On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:34:21 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:

In article , Nightjar
wrote:

On 25/09/2018 16:54, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Nightjar
wrote:

On 25/09/2018 16:17, harry wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 14:51:23 UTC+1, MM* wrote:

All the polling evidence of the past few weeks puts remain firmly in
the lead.

We had a poll of 100% of the population.

The poll was of the 72% of the electorate who voted, which equates to
about 51% of the total population.

Stop talking cock. The poll was for 100% of the voters. That 29% chose
"no vote" is their affair, unless like* T r o l l* they then come here
and bleat about it, in which case they get spanked.

Even if you count them in, the entire electorate is still a long way
short of 100% of the population.

As is the case at any election.

Any election that can be changed in 4 years or less.

Whilst we might be able to re-join the EU in the future (when all you
Little Englanders are dead and out of the way) we would never be able
to get the same deal (it will be worse).

Cheers, T i m

On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 11:12:44 UTC+1, T i m wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:34:21 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:

In article , Nightjar
wrote:

On 25/09/2018 16:54, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Nightjar
wrote:

On 25/09/2018 16:17, harry wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 14:51:23 UTC+1, MMÂ* wrote:

All the polling evidence of the past few weeks puts remain firmly in
the lead.

We had a poll of 100% of the population.

The poll was of the 72% of the electorate who voted, which equates to
about 51% of the total population.

Stop talking cock. The poll was for 100% of the voters. That 29% chose
"no vote" is their affair, unless likeÂ* T r o l lÂ* they then come here
and bleat about it, in which case they get spanked.

Even if you count them in, the entire electorate is still a long way
short of 100% of the population.

As is the case at any election.

Any election that can be changed in 4 years or less.

Whilst we might be able to re-join the EU in the future (when all you
Little Englanders are dead and out of the way) we would never be able
to get the same deal (it will be worse).



How many European languages do you speak?

"harry" wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 11:12:44 UTC+1, T i m wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:34:21 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:

In article , Nightjar
wrote:

On 25/09/2018 16:54, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Nightjar
wrote:

On 25/09/2018 16:17, harry wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 14:51:23 UTC+1, MM wrote:

All the polling evidence of the past few weeks puts remain firmly
in
the lead.

We had a poll of 100% of the population.

The poll was of the 72% of the electorate who voted, which equates
to
about 51% of the total population.

Stop talking cock. The poll was for 100% of the voters. That 29%
chose
"no vote" is their affair, unless like T r o l l they then come
here
and bleat about it, in which case they get spanked.

Even if you count them in, the entire electorate is still a long way
short of 100% of the population.

As is the case at any election.

Any election that can be changed in 4 years or less.

Whilst we might be able to re-join the EU in the future (when all you
Little Englanders are dead and out of the way) we would never be able
to get the same deal (it will be worse).

How many European languages do you speak?

Dont need to speak any, most of them have at least some english.

On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 05:35:18 +1000, cantankerous trolling senile geezer Rot
Speed blabbered, again:


Whilst we might be able to re-join the EU in the future (when all you
Little Englanders are dead and out of the way) we would never be able
to get the same deal (it will be worse).

How many European languages do you speak?

Don¢t need to speak any, most of them have at least some english.

Nobody asked YOU, you ****ed up senile troll!

--
"Anonymous" to trolling senile Rot Speed:
"You can **** off as you know less than pig **** you sad
little ignorant ****."
MID:

On Thursday, 27 September 2018 17:23:46 UTC+1, harry wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 11:12:44 UTC+1, T i m wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:34:21 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:

In article , Nightjar
wrote:

On 25/09/2018 16:54, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Nightjar
wrote:

On 25/09/2018 16:17, harry wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 14:51:23 UTC+1, MMÂ* wrote:

All the polling evidence of the past few weeks puts remain firmly in
the lead.

We had a poll of 100% of the population.

The poll was of the 72% of the electorate who voted, which equates to
about 51% of the total population.

Stop talking cock. The poll was for 100% of the voters. That 29% chose
"no vote" is their affair, unless likeÂ* T r o l lÂ* they then come here
and bleat about it, in which case they get spanked.

Even if you count them in, the entire electorate is still a long way
short of 100% of the population.

As is the case at any election.

Any election that can be changed in 4 years or less.

Whilst we might be able to re-join the EU in the future (when all you
Little Englanders are dead and out of the way) we would never be able
to get the same deal (it will be worse).



How many European languages do you speak?

Is English a European language ?