"Steve Firth" wrote in message
.. .
IMM wrote:

"Steve Firth" wrote in message
.. .
IMM wrote:

Another menalist

snip more mentalism

snip a mentalist

Needs professional attention

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:46:57 +0100, "Mary Fisher"
wrote:


"Mike Mitchell" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:07:58 +0100, "Mary Fisher"
wrote:


"Mike Mitchell" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:18:39 +0100, "Mary Fisher"
wrote:


"Mike Mitchell" wrote in message
.. .


Even the 11+ dropout "dross"

I don't agree with that - surely it negates what you said above?

Irony. I sensed that the mayor plus dignitaries were present purely
out of duty to their voters and not because of any undue pride in
those who had achieved in spite of the odds against them - like
finding it amazing that we had managed to walk on our hind legs at
all. The parents, of course, were soley there because they were
darned
proud that their offspring had indeed achieved something.

OK, sorry I missed it.

I was taking you seriously ... I usually do :-)

Yeah, like that time I sidled up to you in the supermarket, remember?
No, it was me, honest!

But it wasn't me - I don't go to supermarkets :-)

Oh, poor Mike, how embarrassing for you - LOL

Mary

It was this woman with a screaming kid, going Jesus H Christ over and
over, so I thought...

My kids don't scream, I don't blaspheme, what did you do apart from sidling?

Sidling is about the sum of it, I'm afraid. I was wearing a raincoat,
though.

MM

"Mike Mitchell" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:46:57 +0100, "Mary Fisher"
wrote:


"Mike Mitchell" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:07:58 +0100, "Mary Fisher"
wrote:


"Mike Mitchell" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:18:39 +0100, "Mary Fisher"
wrote:


"Mike Mitchell" wrote in message
.. .


Even the 11+ dropout "dross"

I don't agree with that - surely it negates what you said above?

Irony. I sensed that the mayor plus dignitaries were present
purely
out of duty to their voters and not because of any undue pride in
those who had achieved in spite of the odds against them - like
finding it amazing that we had managed to walk on our hind legs
at
all. The parents, of course, were soley there because they were
darned
proud that their offspring had indeed achieved something.

OK, sorry I missed it.

I was taking you seriously ... I usually do :-)

Yeah, like that time I sidled up to you in the supermarket,
remember?
No, it was me, honest!

But it wasn't me - I don't go to supermarkets :-)

Oh, poor Mike, how embarrassing for you - LOL

Mary

It was this woman with a screaming kid, going Jesus H Christ over and
over, so I thought...

My kids don't scream, I don't blaspheme, what did you do apart from
sidling?

Sidling is about the sum of it, I'm afraid. I was wearing a raincoat,
though.

Gosh! I haven't seen one of those for many years!

Mary

MM

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:48:11 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"Steve Firth" wrote in message
. ..
IMM wrote:

"Steve Firth" wrote in message
.. .
IMM wrote:

Another menalist

snip more mentalism

snip a mentalist

Needs professional attention

Either change the record, or answer the question.

--
I have a vitally important role serving as a bad example.

Mail john rather than nospam...

"John Laird" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 12:48:11 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"Steve Firth" wrote in message
. ..
IMM wrote:

"Steve Firth" wrote in message
.. .
IMM wrote:

Another menalist

snip more mentalism

snip a mentalist

Needs professional attention

Either change the record, or answer the question.

Do you mean I should respond to mentalism? That will encourage them!

"Steve Firth" wrote in message
...
IMM wrote:

"Steve Firth" wrote in message
.. .
IMM wrote:

"Steve Firth" wrote in message
.. .
IMM wrote:

Another menalist

snip more mentalism

snip a mentalist

Needs professional attention

snip more mentalism

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:19:56 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
.. .

Either change the record, or answer the question.

Do you mean I should respond to mentalism? That will encourage them!

If you wish to prove this charge, you need only quote one tiny little
factoid to show that Steve's beliefs about your qualifications are entirely
imaginary (which I presume to be what you mean when you repetitively
describe him as a "mentalist"). It does not have to be verifiable, just
believable.

