Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/02/2021 20:37, bert wrote:
In article , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes In article , Â* Tim Streater wrote: On 15 Feb 2021 at 18:04:21 GMT, George Miles wrote: they know the lies of £350 milllion saved for the NHS , Oh is this a lie? Do tell me in what way. I'm keen to know. No, they dont want more chaos in the EU with more countries leaving, Whether countries leave or not is not a matter for the EU, it's a matter for the country concerned. More particularly, for its population. This is obviously the case since it's wired into the Lisbon Treaty. But I don't recall there being any text there that the EU reserved the right to sulk about it, or could veto countries which chose to leave, or treat them in a ****ty childish way. If you disagree, feel free to point me at the relevant text. But, of course, the last thing the UK wanted was to leave the EU. They expected to still be in it (as it were) except for all the bits they didn't like. An EU lite, designed by the UK. Surely it comes as no surprise that the EU simply isn't having it? It will be very interesting to see how the leave supporters treat Scotland if it gains independence. Scotland will not "gain independence". It may in due course decide to withdraw from the Union it entered voluntarily. I don't think it was that voluntary. They were bankrupt. Union was the price of financial support. And still is -- "I guess a rattlesnake ain't risponsible fer bein' a rattlesnake, but ah puts mah heel on um jess the same if'n I catches him around mah chillun". |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Tim Streater wrote: On 15 Feb 2021 at 18:04:21 GMT, George Miles wrote: they know the lies of £350 milllion saved for the NHS , Oh is this a lie? Do tell me in what way. I'm keen to know. No, they dont want more chaos in the EU with more countries leaving, Whether countries leave or not is not a matter for the EU, it's a matter for the country concerned. More particularly, for its population. This is obviously the case since it's wired into the Lisbon Treaty. But I don't recall there being any text there that the EU reserved the right to sulk about it, or could veto countries which chose to leave, or treat them in a ****ty childish way. If you disagree, feel free to point me at the relevant text. But, of course, the last thing the UK wanted was to leave the EU. They expected to still be in it (as it were) except for all the bits they didn't like. An EU lite, designed by the UK. Surely it comes as no surprise that the EU simply isn't having it? It will be very interesting to see how the leave supporters treat Scotland if it gains independence. and what makes you think it will be in any way other than courteously? Frankly, I don't give a toss if Scotland wants to leave It's a money pit that get's more than its fair share of government spending (admittedly for reasonable socially responsible reasons) If it wants to walk away from that, more fool it IMHO |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2021-02-17, tim... wrote:
It will be very interesting to see how the leave supporters treat Scotland if it gains independence. and what makes you think it will be in any way other than courteously? Have you seen the bile handed out round here? Not much courtesy shown. |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/02/2021 17:08, Jim Jackson wrote:
On 2021-02-17, tim... wrote: It will be very interesting to see how the leave supporters treat Scotland if it gains independence. and what makes you think it will be in any way other than courteously? Have you seen the bile handed out round here? Not much courtesy shown. Its not bile. Its reason If Scotland wants to leave, good luck, BUT their bile against the English must stop and they must take full economic responsibility even when it results in a 50% drop in living standards and people dying on the streets. England would be under no obligation: - to subsidise their windmills - to subsidise their welfare - to underwrite or guarantee their currency - to protect their banks from total failure - to give them access to capital at preferential rates - to guarantee free movement of their citizens in and out of the rest of the UK - to allow them to work in the UK unless they complied with the 'rest of the world' immigration requirements - to allow them access to the NHS - to pay them social security or pensions The problem is that this is simply not being faced up to by the SNP. who are simply lying to them. All well and good you may say, but at some point the truth needs to be told Scotland is a ****y little county of 5 million that is smaller in importance than London or Manchester and Birmingham together.Its less than 8% of UK population and is overall parasitic on the rest of the UK Its got **** all natural resources, a bolshy population, a ****ty government that couldn't run a car boot sale and a massive drug problem. If it were an island in the Atlantic we would have encouraged it to **** off years ago. The problem is it has a land border to England, and unless that was made a very hard border indeed, it would export its dross to England just as Mexico does to the USA. The cost benefit analysis that needs to be applied is a Boris Bus one. "Why don't we take the £3.5bn we send to Scotland every year and spend it on sentry guns for Hadrian's wall instead?" All te carp that et EU threatened would happen to the UK but didnt. WILL happen to scotland -- WOKE is an acronym... Without Originality, Knowledge or Education. |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
tim... wrote: Frankly, I don't give a toss if Scotland wants to leave It's a money pit that get's more than its fair share of government spending (admittedly for reasonable socially responsible reasons) If it wants to walk away from that, more fool it IMHO I totally agree. Time the SE of England was independent, given it subsidises the rest of the country. Could rename it Monaco on Thames. -- *A bartender is just a pharmacist with a limited inventory * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/02/2021 10:37, Jethro_uk wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 01:10:00 +0000, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Tim Streater wrote: On 15 Feb 2021 at 18:04:21 GMT, George Miles wrote: they know the lies of £350 milllion saved for the NHS , Oh is this a lie? Do tell me in what way. I'm keen to know. No, they dont want more chaos in the EU with more countries leaving, Whether countries leave or not is not a matter for the EU, it's a matter for the country concerned. More particularly, for its population. This is obviously the case since it's wired into the Lisbon Treaty. But I don't recall there being any text there that the EU reserved the right to sulk about it, or could veto countries which chose to leave, or treat them in a ****ty childish way. If you disagree, feel free to point me at the relevant text. But, of course, the last thing the UK wanted was to leave the EU. They expected to still be in it (as it were) except for all the bits they didn't like. An EU lite, designed by the UK. Surely it comes as no surprise that the EU simply isn't having it? It will be very interesting to see how the leave supporters treat Scotland if it gains independence. When. One way or another it will happen. If it does it will be a massive boost to England, especially if there is a hard border so the third world starving jocks cant emigrate to England. -- €œIt is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since...it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned into, we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a power-directed system of thought.€ Sir Roger Scruton |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , The Natural Philosopher
wrote: On 16/02/2021 10:37, Jethro_uk wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 01:10:00 +0000, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Tim Streater wrote: On 15 Feb 2021 at 18:04:21 GMT, George Miles wrote: they know the lies of £350 milllion saved for the NHS , Oh is this a lie? Do tell me in what way. I'm keen to know. No, they dont want more chaos in the EU with more countries leaving, Whether countries leave or not is not a matter for the EU, it's a matter for the country concerned. More particularly, for its population. This is obviously the case since it's wired into the Lisbon Treaty. But I don't recall there being any text there that the EU reserved the right to sulk about it, or could veto countries which chose to leave, or treat them in a ****ty childish way. If you disagree, feel free to point me at the relevant text. But, of course, the last thing the UK wanted was to leave the EU. They expected to still be in it (as it were) except for all the bits they didn't like. An EU lite, designed by the UK. Surely it comes as no surprise that the EU simply isn't having it? It will be very interesting to see how the leave supporters treat Scotland if it gains independence. When. One way or another it will happen. If it does it will be a massive boost to England, especially if there is a hard border so the third world starving jocks cant emigrate to England. there are plenty of us here already. - -- from KT24 in Surrey, England "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/02/2021 11:04, charles wrote:
In article , The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 16/02/2021 10:37, Jethro_uk wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 01:10:00 +0000, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Tim Streater wrote: On 15 Feb 2021 at 18:04:21 GMT, George Miles wrote: they know the lies of £350 milllion saved for the NHS , Oh is this a lie? Do tell me in what way. I'm keen to know. No, they dont want more chaos in the EU with more countries leaving, Whether countries leave or not is not a matter for the EU, it's a matter for the country concerned. More particularly, for its population. This is obviously the case since it's wired into the Lisbon Treaty. But I don't recall there being any text there that the EU reserved the right to sulk about it, or could veto countries which chose to leave, or treat them in a ****ty childish way. If you disagree, feel free to point me at the relevant text. But, of course, the last thing the UK wanted was to leave the EU. They expected to still be in it (as it were) except for all the bits they didn't like. An EU lite, designed by the UK. Surely it comes as no surprise that the EU simply isn't having it? It will be very interesting to see how the leave supporters treat Scotland if it gains independence. When. One way or another it will happen. If it does it will be a massive boost to England, especially if there is a hard border so the third world starving jocks cant emigrate to England. there are plenty of us here already. Well yes. as with Britain in the 1950s and 1960s, the best mostly emigrated. - -- "The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." - Leo Tolstoy |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
