|
Sense of humour failure
Roger Hayter wrote:
Graham. wrote: There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether it is on my part or the moderator's? On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote: I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer adjacent to a sign which read Free food and drink = Your business card The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if you put your card in the box. Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed. And very tasty it was, too. How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many principles have been breached - in this transaction? Discuss. I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception. After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any business card that happens to belong to you. "Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to another contributor." Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time. HNY&WOTF. "Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron. How do you feel about the €śjizzing cock€ť emoji, Rog? 8===D - ~ - -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote: Graham. wrote: There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether it is on my part or the moderator's? On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote: I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer adjacent to a sign which read Free food and drink = Your business card The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if you put your card in the box. Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed. And very tasty it was, too. How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many principles have been breached - in this transaction? Discuss. I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception. After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any business card that happens to belong to you. "Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to another contributor." Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time. HNY&WOTF. "Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron. How do you feel about the €śjizzing cock€ť emoji, Rog? 8===D - ~ - pervert |
Sense of humour failure
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote: Roger Hayter wrote: Graham. wrote: There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether it is on my part or the moderator's? On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote: I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer adjacent to a sign which read Free food and drink = Your business card The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if you put your card in the box. Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed. And very tasty it was, too. How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many principles have been breached - in this transaction? Discuss. I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception. After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any business card that happens to belong to you. "Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to another contributor." Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time. HNY&WOTF. "Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron. How do you feel about the €śjizzing cock€ť emoji, Rog? 8===D - ~ - pervert Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)= Thanks, Jim. -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 07:31, Stephen Cole wrote:
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote: Roger Hayter wrote: Graham. wrote: There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether it is on my part or the moderator's? On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote: I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer adjacent to a sign which read Free food and drink = Your business card The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if you put your card in the box. Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed. And very tasty it was, too. How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many principles have been breached - in this transaction? Discuss. I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception. After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any business card that happens to belong to you. "Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to another contributor." Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time. HNY&WOTF. "Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron. How do you feel about the €śjizzing cock€ť emoji, Rog? 8===D - ~ - pervert Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)= Thanks, Jim. glad you agree ... |
Sense of humour failure
In message , Stephen Cole
writes Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote: Roger Hayter wrote: Graham. wrote: There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether it is on my part or the moderator's? On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote: I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer adjacent to a sign which read Free food and drink = Your business card The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if you put your card in the box. Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed. And very tasty it was, too. How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many principles have been breached - in this transaction? Discuss. I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception. After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any business card that happens to belong to you. "Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to another contributor." Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time. HNY&WOTF. "Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron. How do you feel about the €śjizzing cock€ť emoji, Rog? 8===D - ~ - pervert Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)= ?_? /Pedant They're emoticons , not emojis /Pedant B -- Brian Howie |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 12:16, brian wrote:
In message , Stephen Cole writes Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote: Roger Hayter wrote: Graham. wrote: There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether it is on my part or the moderator's? On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote: I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer adjacent to a sign which read Free food and drink = Your business card The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if you put your card in the box. Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed. And very tasty it was, too. How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many principles have been breached - in this transaction? Discuss. I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception. After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any business card that happens to belong to you. "Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to another contributor." Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time. HNY&WOTF. "Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron. How do you feel about the €śjizzing cock€ť emoji, Rog? 8===D - ~ - pervert Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji:Â* =(_o_)= ?_? /Pedant They're emoticons , not emojis /Pedant B who cares what they are? ... |
Sense of humour failure
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 12:16, brian wrote: In message , Stephen Cole writes Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote: Roger Hayter wrote: Graham. wrote: There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether it is on my part or the moderator's? On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote: I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer adjacent to a sign which read Free food and drink = Your business card The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if you put your card in the box. Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed. And very tasty it was, too. How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many principles have been breached - in this transaction? Discuss. I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception. After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any business card that happens to belong to you. "Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to another contributor." Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time. HNY&WOTF. "Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron. How do you feel about the "jizzing cock" emoji, Rog? 8===D - ~ - pervert Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)= ?_? /Pedant They're emoticons , not emojis /Pedant B who cares what they are? ... Anyone who cares about clarity and precision of communication. -- Roger Hayter |
