http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...l-care-Austria

Migrants get priority care over locals.

harry wrote:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...l-care-Austria

Migrants get priority care over locals.


I saw it try to happen here about 5 yrs ago. An immigrant tried to
jump a surgery queue in the local hospital. Fortunately the surgeon was
French and he knew what the pecking order was, so the immigrant was sent
home with a flea in his ear.

Surely they should prioritise the worst cases no mater what the residential
status of the person though.
Brian

"Capitol" wrote in message
o.uk...
harry wrote:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...l-care-Austria

Migrants get priority care over locals.


I saw it try to happen here about 5 yrs ago. An immigrant tried to
jump a surgery queue in the local hospital. Fortunately the surgeon was
French and he knew what the pecking order was, so the immigrant was sent
home with a flea in his ear.

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!

On Thursday, 11 February 2016 10:33:48 UTC, Brian Gaff wrote:
Surely they should prioritise the worst cases no mater what the residential
status of the person though.




Well, do some research & let us all know what you discover.

On 12/02/2016 08:41, harry wrote:
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 10:33:48 UTC, Brian Gaff wrote:
Surely they should prioritise the worst cases no mater what the residential
status of the person though.




Well, do some research & let us all know what you discover.

The trouble is (certainly here) that the NHS has to pay £500 for 3 hours
of a translators time - even if only a few minutes are required - and
then per hour after that. I can understand making sure that if one is
needed, they are fed a constant stream of patients to make the best use
of their time. I'd be pretty ****ed off if I was a local stuck behind
them though.

SteveW

In article ,
Steve Walker wrote:
On 12/02/2016 08:41, harry wrote:
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 10:33:48 UTC, Brian Gaff wrote:
Surely they should prioritise the worst cases no mater what the
residential status of the person though.




Well, do some research & let us all know what you discover.

The trouble is (certainly here) that the NHS has to pay £500 for 3 hours
of a translators time - even if only a few minutes are required - and
then per hour after that. I can understand making sure that if one is
needed, they are fed a constant stream of patients to make the best use
of their time. I'd be pretty ****ed off if I was a local stuck behind
them though.

SteveW

Why don't the NHS have interpreters on their staff?

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England

In article ,
Steve Walker wrote:
The trouble is (certainly here) that the NHS has to pay £500 for 3 hours
of a translators time - even if only a few minutes are required - and
then per hour after that. I can understand making sure that if one is
needed, they are fed a constant stream of patients to make the best use
of their time. I'd be pretty ****ed off if I was a local stuck behind
them though.

Let's hope you never go abroad and require medical services, then.

--
*Do infants enjoy infancy as much as adults enjoy adultery?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On Thursday, 11 February 2016 10:33:48 UTC, Brian Gaff wrote:
Surely they should prioritise the worst cases no mater what the residential
status of the person though.
Brian


They're already getting priority in social housing in the UK.
So health care could be next.

harry wrote
Brian Gaff wrote

Surely they should prioritise the worst cases no mater
what the residential status of the person though.

They're already getting priority in social housing in the UK.

Pigs arse they are.

So health care could be next.

Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

On Friday, 12 February 2016 09:22:08 UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
harry wrote
Brian Gaff wrote

Surely they should prioritise the worst cases no mater
what the residential status of the person though.

They're already getting priority in social housing in the UK.

Pigs arse they are.

They are, because there;s no way the authorities will allow a family to sleep on the street like they do with the homeless in the UK.

"harry" wrote in message
...
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...l-care-Austria

Migrants get priority care over locals.

Bet that is just another bare faced lie, just like the other
one you posted where some pathological liar lied thru
her teeth about what happened in a kraut hospital.

On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 20:55:11 UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
"harry" wrote in message
...
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...l-care-Austria

Migrants get priority care over locals.

Bet that is just another bare faced lie, just like the other
one you posted where some pathological liar lied thru
her teeth about what happened in a kraut hospital.

Here you are ****-fer-brains.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-eur...-idUKKCN0UY0R0

"harry" wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 20:55:11 UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
"harry" wrote in message
...
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...l-care-Austria

Migrants get priority care over locals.

Bet that is just another bare faced lie, just like the other
one you posted where some pathological liar lied thru
her teeth about what happened in a kraut hospital.

Here you are ****-fer-brains.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-eur...-idUKKCN0UY0R0

Nothing to do with that other **** of yours.