2000 Raspberry Pi's are now in the UK.You can see pictures of them leaving
the factory in China here; http://www.raspberrypi.org/
LOL

In message m, brass
monkey wrote
2000 Raspberry Pi's are now in the UK.You can see pictures of them leaving
the factory in China here; http://www.raspberrypi.org/
LOL

They don't even know if it can be sold in the EU or if the whole batch
will have to be scrapped.

Back in the real world, increasingly it looks like RS and Farnell are
attempting to sell vapourware.


--
Alan
news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

On Mar 31, 6:44*am, Alan wrote:

They don't even know if it can be sold in the EU or if the whole batch
will have to be scrapped.

Why, what's the problem with them?

On Mar 31, 7:57*pm, David Paste wrote:
On Mar 31, 6:44*am, Alan wrote:

They don't even know if it can be sold in the EU or if the whole batch
will have to be scrapped.

Why, what's the problem with them?

In short nothing.

They need CE marks before they can be sold.

Philip

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 06:44:42 +0100, Alan
wrote:


They don't even know if it can be sold in the EU or if the whole batch
will have to be scrapped.

Back in the real world, increasingly it looks like RS and Farnell are
attempting to sell vapourware.

Had a message from Farnell yesterday saying that they are assisting
with the CE testing and inviting me to place an order.

On Mar 31, 9:53*pm, " wrote:

In short nothing.

They need CE marks before they can be sold.

Philip

Is this a difficult thing to get? I have seen some utter utter crap on
sale on these glorious shores, so I can't believe it's particularly
difficult to get. Or is it a case of brown envelopes, sir?

On Mar 31, 9:53*pm, " wrote:
On Mar 31, 7:57*pm, David Paste wrote:

On Mar 31, 6:44*am, Alan wrote:

They don't even know if it can be sold in the EU or if the whole batch
will have to be scrapped.

Why, what's the problem with them?

In short nothing.

They need CE marks before they can be sold.

It can go on the packaging or the documentation.

Oh, you mean they haven't even been *tested*, or at least self
certified? What a cock-up.

MBQ

On Apr 2, 8:36*pm, "Man at B&Q" wrote:
On Mar 31, 9:53*pm, " wrote:

On Mar 31, 7:57*pm, David Paste wrote:

On Mar 31, 6:44*am, Alan wrote:

They don't even know if it can be sold in the EU or if the whole batch
will have to be scrapped.

Why, what's the problem with them?

In short nothing.

They need CE marks before they can be sold.

It can go on the packaging or the documentation.

Oh, you mean they haven't even been *tested*, or at least self
certified? What a cock-up.

MBQ

You don't want to go actually testing them, you never know what you
might find actually slapping a label on them and producing a
declaration of conformity is much easier

They were hoping they wouldn't have to CE mark them as they a
component part

Martin

David Paste wrote:
On Mar 31, 6:44 am, Alan wrote:

They don't even know if it can be sold in the EU or if the whole batch
will have to be scrapped.

Why, what's the problem with them?
production boys used cheaper non isolating sockets on the Ethernet. puts
a voltage on the ethernet and can destroy other kit.


--
To people who know nothing, anything is possible.
To people who know too much, it is a sad fact
that they know how little is really possible -
and how hard it is to achieve it.

On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:50:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

David Paste wrote:
On Mar 31, 6:44 am, Alan wrote:

They don't even know if it can be sold in the EU or if the whole batch
will have to be scrapped.

Why, what's the problem with them?
production boys used cheaper non isolating sockets on the Ethernet. puts
a voltage on the ethernet and can destroy other kit.

No, this is a separate problem. It's the CE problem...they understood
that they could sell them without CE because they were 'unfinished' (not
in cases, etc.). They've now been told that is not so.



--
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

*lightning protection* - a w_tom conductor

"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
David Paste wrote:
On Mar 31, 6:44 am, Alan wrote:

They don't even know if it can be sold in the EU or if the whole batch
will have to be scrapped.

Why, what's the problem with them?
production boys used cheaper non isolating sockets on the Ethernet. puts a
voltage on the ethernet and can destroy other kit.

Rubbish.
The other kit will have the isolating transformers so it is safe.
The Pi might get killed by PoE.

On Monday, April 2, 2012 10:14:54 PM UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:

The Pi might get killed by PoE.

PoE? What's that?

David Paste wrote:
On Monday, April 2, 2012 10:14:54 PM UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:

The Pi might get killed by PoE.

PoE? What's that?

