Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
I'm about to start a project which basically involves building lots of MDF boxes then stacking them in a brick-like fashion to make a wall-to-wall bookshelf.
The boxes will be constructed out of 18mm MDF, and be either 280x350x400mm or 180x250x400mm in size. (I'll use 2mm MDF for backs.) I haven't decided yet whether to use veneered MDF. If I don't then I need to treat the whole lot (probably a satin varnish, although I may paint them as MDF is quite boring), but if I use veneered then I only need to treat the cut edges, none of which will be visible once complete (assuming I use a veneer edging strip on the visible edges). I can't get 2mm veneer for the backs so I'll paint those to roughly match whichever veneer I choose. What's the best way to treat the "invisible" edges? I'm thinking both in terms of the product and the method - I obviously don't want the product coming over the edges onto the veneer, and my DIY skills are "basic". I considered stacking all the parts together and treating all the edges in one go but I wasn't sure if I'd end up sticking them together or leaving a rough edge when they were separated. A couple of people have suggested diluted PVA to seal the edges, which would certainly be cheap but would it work? (The shelves will be going into a bedroom so I don't expect them to be damp.) In total I'll have around 60 boxes to build so anything complicated is out, I don't have the patience! |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
wrote
I'm about to start a project which basically involves building lots of MDF boxes then stacking them in a brick-like fashion to make a wall-to-wall bookshelf. Urk, I prefer to do wall to wall bookshelves by welding Dexion slotted 25mm square steel tubing into floor to ceiling rectangles, dynabolting them to the walls and floor and using aluminium flats cut to length in the slots, with MDF shelves on those. Works very well indeed. Do that for the kitchen pantry too and all the other shelves in the house. Mostly wall to wall or close to that. The boxes will be constructed out of 18mm MDF, and be either 280x350x400mm or 180x250x400mm in size. (I'll use 2mm MDF for backs.) I haven't decided yet whether to use veneered MDF. I use the white melamine coated MDF myself. If I don't then I need to treat the whole lot (probably a satin varnish, although I may paint them as MDF is quite boring), I did white paint the first ones I did. but if I use veneered then I only need to treat the cut edges, none of which will be visible once complete (assuming I use a veneer edging strip on the visible edges). I didn't bother with the white melamine coated MDF I used, just need the front edge coated and it comes like that. I can't get 2mm veneer for the backs so I'll paint those to roughly match whichever veneer I choose. What's the best way to treat the "invisible" edges? I just leave them raw with shelves. I did paint the edges with epoxy paint with the kitchen bench which is full laminex on MDF. I'm thinking both in terms of the product and the method - I obviously don't want the product coming over the edges onto the veneer, and my DIY skills are "basic". I considered stacking all the parts together and treating all the edges in one go but I wasn't sure if I'd end up sticking them together or leaving a rough edge when they were separated. Likely but easy to try with some scrap. A couple of people have suggested diluted PVA to seal the edges, which would certainly be cheap but would it work? (The shelves will be going into a bedroom so I don't expect them to be damp.) I don't see any point in bothering with those. I did fill and paint the edges of the ones I did with white paint, but didn't bother with the melamine coated ones and they have survived fine. In total I'll have around 60 boxes to build so anything complicated is out, I don't have the patience! I'd go the slotted metal tube route myself, MUCH less work. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
|
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 9:21:34 AM UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
Urk, I prefer to do wall to wall bookshelves by welding Dexion slotted 25mm square steel tubing into floor to ceiling rectangles, dynabolting them to the walls and floor and using aluminium flats cut to length in the slots, with MDF shelves on those. It may not be the most "functional" design but we quite like the look of the design (whether we'll like it once finished I have no idea though!) I considered stacking all the parts together and treating all the edges in one go but I wasn't sure if I'd end up sticking them together or leaving a rough edge when they were separated. Likely but easy to try with some scrap. Good point, I will do that. Thanks Mark Rogers |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 9:52:07 AM UTC, stuart noble wrote:
I've done a bit of this for my siblings over the years, mainly 15mm, and the various finishes they were threatening to use never materialised. That neutral, scruffy mdf look grows on you. Any clear finish tends to give them a dark tan "wet" look, which is not very appealing on mdf. Try it on a scrap first. I have some MDF shelves that were varnished (to protect the MDF not for effect) and as you say, the effect grows on you. But that was stuck in an office, this is going to be a "feature" in a spare bedroom that is supposed to become more of a library/snug, so I want to at least try to make something "nice". Using veneered MDF is obviously a lot more expensive, but is somewhat offset by the saving in varnish and would be a considerable time saving, for a much better end result, which is why I'm leaning that way at the moment. Sixty boxes? Blimey, you're going to waste a lot of space with the thickness of the mdf. I prefer to make half a dozen modules with shelf supports so that you can change the spacing. There always seems to be one thing that's slightly too tall for any of the boxes. The bottom boxes (35cm internal height) are tall enough for box file (I haven't 100% decided on dimensions yet). They will likely be filled with magazine archives - ie will be heavy. I need to be sure they will take the weight without bowing. (They'll also have the weight of the upper boxes to support.) If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. By constructing it from boxes laid out like bricks (ie each row is 50% offset from the ones either side of it) I end up with quite short gaps between verticals without making the shelves too short, which should lend strength. However this is all speculation from a software engineer with no experience of constructing projects like this so if anyone thinks I'm taking a big risk let me know! I'm sure you have a plan for the assembly but FWIW I'd have the whole lot cut to size by a timber merchant, Absolutely! In fact it was partly my lack of skill when it comes to cutting timber that lead to the design - this is very easy to get supplied almost in kit form just from a set of measurements. Aside from treating the MDF, all I should need to do is to put in 2 or 3 screws on each edge and either pin or staple the backs on. Given that I have a lot of nearly identical boxes to make, I may even make up a jig to hold the sides in place while I screw them together. [...] and treat yourself to an electric stapler. Great for putting the backs on and holding the four sides in position if you're working alone I wondered about this too. It wouldn't be worth me spending a lot on one though as this could well be the only time it gets used. I can get a cheap one for about £20 with 1000 staples and 1000 nails, or a Stanley one for twice that - is it worth it? -- Mark Rogers |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
