 |
|
| UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Supreme Court
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:19:19 +0100, nightjar
wrote: On 24/09/2019 11:24, Pancho wrote: On 24/09/2019 11:02, Stephen Cole wrote: Supreme LOL, more like. Bercow’s demanding Parliament meet ASAP, PMQs tomorrow? :-D The ****’s really hit the fan here. Quite remarkable scenes. Not really being following but AIUI unlawful means not authorized by law, where as illegal means forbidden by law. Unlawful means more that it is against the precepts that law is based upon. So strictly speaking Boris isn't compelled to do anything with regard to this ruling. It implies that he wrongly advised the Queen. That means he should now resign as PM. how did he manage to advise the queen to do what hasn't been done? Presumably MPs, if the had any backbone, could unilaterally reopen parliament with out BoJo's authorization, but as you say lol! According to the ruling, it hasn't been closed. -- www.abelard.org |
|
#2
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
Supreme Court
On 2019-09-24, abelard wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:19:19 +0100, nightjar wrote: On 24/09/2019 11:24, Pancho wrote: On 24/09/2019 11:02, Stephen Cole wrote: Supreme LOL, more like. BercowÂ’s demanding Parliament meet ASAP, PMQs tomorrow? :-D The ****Â’s really hit the fan here. Quite remarkable scenes. Not really being following but AIUI unlawful means not authorized by law, where as illegal means forbidden by law. Unlawful means more that it is against the precepts that law is based upon. So strictly speaking Boris isn't compelled to do anything with regard to this ruling. It implies that he wrongly advised the Queen. That means he should now resign as PM. how did he manage to advise the queen to do what hasn't been done? Perhaps that is what constitutes the "lie" people keep claiming. Maybe he never spoke to her at all. |
|
#3
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
Supreme Court
On 24/09/2019 16:22, abelard wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:19:19 +0100, nightjar wrote: .... It implies that he wrongly advised the Queen. That means he should now resign as PM. how did he manage to advise the queen to do what hasn't been done?... It would be more accurate to say what was done but is now as if it had not been done. -- Colin Bignell |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Supreme Court Ruling Today | Electronic Schematics | |||
| Supreme Court Ruling Today | Electronic Schematics | |||
| Supreme Court decision on jury awards and attourny fees | Metalworking | |||
| Ah, the "good old days", were rotten, was OT - Bush *ignores*Supreme Court's rulings .. | Metalworking | |||
| OT - Bush *ignores* Supreme Court's rulings .. | Metalworking | |||
Linear Mode