Proably this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet

but what it has to do with a Pi I have no idea..but then it is dennis
who said it, so its pretty much guaranteed to be more or less a techno
wamk fantasy of some sort.

Dennis likes to drop these this in so he can tell you about something he
read about yesterday...

On the other hand ot might be this

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law

which would seem to apply to what dennis laughingly refers to as his mind.


--
To people who know nothing, anything is possible.
To people who know too much, it is a sad fact
that they know how little is really possible -
and how hard it is to achieve it.

The Natural Philosopher wrote:
David Paste wrote:
On Monday, April 2, 2012 10:14:54 PM UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:

The Pi might get killed by PoE.

PoE? What's that?

Proably this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet

but what it has to do with a Pi I have no idea..but then it is dennis
who said it, so its pretty much guaranteed to be more or less a techno
wamk fantasy of some sort.

Dennis likes to drop these this in so he can tell you about something he
read about yesterday...

On the other hand ot might be this

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law

which would seem to apply to what dennis laughingly refers to as his mind.


Just for once, Dennis got something right. The first batch of Rasperry
Pis were made with non-isolating ethernet sockets, and applying Power
Over Ethernet would fry the board. So they had to delay release while
the factory installed the correct sockets with the built-in isolating
transormer.

--
Tciao for Now!

John.

On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 06:04:59 +0100, John Williamson wrote:

The Natural Philosopher wrote:
David Paste wrote:
On Monday, April 2, 2012 10:14:54 PM UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:

The Pi might get killed by PoE.

PoE? What's that?

Proably this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet

but what it has to do with a Pi I have no idea..but then it is dennis
who said it, so its pretty much guaranteed to be more or less a techno
wamk fantasy of some sort.

Dennis likes to drop these this in so he can tell you about something
he read about yesterday...

On the other hand ot might be this

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law

which would seem to apply to what dennis laughingly refers to as his
mind.


Just for once, Dennis got something right. The first batch of Rasperry
Pis were made with non-isolating ethernet sockets, and applying Power
Over Ethernet would fry the board. So they had to delay release while
the factory installed the correct sockets with the built-in isolating
transormer.

No, that had nothing to do with the CE approval, which is a second
problem. And the one being discussed here.

dennis leapt in with both feet once again.



--
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

*lightning protection* - a w_tom conductor

Bob Eager wrote:

they understood that they could sell them without CE because they
were 'unfinished' (not in cases, etc.). They've now been told that is
not so.

Probably a case of them thinking that would be how they'd do it when the
RPi foundation were going to manufacture an sell themselves, but
RS/Farnell deciding they weren't happy now that *they* are licensed to
do the manufacturing and selling.

John Williamson wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
David Paste wrote:
On Monday, April 2, 2012 10:14:54 PM UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:

The Pi might get killed by PoE.

PoE? What's that?

Proably this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet

but what it has to do with a Pi I have no idea..but then it is dennis
who said it, so its pretty much guaranteed to be more or less a techno
wamk fantasy of some sort.

Dennis likes to drop these this in so he can tell you about something
he read about yesterday...

On the other hand ot might be this

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law

which would seem to apply to what dennis laughingly refers to as his
mind.


Just for once, Dennis got something right. The first batch of Rasperry
Pis were made with non-isolating ethernet sockets, and applying Power
Over Ethernet would fry the board. So they had to delay release while
the factory installed the correct sockets with the built-in isolating
transormer.


No, Deniis still dint get it right.

He said 'the Pi'. Not 'Pis' or 'your Pi' or 'the Pis' any of which
might refer to one or more rasberry Pis. No, he used the term 'the Pi'
which has only one meaning outside of discuussion of a particular board
(which we weren't') and that is the whole company or concept of Rasberry
Pis. And it would be hard to imagine them dying..juts on account of a
batch of faulty production units,.

Secondly if you bother to THINK about it, one thing you can be 100%
sure of in todays H & S culture is that whatever else may or may not be
inside a PoE adapter some way of making sure than mains voltages do not
appear anywhere on the RJ45 socket is likely to be one of them.

So its more likely than not that PoE will actually be far far less
likely to fry one of the faulty units.

Dennis has succeeded in making you take a casual glance and speak
without thinking in his defence: You must be relatively new here or you
would have learnt that the default stance is that anything dennis says
is wrong or ill conceived and understood or badly expressed.

The rare occasion that he is in fact right is usually over something so
well known and trivial, it's not worth commenting on.


