Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the
approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
"Holiday Hacienda ..." wrote in message ... I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years Done very differently to how you have used yours. it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
Holiday Hacienda ... wrote:
I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ Totally unsuitable. Put an RSJ in and do the job properly. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
On 05/05/2015 13:39, Bob Minchin wrote:
Holiday Hacienda ... wrote: I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ Totally unsuitable. Put an RSJ in and do the job properly. Why can't you provide calcs? |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
In article ,
Holiday Hacienda ... wrote: I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ You should have used polystyrene tiles. Much easier to work than old rails. -- He who laughs last, thinks slowest* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
"Holiday Hacienda ..." wrote in message ... I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ I have seen this done several times. Railway lines are a bit OTT. Some many decades old, seems to have been a common practice. Your mistake was in telling them. They employ ****heads with little practical experience these days. The "cover-my-arse" types. |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
But it might bend of course, more than the actually specified item. One
really needs to know such things in case it cracks the building by its lack of rigidity. After all it is load bearing in a different way. also if you are indeed using old lines, the how do you know metal fatigue has not started? Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Holiday Hacienda ..." wrote in message ... I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
I'm not sure I believe anyone would truly do this, so wonder if its a troll
post. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Rod Speed" wrote in message ... "Holiday Hacienda ..." wrote in message ... I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years Done very differently to how you have used yours. it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
Yes, this sounds an awful lot like Scrap Heap Challenge to me.
So I have this 2CV with a wheel missing is it OK to make up the other one from three bicycle wheels of the same diameter welded to a hub? King of thing. brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Holiday Hacienda ... wrote: I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ You should have used polystyrene tiles. Much easier to work than old rails. -- He who laughs last, thinks slowest* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
"harryagain" wrote in message ... "Holiday Hacienda ..." wrote in message ... I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ I have seen this done several times. Railway lines are a bit OTT. Some many decades old, seems to have been a common practice. Your mistake was in telling them. They employ ****heads with little practical experience these days. The "cover-my-arse" types. I know all flashing their B.Sc certs and just gathering in certificates for everything....and no idea what a Buchan trap is ......tee hee |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message ... But it might bend of course, more than the actually specified item. One really needs to know such things in case it cracks the building by its lack of rigidity. After all it is load bearing in a different way. also if you are indeed using old lines, the how do you know metal fatigue has not started? Brian well considering there are no other loads like a floor on it, a small triangle of stone is all it is supporting....i |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
On 06/05/2015 08:29, Brian-Gaff wrote:
But it might bend of course, more than the actually specified item. One really needs to know such things in case it cracks the building by its lack of rigidity. After all it is load bearing in a different way. also if you are indeed using old lines, the how do you know metal fatigue has not started? Brian The OP is presumably another troll. Assuming it is a reasonably normal domestic building the specified RSJs will be a long way from deforming plastically, so all that matters is whether the elastic deformation of the rails is similar to or better than the RSJs. The elastic modulus of RSJs and steel rails will not be very different, so what matters is the second moment of area which is reasonably easy to calculate. Fatigue is a red herring: unless it breaks on installation owing to a large pre-existing fatigue crack, it will be OK because there won't be any more fatigue cycles. Strictly, I suppose, a crack might become jacked open by corrosion, but even then as a lintel it is unlikely to lead to collapse even if it does fail catastrophically. That's not to say that it wasn't a really stupid thing to do on a build which was going to get inspected. |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
In article ,
harryagain wrote: "Holiday Hacienda ..." wrote in message ... I slapped an opening in a thick internal stone loadbearing wall.....the approved plans show RSJs to be installed but I have installed a row of old railway lines.....the problem is they don't want to accept this as I cannot provide calcs ..... surely if a railway line has supported the Flying Scotsman for years it should be OK to support a triangle of stone? ........ I have seen this done several times. Railway lines are a bit OTT. Some many decades old, seems to have been a common practice. Your mistake was in telling them. They employ ****heads with little practical experience these days. The "cover-my-arse" types. Showing your ignorance again, Harry? For as long as I can remember it has been a requirement to show simple calculations that any such alteration is up to the job. And just why should the public be required to pay for them? -- *Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Showing your ignorance again, Harry? For as long as I can remember it has been a requirement to show simple calculations that any such alteration is up to the job. And just why should the public be required to pay for them? And for quite a bit of work it's fairly simple to put together the data needed for those calculations. For example, when we replaced our roof in the 1990s it was sufficient to get the data and calculate that X sqm of welsh slate weighed Y, and X sqm of replacement artificial slates weighed less-than-Y, so the replacement would work. jgh |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