--
Fighting for peace is like screaming for quiet.

Mail john rather than nospam...

"John Laird" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:19:56 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
.. .

Either change the record, or answer the question.

Do you mean I should respond to mentalism? That will encourage them!

If you wish to prove this charge, you need only quote one tiny little
factoid to show that Steve's beliefs about your qualifications are
entirely
imaginary (which I presume to be what you mean when you repetitively
describe him as a "mentalist"). It does not have to be verifiable, just
believable.

Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:47 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
.. .

If you wish to prove this charge, you need only quote one tiny little
factoid to show that Steve's beliefs about your qualifications are entirely
imaginary (which I presume to be what you mean when you repetitively
describe him as a "mentalist"). It does not have to be verifiable, just
believable.

Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

Sorry, I thought I said believable.

--
The buck doesn't even slow down here!

Mail john rather than nospam...

"John Laird" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:47 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
.. .

If you wish to prove this charge, you need only quote one tiny little
factoid to show that Steve's beliefs about your qualifications are
entirely
imaginary (which I presume to be what you mean when you repetitively
describe him as a "mentalist"). It does not have to be verifiable,
just
believable.

Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

Sorry, I thought I said believable.

Highly factual.

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:30:26 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:47 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

Sorry, I thought I said believable.

Highly factual.

Was it in some form of entertainment, by any chance ?

--
Vegetarians eat vegetables. Beware of humanitarians!

Mail john rather than nospam...

"John Laird" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:30:26 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:47 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

Sorry, I thought I said believable.

Highly factual.

Was it in some form of entertainment, by any chance ?

Nope.

"John Laird" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:30:26 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:47 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

Sorry, I thought I said believable.

Highly factual.

Was it in some form of entertainment, by any chance ?


Muppetry?

"Bob" wrote in message
...

"John Laird" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:30:26 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:47 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

Sorry, I thought I said believable.

Highly factual.

Was it in some form of entertainment, by any chance ?

Muppetry?

I suppose you must know. Are you DR Bob from the Muppets?

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:08:27 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"Bob" wrote in message
...

"John Laird" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:30:26 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:47 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

Sorry, I thought I said believable.

Highly factual.

Was it in some form of entertainment, by any chance ?

Muppetry?

I suppose you must know. Are you DR Bob from the Muppets?

I doubt it. But I now have the unshakeable mental image of you as Beaker.

--
A little inaccuracy saves a lot of explanation.

Mail john rather than nospam...

"John Laird" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:08:27 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"Bob" wrote in message
...

"John Laird" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:30:26 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:47 +0100, "IMM" wrote:

Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

Sorry, I thought I said believable.

Highly factual.

Was it in some form of entertainment, by any chance ?

Muppetry?

I suppose you must know. Are you DR Bob from the Muppets?

I doubt it. But I now have the unshakeable mental image of you as Beaker.

How long have you been in the mentalist club?

IMM wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:30:26 +0100, "IMM" wrote:


"John Laird" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:47 +0100, "IMM" wrote:


Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

Sorry, I thought I said believable.

Highly factual.

Was it in some form of entertainment, by any chance ?


Nope.


I know. It was a pharmacology and needlework course wasn't it?

"Steve Firth" wrote in message
.. .
IMM wrote:

snip more mentalism

The mentalist says...

Grow up.

and also...

--
Quanto e quel cane nella vetrina (arf, arf)
Quello con coda scuotente
Quanto e quel cane nella vetrina (arf, arf)
Spero che il cane sia vendita

arf, arf!

"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
IMM wrote:

"John Laird" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:30:26 +0100, "IMM" wrote:


"John Laird" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:02:47 +0100, "IMM" wrote:


Factoid: I a have an honours degree. There you are.

Sorry, I thought I said believable.

Highly factual.

Was it in some form of entertainment, by any chance ?


Nope.

I know. It was a pharmacology and needlework course wasn't it?

er...nope.