--
To people who know nothing, anything is possible.
To people who know too much, it is a sad fact
that they know how little is really possible -
and how hard it is to achieve it.

"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
David Paste wrote:
On Monday, April 2, 2012 10:14:54 PM UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:

The Pi might get killed by PoE.

PoE? What's that?

Proably this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet

but what it has to do with a Pi I have no idea..but then it is dennis who
said it, so its pretty much guaranteed to be more or less a techno wamk
fantasy of some sort.

Typical TNP, can't even remember what has been posted and associate the
missing isolating transformers on the Pi with the possibility of applying a
18+V supply directly across chips on the Pi.
TNP really is becoming more stupid by the post.

"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
John Williamson wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
David Paste wrote:
On Monday, April 2, 2012 10:14:54 PM UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:

The Pi might get killed by PoE.

PoE? What's that?

Proably this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet

but what it has to do with a Pi I have no idea..but then it is dennis
who said it, so its pretty much guaranteed to be more or less a techno
wamk fantasy of some sort.

Dennis likes to drop these this in so he can tell you about something he
read about yesterday...

On the other hand ot might be this

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law

which would seem to apply to what dennis laughingly refers to as his
mind.


Just for once, Dennis got something right. The first batch of Rasperry
Pis were made with non-isolating ethernet sockets, and applying Power
Over Ethernet would fry the board. So they had to delay release while the
factory installed the correct sockets with the built-in isolating
transormer.


No, Deniis still dint get it right.

He said 'the Pi'. Not 'Pis' or 'your Pi' or 'the Pis' any of which might
refer to one or more rasberry Pis. No, he used the term 'the Pi' which has
only one meaning outside of discuussion of a particular board (which we
weren't') and that is the whole company or concept of Rasberry Pis. And it
would be hard to imagine them dying..juts on account of a batch of faulty
production units,.

What cr@p.


Secondly if you bother to THINK about it, one thing you can be 100% sure
of in todays H & S culture is that whatever else may or may not be inside
a PoE adapter some way of making sure than mains voltages do not appear
anywhere on the RJ45 socket is likely to be one of them.

So its more likely than not that PoE will actually be far far less likely
to fry one of the faulty units.

So you think 18+V is not going to affect the Pi chips then.
You really are stupid.


Dennis has succeeded in making you take a casual glance and speak without
thinking in his defence: You must be relatively new here or you would have
learnt that the default stance is that anything dennis says is wrong or
ill conceived and understood or badly expressed.

Where as you are wriggling and hoping nobody will notice your cr@p.


The rare occasion that he is in fact right is usually over something so
well known and trivial, it's not worth commenting on.

Where as you are never right.

dennis@home wrote:


"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
John Williamson wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
David Paste wrote:
On Monday, April 2, 2012 10:14:54 PM UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:

The Pi might get killed by PoE.

PoE? What's that?

Proably this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet

but what it has to do with a Pi I have no idea..but then it is
dennis who said it, so its pretty much guaranteed to be more or less
a techno wamk fantasy of some sort.

Dennis likes to drop these this in so he can tell you about
something he read about yesterday...

On the other hand ot might be this

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law

which would seem to apply to what dennis laughingly refers to as his
mind.


Just for once, Dennis got something right. The first batch of
Rasperry Pis were made with non-isolating ethernet sockets, and
applying Power Over Ethernet would fry the board. So they had to
delay release while the factory installed the correct sockets with
the built-in isolating transormer.


No, Deniis still dint get it right.

He said 'the Pi'. Not 'Pis' or 'your Pi' or 'the Pis' any of which
might refer to one or more rasberry Pis. No, he used the term 'the Pi'
which has only one meaning outside of discuussion of a particular
board (which we weren't') and that is the whole company or concept of
Rasberry Pis. And it would be hard to imagine them dying..juts on
account of a batch of faulty production units,.

What cr@p.


Secondly if you bother to THINK about it, one thing you can be 100%
sure of in todays H & S culture is that whatever else may or may not
be inside a PoE adapter some way of making sure than mains voltages do
not appear anywhere on the RJ45 socket is likely to be one of them.

So its more likely than not that PoE will actually be far far less
likely to fry one of the faulty units.

So you think 18+V is not going to affect the Pi chips then.
You really are stupid.


what 18v would that be dennis? the 18v in your mind?


Dennis has succeeded in making you take a casual glance and speak
without thinking in his defence: You must be relatively new here or
you would have learnt that the default stance is that anything dennis
says is wrong or ill conceived and understood or badly expressed.

