https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/chi...hreat-reported

Oh dear. Is this the same type being built at Hinkley C ?

On 14/06/2021 18:24, Andrew wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/chi...hreat-reported


Oh dear. Is this the same type being built at Hinkley C ?

Effing hell, you ****, go away. You could read the article... but, oh,
wait! Try alt.discussion.wank, not uk.d-i-y.

*PLONK*

Andrew wrote in
:


https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/chi...nts-gasses-aft
er-imminent-radiological-threat-reported

Oh dear. Is this the same type being built at Hinkley C ?

We should go with Small Modular Reactors.

Yes just mention of the web site its on is a bit of a worry, If I recall
they also need a lot of your data before they will let you read anything.
Brian

--

This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"Chris Bacon" wrote in message
...
On 14/06/2021 18:24, Andrew wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/chi...hreat-reported
Oh dear. Is this the same type being built at Hinkley C ?

Effing hell, you ****, go away. You could read the article... but, oh,
wait! Try alt.discussion.wank, not uk.d-i-y.

*PLONK*

On 14/06/2021 17:24, Andrew wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/chi...hreat-reported

Oh dear. Is this the same type being built at Hinkley C ?

Don't worry about it. A young lady professor speaking on the radio
explained that the gasses are due to a malfunctioning fuel rod, and that
this is a general reactor issue that is known and for which simple
corrective procedures are put in place. In other words, it's a non-story.

--
Spike

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 08:29:32 +0100, Brian Gaff \(Sofa\) wrote:

Yes just mention of the web site its on is a bit of a worry, If I recall
they also need a lot of your data before they will let you read
anything.
Brian

Yes, it's clickbait.

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:57:09 +0000, Spike wrote:

On 14/06/2021 17:24, Andrew wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/chi...-vents-gasses-
after-imminent-radiological-threat-reported

Oh dear. Is this the same type being built at Hinkley C ?

Don't worry about it. A young lady professor speaking on the radio
explained that the gasses are due to a malfunctioning fuel rod, and that
this is a general reactor issue that is known and for which simple
corrective procedures are put in place. In other words, it's a
non-story.

Perhaps the ONR will not license it.

On 15/06/2021 09:12, jon wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:57:09 +0000, Spike wrote:

On 14/06/2021 17:24, Andrew wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/chi...-vents-gasses-
after-imminent-radiological-threat-reported

Oh dear. Is this the same type being built at Hinkley C ?

Don't worry about it. A young lady professor speaking on the radio
explained that the gasses are due to a malfunctioning fuel rod, and that
this is a general reactor issue that is known and for which simple
corrective procedures are put in place. In other words, it's a
non-story.

Perhaps the ONR will not license it.

That's like refusing to award a type certificate to a vehicle because it
might get a puncture.


--
Spike

On 15/06/2021 08:57, Spike wrote:
On 14/06/2021 17:24, Andrew wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/chi...hreat-reported

Oh dear. Is this the same type being built at Hinkley C ?

Don't worry about it. A young lady professor speaking on the radio
explained that the gasses are due to a malfunctioning fuel rod, and that
this is a general reactor issue that is known and for which simple
corrective procedures are put in place. In other words, it's a non-story.

Correct. No leak. Just rather more xenon and krypton in the primary
water circuit.


--
"It is an established fact to 97% confidence limits that left wing
conspirators see right wing conspiracies everywhere"

On 14/06/2021 21:06, JohnP wrote:
Andrew wrote in
:


https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/chi...nts-gasses-aft
er-imminent-radiological-threat-reported

Oh dear. Is this the same type being built at Hinkley C ?

We should go with Small Modular Reactors.

More people died at Grenfell Towers than at Chernobyl


--
"It is an established fact to 97% confidence limits that left wing
conspirators see right wing conspiracies everywhere"

On 15/06/2021 13:32, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

More people died at Grenfell Towers than at Chernobyl



The long term death toll from Chernobyl is probably several thousand.

Or, possibly several hundred thousand, according to the Washington Post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlo...f6a_story.html

On 15/06/2021 12:52, GB wrote:
On 15/06/2021 13:32, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

More people died at Grenfell Towers than at Chernobyl

The long term death toll from Chernobyl is probably several thousand.

Or, possibly several hundred thousand, according to the Washington Post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlo...f6a_story.html

Access Denied.

The LNT model has long been discredited, but there may be a reason why
an American newspaper wants to portray the Chernobyl reactor incident in
as gloomy a manner as possible.


--
Spike