UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 264
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas

Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 260
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

On 31/10/2011 19:58, rbel wrote:
http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas

Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel

It's quite hard to say really, from some reviews I get the impression
that the boiler wasn't installed properly - mostly dirty systems and
sometimes it just seems like whoever is called to fix them just throws
parts in until the problem is cured.

--
David

  #3   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

On 31/10/2011 19:58, rbel wrote:
http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas


Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel

Take into consideration that if your boiler is working ok, your probably
not going to write a review. The ones likely to write are the folk who
have had problems and want the world to know about it.
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,112
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

On 31/10/2011 20:54, Justine Time wrote:
On 31/10/2011 19:58, rbel wrote:
http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas


Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel

Take into consideration that if your boiler is working ok, your probably
not going to write a review. The ones likely to write are the folk who
have had problems and want the world to know about it.


Worth noting that their "top five" are a Vaillant and two Worcesters,
exactly what the experts in this group say. (The other two look like
adverts).
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 260
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

On 31/10/2011 22:59, Newshound wrote:
On 31/10/2011 20:54, Justine Time wrote:
On 31/10/2011 19:58, rbel wrote:
http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas

Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel

Take into consideration that if your boiler is working ok, your probably
not going to write a review. The ones likely to write are the folk who
have had problems and want the world to know about it.


Worth noting that their "top five" are a Vaillant and two Worcesters,
exactly what the experts in this group say. (The other two look like
adverts).

It would be interesting if geoff can tell us if he gets more Worcester
parts or Vaillant parts in for repairs? General consensus seems to be
the electronics of a Vaillant are more solid...

--
David



  #6   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,819
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

In message , gremlin_95
writes
On 31/10/2011 22:59, Newshound wrote:
On 31/10/2011 20:54, Justine Time wrote:
On 31/10/2011 19:58, rbel wrote:
http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas

Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel
Take into consideration that if your boiler is working ok, your probably
not going to write a review. The ones likely to write are the folk who
have had problems and want the world to know about it.


Worth noting that their "top five" are a Vaillant and two Worcesters,
exactly what the experts in this group say. (The other two look like
adverts).

It would be interesting if geoff can tell us if he gets more Worcester
parts or Vaillant parts in for repairs? General consensus seems to be
the electronics of a Vaillant are more solid...

Yes, I get a lot of worcester stuff coming through now

I used to recommend them to people, but I have given up doing that

However, it has to be said that there are an awful lot of worcester
boilers out there (I have one)

Vaillants do seem to have a slightly better track record

I had someone phone up today who still had the original (15 year old)
pcb in his suprima boiler and wanted a fan instead - miracles happen

--
geoff
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,896
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

In article , Newshound
scribeth thus
On 31/10/2011 20:54, Justine Time wrote:
On 31/10/2011 19:58, rbel wrote:
http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas

Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel

Take into consideration that if your boiler is working ok, your probably
not going to write a review. The ones likely to write are the folk who
have had problems and want the world to know about it.



Of course. You have a car for 10 years. Now it breaks down one night and
causes you some inconvenience.

When anyone asks you about that car what do you remember?, that one time
in 10 years that it broke down, or the 9 years 364 days that it started
ands ran fine and did what you required of it;...


Worth noting that their "top five" are a Vaillant and two Worcesters,
exactly what the experts in this group say. (The other two look like
adverts).


I'd rather trust Geoff Raden's opinion anyday rather than some anonymous
website;!..
--
Tony Sayer

  #8   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,896
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?


Yes, I get a lot of worcester stuff coming through now

I used to recommend them to people, but I have given up doing that

However, it has to be said that there are an awful lot of worcester
boilers out there (I have one)

Vaillants do seem to have a slightly better track record

I had someone phone up today who still had the original (15 year old)
pcb in his suprima boiler and wanted a fan instead - miracles happen


Truly master that indeed is a sign of the second coming!...

Be ye !!-\Mightily/-!! afraid;!!!!
--
Tony Sayer

  #9   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,640
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

geoff wrote:
In message , gremlin_95
writes
On 31/10/2011 22:59, Newshound wrote:
On 31/10/2011 20:54, Justine Time wrote:
On 31/10/2011 19:58, rbel wrote:
http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas

Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel
Take into consideration that if your boiler is working ok, your
probably
not going to write a review. The ones likely to write are the folk who
have had problems and want the world to know about it.

Worth noting that their "top five" are a Vaillant and two Worcesters,
exactly what the experts in this group say. (The other two look like
adverts).

It would be interesting if geoff can tell us if he gets more Worcester
parts or Vaillant parts in for repairs? General consensus seems to be
the electronics of a Vaillant are more solid...