Where as you are wriggling and hoping nobody will notice your cr@p.



keep staring at your own refection dennis, you might just turn into a fairy.

The rare occasion that he is in fact right is usually over something
so well known and trivial, it's not worth commenting on.

Where as you are never right.

you dont even understand waht that means.

--
To people who know nothing, anything is possible.
To people who know too much, it is a sad fact
that they know how little is really possible -
and how hard it is to achieve it.

On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:06:03 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

So you think 18+V is not going to affect the Pi chips then.
You really are stupid.

what 18v would that be dennis? the 18v in your mind?

I was wondering that as well. The voltage used to detect the "I'm PoE
capeable" resistor is 2.7 to 10.1v. The full supply voltage, which is
some what higher than 18v, is not supplied until there has been some
handshaking.

--
Cheers
Dave.

On Apr 3, 12:56*am, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:
David Paste wrote:
On Monday, April 2, 2012 10:14:54 PM UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:

The Pi might get killed by PoE.

PoE? What's that?

Proably this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet

but what it has to do with a Pi I have no idea..but then it is dennis
who said it, so its pretty much guaranteed to be more or less a techno
wamk fantasy of some sort.

In this case it's you who hasn't got a clue.

MBQ

On Apr 3, 9:08*am, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:
John Williamson wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
David Paste wrote:
On Monday, April 2, 2012 10:14:54 PM UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:

The Pi might get killed by PoE.

PoE? What's that?

Proably this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet

but what it has to do with a Pi I have no idea..but then it is dennis
who said it, so its pretty much guaranteed to be more or less a techno
wamk fantasy of some sort.

Dennis likes to drop these this in so he can tell you about something
he read about yesterday...

On the other hand ot might be this

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe%27s_Law

which would seem to apply to what dennis laughingly refers to as his
mind.

Just for once, Dennis got something right. The first batch of Rasperry
Pis were made with non-isolating ethernet sockets, and applying Power
Over Ethernet would fry the board. So they had to delay release while
the factory installed the correct sockets with the built-in isolating
transormer.

No, Deniis still dint get it right.

He said 'the Pi'. Not 'Pis' or *'your Pi' or 'the Pis' any of which
might refer to one or more rasberry Pis. No, he used the term 'the Pi'
which has only one meaning outside of discuussion of a particular board
(which we weren't') and that is the whole company or concept of Rasberry
Pis. And it would be hard to imagine them dying..juts on account of a
batch of faulty production units,.

Secondly *if you bother to THINK about it, one thing you can be 100%
sure of in todays H & S culture is that whatever else may or may not be
inside a PoE adapter some way of making sure than mains voltages do not
appear anywhere on the RJ45 socket is likely to be one of them.

Who said anything about mains?

STOP DIGGING NOW

MBQ

"Dave Liquorice" wrote in message
ll.co.uk...
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:06:03 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

So you think 18+V is not going to affect the Pi chips then.
You really are stupid.

what 18v would that be dennis? the 18v in your mind?

I was wondering that as well. The voltage used to detect the "I'm PoE
capeable" resistor is 2.7 to 10.1v. The full supply voltage, which is
some what higher than 18v, is not supplied until there has been some
handshaking.

Well I know that some of them just put ~18V out without any detection.
It won't harm any correctly implemented Ethernet device and it just isn't
worth it for cheap devices.
Have a look at any PoE plug in adapter.

dennis@home wrote:

Well I know that some of them just put ~18V out without any detection.
It won't harm any correctly implemented Ethernet device and it just
isn't worth it for cheap devices.
Have a look at any PoE plug in adapter.

There are some devices that borrow the unused pairs from 10/100 ethernet
and just shove 12V down them in a brute force method, but they are not
802.2af devices, which is what most people would take by PoE now

"Andy Burns" wrote in message
o.uk...
dennis@home wrote:

Well I know that some of them just put ~18V out without any detection.
It won't harm any correctly implemented Ethernet device and it just
isn't worth it for cheap devices.
Have a look at any PoE plug in adapter.

There are some devices that borrow the unused pairs from 10/100 ethernet
and just shove 12V down them in a brute force method, but they are not
802.2af devices, which is what most people would take by PoE now

Is that what Cisco do these days, they weren't compliant last time I looked
a few years ago.

dennis@home wrote:

"Andy Burns" wrote:

There are some devices that borrow the unused pairs from 10/100
ethernet and just shove 12V down them

Is that what Cisco do these days, they weren't compliant last time I
looked a few years ago.