The bottom boxes (35cm internal height) are tall enough for box file (I haven't 100% decided on dimensions yet). They will likely be filled with magazine archives - ie will be heavy. I need to be sure they will take the weight without bowing. (They'll also have the weight of the upper boxes to support.) If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. By constructing it from boxes laid out like bricks (ie each row is 50% offset from the ones either side of it) I end up with quite short gaps between verticals without making the shelves too short, which should lend strength. However this is all speculation from a software engineer with no experience of constructing projects like this so if anyone thinks I'm taking a big risk let me know! Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell of a lot heavier than books. I'm sure you have a plan for the assembly but FWIW I'd have the whole lot cut to size by a timber merchant, Absolutely! In fact it was partly my lack of skill when it comes to cutting timber that lead to the design - this is very easy to get supplied almost in kit form just from a set of measurements. Aside from treating the MDF, all I should need to do is to put in 2 or 3 screws on each edge and either pin or staple the backs on. Given that I have a lot of nearly identical boxes to make, I may even make up a jig to hold the sides in place while I screw them together. Clamping a piece of the shelving to the sides gives you a "ledge" to sit the cross piece on. If screwing thorough the sides into the edges, these might be useful http://www.screwfix.com/p/mdf-tite-s...equestid=54415 but I've found drywall screws just as good. Standard woodscrews tend to be a bit too fat, and will swell the mdf if not 100% accurately positioned. Oh, and get one of those combination bits that do the hole and the countersink in one. Then, with a jig, you can pre-drill all the sides accurately in one operation. You don't want to be doing that by eye! [...] and treat yourself to an electric stapler. Great for putting the backs on and holding the four sides in position if you're working alone I wondered about this too. It wouldn't be worth me spending a lot on one though as this could well be the only time it gets used. I can get a cheap one for about £20 with 1000 staples and 1000 nails, or a Stanley one for twice that - is it worth it? I've had a Bosch for years and wouldn't be without it. Takes generic staples too, so you're not tied in to expensive Bosch stuff. IME forget the nail option on cheap tools, they misfire so often it'll drive you crazy. |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
"stuart noble" wrote in message ... The bottom boxes (35cm internal height) are tall enough for box file (I haven't 100% decided on dimensions yet). They will likely be filled with magazine archives - ie will be heavy. I need to be sure they will take the weight without bowing. (They'll also have the weight of the upper boxes to support.) If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. By constructing it from boxes laid out like bricks (ie each row is 50% offset from the ones either side of it) I end up with quite short gaps between verticals without making the shelves too short, which should lend strength. However this is all speculation from a software engineer with no experience of constructing projects like this so if anyone thinks I'm taking a big risk let me know! Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell of a lot heavier than books. I'm sure you have a plan for the assembly but FWIW I'd have the whole lot cut to size by a timber merchant, Absolutely! In fact it was partly my lack of skill when it comes to cutting timber that lead to the design - this is very easy to get supplied almost in kit form just from a set of measurements. Aside from treating the MDF, all I should need to do is to put in 2 or 3 screws on each edge and either pin or staple the backs on. Given that I have a lot of nearly identical boxes to make, I may even make up a jig to hold the sides in place while I screw them together. Clamping a piece of the shelving to the sides gives you a "ledge" to sit the cross piece on. If screwing thorough the sides into the edges, these might be useful http://www.screwfix.com/p/mdf-tite-s...equestid=54415 but I've found drywall screws just as good. Standard woodscrews tend to be a bit too fat, and will swell the mdf if not 100% accurately positioned. Oh, and get one of those combination bits that do the hole and the countersink in one. Then, with a jig, you can pre-drill all the sides accurately in one operation. You don't want to be doing that by eye! [...] and treat yourself to an electric stapler. Great for putting the backs on and holding the four sides in position if you're working alone I wondered about this too. It wouldn't be worth me spending a lot on one though as this could well be the only time it gets used. I can get a cheap one for about £20 with 1000 staples and 1000 nails, or a Stanley one for twice that - is it worth it? I've had a Bosch for years and wouldn't be without it. Takes generic staples too, so you're not tied in to expensive Bosch stuff. IME forget the nail option on cheap tools, they misfire so often it'll drive you crazy. I have bookshelves in 18mm mdf - they have bowed under the weight at 750mm length. MDF is not as rigid as it looks. Pine is stiffer - shelves that long stay straight. |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Feb 12, 8:51*am, wrote:
I'm about to start a project which basically involves building lots of MDF boxes then stacking them in a brick-like fashion to make a wall-to-wall bookshelf. The boxes will be constructed out of 18mm MDF, and be either 280x350x400mm or 180x250x400mm in size. (I'll use 2mm MDF for backs.) I haven't decided yet whether to use veneered MDF. If I don't then I need to treat the whole lot (probably a satin varnish, although I may paint them as MDF is quite boring), but if I use veneered then I only need to treat the cut edges, none of which will be visible once complete (assuming I use a veneer edging strip on the visible edges). I can't get 2mm veneer for the backs so I'll paint those to roughly match whichever veneer I choose. What's the best way to treat the "invisible" edges? I'm thinking both in terms of the product and the method - I obviously don't want the product coming over the edges onto the veneer, and my DIY skills are "basic". I considered stacking all the parts together and treating all the edges in one go but I wasn't sure if I'd end up sticking them together or leaving a rough edge when they were separated. A couple of people have suggested diluted PVA to seal the edges, which would certainly be cheap but would it work? (The shelves will be going into a bedroom so I don't expect them to be damp.) In total I'll have around 60 boxes to build so anything complicated is out, I don't have the patience! There is special primer paint for MDF. Other paints allow pinholes to form as they dry. |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
A 1 metre span of 15mm chipboard will carry very little unless pinned along the back to the back panel and even then I would't risk a lot on it. We use 25mm for shelves in an office environment and don't go beyond 900mm with it. Even at that it will still deform slighty under a load of books.
