Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote:

There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether
it is on my part or the moderator's?


On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote:
I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in
the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer
adjacent to a sign which read

Free food and drink = Your business card

The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if
you put your card in the box.

Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an
adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed.
And very tasty it was, too.

How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many
principles have been breached - in this transaction?

Discuss.

I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out
fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception.
After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the
business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your
business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any
business card that happens to belong to you.


"Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor."




Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time.

HNY&WOTF.

"Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron.

How do you feel about the €œjizzing cock€� emoji, Rog?

8===D - ~ -

--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote:

There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether
it is on my part or the moderator's?


On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote:
I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in
the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer
adjacent to a sign which read

Free food and drink = Your business card

The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if
you put your card in the box.

Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an
adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed.
And very tasty it was, too.

How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many
principles have been breached - in this transaction?

Discuss.

I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out
fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception.
After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the
business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your
business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any
business card that happens to belong to you.


"Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor."




Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time.

HNY&WOTF.

"Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron.

How do you feel about the €œjizzing cock€� emoji, Rog?

8===D - ~ -

pervert

Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote:

There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether
it is on my part or the moderator's?


On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote:
I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in
the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer
adjacent to a sign which read

Free food and drink = Your business card

The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if
you put your card in the box.

Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an
adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed.
And very tasty it was, too.

How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many
principles have been breached - in this transaction?

Discuss.

I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out
fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception.
After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the
business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your
business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any
business card that happens to belong to you.


"Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor."




Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time.

HNY&WOTF.

"Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron.

How do you feel about the €œjizzing cock€� emoji, Rog?

8===D - ~ -

pervert

Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)=

Thanks, Jim.

--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

On 04/10/2019 07:31, Stephen Cole wrote:
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote:

There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether
it is on my part or the moderator's?


On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote:
I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in
the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer
adjacent to a sign which read

Free food and drink = Your business card

The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if
you put your card in the box.

Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an
adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed.
And very tasty it was, too.

How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many
principles have been breached - in this transaction?

Discuss.

I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out
fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception.
After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the
business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your
business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any
business card that happens to belong to you.


"Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor."




Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time.

HNY&WOTF.

"Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron.

How do you feel about the €œjizzing cock€� emoji, Rog?

8===D - ~ -

pervert

Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)=

Thanks, Jim.

glad you agree ...

In message , Stephen Cole
writes
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote:

There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether
it is on my part or the moderator's?


On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote:
I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in
the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer
adjacent to a sign which read

Free food and drink = Your business card

The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if
you put your card in the box.

Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an
adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed.
And very tasty it was, too.

How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many
principles have been breached - in this transaction?

Discuss.

I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out
fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception.
After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the
business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your
business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any
business card that happens to belong to you.


"Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor."




Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time.

HNY&WOTF.

"Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron.

How do you feel about the €œjizzing cock€� emoji, Rog?

8===D - ~ -

pervert

Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)=

?_?

/Pedant

They're emoticons , not emojis

/Pedant


B
--
Brian Howie

On 04/10/2019 12:16, brian wrote:
In message , Stephen Cole
writes
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote:

There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure
whether
it is on my part or the moderator's?


On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote:
I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade
stands in
the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer
adjacent to a sign which read

Free food and drink = Your business card

The sign gave no other information as to what would be the
outcome if
you put your card in the box.

Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a
vendor at an
adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I
consumed.
And very tasty it was, too.

How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many
principles have been breached - in this transaction?

Discuss.

I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out
fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception.
After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that
the
business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your
business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any
business card that happens to belong to you.


"Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor."




Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time.

HNY&WOTF.

"Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron.

How do you feel about the €œjizzing cock€� emoji, Rog?

8===D - ~ -

pervert

Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji:Â* =(_o_)=

?_?

/Pedant

They're emoticons , not emojis

/Pedant


B
who cares what they are? ...

Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:

On 04/10/2019 12:16, brian wrote:
In message , Stephen Cole
writes
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote:

There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure
whether
it is on my part or the moderator's?


On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote:
I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade
stands in
the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer
adjacent to a sign which read

Free food and drink = Your business card

The sign gave no other information as to what would be the
outcome if
you put your card in the box.

Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a
vendor at an
adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I
consumed.
And very tasty it was, too.

How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many
principles have been breached - in this transaction?

Discuss.

I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out
fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception.
After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that
the
business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your
business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any
business card that happens to belong to you.


"Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor."




Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time.

HNY&WOTF.

"Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron.

How do you feel about the "jizzing cock" emoji, Rog?

8===D - ~ -

pervert

Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)=

?_?

/Pedant

They're emoticons , not emojis

/Pedant


B
who cares what they are? ...

Anyone who cares about clarity and precision of communication.

--

Roger Hayter

I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.
Brian

--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"brian" wrote in message
...
In message , Stephen Cole
writes
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote:

There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure
whether
it is on my part or the moderator's?