Yes, newer Cisco access points are standards compliant, but some of
their older ones were among those using the dumb method.

brass monkey wrote:

2000 Raspberry Pi's are now in the UK

I got a quick fondle of one today, chap in the office who ordered his on
day one, got it delivered this morning ...

In article ,
Andy Burns wrote:
brass monkey wrote:

2000 Raspberry Pi's are now in the UK

I got a quick fondle of one today, chap in the office who ordered his on
day one, got it delivered this morning ...

Had mine for a couple of weeks now... Intersting little bit of kit!
somewhat slower then I expected, but it's getting there. Fully functional
as a little Linux box (with the addition of cabling, keyboard, mouse, etc.)

Gordon

On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:23:27 +0000 (UTC), Gordon Henderson
wrote:

In article ,
Andy Burns wrote:
brass monkey wrote:

2000 Raspberry Pi's are now in the UK

I got a quick fondle of one today, chap in the office who ordered his on
day one, got it delivered this morning ...

Had mine for a couple of weeks now... Intersting little bit of kit!
somewhat slower then I expected, but it's getting there. Fully functional
as a little Linux box (with the addition of cabling, keyboard, mouse, etc.)

Lucky you. I ordered on day 1 but have been told end of June for
delivery :-(
--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) If a man stands in a forest and no woman is around
(")_(") is he still wrong?

On Mon, 14 May 2012 16:47:36 +0100, Mark wrote:

On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:23:27 +0000 (UTC), Gordon Henderson
wrote:

In article , Andy
Burns wrote:
brass monkey wrote:

2000 Raspberry Pi's are now in the UK

I got a quick fondle of one today, chap in the office who ordered his
on day one, got it delivered this morning ...

Had mine for a couple of weeks now... Intersting little bit of kit!
somewhat slower then I expected, but it's getting there. Fully
functional as a little Linux box (with the addition of cabling,
keyboard, mouse, etc.)

Lucky you. I ordered on day 1 but have been told end of June for
delivery :-(

Mine's coming tomorrow.



--
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

*lightning protection* - a w_tom conductor

On 14/05/2012 18:36, Bob Eager wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 16:47:36 +0100, Mark wrote:

On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:23:27 +0000 (UTC), Gordon Henderson
wrote:

In articleeICdnb2VLtMXdjfSnZ2dnUVZ7oidnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk, Andy
wrote:
brass monkey wrote:

2000 Raspberry Pi's are now in the UK

I got a quick fondle of one today, chap in the office who ordered his
on day one, got it delivered this morning ...

Had mine for a couple of weeks now... Intersting little bit of kit!
somewhat slower then I expected, but it's getting there. Fully
functional as a little Linux box (with the addition of cabling,
keyboard, mouse, etc.)

Lucky you. I ordered on day 1 but have been told end of June for
delivery :-(

Mine's coming tomorrow.

When did you order yours?

(I think mine was ordered at about 4pm on the 29th of Feb)


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

On Mon, 14 May 2012 21:23:37 +0100, John Rumm wrote:

On 14/05/2012 18:36, Bob Eager wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 16:47:36 +0100, Mark wrote:

On Thu, 10 May 2012 08:23:27 +0000 (UTC), Gordon Henderson
wrote:

In articleeICdnb2VLtMXdjfSnZ2dnUVZ7oidnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk, Andy
wrote:
brass monkey wrote:

2000 Raspberry Pi's are now in the UK

I got a quick fondle of one today, chap in the office who ordered
his on day one, got it delivered this morning ...

Had mine for a couple of weeks now... Intersting little bit of kit!
somewhat slower then I expected, but it's getting there. Fully
functional as a little Linux box (with the addition of cabling,
keyboard, mouse, etc.)

Lucky you. I ordered on day 1 but have been told end of June for
delivery :-(

Mine's coming tomorrow.

When did you order yours?

(I think mine was ordered at about 4pm on the 29th of Feb)

0830 on the first morning. There was a lull - I think everyone else was
going to work!

--
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

*lightning protection* - a w_tom conductor

In article ,
Bob Eager wrote:

Lucky you. I ordered on day 1 but have been told end of June for
delivery :-(

Mine's coming tomorrow.

When did you order yours?

(I think mine was ordered at about 4pm on the 29th of Feb)

0830 on the first morning. There was a lull - I think everyone else was
going to work!


Hmm.. I ordered mine around 10am on the first morning. Had an email from
Farnell a while ago saying ETA of this week, heard nothing since.

