (compact), before putting in 3 more inches and tamping...if you backfill all the way and then tamp, the lower parts don't get properly compacted. Easy way to make a tamper: 6-foot length of 1/2" steel pipe, an empty soup can, and enough mortar to fill the can. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#8
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Miller" wrote in message ... In article , Ecnerwal wrote: When backfilling and compacting, put in 3 inches of backfill and tamp (compact), before putting in 3 more inches and tamping...if you backfill all the way and then tamp, the lower parts don't get properly compacted. Easy way to make a tamper: 6-foot length of 1/2" steel pipe, an empty soup can, and enough mortar to fill the can. Oh yeah - just what I need - another jig I have to find room to store! ![]() |
#9
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Miller wrote:
In article , Ecnerwal wrote: When backfilling and compacting, put in 3 inches of backfill and tamp (compact), before putting in 3 more inches and tamping...if you backfill all the way and then tamp, the lower parts don't get properly compacted. Easy way to make a tamper: 6-foot length of 1/2" steel pipe, an empty soup can, and enough mortar to fill the can. I usually use the end of an 8' 2X4. -- Jack Novak Buffalo, NY - USA |
#10
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article v8sZh.2541$dy2.2479@trndny01, Nova wrote:
Doug Miller wrote: In article , Ecnerwal wrote: When backfilling and compacting, put in 3 inches of backfill and tamp (compact), before putting in 3 more inches and tamping...if you backfill all the way and then tamp, the lower parts don't get properly compacted. Easy way to make a tamper: 6-foot length of 1/2" steel pipe, an empty soup can, and enough mortar to fill the can. I usually use the end of an 8' 2X4. That's what I used to use, before I figured out the pipe and soup can. A pipe is easier to grip than a 2x4, and the soup can fits into the hole more easily. Try it some time -- you might be surprised. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#11
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sean wrote:
Does anyone know much about PTT ? If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT .... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). Don't remember all the reasons why, but current thinking is NOT to use concrete, but rather gravel as per your question. Lew |
#12
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What I've heard and seen in my part of the country (California delta area) is
that contractors that install fences will set the post in the hole, add some sand, pour in a sack of fencepost mix (no water, just the dry mix), and finish filling the hole packing the sand, of course. Over time the rain water will set the fencepost mix. But what a lot of individuals do is just dig the hole, drop in the post, fill with sand and pack it down. The sand by itself seems to do just as good as concrete. Since the sand drains well, I suspect that they will last a good long time. It isn't like the "caliche" soil that I grew up with in New Mexico. My definition of caliche is that hard, dense, heavy clay just below the surface. It gets so dense that plant roots will not penetrate it(plus it's is very alkaline too). That sh__ doesn't drain at all so water just sits on it and rots the wood. Sand around here isn't a problem. Any hole you dig is going to be in sand because the area is old river delta and the sand is literally 500 feet deep. In the summer, the sand gets nearly as hard as concrete so the posts stay put. It softens a little in the rainy months, but not enough to loosen the posts and they still stay put. I had four 20 year old redwood fence posts break last year. Well, they didn't actually break, there just wasn't any wood left below ground level. These posts were set in two bags of concrete each. When we replaced them we used PT 4x4's and just set them in the sand. We decided to use PT because the people at our lumber yard said that PT would last at least as long as redwood, and the PT was a bit cheaper. No concrete because it doesn't seem to be necessary in this area. Time will tell. Wayne Sean wrote: Does anyone know much about PTT ? If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). |
#13
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think several of the posters might be misunderstanding the use of
concrete. Concrete should be used as a footer pad not as a surround. You pour the concrete Pad (Using Sono Tubes or such enhances the experience) and put an anchor in the curing concrete. The anchor holds the post several fractions above the concrete allowing for drainage. The biggest advantage of using the anchor is that if the post does happen to rot out, or you wish to enlarge the deck, the post can be removed and replaced. For those who live in high wind zones wind will lift up your deck if it has not been anchored properly. Some codes require the Anchor method because theoretically and deck could be pulled right out of the ground. If you choose to put the post in the ground beware. PT is not always 100% bug proof. It can make a fast channel to your house. Several of you did address drainage with stone etc. However gravel can move with leverage of a rocking post. YC The biggest advantage of using the anchor is that if the post does happen to rot out, or you wish to enlarge the deck, the post can be removed and replaced. "Sean" wrote in message ... Does anyone know much about PTT ? If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). |
#14
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "young_carpenter" wrote in message news:I8vZh.4780$r77.4388@trndny08... I think several of the posters might be misunderstanding the use of concrete. Concrete should be used as a footer pad not as a surround. And if you are setting fence posts that footer and anchor are not going to do squat. Different soil conditions dictate different way to set a post. |
#15
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 19:16 -0500, Leon wrote:
"young_carpenter" wrote in message news:I8vZh.4780$r77.4388@trndny08... I think several of the posters might be misunderstanding the use of concrete. Concrete should be used as a footer pad not as a surround. And if you are setting fence posts that footer and anchor are not going to do squat. Different soil conditions dictate different way to set a post. From the OP's post, he's setting support posts for some structure and isn't worried about any horizontal leaning problems, just solid vertical support. I'd guess he's building a deck attached to a house? In this case, I'd use the iron saddle brackets with the iron support rod set in a concrete footing, making sure the concrete drains away from the support rod. The post is bolted in the saddle bracket and if PT, will last longer than most of us geezers. - Doug |