I would not be a big fan of screwing into mdf. If necessary we use drywall screws but even with pro drilling etc. it can still split. F.Y.I. and further enlightenment read here http://www.geoffswoodwork.co.uk/book%20weights.htm On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:17:40 PM UTC, stuart noble wrote: The bottom boxes (35cm internal height) are tall enough for box file (I haven't 100% decided on dimensions yet). They will likely be filled with magazine archives - ie will be heavy. I need to be sure they will take the weight without bowing. (They'll also have the weight of the upper boxes to support.) If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. By constructing it from boxes laid out like bricks (ie each row is 50% offset from the ones either side of it) I end up with quite short gaps between verticals without making the shelves too short, which should lend strength. However this is all speculation from a software engineer with no experience of constructing projects like this so if anyone thinks I'm taking a big risk let me know! Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell of a lot heavier than books. I'm sure you have a plan for the assembly but FWIW I'd have the whole lot cut to size by a timber merchant, Absolutely! In fact it was partly my lack of skill when it comes to cutting timber that lead to the design - this is very easy to get supplied almost in kit form just from a set of measurements. Aside from treating the MDF, all I should need to do is to put in 2 or 3 screws on each edge and either pin or staple the backs on. Given that I have a lot of nearly identical boxes to make, I may even make up a jig to hold the sides in place while I screw them together. Clamping a piece of the shelving to the sides gives you a "ledge" to sit the cross piece on. If screwing thorough the sides into the edges, these might be useful http://www.screwfix.com/p/mdf-tite-s...equestid=54415 but I've found drywall screws just as good. Standard woodscrews tend to be a bit too fat, and will swell the mdf if not 100% accurately positioned. Oh, and get one of those combination bits that do the hole and the countersink in one. Then, with a jig, you can pre-drill all the sides accurately in one operation. You don't want to be doing that by eye! [...] and treat yourself to an electric stapler. Great for putting the backs on and holding the four sides in position if you're working alone I wondered about this too. It wouldn't be worth me spending a lot on one though as this could well be the only time it gets used. I can get a cheap one for about £20 with 1000 staples and 1000 nails, or a Stanley one for twice that - is it worth it? I've had a Bosch for years and wouldn't be without it. Takes generic staples too, so you're not tied in to expensive Bosch stuff. IME forget the nail option on cheap tools, they misfire so often it'll drive you crazy. |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:09:45 PM UTC, fred wrote:
A 1 metre span of 15mm chipboard will carry very little unless pinned along the back to the back panel and even then I would't risk a lot on it. We use 25mm for shelves in an office environment and don't go beyond 900mm with it. Even at that it will still deform slighty under a load of books. That ties in with what I figured, hence using 18mm MDF doubled up. But I think I may still be overdoing it - the box width is 40cm but by staggering them it is supported underneath at the midpoint, but then it is also taking weight from above at its own midpoint which works against it.... Even so, 18mm doubled is 36mm (1.5"). 12mm doubled to give me 24mm (1") would surely be enough, wouldn't it? (it's a big project to get wrong!) I would not be a big fan of screwing into mdf. If necessary we use drywall screws but even with pro drilling etc. it can still split. That is another advantage of the thicker MDF - I'm going to be quite a long way from the edges. This could be where I'd regret having 12mm. Just so we're clear, the design is something like this: ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- ... with the span between uprights 40cm, and because each box is independently constructed from 18mm MDF each horizontal and vertical is actually two adjacent 18mm pieces, ie 36mm total) -- Mark |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
"Tim Watts" wrote in message ... On Tuesday 12 February 2013 08:51 wrote in uk.d-i- y: I'm about to start a project which basically involves building lots of MDF boxes then stacking them in a brick-like fashion to make a wall-to-wall bookshelf. The boxes will be constructed out of 18mm MDF, and be either 280x350x400mm or 180x250x400mm in size. (I'll use 2mm MDF for backs.) I haven't decided yet whether to use veneered MDF. If I don't then I need to treat the whole lot (probably a satin varnish, although I may paint them as MDF is quite boring), but if I use veneered then I only need to treat the cut edges, none of which will be visible once complete (assuming I use a veneer edging strip on the visible edges). I can't get 2mm veneer for the backs so I'll paint those to roughly match whichever veneer I choose. What's the best way to treat the "invisible" edges? I'm thinking both in terms of the product and the method - I obviously don't want the product coming over the edges onto the veneer, and my DIY skills are "basic". I considered stacking all the parts together and treating all the edges in one go but I wasn't sure if I'd end up sticking them together or leaving a rough edge when they were separated. A couple of people have suggested diluted PVA to seal the edges, which would certainly be cheap but would it work? (The shelves will be going into a bedroom so I don't expect them to be damp.) I would not - the water content will swell the MDF. Perhaps a diluted polyurethane varnish, spirit based? The MDF shelves that I painted white were fine with water based paint. In total I'll have around 60 boxes to build so anything complicated is out, I don't have the patience! |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
wrote
Rod Speed wrote Urk, I prefer to do wall to wall bookshelves by welding Dexion slotted 25mm square steel tubing into floor to ceiling rectangles, dynabolting them to the walls and floor and using aluminium flats cut to length in the slots, with MDF shelves on those. It may not be the most "functional" design but we quite like the look of the design My superficial reaction is that you're going to have a problem with the fact that the boxes will have a lot of wasted space vertically, because there is so much variation in the height of the books so if you have 60 uniform sized boxes, most of them are going to have a lot of free space above the books in them. If they aren't all going to be the same size, you'll have a problem stacking them so they look good, particularly at the top. (whether we'll like it once finished I have no idea though!) And a bit hard to mock up and try too. I considered stacking all the parts together and treating all the edges in one go but I wasn't sure if I'd end up sticking them together or leaving a rough edge when they were separated. Likely but easy to try with some scrap. Good point, I will do that. Thanks Mark Rogers |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
"Geoff Pearson" wrote in message ... "stuart noble" wrote in message ... The bottom boxes (35cm internal height) are tall enough for box file (I haven't 100% decided on dimensions yet). They will likely be filled with magazine archives - ie will be heavy. I need to be sure they will take the weight without bowing. (They'll also have the weight of the upper boxes to support.) If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. By constructing it from boxes laid out like bricks (ie each row is 50% offset from the ones either side of it) I end up with quite short gaps between verticals without making the shelves too short, which should lend strength. However this is all speculation from a software engineer with no experience of constructing projects like this so if anyone thinks I'm taking a big risk let me know! Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell of a lot heavier than books. I'm sure you have a plan for the assembly but FWIW I'd have the whole lot cut to size by a timber merchant, Absolutely! In fact it was partly my lack of skill when it comes to cutting timber that lead to the design - this is very easy to get supplied almost in kit form just from a set of measurements. Aside from treating the MDF, all I should need to do is to put in 2 or 3 screws on each edge and either pin or staple the backs on. Given that I have a lot of nearly identical boxes to make, I may even make up a jig to hold the sides in place while I screw them together. Clamping a piece of the shelving to the sides gives you a "ledge" to sit the cross piece on. If screwing thorough the sides into the edges, these might be useful http://www.screwfix.com/p/mdf-tite-s...equestid=54415 but I've found drywall screws just as good. Standard woodscrews tend to be a bit too fat, and will swell the mdf if not 100% accurately positioned. Oh, and get one of those combination bits that do the hole and the countersink in one. Then, with a jig, you can pre-drill all the sides accurately in one operation. You don't want to be doing that by eye! [...] and treat yourself to an electric stapler. Great for putting the backs on and holding the four sides in position if you're working alone I wondered about this too. It wouldn't be worth me spending a lot on one though as this could well be the only time it gets used. I can get a cheap one for about £20 with 1000 staples and 1000 nails, or a Stanley one for twice that - is it worth it? I've had a Bosch for years and wouldn't be without it. Takes generic staples too, so you're not tied in to expensive Bosch stuff. IME forget the nail option on cheap tools, they misfire so often it'll drive you crazy. I have bookshelves in 18mm mdf - they have bowed under the weight at 750mm length. MDF is not as rigid as it looks. That's the other reason I prefer to use the 25mm square slotted steel tube verticals, you can space those closer so you can use the much cheaper MDF and not get any bowing. I did that with the pantry, with 12mm melamine coated MDF 580mm between verticals, 330mm deep shelves. Those handle the 4 deep 600ml glass jars that I do the marmalade and relish in 200 of them in the case of the marmalade, without any bowing in years now. Pine is stiffer - shelves that long stay straight. Yes, but its much more expensive, its cheaper to have more verticals the way I do bookshelves and other shelves. Not as easy to do in his case with his boxes either. |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
fred wrote
A 1 metre span of 15mm chipboard will carry very little unless pinned along the back to the back panel That's just plain wrong. I did my kitchen pantry shelves with 15mm melamine coated MDF 580mm between verticals, 330mm deep shelves with no support at all along the back edge. Those handle the 4 deep 600ml glass jars that I do the marmalade and relish in 200 of them in the case of the marmalade, without any bowing in years now. and even then I would't risk a lot on it. I did and it worked fine. We use 25mm for shelves in an office environment and don't go beyond 900mm with it. Even at that it will still deform slighty under a load of books. Mine doesn't with a load much heavier than books. I would not be a big fan of screwing into mdf. Yeah, I don't screw into mine at all, they just lie on the flat aluminium that goes from the front to the back of the Dexion slotted square steel verticals. If necessary we use drywall screws but even with pro drilling etc. it can still split. F.Y.I. and further enlightenment read here http://www.geoffswoodwork.co.uk/book%20weights.htm That's not that useful for bookshelves, it would be better to give the shelf thickness needed for various spans and woods. On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:17:40 PM UTC, stuart noble wrote: The bottom boxes (35cm internal height) are tall enough for box file (I haven't 100% decided on dimensions yet). They will likely be filled with magazine archives - ie will be heavy. I need to be sure they will take the weight without bowing. (They'll also have the weight of the upper boxes to support.) If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. By constructing it from boxes laid out like bricks (ie each row is 50% offset from the ones either side of it) I end up with quite short gaps between verticals without making the shelves too short, which should lend strength. However this is all speculation from a software engineer with no experience of constructing projects like this so if anyone thinks I'm taking a big risk let me know! Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell of a lot heavier than books. I'm sure you have a plan for the assembly but FWIW I'd have the whole lot cut to size by a timber merchant, Absolutely! In fact it was partly my lack of skill when it comes to cutting timber that lead to the design - this is very easy to get supplied almost in kit form just from a set of measurements. Aside from treating the MDF, all I should need to do is to put in 2 or 3 screws on each edge and either pin or staple the backs on. Given that I have a lot of nearly identical boxes to make, I may even make up a jig to hold the sides in place while I screw them together. Clamping a piece of the shelving to the sides gives you a "ledge" to sit the cross piece on. If screwing thorough the sides into the edges, these might be useful http://www.screwfix.com/p/mdf-tite-s...equestid=54415 but I've found drywall screws just as good. Standard woodscrews tend to be a bit too fat, and will swell the mdf if not 100% accurately positioned. Oh, and get one of those combination bits that do the hole and the countersink in one. Then, with a jig, you can pre-drill all the sides accurately in one operation. You don't want to be doing that by eye! [...] and treat yourself to an electric stapler. Great for putting the backs on and holding the four sides in position if you're working alone I wondered about this too. It wouldn't be worth me spending a lot on one though as this could well be the only time it gets used. I can get a cheap one for about £20 with 1000 staples and 1000 nails, or a Stanley one for twice that - is it worth it? I've had a Bosch for years and wouldn't be without it. Takes generic staples too, so you're not tied in to expensive Bosch stuff. IME forget the nail option on cheap tools, they misfire so often it'll drive you crazy. |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
"Rod Speed" wrote in message ... "Geoff Pearson" wrote in message ... "stuart noble" wrote in message ... The bottom boxes (35cm internal height) are tall enough for box file (I haven't 100% decided on dimensions yet). They will likely be filled with magazine archives - ie will be heavy. I need to be sure they will take the weight without bowing. (They'll also have the weight of the upper boxes to support.) If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. By constructing it from boxes laid out like bricks (ie each row is 50% offset from the ones either side of it) I end up with quite short gaps between verticals without making the shelves too short, which should lend strength. However this is all speculation from a software engineer with no experience of constructing projects like this so if anyone thinks I'm taking a big risk let me know! Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell of a lot heavier than books. I'm sure you have a plan for the assembly but FWIW I'd have the whole lot cut to size by a timber merchant, Absolutely! In fact it was partly my lack of skill when it comes to cutting timber that lead to the design - this is very easy to get supplied almost in kit form just from a set of measurements. Aside from treating the MDF, all I should need to do is to put in 2 or 3 screws on each edge and either pin or staple the backs on. Given that I have a lot of nearly identical boxes to make, I may even make up a jig to hold the sides in place while I screw them together. Clamping a piece of the shelving to the sides gives you a "ledge" to sit the cross piece on. If screwing thorough the sides into the edges, these might be useful http://www.screwfix.com/p/mdf-tite-s...equestid=54415 but I've found drywall screws just as good. Standard woodscrews tend to be a bit too fat, and will swell the mdf if not 100% accurately positioned. Oh, and get one of those combination bits that do the hole and the countersink in one. Then, with a jig, you can pre-drill all the sides accurately in one operation. You don't want to be doing that by eye! [...] and treat yourself to an electric stapler. Great for putting the backs on and holding the four sides in position if you're working alone I wondered about this too. It wouldn't be worth me spending a lot on one though as this could well be the only time it gets used. I can get a cheap one for about £20 with 1000 staples and 1000 nails, or a Stanley one for twice that - is it worth it? I've had a Bosch for years and wouldn't be without it. Takes generic staples too, so you're not tied in to expensive Bosch stuff. IME forget the nail option on cheap tools, they misfire so often it'll drive you crazy. I have bookshelves in 18mm mdf - they have bowed under the weight at 750mm length. MDF is not as rigid as it looks. That's the other reason I prefer to use the 25mm square slotted steel tube verticals, you can space those closer so you can use the much cheaper MDF and not get any bowing. I did that with the pantry, with 12mm melamine coated MDF 580mm Sorry, just measured it, the MDF must be 15mm, the overall with the melamine coating is about 18mm between verticals, 330mm deep shelves. Those handle the 4 deep 600ml glass jars that I do the marmalade and relish in 200 of them in the case of the marmalade, without any bowing in years now. Pine is stiffer - shelves that long stay straight. Yes, but its much more expensive, its cheaper to have more verticals the way I do bookshelves and other shelves. Not as easy to do in his case with his boxes either. |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