On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote:
I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands
in
the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer
adjacent to a sign which read

Free food and drink = Your business card

The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome
if
you put your card in the box.

Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor
at an
adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I
consumed.
And very tasty it was, too.

How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many
principles have been breached - in this transaction?

Discuss.

I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out
fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception.
After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that
the
business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your
business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any
business card that happens to belong to you.


"Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor."




Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time.

HNY&WOTF.

"Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron.

How do you feel about the "jizzing cock" emoji, Rog?

8===D - ~ -

pervert

Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)=

?_?

/Pedant

They're emoticons , not emojis

/Pedant


B
--
Brian Howie

Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.


For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of
a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of
Jims favourite bedroom activities.

--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.


For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of
a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of
Jims favourite bedroom activities.

Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties.

On 04/10/2019 13:20, Roger Hayter wrote:
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:

On 04/10/2019 12:16, brian wrote:
In message , Stephen Cole
writes
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote:

There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure
whether
it is on my part or the moderator's?


On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote:
I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade
stands in
the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer
adjacent to a sign which read

Free food and drink = Your business card

The sign gave no other information as to what would be the
outcome if
you put your card in the box.

Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a
vendor at an
adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I
consumed.
And very tasty it was, too.

How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many
principles have been breached - in this transaction?

Discuss.

I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out
fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception.
After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that
the
business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your
business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any
business card that happens to belong to you.


"Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor."




Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time.

HNY&WOTF.

"Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron.

How do you feel about the "jizzing cock" emoji, Rog?

8===D - ~ -

pervert

Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)=

?_?

/Pedant

They're emoticons , not emojis

/Pedant


B
who cares what they are? ...

Anyone who cares about clarity and precision of communication.

not me then ...

On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.


For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of
a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of
Jims favourite bedroom activities.

only perverts of the first degree would have seen It...you know scumbags
like cole and FMF .....

On 04/10/2019 18:04, mm0fmf wrote:
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.

For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII
depiction of
a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is
one of
Jims favourite bedroom activities.

Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties.

stop trying to project your perverted pass times on to me you scumbag
.........

On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.


For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of
a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of
Jims favourite bedroom activities.

is THAT what it was........I had no idea .....

On 04/10/2019 18:16, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.

For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII
depiction of
a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is
one of
Jims favourite bedroom activities.

is THAT what it was........I had no idea .....
thought it was a picture of the contents of your brain ....tee hee

mm0fmf wrote:
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.


For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of
a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of
Jims favourite bedroom activities.

Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties.


To be fair to Jim, thats an activity he doesnt confine to the bedroom.

--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

On 04/10/2019 19:21, Stephen Cole wrote:
mm0fmf wrote:
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.


For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of
a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of
Jims favourite bedroom activities.

Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties.


To be fair to Jim, thats an activity he doesnt confine to the bedroom.

so...where do I do it then ? ...

On 04/10/2019 19:21, Stephen Cole wrote:
mm0fmf wrote:
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.


For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of
a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of
Jims favourite bedroom activities.

Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties.


To be fair to Jim, thats an activity he doesnt confine to the bedroom.

Even when driving?

mm0fmf wrote:
On 04/10/2019 19:21, Stephen Cole wrote:
mm0fmf wrote:
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.


For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of
a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of
Jims favourite bedroom activities.

Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties.


To be fair to Jim, thats an activity he doesnt confine to the bedroom.

Even when driving?

Especially when driving. Why do you think he has to keep selling his cars?
Too badly soiled.

--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

"Brian Gaff" wrote in message
...
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.

But your screen reader should do the appropriate thing
to you when it finds one of those.

"brian" wrote in message
...
In message , Stephen Cole
writes
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote:

There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure
whether
it is on my part or the moderator's?


On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote:
I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade
stands in
the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on
offer
adjacent to a sign which read

Free food and drink = Your business card

The sign gave no other information as to what would be the
outcome if
you put your card in the box.

Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor
at an
adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I
consumed.
And very tasty it was, too.

How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many
principles have been breached - in this transaction?

Discuss.

I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out
fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception.
After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that
the
business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase
'your
business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not
any
business card that happens to belong to you.


"Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to
another contributor."




Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time.

HNY&WOTF.

"Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron.

How do you feel about the "jizzing cock" emoji, Rog?

8===D - ~ -

pervert

Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)=

?_?

/Pedant

They're emoticons , not emojis

/Pedant


B
--
Brian Howie

On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 05:51:20 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.

But your screen reader should do the appropriate thing
to you when it finds one of those.

More bull**** from the resident senile bull**** artist! tsk

--
addressing nym-shifting senile Rodent:
"You on the other hand are a heavyweight bull****ter who demonstrates
your particular prowess at it every day."
MID:

On 04/10/2019 16:48, Brian Gaff wrote:

I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii.

Emoticons are ASCII. Don't you visualise the smilies? :-)

--
Max Demian