#16
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Winterburn" wrote in message news:1177981426.14915.84.camel@navajo... From the OP's post, he's setting support posts for some structure and isn't worried about any horizontal leaning problems, just solid vertical support. I'd guess he's building a deck attached to a house? In this case, I'd use the iron saddle brackets with the iron support rod set in a concrete footing, making sure the concrete drains away from the support rod. The post is bolted in the saddle bracket and if PT, will last longer than most of us geezers. - Doug I looked at that 2 times and missed the fact that the post would be held down by weight. Nevermind. ;~) |
#17
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sean" wrote in
: Does anyone know much about PTT ? If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). On our previous property, we dug holes, lined up the 4x4 poles, poured concrete till just above ground level, and smoothed down the concrete so it sloped away from the pole. Deck was even with the first floor as if it was meant to be. When we sold the house, I had to remove the 2x2 wire that was between deck and railing and put up wood 1x1 strips instead. Hope the current owners can deal with the shape everything is in now. Must be 20 years since we made the deck, when we lived on Long Island. -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#18
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sean" wrote in message ... Does anyone know much about PTT ? If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). Thanks to you for taking the time to answer. In reply to a couple of points that were raised in the replies .... -- Yes, I am from the UK. -- The posts will be supporting a deck, that is not going to be attached to the house. All in all, the deck will be around 400sq foot with all the usual trimmings of rails, steps, seating, etc., so it will weigh quite a lot. I will distribute the weight across a good number of posts, in fact probably more than is necessary. I have posted a couple of pictures on my site, which will be extended as the project develops. http://garden.fullingdale.com Sean |
#19
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just what I thought when I saw this post last evening. You were going to
get about as many opinions as posts. What is right? I dunno for sure. I built a fence last year and checked out a couple of books and several web sites. Consensus seemed to be to fill the holes with concrete to a level of 1" or so above grade and taper the surface from the post to allow water to run off. RonB "Sean" wrote in message ... Does anyone know much about PTT ? If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). |
#20
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just what I thought when I saw this post last evening. You were going to
get about as many opinions as posts. What is right? I dunno for sure. I built a fence last year and checked out a couple of books and several web sites. Consensus seemed to be to fill the holes with concrete to a level of 1" or so above grade and taper the surface from the post to allow water to run off. RonB Having said this, some construction pros will tell you to put the post in the hole, dump a bag or so if Quickcrete in to stabilize it and add a little water (some don't even add water - that's natures job.). That makes me nervous and doesn't start to fill the hole with concrete. RonB |
#21
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RonB" wrote in message ... Having said this, some construction pros will tell you to put the post in the hole, dump a bag or so if Quickcrete in to stabilize it and add a little water (some don't even add water - that's natures job.). That makes me nervous and doesn't start to fill the hole with concrete. RonB I strongly suggest adding the water. Nature is not always on the correct watering schedule. If concrete gets damp and not properly wet it will not ever set up correctly. I do subscribe to pouring the dry concrete around the post and adding water in 2 to 3 increments. A few weeks ago I replaced a 15 year old fence for a customer. The fence was leaning badly and the posts were not secure. I pulled out all 9 posts using my bare hands and rocking the posts back and for a bit. Closer inspection revealed a hole full of cement that looked mostly like it did when it was poured in. Very little actually hardened and stuck to the posts. 80% remained in a sand like state. This is in the Houston area and the soil is mostly clay. |
#22
![]()
Posted to alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sean wrote:
Does anyone know much about PTT ? If you dig a hole, put in some hardcore/gravel and plonk in a PTT ... back filling with more gravel and compacting ... how will it fair with the elements? Basically, is it really necessary to concrete the posts in as they will be securely held in place by the (above ground structure). 32+ years ago I built a dog run in the yard. I did it on the cheap and used regular 4x4's that I dipped in Creosote and then coated (the bottom 30" or so with roofing compound). I dug post holes, put a couple inches (scant) of septic stone (smooth 3/4" to 1¼") sunk them in and backfilled with dirt. About 10 years later we pulled them out and found them soggy but still sound enough to keep the fencing taut. Put in a swimming pool deck around 1988 using PTL and again, with the 4x4's otherwise untreated. This time the holes went down 32" and a good-sized dollop on Sakrete went in each hole forming a "cookie" at the bottom. Posts went in as they came from the lumber yard and back-filled with dirt and a bit of water to settle things in. Got rid of the pool circa 2002 and the new owner took the decking apart, including the support posts and rebuilt same on his site. They were as solid as the day they went in. My experiences, your mileage may vary. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pressure treated privacy fencing question | Home Repair | |||
Treated Lumber Question | Home Repair | |||
presure loss | Home Repair | |||
Clamping presure | Woodturning | |||
timber rot question | UK diy |