wrote
stuart noble wrote I've done a bit of this for my siblings over the years, mainly 15mm, and the various finishes they were threatening to use never materialised. That neutral, scruffy mdf look grows on you. Any clear finish tends to give them a dark tan "wet" look, which is not very appealing on mdf. Try it on a scrap first. I have some MDF shelves that were varnished (to protect the MDF not for effect) and as you say, the effect grows on you. Yeah, I don't mine the effect at all myself, but presumably it doesn't grow on everyone. But that was stuck in an office, this is going to be a "feature" in a spare bedroom that is supposed to become more of a library/snug, so I want to at least try to make something "nice". Using veneered MDF is obviously a lot more expensive, but is somewhat offset by the saving in varnish and would be a considerable time saving, for a much better end result, which is why I'm leaning that way at the moment. So why not use 18mm ply instead of MDF ? Sixty boxes? Blimey, you're going to waste a lot of space with the thickness of the mdf. I prefer to make half a dozen modules with shelf supports so that you can change the spacing. There always seems to be one thing that's slightly too tall for any of the boxes. The bottom boxes (35cm internal height) are tall enough for box file (I haven't 100% decided on dimensions yet). They will likely be filled with magazine archives - ie will be heavy. I need to be sure they will take the weight without bowing. (They'll also have the weight of the upper boxes to support.) My gut feeling is that the upper box weight should not be a major problem with your brick approach. Never tried it tho. If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. By constructing it from boxes laid out like bricks (ie each row is 50% offset from the ones either side of it) Trouble with that approach is the end of each row. You'll either have every second row with a gap half a box wide at each end, or have every row with half a box gap at alternating ends. I end up with quite short gaps between verticals without making the shelves too short, which should lend strength. However this is all speculation from a software engineer with no experience of constructing projects like this so if anyone thinks I'm taking a big risk let me know! I'm sure you have a plan for the assembly but FWIW I'd have the whole lot cut to size by a timber merchant, Absolutely! In fact it was partly my lack of skill when it comes to cutting timber that lead to the design - this is very easy to get supplied almost in kit form just from a set of measurements. Aside from treating the MDF, all I should need to do is to put in 2 or 3 screws on each edge and either pin or staple the backs on. Given that I have a lot of nearly identical boxes to make, I may even make up a jig to hold the sides in place while I screw them together. [...] and treat yourself to an electric stapler. Great for putting the backs on and holding the four sides in position if you're working alone I wondered about this too. It wouldn't be worth me spending a lot on one though as this could well be the only time it gets used. I can get a cheap one for about £20 with 1000 staples and 1000 nails, or a Stanley one for twice that - is it worth it? You could go for the more expensive one and flog it on ebay when you're done. |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
That ties in with what I figured, hence using 18mm MDF doubled up. But I think I may still be overdoing it - the box width is 40cm but by staggering them it is supported underneath at the midpoint, but then it is also taking weight from above at its own midpoint which works against it.... As long as the bottoms rest on the floor, you'll be ok Even so, 18mm doubled is 36mm (1.5"). 12mm doubled to give me 24mm (1") would surely be enough, wouldn't it? (it's a big project to get wrong!) I would not be a big fan of screwing into mdf. If necessary we use drywall screws but even with pro drilling etc. it can still split. That is another advantage of the thicker MDF - I'm going to be quite a long way from the edges. This could be where I'd regret having 12mm. It's 15mm you need. You can screw into the edge, but it doesn't look ungainly. Just so we're clear, the design is something like this: ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- .. with the span between uprights 40cm, and because each box is independently constructed from 18mm MDF each horizontal and vertical is actually two adjacent 18mm pieces, ie 36mm total) I think you could store car engines on that :-) |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On 12/02/2013 14:57, harry wrote:
There is special primer paint for MDF. Other paints allow pinholes to form as they dry. Certainly seen that claimed several times. But when I painted lots of MDF shelves, I used ordinary emulsion - rollered on - two or three coats. And a topcoat of quite a good water-based acrylic floor "varnish" (got from Screwfix - made somewhere in Essex, IIRC). Excellent, remarkably tough finish - though had to dispose of some recently and they looked immaculate as they were turfed into skip at dump. -- Rod |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
In article , Tim Watts
writes On Tuesday 12 February 2013 08:51 wrote in uk.d-i- y: I'm about to start a project which basically involves building lots of MDF boxes then stacking them in a brick-like fashion to make a wall-to-wall bookshelf. snip What's the best way to treat the "invisible" edges? I'm thinking both in terms of the product and the method - snip A couple of people have suggested diluted PVA to seal the edges, which would certainly be cheap but would it work? (The shelves will be going into a bedroom so I don't expect them to be damp.) I would not - the water content will swell the MDF. Perhaps a diluted polyurethane varnish, spirit based? What about clear cellulose dope? -- Chris Holford |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On 12/02/2013 18:47, stuart noble wrote:
That ties in with what I figured, hence using 18mm MDF doubled up. But I think I may still be overdoing it - the box width is 40cm but by staggering them it is supported underneath at the midpoint, but then it is also taking weight from above at its own midpoint which works against it.... As long as the bottoms rest on the floor, you'll be ok Even so, 18mm doubled is 36mm (1.5"). 12mm doubled to give me 24mm (1") would surely be enough, wouldn't it? (it's a big project to get wrong!) I would not be a big fan of screwing into mdf. If necessary we use drywall screws but even with pro drilling etc. it can still split. That is another advantage of the thicker MDF - I'm going to be quite a long way from the edges. This could be where I'd regret having 12mm. It's 15mm you need. You can screw into the edge, but it doesn't look ungainly. Just so we're clear, the design is something like this: ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- .. with the span between uprights 40cm, and because each box is independently constructed from 18mm MDF each horizontal and vertical is actually two adjacent 18mm pieces, ie 36mm total) I think you could store car engines on that :-) My bookshelves are 50 and 60cm supports with 15mm chip with a laminate coating. They don't bend enough to notice. That design seems to have the uprights staggered. I think it would be better if they went all the way to the floor, else the load from the upper shelf is carried by the shelf below and not transferred through an upright. Andy |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 6:25:26 PM UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