When I saw your post I logged into onecall but can't see my order at all
in the order history...

Wonder if my order has somehow vanished? :-/

Darren

On Tue, 15 May 2012 05:31:20 +0000, D.M.Chapman wrote:

In article , Bob Eager
wrote:

Lucky you. I ordered on day 1 but have been told end of June for
delivery :-(

Mine's coming tomorrow.

When did you order yours?

(I think mine was ordered at about 4pm on the 29th of Feb)

0830 on the first morning. There was a lull - I think everyone else was
going to work!


Hmm.. I ordered mine around 10am on the first morning. Had an email from
Farnell a while ago saying ETA of this week, heard nothing since.

When I saw your post I logged into onecall but can't see my order at all
in the order history...

Wonder if my order has somehow vanished? :-/

MIne was actually delayed a few days because the credit card I used to
order has since been cancelled (long story). But they phoned me last week
for new details.

--
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

*lightning protection* - a w_tom conductor

On Tue, 15 May 2012 05:31:20 +0000 (UTC), dmc@puffin. (D.M.Chapman)
wrote:

In article ,
Bob Eager wrote:

Lucky you. I ordered on day 1 but have been told end of June for
delivery :-(

Mine's coming tomorrow.

When did you order yours?

(I think mine was ordered at about 4pm on the 29th of Feb)

0830 on the first morning. There was a lull - I think everyone else was
going to work!


Hmm.. I ordered mine around 10am on the first morning. Had an email from
Farnell a while ago saying ETA of this week, heard nothing since.

When I saw your post I logged into onecall but can't see my order at all
in the order history...

Wonder if my order has somehow vanished? :-/

Darren


Have they taken the money already, though?

MM

In article ,
MM wrote:

Have they taken the money already, though?


Not obviously.

Anyway, just gave them a ring and yes the order is still there (they don't
know why I can't see it but I don't particularly care about that).

Just need to wait - might be this week \o/

Darren

On Tue, 15 May 2012 05:31:20 +0000 (UTC), dmc@puffin. (D.M.Chapman)
wrote:

In article ,
Bob Eager wrote:

Lucky you. I ordered on day 1 but have been told end of June for
delivery :-(

Mine's coming tomorrow.

When did you order yours?

(I think mine was ordered at about 4pm on the 29th of Feb)

0830 on the first morning. There was a lull - I think everyone else was
going to work!


Hmm.. I ordered mine around 10am on the first morning. Had an email from
Farnell a while ago saying ETA of this week, heard nothing since.

I ordered by phone because the web site was not working. They
originally told me the end of April. I phoned in May and was told end
of June.
--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) If a man stands in a forest and no woman is around
(")_(") is he still wrong?

On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:34:31 +0100, Mark wrote:

On Tue, 15 May 2012 05:31:20 +0000 (UTC), dmc@puffin. (D.M.Chapman)
wrote:

In article , Bob Eager
wrote:

Lucky you. I ordered on day 1 but have been told end of June for
delivery :-(

Mine's coming tomorrow.

When did you order yours?

(I think mine was ordered at about 4pm on the 29th of Feb)

0830 on the first morning. There was a lull - I think everyone else was
going to work!


Hmm.. I ordered mine around 10am on the first morning. Had an email from
Farnell a while ago saying ETA of this week, heard nothing since.

I ordered by phone because the web site was not working. They
originally told me the end of April. I phoned in May and was told end
of June.

Mine is now here.



--
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

*lightning protection* - a w_tom conductor

In article ,
Bob Eager wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:34:31 +0100, Mark wrote:

On Tue, 15 May 2012 05:31:20 +0000 (UTC), dmc@puffin. (D.M.Chapman)
wrote:

In article , Bob Eager
wrote:

Lucky you. I ordered on day 1 but have been told end of June for
delivery :-(

Mine's coming tomorrow.

When did you order yours?

(I think mine was ordered at about 4pm on the 29th of Feb)

0830 on the first morning. There was a lull - I think everyone else was
going to work!


Hmm.. I ordered mine around 10am on the first morning. Had an email from
Farnell a while ago saying ETA of this week, heard nothing since.

I ordered by phone because the web site was not working. They
originally told me the end of April. I phoned in May and was told end
of June.

Mine is now here.

You're probably an old-hand at this, but I put some initial setup hints he

https://projects.drogon.net/raspberr...nitial-setup1/

If your using the supplied Debian, then note that the password and group
files are somewhat "creative" - an a pwck / grpck is suggested...

Gordon