Sense of humour failure
|
Sense of humour failure
Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of Jims favourite bedroom activities. -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote: I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of Jims favourite bedroom activities. Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties. |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 13:20, Roger Hayter wrote:
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: On 04/10/2019 12:16, brian wrote: In message , Stephen Cole writes Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote: Roger Hayter wrote: Graham. wrote: There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether it is on my part or the moderator's? On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote: I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer adjacent to a sign which read Free food and drink = Your business card The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if you put your card in the box. Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed. And very tasty it was, too. How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many principles have been breached - in this transaction? Discuss. I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception. After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any business card that happens to belong to you. "Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to another contributor." Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time. HNY&WOTF. "Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron. How do you feel about the "jizzing cock" emoji, Rog? 8===D - ~ - pervert Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)= ?_? /Pedant They're emoticons , not emojis /Pedant B who cares what they are? ... Anyone who cares about clarity and precision of communication. not me then ... |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote: I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of Jims favourite bedroom activities. only perverts of the first degree would have seen It...you know scumbags like cole and FMF ..... |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 18:04, mm0fmf wrote:
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Gaff wrote: I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of Jims favourite bedroom activities. Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties. stop trying to project your perverted pass times on to me you scumbag ......... |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Gaff wrote: I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of Jims favourite bedroom activities. is THAT what it was........I had no idea ..... |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 18:16, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Gaff wrote: I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of Jims favourite bedroom activities. is THAT what it was........I had no idea ..... thought it was a picture of the contents of your brain ....tee hee |
Sense of humour failure
mm0fmf wrote:
On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Gaff wrote: I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of Jims favourite bedroom activities. Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties. To be fair to Jim, thats an activity he doesnt confine to the bedroom. -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 19:21, Stephen Cole wrote:
mm0fmf wrote: On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Gaff wrote: I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of Jims favourite bedroom activities. Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties. To be fair to Jim, thats an activity he doesnt confine to the bedroom. so...where do I do it then ? ... |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 19:21, Stephen Cole wrote:
mm0fmf wrote: On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Gaff wrote: I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of Jims favourite bedroom activities. Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties. To be fair to Jim, thats an activity he doesnt confine to the bedroom. Even when driving? |
Sense of humour failure
mm0fmf wrote:
On 04/10/2019 19:21, Stephen Cole wrote: mm0fmf wrote: On 04/10/2019 17:11, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Gaff wrote: I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. For the benefit of the blind, the Goatse emoticon is an ASCII depiction of a man bent over and hauling his anus open with both hands, which is one of Jims favourite bedroom activities. Another is wearing and then ****ting in his wife's panties. To be fair to Jim, thats an activity he doesnt confine to the bedroom. Even when driving? Especially when driving. Why do you think he has to keep selling his cars? Too badly soiled. -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Sense of humour failure
"Brian Gaff" wrote in message ... I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. But your screen reader should do the appropriate thing to you when it finds one of those. "brian" wrote in message ... In message , Stephen Cole writes Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote: On 04/10/2019 06:02, Stephen Cole wrote: Roger Hayter wrote: Graham. wrote: There's been a definite sense of humour failure. I am not sure whether it is on my part or the moderator's? On 02/10/2019 21:16, Mark Goodge wrote: I was at an event earlier this week, where one of the trade stands in the exhibition hall had a selection of tasty refreshments on offer adjacent to a sign which read Free food and drink = Your business card The sign gave no other information as to what would be the outcome if you put your card in the box. Into the box, I placed a card that I had collected from a vendor at an adjacent stand. In return for which I received food. Which I consumed. And very tasty it was, too. How many difference aspects of GDPR are engaged - and how many principles have been breached - in this transaction? Discuss. I don't know about GDPR, but I'm concerned this may be out and out fraud on your part, ie obtaining tasty food by deception. After all, they asked for your business card. Now, I accept that the business card you gave them did belong to you, but the phrase 'your business card' has a clear meaning, in my opinion, which is not any business card that happens to belong to you. "Your message appears to the moderator to be abusive or hurtful to another contributor." Try it with the appropriate smiley face next time. HNY&WOTF. "Appropriate smiley face" is an oxymoron. How do you feel about the "jizzing cock" emoji, Rog? 8===D - ~ - pervert Just for you, Jim, the Goatse emoji: =(_o_)= ?_? /Pedant They're emoticons , not emojis /Pedant B -- Brian Howie |
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 05:51:20 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. But your screen reader should do the appropriate thing to you when it finds one of those. More bull**** from the resident senile bull**** artist! tsk -- addressing nym-shifting senile Rodent: "You on the other hand are a heavyweight bull****ter who demonstrates your particular prowess at it every day." MID: |
Sense of humour failure
On 04/10/2019 16:48, Brian Gaff wrote:
I don't see it myself.... hint \I am blind and newsgroups work in ascii. Emoticons are ASCII. Don't you visualise the smilies? :-) -- Max Demian |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter