Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or
its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. Bill |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
Bill Wright wrote
When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. Dunno, with the current fad with say smartphones and laptops and tablets with thin being what most of them are, its very hard for any designer to design them to stand on their end so if you demand that it must be able to stand on its end you radically limit what you get to choose from. And does it make any real sense to be able to stand a corded angle grinder or drill on its end ? Why would any designer design it so that it can ? |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
"Bill Wright" wrote in message ... When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. Bill .................................................. ..................right........................... ...................? |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
Butsome things are inherently unbalanced. Electric shavers are the worst for
this. If you need to use them on the face, then they need to be balanced in the hand, but to charge, they often come with a charger that has a small footprint, and the shaver then stands on end, but is easily knocked over as its centre of gravity is now high. The same problem seems to occur with other rechargeable items like portable phones and electric toothbrushes. I simply do not understand why they cannot just admit that it needs to have its centre of gravity in one place for use, and build the chargers to keep it horizontal so it cannot be knocked over. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Bill Wright" wrote in message ... When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. Bill |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
Brian-Gaff wrote:
The same problem seems to occur with other rechargeable items like portable phones and electric toothbrushes. I simply do not understand why they cannot just admit that it needs to have its centre of gravity in one place for use, and build the chargers to keep it horizontal so it cannot be knocked over. Brian Good point. Bill |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
On 30/05/2015 04:53, Bill Wright wrote:
When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. Bill You shouldn't be able to stand some things on end as they become hazards, like screwdrivers, knives, drills, etc. Next time you step on one you have dropped you will understand why. |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
"Bill Wright" wrote in message
... Brian-Gaff wrote: The same problem seems to occur with other rechargeable items like portable phones and electric toothbrushes. I simply do not understand why they cannot just admit that it needs to have its centre of gravity in one place for use, and build the chargers to keep it horizontal so it cannot be knocked over. Brian Good point. Does that apply to vibrators?:-) -- Adam |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
On Sat, 30 May 2015 04:53:51 +0100, Bill Wright
wrote: When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. Bill Bill, did this mode of thinking apply when you were choosing a new girlfriend? -- Graham. %Profound_observation% |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
"Bill Wright" wrote in message ... When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. I'm going buying a snake later, I'll let you know how I get on. |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
On Saturday, 30 May 2015 04:53:54 UTC+1, Bill Wright wrote:
I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm puzzled. NT |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
wrote in message ... On Saturday, 30 May 2015 04:53:54 UTC+1, Bill Wright wrote: I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm puzzled. I'm not. He's right in the sense that it does show that the designer has put more effort into the design if it will stand on its end or side properly, but the problem with that line is that there are some things like smartphones, tablets and knives where it isn't possible with even the best design and very undesirable with some stuff like knives. |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
|
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
Well one of the most illogical items in this respect and indeed in standing
on its bottom is the Wok. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Jim GM4DHJ/m ..." wrote in message ... "Bill Wright" wrote in message ... When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. Bill .................................................. .................right............................ ..................? |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
No, in the case of a shaver, one can lay the whole thing on its side, at
least you could if it had a flat side. Toothbrushes and phones could be made the same way. In any case the gravity held chargers are notoriously intermittent as you get some corrosion on the contacts. Far better y to use a proper plug and socket like Remminton seem to do, which is why I'm very surprised they do not have a flat on one side as well as the base. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Tim Streater" wrote in message .. . In article , Brian-Gaff wrote: Butsome things are inherently unbalanced. Electric shavers are the worst for this. If you need to use them on the face, then they need to be balanced in the hand, but to charge, they often come with a charger that has a small footprint, and the shaver then stands on end, but is easily knocked over as its centre of gravity is now high. The same problem seems to occur with other rechargeable items like portable phones and electric toothbrushes. I simply do not understand why they cannot just admit that it needs to have its centre of gravity in one place for use, and build the chargers to keep it horizontal so it cannot be knocked over. Interesting idea. I guess in general for sighted people you can guide the toothbrush over the charger spigot and then gravity keeps it there. Also the footprint is then low - I imagine that's why toothpaste tubes can stand on end these days. If you want to keep it horizontal, do you still have the charger spigot entering the end, which presumably means designing thew cradle so the toothbrush snaps in, or do you want the charger spigot entering the side? It sort of seems to me either of those might be harder for a blind person to manage. -- HAL 9000: Dave. Put down those Windows disks. Dave. DAVE! |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
I don't know as I do not have the correct orifices to need one, but I'd
imagine it might be the same problem. Incidentally, one of those useless spams told me the other day that the company now had vibrators with a blue tooth connection. Mind and boggling etc. brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "ARW" wrote in message ... "Bill Wright" wrote in message ... Brian-Gaff wrote: The same problem seems to occur with other rechargeable items like portable phones and electric toothbrushes. I simply do not understand why they cannot just admit that it needs to have its centre of gravity in one place for use, and build the chargers to keep it horizontal so it cannot be knocked over. Brian Good point. Does that apply to vibrators?:-) -- Adam |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
Actually the answer to getting most things to stand on end is to attach them
to a gyroscope. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "dennis@home" wrote in message b.com... On 30/05/2015 04:53, Bill Wright wrote: When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. Bill You shouldn't be able to stand some things on end as they become hazards, like screwdrivers, knives, drills, etc. Next time you step on one you have dropped you will understand why. |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
That is where Blue tack is very useful of course.
Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Simon263" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Saturday, 30 May 2015 04:53:54 UTC+1, Bill Wright wrote: I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm puzzled. I'm not. He's right in the sense that it does show that the designer has put more effort into the design if it will stand on its end or side properly, but the problem with that line is that there are some things like smartphones, tablets and knives where it isn't possible with even the best design and very undesirable with some stuff like knives. |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
Brian-Gaff wrote
No, in the case of a shaver, one can lay the whole thing on its side, at least you could if it had a flat side. Toothbrushes and phones could be made the same way. Phones are. In any case the gravity held chargers are notoriously intermittent as you get some corrosion on the contacts. Hasn’t happened with my Panasonic cordless phones. Far better y to use a proper plug and socket like Remminton seem to do, Not with something that is used daily. which is why I'm very surprised they do not have a flat on one side as well as the base. You don’t need one when it drops into the charger. "Tim Streater" wrote in message .. . In article , Brian-Gaff wrote: Butsome things are inherently unbalanced. Electric shavers are the worst for this. If you need to use them on the face, then they need to be balanced in the hand, but to charge, they often come with a charger that has a small footprint, and the shaver then stands on end, but is easily knocked over as its centre of gravity is now high. The same problem seems to occur with other rechargeable items like portable phones and electric toothbrushes. I simply do not understand why they cannot just admit that it needs to have its centre of gravity in one place for use, and build the chargers to keep it horizontal so it cannot be knocked over. Interesting idea. I guess in general for sighted people you can guide the toothbrush over the charger spigot and then gravity keeps it there. Also the footprint is then low - I imagine that's why toothpaste tubes can stand on end these days. If you want to keep it horizontal, do you still have the charger spigot entering the end, which presumably means designing thew cradle so the toothbrush snaps in, or do you want the charger spigot entering the side? It sort of seems to me either of those might be harder for a blind person to manage. -- HAL 9000: Dave. Put down those Windows disks. Dave. DAVE! |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message ... Its not always the designers fault, it can be shoddy work as in the two halves of a moulded screwdriver handle having a seem or ridge that hurts your hand. Good quality ones either do not use this mode of construction or are made more accurately. I am reminded of the Dindy cassette problem where they started to be very successful so they farmed out the manufacture to foreign parts and most of the new stuff was crap. Didn’t happen with Apple. "Sam Plusnet" wrote in message ... In article , says... When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. You regard "standing-on-endishness" as a valuable attribute. There's rather a lot of people who do not share this fixation - especially if the item can thus be easily knocked over and damaged. -- Sam |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message