So why not use 18mm ply instead of MDF ? Is "never crossed my mind" a good reason? I'll add that to my list of possibilities. [...] Trouble with that approach is the end of each row. You'll either have every second row with a gap half a box wide at each end, or have every row with half a box gap at alternating ends. That's correct, and from my attempts at drawing something up is part of it's charm (the room is 7.5 boxes wide, so the end box at alternating ends will be 50% width). You could go for the more expensive one and flog it on ebay when you're done. Looking on eBay I can get the Stanley for £20 anyway. I know that's not going to be the best stapler in the world but should do the job? -- Mark |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 6:47:00 PM UTC, stuart noble wrote:
It's 15mm you need. You can screw into the edge, but it doesn't look ungainly. Thanks, I'll get the timber merchant to price that. It also crossed my mind that the smaller boxes at the top may not need to be the same thickness but I'd need to mock something up on my PC to see what it would look like. (Any recommendations for a sort of CAD "Lite" for this sort of job much appreciated.) [...] I think you could store car engines on that :-) I did say it might be overkill! -- Mark |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 9:12:56 AM UTC, Andy Champ wrote:
That design seems to have the uprights staggered. I think it would be better if they went all the way to the floor, else the load from the upper shelf is carried by the shelf below and not transferred through an upright. Structurally I can't decide whether you're right or not - I'm 50% on the side of staggered being better, and 50% on the side of it being worse. But I prefer the stacked brick look so I guess my goal would be to find a way to make it strong enough, rather than change it to use thinner materials. Within reason, of-course - if the design is simply not workable I need to go back to the drawing board. -- Mark |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
"Andy Champ" wrote in message . uk... On 12/02/2013 18:47, stuart noble wrote: That ties in with what I figured, hence using 18mm MDF doubled up. But I think I may still be overdoing it - the box width is 40cm but by staggering them it is supported underneath at the midpoint, but then it is also taking weight from above at its own midpoint which works against it.... As long as the bottoms rest on the floor, you'll be ok Even so, 18mm doubled is 36mm (1.5"). 12mm doubled to give me 24mm (1") would surely be enough, wouldn't it? (it's a big project to get wrong!) I would not be a big fan of screwing into mdf. If necessary we use drywall screws but even with pro drilling etc. it can still split. That is another advantage of the thicker MDF - I'm going to be quite a long way from the edges. This could be where I'd regret having 12mm. It's 15mm you need. You can screw into the edge, but it doesn't look ungainly. Just so we're clear, the design is something like this: ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | ---------------------------------------------- .. with the span between uprights 40cm, and because each box is independently constructed from 18mm MDF each horizontal and vertical is actually two adjacent 18mm pieces, ie 36mm total) I think you could store car engines on that :-) My bookshelves are 50 and 60cm supports with 15mm chip with a laminate coating. They don't bend enough to notice. That design seems to have the uprights staggered. I think it would be better if they went all the way to the floor, else the load from the upper shelf is carried by the shelf below and not transferred through an upright. He's doing it with boxes tho, so it should work fine apart from having double thickness horizontals etc. |
#26
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
Mark Rogers wrote
Rod Speed wrote So why not use 18mm ply instead of MDF ? Is "never crossed my mind" a good reason? Yep. I'll add that to my list of possibilities. Not as cheap as MDF but likely cheaper than veneered MDF. Trouble with that approach is the end of each row. You'll either have every second row with a gap half a box wide at each end, or have every row with half a box gap at alternating ends. That's correct, and from my attempts at drawing something up is part of it's charm (the room is 7.5 boxes wide, so the end box at alternating ends will be 50% width). On further thought I guess it doesn't really matter because the end gaps are like a box without the wall side to the 'box' You could go for the more expensive one and flog it on ebay when you're done. Looking on eBay I can get the Stanley for £20 anyway. Yeah, didn't think of that. I know that's not going to be the best stapler in the world but should do the job? Dunno, don't have any personal experience with those. I am more into welded steel with drop in melamine faced MDF instead of doing stuff with MDF myself so I don't need to nail anything at all. Even the house oregon facia board uses plated gutter bolts into angle iron verticals welded to the galvanised steel beams that are part of the Stramit ceiling/roof system and the timber rafters for the flat metal decking roof are bolted to the top of those galvanised steel beams. |
#27
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 02:30:20 -0800 (PST),
wrote: If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. You might find the Sagulator http://www.woodbin.com/calcs/sagulator.htm useful. |
#28
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:30:51 AM UTC, Peter Parry wrote:
http://www.woodbin.com/calcs/sagulator.htm Thanks, I'd used that before ages ago but forgotten where to find it. I've now pretty much convinced myself, based on advice here, to go with ply instead of MDF. Birch ply looks pretty good (better than MDF anyway!) and should be stronger. Using the Sagulator, 500kg/ft on my 40cm spans, even at 12mm (not 12mm doubled up), produces only 0.01mm sag/ft, so I think that even for the biggest boxes 12mm ply should do what I need? (Again, remember that's 12mm for the box construction so the actual shelf thickness would be twice that.) Also, I assume that ply would not need to be treated for preservation purposes, so treatment becomes just a matter of aesthetics? And that it should be easier to (eg) varnish than MDF? The only big question, if the above assumptions are correct, is how to secure the corner joints - I assume that screwing into the ends of the ply isn't a great idea? Would long(ish) nails be better? As far as I can see, 12mm birch ply will cost me about the same as 12mm veneered MDF, and give me a "real" wood finish, extra strength, and easier treatment into the bargain, so it feels like a no brainer.... (Someone is about to tell me I'm wrong!) -- Mark |
#29
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 6:15:31 PM UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote in message ... "Geoff Pearson" wrote in message ... "stuart noble" wrote in message ... The bottom boxes (35cm internal height) are tall enough for box file (I haven't 100% decided on dimensions yet). They will likely be filled with magazine archives - ie will be heavy. I need to be sure they will take the weight without bowing. (They'll also have the weight of the upper boxes to support.) If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. By constructing it from boxes laid out like bricks (ie each row is 50% offset from the ones either side of it) I end up with quite short gaps between verticals without making the shelves too short, which should lend strength. However this is all speculation from a software engineer with no experience of constructing projects like this so if anyone thinks I'm taking a big risk let me know! Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell of a lot heavier than books. I'm sure you have a plan for the assembly but FWIW I'd have the whole lot cut to size by a timber merchant, Absolutely! In fact it was partly my lack of skill when it comes to cutting timber that lead to the design - this is very easy to get supplied almost in kit form just from a set of measurements. Aside from treating the MDF, all I should need to do is to put in 2 or 3 screws on each edge and either pin or staple the backs on. Given that I have a lot of nearly identical boxes to make, I may even make up a jig to hold the sides in place while I screw them together. Clamping a piece of the shelving to the sides gives you a "ledge" to sit the cross piece on. If screwing thorough the sides into the edges, these might be useful http://www.screwfix.com/p/mdf-tite-s...equestid=54415 but I've found drywall screws just as good. Standard woodscrews tend to be a bit too fat, and will swell the mdf if not 100% accurately positioned. Oh, and get one of those combination bits that do the hole and the countersink in one. Then, with a jig, you can pre-drill all the sides accurately in one operation. You don't want to be doing that by eye! [...] and treat yourself to an electric stapler. Great for putting the backs on and holding the four sides in position if you're working alone I wondered about this too. It wouldn't be worth me spending a lot on one though as this could well be the only time it gets used. I can get a cheap one for about £20 with 1000 staples and 1000 nails, or a Stanley one for twice that - is it worth it? I've had a Bosch for years and wouldn't be without it. Takes generic staples too, so you're not tied in to expensive Bosch stuff. IME forget the nail option on cheap tools, they misfire so often it'll drive you crazy. I have bookshelves in 18mm mdf - they have bowed under the weight at 750mm length. MDF is not as rigid as it looks. That's the other reason I prefer to use the 25mm square slotted steel tube verticals, you can space those closer so you can use the much cheaper MDF and not get any bowing. I did that with the pantry, with 12mm melamine coated MDF 580mm Sorry, just measured it, the MDF must be 15mm, the overall with the melamine coating is about 18mm between verticals, 330mm deep shelves. Those handle the 4 deep 600ml glass jars that I do the marmalade and relish in 200 of them in the case of the marmalade, without any bowing in years now. Pine is stiffer - shelves that long stay straight. Yes, but its much more expensive, its cheaper to have more verticals the way I do bookshelves and other shelves. Not as easy to do in his case with his boxes either. Melamine film is paper thin. In fact melamine faced board as supplied in untrimmed format will rapidly give paper cuts if not handled with gloves. No way would it equal 1.5mm per face. Even if it was a natural wood veneer it would not be 1.5mm thick, and the thickest, and far from being very common, Formica is only 1.1mm thick. What you have is 18mm board plain and simple.. The o.p. mentioned spanning 1m with 15mm board and claimed this would carry a load of dishes. This now seems to have changed to 18mm board spanning 580mm. Quite do-able. |
#30
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 12:38:13 PM UTC, Mark Rogers wrote:
snip Ply sounds good and will look a lot better. I know it may not be the effect you want but I would be inclined to run horizontals the full width, or as wide as possible, and insert verticals in the appropriate places. Board will carry a heavier load when the ends are cantilevered as opposed to being held by the ends only. As you are staggering the uprights it would be a simple matter to screw through them into the verticals. |
#31
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
Mark Rogers wrote
Peter Parry wrote http://www.woodbin.com/calcs/sagulator.htm Thanks, I'd used that before ages ago but forgotten where to find it. Yeah, when I tried to add it to my favourites, it said its already there |-) I've now pretty much convinced myself, based on advice here, to go with ply instead of MDF. Birch ply looks pretty good (better than MDF anyway!) and should be stronger. And easier to screw into too. Using the Sagulator, 500kg/ft on my 40cm spans, even at 12mm (not 12mm doubled up), produces only 0.01mm sag/ft, so I think that even for the biggest boxes 12mm ply should do what I need? Yep. (Again, remember that's 12mm for the box construction so the actual shelf thickness would be twice that.) Yeah, they'll be fine, it's a lot stiffer than MDF. Also, I assume that ply would not need to be treated for preservation purposes, so treatment becomes just a matter of aesthetics? Yep. And that it should be easier to (eg) varnish than MDF? I doubt there would much in that. The only big question, if the above assumptions are correct, is how to secure the corner joints - I assume that screwing into the ends of the ply isn't a great idea? Would long(ish) nails be better? Pass, like I said, I'm not really into wood joints. As far as I can see, 12mm birch ply will cost me about the same as 12mm veneered MDF, and give me a "real" wood finish, extra strength, and easier treatment into the bargain, so it feels like a no brainer.... Yep. (Someone is about to tell me I'm wrong!) I doubt it. |
#32
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 1:44:56 PM UTC, fred wrote:
Ply sounds good and will look a lot better. Thanks I know it may not be the effect you want but I would be inclined to run horizontals the full width, or as wide as possible, and insert verticals in the appropriate places. Board will carry a heavier load when the ends are cantilevered as opposed to being held by the ends only. As you are staggering the uprights it would be a simple matter to screw through them into the verticals. I haven't ruled this out. The effect can be gained anyway by still using two 12mm lengths on top of each other, with small cuts on the outer edge where the verticals are (just 1mm into the wood would give the effect of it being a separate piece). Alternatively I could switch to 25mm ply, without doubling anything up, and look at the ply as being the "mortar" between the brick-shaped "holes" - I need to try and mock this up. The only major question I have left is how to do the joins. I've just invested in a basic 18ga nail gun (15-35mm nails or 15-30mm staples), which I think would probably be better than screws? Almost all the stresses should be pushing downwards such that everything would probably be fairly stable without any screws or nails anyway (albeit very hard to construct in the first place), and any sheer there is should be countered by having backs on the units? -- Mark |
#33
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
"fred" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 6:15:31 PM UTC, Rod Speed wrote: "Rod Speed" wrote in message ... "Geoff Pearson" wrote in message ... "stuart noble" wrote in message ... The bottom boxes (35cm internal height) are tall enough for box file (I haven't 100% decided on dimensions yet). They will likely be filled with magazine archives - ie will be heavy. I need to be sure they will take the weight without bowing. (They'll also have the weight of the upper boxes to support.) If I could be convinced that a thinner MDF would suffice I'd drop down a size - with 18mm I'm playing it safe. By constructing it from boxes laid out like bricks (ie each row is 50% offset from the ones either side of it) I end up with quite short gaps between verticals without making the shelves too short, which should lend strength. However this is all speculation from a software engineer with no experience of constructing projects like this so if anyone thinks I'm taking a big risk let me know! Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell of a lot heavier than books. I'm sure you have a plan for the assembly but FWIW I'd have the whole lot cut to size by a timber merchant, Absolutely! In fact it was partly my lack of skill when it comes to cutting timber that lead to the design - this is very easy to get supplied almost in kit form just from a set of measurements. Aside from treating the MDF, all I should need to do is to put in 2 or 3 screws on each edge and either pin or staple the backs on. Given that I have a lot of nearly identical boxes to make, I may even make up a jig to hold the sides in place while I screw them together. Clamping a piece of the shelving to the sides gives you a "ledge" to sit the cross piece on. If screwing thorough the sides into the edges, these might be useful http://www.screwfix.com/p/mdf-tite-s...equestid=54415 but I've found drywall screws just as good. Standard woodscrews tend to be a bit too fat, and will swell the mdf if not 100% accurately positioned. Oh, and get one of those combination bits that do the hole and the countersink in one. Then, with a jig, you can pre-drill all the sides accurately in one operation. You don't want to be doing that by eye! [...] and treat yourself to an electric stapler. Great for putting the backs on and holding the four sides in position if you're working alone I wondered about this too. It wouldn't be worth me spending a lot on one though as this could well be the only time it gets used. I can get a cheap one for about £20 with 1000 staples and 1000 nails, or a Stanley one for twice that - is it worth it? I've had a Bosch for years and wouldn't be without it. Takes generic staples too, so you're not tied in to expensive Bosch stuff. IME forget the nail option on cheap tools, they misfire so often it'll drive you crazy. I have bookshelves in 18mm mdf - they have bowed under the weight at 750mm length. MDF is not as rigid as it looks. That's the other reason I prefer to use the 25mm square slotted steel tube verticals, you