On Wed, 6 May 2015 08:30:11 +0100 Brian-Gaff wrote :
I'm not sure I believe anyone would truly do this, so wonder if its a troll post. One of my former colleagues when I was a BCO 30+ years ago told us about this being not uncommon on his former patch - Wolverhampton IIRC so I think it quite possible. But I don't plan to add rail sections to SuperBeam! -- Tony Bryer, Greentram: 'Software to build on', Melbourne, Australia www.greentram.com |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
In article ,
wrote: Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Showing your ignorance again, Harry? For as long as I can remember it has been a requirement to show simple calculations that any such alteration is up to the job. And just why should the public be required to pay for them? And for quite a bit of work it's fairly simple to put together the data needed for those calculations. For example, when we replaced our roof in the 1990s it was sufficient to get the data and calculate that X sqm of welsh slate weighed Y, and X sqm of replacement artificial slates weighed less-than-Y, so the replacement would work. Quite - for this sort of job basically a back of the fag packet calculation. I had it done for my through lounge, and it didn't cost much. -- *There are two sides to every divorce: Yours and **** head's* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message ... But it might bend of course, more than the actually specified item. One really needs to know such things in case it cracks the building by its lack of rigidity. After all it is load bearing in a different way. also if you are indeed using old lines, the how do you know metal fatigue has not started? Brian A railway line is probably about 20 times stronger than needed. The axle loading of a steam locomotive could be over 20 tons. Your little triangle of masonary wieghs nothing by comparison. Especially if two are fitted side by side as was the normal trick. |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
In article ,
harryagain wrote: A railway line is probably about 20 times stronger than needed. The axle loading of a steam locomotive could be over 20 tons. If it last carried a steam engine, it could be rusted away by now. BTW, when will idiots like you learn that 'probably' isn't good enough when it comes such things? I've seen enough building collapse because some ****** thought 'probably' was ok. -- *Wood burns faster when you have to cut and chop it yourself. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
On 06/05/2015 15:56, harryagain wrote:
"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message ... But it might bend of course, more than the actually specified item. One really needs to know such things in case it cracks the building by its lack of rigidity. After all it is load bearing in a different way. also if you are indeed using old lines, the how do you know metal fatigue has not started? Brian A railway line is probably about 20 times stronger than needed. The axle loading of a steam locomotive could be over 20 tons. Your little triangle of masonary wieghs nothing by comparison. Especially if two are fitted side by side as was the normal trick. Railway tracks have a pretty small span. |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
I've seen enough building collapse because some ****** thought 'probably' was ok. *Wood burns faster when you have to cut and chop it yourself. Dave Plowman me too..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH3FyjOVSSU |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
harryagain wrote
Brian-Gaff wrote But it might bend of course, more than the actually specified item. One really needs to know such things in case it cracks the building by its lack of rigidity. After all it is load bearing in a different way. also if you are indeed using old lines, the how do you know metal fatigue has not started? A railway line is probably about 20 times stronger than needed. The axle loading of a steam locomotive could be over 20 tons. But those don’t have a ****ing great hole under the rail. Your little triangle of masonary wieghs nothing by comparison. Especially if two are fitted side by side as was the normal trick. |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , harryagain wrote: A railway line is probably about 20 times stronger than needed. The axle loading of a steam locomotive could be over 20 tons. If it last carried a steam engine, it could be rusted away by now. Rust is visible SFB. |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RSJ problem ...
In article ,
harryagain wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , harryagain wrote: A railway line is probably about 20 times stronger than needed. The axle loading of a steam locomotive could be over 20 tons. If it last carried a steam engine, it could be rusted away by now. Rust is visible SFB. *You* don't seem to be able to see most things, so why not rust too? But just carry on guessing about such things. In your own house. Hopefully well away from others. -- *I used up all my sick days so I called in dead Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Laminate flooring joint problem: Problem solved | Home Repair | |||
Aluminum soffit installation problem-How would the pros handle this problem? | Home Repair | |||
Diverter valve problem fixed but now another problem. | UK diy | |||
Roof Problem - Major or Minor Problem? | Home Repair | |||
Septic system problem-pump out or drain field problem? | Home Repair |