... I don't know as I do not have the correct orifices to need one, but I'd imagine it might be the same problem. I suppose that you have never had a good look around in a sex shop. -- Adam |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
ARW wrote:
"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message ... I don't know as I do not have the correct orifices to need one, but I'd imagine it might be the same problem. I suppose that you have never had a good look around in a sex shop. If Brian did that we'd all have to go and visit him in clink, having been banged up for groping the merchandise..... (Brian's blind, Adam :-) ) -- Scott Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket? |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
On 31/05/2015 11:32, Scott M wrote:
ARW wrote: "Brian-Gaff" wrote in message ... I don't know as I do not have the correct orifices to need one, but I'd imagine it might be the same problem. I suppose that you have never had a good look around in a sex shop. If Brian did that we'd all have to go and visit him in clink, having been banged up for groping the merchandise..... (Brian's blind, Adam :-) ) Adam knows. |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
dennis@home wrote:
On 31/05/2015 11:32, Scott M wrote: ARW wrote: "Brian-Gaff" wrote in message ... I don't know as I do not have the correct orifices to need one, but I'd imagine it might be the same problem. I suppose that you have never had a good look around in a sex shop. If Brian did that we'd all have to go and visit him in clink, having been banged up for groping the merchandise..... (Brian's blind, Adam :-) ) Adam knows. Well, I did think he did, but liked my comment too much not to post it :-) -- Scott Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket? |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
On Sun, 31 May 2015 12:12:25 +0100, Scott M wrote:
dennis@home wrote: On 31/05/2015 11:32, Scott M wrote: ARW wrote: "Brian-Gaff" wrote in message ... I don't know as I do not have the correct orifices to need one, but I'd imagine it might be the same problem. I suppose that you have never had a good look around in a sex shop. If Brian did that we'd all have to go and visit him in clink, having been banged up for groping the merchandise..... (Brian's blind, Adam :-) ) Adam knows. Well, I did think he did, but liked my comment too much not to post it :-) And anyway, Brian wasn't always blind...he had his chances to look round (not that I'm suggesting he did, you understand) |
#26
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
On 31 May 2015, "Brian-Gaff" grunted:
I don't know as I do not have the correct orifices to need one, but Brian, I really hope you do. NSFW, but I think the following URL example will give you the gist even if you don't want to visit the site: https://www.boyzshop.com/vibrating-s...-vibrators_82/ And no, I've never sampled the goods. -- David |
#27
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
On 31 May 2015 11:28:57 GMT, Bob Eager wrote:
If Brian did that we'd all have to go and visit him in clink, having been banged up for groping the merchandise..... (Brian's blind, Adam :-) ) Adam knows. Well, I did think he did, but liked my comment too much not to post it :-) And anyway, Brian wasn't always blind...he had his chances to look round (not that I'm suggesting he did, you understand) Weren't teenage boys once told that doing what a visit to a Sex shop might encourage made you blind anyway? Not I'm suggesting that was the case for Brian ,you understand. G.Harman |
#28
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
Brian-Gaff wrote:
I don't know as I do not have the correct orifices to need one, How do you **** then? Bill |
#29
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
Graham. wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2015 04:53:51 +0100, Bill Wright wrote: When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. Bill Bill, did this mode of thinking apply when you were choosing a new girlfriend? I like a woman that can be upended easily, then afterwards quickly gets to her feet and makes me a cuppa. I like to see the spunk running down her legs as she puts the kettle on. Bill |
#30
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
Sam Plusnet wrote:
You regard "standing-on-endishness" as a valuable attribute. There's rather a lot of people who do not share this fixation - especially if the item can thus be easily knocked over and damaged. I can't help what silly people think. Bill |
#31
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
on end
In article , Bill Wright
scribeth thus Graham. wrote: On Sat, 30 May 2015 04:53:51 +0100, Bill Wright wrote: When I buy a thing, I always check whether it will stand on its end or its edge, if this is possible for the thing in question. It isn't merely because I might want it to stand on its end, it's because I regard the ability of a thing to stand on its end as evidence that the designer has done a thorough job. I'm talking about small screwdrivers, torches, remote handsets, tape measures, cameras, cordless phones, all that sort of thing. Bill Bill, did this mode of thinking apply when you were choosing a new girlfriend? I like a woman that can be upended easily, then afterwards quickly gets to her feet and makes me a cuppa. I like to see the spunk running down her legs as she puts the kettle on. Bill I think for most on here that tense should have been "used to like" ;(... -- Tony Sayer |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|