charles wrote: In article , The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 16/02/2021 10:37, Jethro_uk wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 01:10:00 +0000, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Tim Streater wrote: On 15 Feb 2021 at 18:04:21 GMT, George Miles wrote: they know the lies of £350 milllion saved for the NHS , Oh is this a lie? Do tell me in what way. I'm keen to know. No, they dont want more chaos in the EU with more countries leaving, Whether countries leave or not is not a matter for the EU, it's a matter for the country concerned. More particularly, for its population. This is obviously the case since it's wired into the Lisbon Treaty. But I don't recall there being any text there that the EU reserved the right to sulk about it, or could veto countries which chose to leave, or treat them in a ****ty childish way. If you disagree, feel free to point me at the relevant text. But, of course, the last thing the UK wanted was to leave the EU. They expected to still be in it (as it were) except for all the bits they didn't like. An EU lite, designed by the UK. Surely it comes as no surprise that the EU simply isn't having it? It will be very interesting to see how the leave supporters treat Scotland if it gains independence. When. One way or another it will happen. If it does it will be a massive boost to England, especially if there is a hard border so the third world starving jocks cant emigrate to England. there are plenty of us here already. And subsidising the penniless Turnip through our taxes. -- *If PROGRESS is for advancement, what does that make CONGRESS mean? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2021-02-16, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
When. One way or another it will happen. If it does it will be a massive boost to England, especially if there is a hard border so the third world starving jocks cant emigrate to England. You really are not a nice person are you? |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 18:06:15 -0000 (UTC), Jim Jackson
wrote: On 2021-02-16, The Natural Philosopher wrote: When. One way or another it will happen. If it does it will be a massive boost to England, especially if there is a hard border so the third world starving jocks cant emigrate to England. You really are not a nice person are you? I think anyone here long enough will learn who are the 'cold and pricklies' (like Turnip) and the 'warm and fuzzies', those of us who try to be good / kind / considerate and actually think of others (inc other species). I bet there are some parallels between each basic group and the most extreme of those who voted *for* (especially) Brexit etc. Those who call others 'them' and don't consider them to actually be 'us'. Often down to a certain age, arrogance, lack of empathy or compassion etc. Cheers, T i m |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/02/2021 18:06, Jim Jackson wrote:
On 2021-02-16, The Natural Philosopher wrote: When. One way or another it will happen. If it does it will be a massive boost to England, especially if there is a hard border so the third world starving jocks cant emigrate to England. You really are not a nice person are you? I am a very nice person. But I don't think that snowflakes need protecting from the truth. I think they should be confronted with it. Scotland is an economic parasite on Britain If we were independent, we would benefit immeasurably by that. Scots are in denial of the fact that not through any fault of theirs, it's a ****ty **** poor country with a lot of mountains and moors and sod all else of any value whatsoever. It had a bit of steel iron and coal at one time, but that's dead along with shipbuilding. It briefly had a little boost from North Sea oil, but really that's pretty much gone now and there is **** all left except romantic dreams of Braveheart, a twice daily shot of scag in a glasgow tenement, hatred of England and the dole. We pay Scotland to keep their problems in Scotland, We pay them an enormous amount. An amount that the EU would never pay and the scots themselves could never pay. Scotland isn't even as big populations wise as London. Why if the scots want independence, should we stop them? There is nothing in Scotland anyone wants least of all Scots. The problem is that the Scots were bought for cash and that's how we got Scotland to start with. They needed bailing out and the price was economic and political union. Because they couldn't run themselves . Why would we choose to do that again? 5 years of 'independence' so called and they would be back begging for charity. I am sick of the whining scots and wee krankie and her slick lies. Blames her own total failure to achieve anything, on England. Well if that is what the Scots believe they can **** off and die in thousands under 'independence' a pathetic little republic, globally isolated with less people than Libya, no natural resources, and led by political carpetbaggers? Why wouldn't we put a damned hard border down hadrian's wall? -- "Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and higher education positively fortifies it." - Stephen Vizinczey |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Something Old, Something New..Upgrading An Old CNC Millrite | Metalworking | |||
"Smells like something died" - well, something DID! | Home Repair | |||
Prefab house builders in Eastern Europe | UK diy | |||
30 Hours Of Calls to UK, Western Europe & North America for just £15.99 a month | UK diy |