can space those closer so you can use the much cheaper MDF and not get any bowing. I did that with the pantry, with 12mm melamine coated MDF 580mm Sorry, just measured it, the MDF must be 15mm, the overall with the melamine coating is about 18mm between verticals, 330mm deep shelves. Those handle the 4 deep 600ml glass jars that I do the marmalade and relish in 200 of them in the case of the marmalade, without any bowing in years now. Pine is stiffer - shelves that long stay straight. Yes, but its much more expensive, its cheaper to have more verticals the way I do bookshelves and other shelves. Not as easy to do in his case with his boxes either. Melamine film is paper thin. This stuff isnt. Its not as thick as the much thicker laminex, but is thicker than paper, about as thick as the thinnest card stock. In fact melamine faced board as supplied in untrimmed format will rapidly give paper cuts if not handled with gloves. I don't get that problem with the edges that I have cut it to length. No way would it equal 1.5mm per face. Even if it was a natural wood veneer it would not be 1.5mm thick, and the thickest, and far from being very common, Formica is only 1.1mm thick. What you have is 18mm board plain and simple. I've just measured it again, and its actually 16mm. The o.p. mentioned spanning 1m with 15mm board and claimed this would carry a load of dishes. The OP never said anything about dishes, This now seems to have changed to 18mm board spanning 580mm. Quite do-able. Nope, its actually 16mm spanning 580mm. |
#34
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On 13/02/2013 12:38, Mark Rogers wrote:
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:30:51 AM UTC, Peter Parry wrote: http://www.woodbin.com/calcs/sagulator.htm Thanks, I'd used that before ages ago but forgotten where to find it. I've now pretty much convinced myself, based on advice here, to go with ply instead of MDF. Birch ply looks pretty good The birch ply *faces* look great, the edges....er....not great at all. |
#35
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 3:07:43 PM UTC, stuart noble wrote:
The birch ply *faces* look great, the edges....er....not great at all. I actually don't mind them (it has more "character" than MDF anyway). But adding an edging isn't too big a deal if I decide it bothers me. |
#36
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 2:14:00 PM UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
snip. Melamine film is paper thin. This stuff isnt. Its not as thick as the much thicker laminex, but is thicker than paper, about as thick as the thinnest card stock. Well given that you had problems measuring the overall thickness of the board (first 15mm?? Then 18mm ?? and now 16mm?? I'm astonished you can measure the thickness of the laminate. In fact melamine faced board as supplied in untrimmed format will rapidly give paper cuts if not handled with gloves. I don't get that problem with the edges that I have cut it to length. Read what I said. I somehow doubt you are dealing with untrimmed sheets. In fact I doubt if you ever saw one. No way would it equal 1.5mm per face. Even if it was a natural wood veneer it would not be 1.5mm thick, and the thickest, and far from being very common, Formica is only 1.1mm thick. What you have is 18mm board plain and simple. I've just measured it again, and its actually 16mm. See above The o.p. mentioned spanning 1m with 15mm board and claimed this would carry a load of dishes. The OP never said anything about dishes, Quote ' Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell ' I've no intention of arguing semantics ( http://www.thefreedictionary.com/semantics) with you. This now seems to have changed to 18mm board spanning 580mm. Quite do-able. Nope, its actually 16mm spanning 580mm. When you're in a hole stop digging. |
#37
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On 13/02/2013 14:00, Mark Rogers wrote:
Alternatively I could switch to 25mm ply, without doubling anything up, and look at the ply as being the "mortar" between the brick-shaped "holes" - I need to try and mock this up 25mm ply _would_ carry car engines. The bottom of my boat is 12mm, and feels solid as rock (though it does have interesting curves), but that's mostly to get the weight up to the class limit. Most are 6mm, and people run about on them. Unlike chipboard it doesn't creep with age. (Don't know whether or not MDF does) Andy |
#38
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
Mark Rogers wrote
stuart noble wrote The birch ply *faces* look great, the edges....er....not great at all. I actually don't mind them Yeah, I have one that someone else made, just a single piece which was intended to drop into a steel frame where the edge isnt visible and the edges look fine. It is estapoled tho. (it has more "character" than MDF anyway). Yeah, the MDF shelves that I painted, 19mm, I filled with filler before painting them with white water based paint. Quite a bit more work than just painting. But adding an edging isn't too big a deal if I decide it bothers me. |
#39
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
fred wrote
Rod Speed wrote Melamine film is paper thin. This stuff isnt. Its not as thick as the much thicker laminex, but is thicker than paper, about as thick as the thinnest card stock. Well given that you had problems measuring the overall thickness of the board (first 15mm?? Then 18mm ?? and now 16mm?? The original 15mm was a guess, not a measurement. The second one was a guess too, just noticed it was more than 15. I'm astonished you can measure the thickness of the laminate. Even you should be able to measure the actual thickness of the whole thing. No way would it equal 1.5mm per face. Even if it was a natural wood veneer it would not be 1.5mm thick, and the thickest, and far from being very common, Formica is only 1.1mm thick. What you have is 18mm board plain and simple. I've just measured it again, and its actually 16mm. See above See above. The o.p. mentioned spanning 1m with 15mm board and claimed this would carry a load of dishes. The OP never said anything about dishes, Quote ' Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell ' That's not the OP, that's someone else. I've no intention of arguing semantics ( http://www.thefreedictionary.com/semantics) with you. You just did. This now seems to have changed to 18mm board spanning 580mm. Quite do-able. Nope, its actually 16mm spanning 580mm. When you're in a hole stop digging. You're one in the hole with your claim about mine being 18mm and that the OP said anything about dishes. |
#40
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Treating MDF
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 6:34:49 PM UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
fred wrote Rod Speed wrote Melamine film is paper thin. This stuff isnt. Its not as thick as the much thicker laminex, but is thicker than paper, about as thick as the thinnest card stock. Well given that you had problems measuring the overall thickness of the board (first 15mm?? Then 18mm ?? and now 16mm?? The original 15mm was a guess, not a measurement. The second one was a guess too, just noticed it was more than 15. I'm astonished you can measure the thickness of the laminate. Even you should be able to measure the actual thickness of the whole thing. No way would it equal 1.5mm per face. Even if it was a natural wood veneer it would not be 1.5mm thick, and the thickest, and far from being very common, Formica is only 1.1mm thick. What you have is 18mm board plain and simple. I've just measured it again, and its actually 16mm. See above See above. The o.p. mentioned spanning 1m with 15mm board and claimed this would carry a load of dishes. The OP never said anything about dishes, Quote ' Most kitchen unit shelves are 15mm chip, and an unsupported span of a metre is pretty normal. Mine are stacked with crockery, which is a hell ' That's not the OP, that's someone else. I've no intention of arguing semantics ( http://www.thefreedictionary.com/semantics) with you. You just did. This now seems to have changed to 18mm board spanning 580mm. Quite do-able. Nope, its actually 16mm spanning 580mm. When you're in a hole stop digging. You're one in the hole with your claim about mine being 18mm and that the OP said anything about dishes. You're nit picking my dear boy. Regrettably indication of an E.S.N. I'll leave you alone now. Its not fair to pick on the afflicted. More to be pitied than laughed at. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Post fab treating | Metalworking | |||
treating fence | UK diy | |||
Treating Fence | UK diy | |||
Treating knots | UK diy | |||
Treating a well | Home Repair |