"The Todal" wrote in message ...

On 5/2/14 09:37, wrote:

Use of discovery results at trial: the admissibility of document and
reports that were obtained through a request to produce is determined
without regard to the fact that these items were obtained through
discovery.

What is the normal procedure for items which were obtained through
discovery. Does the court just screen all those items and allow only a
couple to be presented to the court?
Thanks


It would be helpful if you could rephrase your question because it is
very difficult to understand. It certainly looks as if you aren't
talking about the English legal system. Are you discussing the American
system?

The term "discovery" is (unfortunately) obsolete in England and the word
"disclosure" is used instead.

The court doesn't screen items. It will normally allow the parties to
produce and refer to all documents which are relevant to the matters in
issue. If documents are alleged to be privileged the court can be asked
to decide whether or not they are privileged.

See http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pro...l/rules/part31

On 05/02/2014 11:02, Anthony wrote:


"The Todal" wrote in message ...

On 5/2/14 09:37, wrote:

Use of discovery results at trial: the admissibility of document and
reports that were obtained through a request to produce is determined
without regard to the fact that these items were obtained through
discovery.

What is the normal procedure for items which were obtained through
discovery. Does the court just screen all those items and allow only a
couple to be presented to the court?
Thanks


It would be helpful if you could rephrase your question because it is
very difficult to understand. It certainly looks as if you aren't
talking about the English legal system. Are you discussing the American
system?

The term "discovery" is (unfortunately) obsolete in England and the word
"disclosure" is used instead.

The court doesn't screen items. It will normally allow the parties to
produce and refer to all documents which are relevant to the matters in
issue. If documents are alleged to be privileged the court can be asked
to decide whether or not they are privileged.

See http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pro...l/rules/part31

Why are you cross posting, Judith?

On 5/2/14 11:20, Brian Robertson wrote:


Why are you cross posting, Judith?

It isn't Judith. It is a moron trying to tease Judith by continually
posting in her name.

However, in usenet we have an equality and diversity policy. We actively
encourage ****wits to keep posting, as therapy to keep them occupied
throughout the day.

"The Todal" wrote in message ...

On 5/2/14 11:20, Brian Robertson wrote:


Why are you cross posting, Judith?

It isn't Judith. It is a moron trying to tease Judith by continually
posting in her name.

However, in usenet we have an equality and diversity policy. We actively
encourage ****wits to keep posting, as therapy to keep them occupied
throughout the day.

do you speak latin

On 05/02/14 12:06, The Todal wrote:
On 5/2/14 11:20, Brian Robertson wrote:


Why are you cross posting, Judith?

It isn't Judith. It is a moron trying to tease Judith by continually
posting in her name.

However, in usenet we have an equality and diversity policy. We actively
encourage ****wits to keep posting, as therapy to keep them occupied
throughout the day.


Please chaps. this is obviously a spat going on somewhere other than
uk.d-i-y.

So don't X-post it here.



--
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc-ra-cy) €“ a system of government where the least capable to
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a
diminishing number of producers.

On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:31:46 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 05/02/14 12:06, The Todal wrote:
On 5/2/14 11:20, Brian Robertson wrote:


Why are you cross posting, Judith?

It isn't Judith. It is a moron trying to tease Judith by continually
posting in her name.

However, in usenet we have an equality and diversity policy. We actively
encourage ****wits to keep posting, as therapy to keep them occupied
throughout the day.


Please chaps. this is obviously a spat going on somewhere other than
uk.d-i-y.

So don't X-post it here.


The OP appears to be from a New Zealand IP.


--
Graham.


%Profound_observation%

"The Todal" wrote in message ...

On 5/2/14 11:20, Brian Robertson wrote:


Why are you cross posting, Judith?

It isn't Judith. It is a moron trying to tease Judith by continually
posting in her name.

However, in usenet we have an equality and diversity policy. We actively
encourage ****wits to keep posting, as therapy to keep them occupied
throughout the day.

do you speak latin

On 5/2/14 12:20, Anthony wrote:


"The Todal" wrote in message ...
On 5/2/14 11:20, Brian Robertson wrote:


Why are you cross posting, Judith?

It isn't Judith. It is a moron trying to tease Judith by continually
posting in her name.

However, in usenet we have an equality and diversity policy. We actively
encourage ****wits to keep posting, as therapy to keep them occupied
throughout the day.

do you speak latin


Yes, fluently.

On 05/02/2014 13:22, The Todal wrote:

do you speak latin


Yes, fluently.


I have no idea whether that is true, but I do know that one of my son's
school teachers spoke Latin conversationally. He used to go to regular
meet ups in London in order to practise.

On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:06:43 +0000, The Todal
wrote:

On 5/2/14 11:20, Brian Robertson wrote:


Why are you cross posting, Judith?

It isn't Judith. It is a moron trying to tease Judith by continually
posting in her name.

However, in usenet we have an equality and diversity policy. We actively
encourage ****wits to keep posting, as therapy to keep them occupied
throughout the day.

Yes it is a PITA Todal but there again Judith is also a troll. I
rarely come here these days because Usenet has been taken over by
trolls.

pete

On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:20:58 +0000, Brian Robertson
wrote:


The court doesn't screen items. It will normally allow the parties to
produce and refer to all documents which are relevant to the matters in
issue. If documents are alleged to be privileged the court can be asked
to decide whether or not they are privileged.

See http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pro...l/rules/part31

Why are you cross posting, Judith?

He does it because he is unwell. Now I can't tell which one is Anthony
Bournes. Usenet is virtually finished now.

pete

On 05/02/2014 11:02, Anthony wrote:

snip drivel

Can anyone who posts a reply to certain posters check that don't
inadvertently cross-post to irrelevant groups or they might just get
tarred with the same brush?

On 5/2/14 15:05, Fredxxx wrote:
On 05/02/2014 11:02, Anthony wrote:

snip drivel

Can anyone who posts a reply to certain posters check that don't
inadvertently cross-post to irrelevant groups or they might just get
tarred with the same brush?


I wouldn't want to spoil the ship for a ha'porth of tar. And that's a
DIY observation.