Yes, I get a lot of worcester stuff coming through now

I used to recommend them to people, but I have given up doing that

However, it has to be said that there are an awful lot of worcester
boilers out there (I have one)

Vaillants do seem to have a slightly better track record

I had someone phone up today who still had the original (15 year old)
pcb in his suprima boiler and wanted a fan instead - miracles happen


Geoff, Is there a pattern to the type of faults you see?
Maybe dry joints due to thermal stress or relay contact dirt/failure.
In the field of electronics I worked in, components were very reliable
unless over stressed in some way. Heat and dirt were a source of
problems though.
Conformal coating used to help a lot but I doubt that they use that.
Maybe the boiler designs are cut to the bone?

cheers

Bob
  #10   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

In article ,
Bob Minchin wrote:
Geoff, Is there a pattern to the type of faults you see?
Maybe dry joints due to thermal stress or relay contact dirt/failure.
In the field of electronics I worked in, components were very reliable
unless over stressed in some way. Heat and dirt were a source of
problems though.
Conformal coating used to help a lot but I doubt that they use that.
Maybe the boiler designs are cut to the bone?


Cynical me says they are designed to fail.
Heat shouldn't be a problem with a decent modern boiler.

--
*Why do they put Braille on the drive-through bank machines?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.


  #11   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 260
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

On 01/11/2011 00:15, geoff wrote:
In message , gremlin_95
writes
On 31/10/2011 22:59, Newshound wrote:
On 31/10/2011 20:54, Justine Time wrote:
On 31/10/2011 19:58, rbel wrote:
http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas

Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually
all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel
Take into consideration that if your boiler is working ok, your
probably
not going to write a review. The ones likely to write are the folk who
have had problems and want the world to know about it.

Worth noting that their "top five" are a Vaillant and two
Worcesters, exactly what the experts in this group say. (The other
two look like adverts).

It would be interesting if geoff can tell us if he gets more
Worcester parts or Vaillant parts in for repairs? General consensus
seems to be the electronics of a Vaillant are more solid...

Yes, I get a lot of worcester stuff coming through now

I used to recommend them to people, but I have given up doing that

However, it has to be said that there are an awful lot of worcester
boilers out there (I have one)

Vaillants do seem to have a slightly better track record

I had someone phone up today who still had the original (15 year old)
pcb in his suprima boiler and wanted a fan instead - miracles happen

Probably bit like my nans Ideal Isar, no breakdowns in nearly 4
years....apart from one diverter valve @ 8 months.

--
David

  #12   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 264
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?


Many thanks for your thoughts on the reliability issue. It looks as
though Vaillant are probably the best bet at the moment. I take it
that this does not take initial cost into consideration? In other
words I am prepared to pay (a bit) more for a reliable boiler and
controls.

Having a 20(?) year old Baxi Boston 70 that has provided years of
service without any problems whatsoever, and listened to others
complaints about their new boilers, reliability of replacement kit is
a concern. As we are having a new bathroom which will involve
moving/changing the existing dhw cylinder I think that now is the time
to bite the bullet and look at a more efficient system.

More questions will follow!

rbel
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 886
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative ofreliability?

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:58:15 +0000, rbel wrote:

http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas


Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.


A non-negative review for an Ideal Isar?!!!

And the site groups different boilers under "Worcester Bosch boiler" but
then has separate entry for "Worcester Junior 28i Combi Condensing
Boiler".

Er, why? Why not either group all boilers by one manufacturer together,
or separate them by model.

Mickey Mouse


--
John Stumbles -- http://yaph.co.uk

An atheist is a person with no invisible means of support
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

On 31/10/2011 23:18, gremlin_95 wrote:
On 31/10/2011 22:59, Newshound wrote:
On 31/10/2011 20:54, Justine Time wrote:
On 31/10/2011 19:58, rbel wrote:
http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas

Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel
Take into consideration that if your boiler is working ok, your probably
not going to write a review. The ones likely to write are the folk who
have had problems and want the world to know about it.


Worth noting that their "top five" are a Vaillant and two Worcesters,
exactly what the experts in this group say. (The other two look like
adverts).

It would be interesting if geoff can tell us if he gets more Worcester
parts or Vaillant parts in for repairs? General consensus seems to be
the electronics of a Vaillant are more solid...


The difficulty with interpreting that sort of information, is not
knowing how many of each model are actually in service, and hence what
proportion of those you are seeing failed components from.


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/
  #15   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 260
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

On 01/11/2011 19:10, rbel wrote:
Many thanks for your thoughts on the reliability issue. It looks as
though Vaillant are probably the best bet at the moment. I take it
that this does not take initial cost into consideration? In other
words I am prepared to pay (a bit) more for a reliable boiler and
controls.

Having a 20(?) year old Baxi Boston 70 that has provided years of
service without any problems whatsoever, and listened to others
complaints about their new boilers, reliability of replacement kit is
a concern. As we are having a new bathroom which will involve
moving/changing the existing dhw cylinder I think that now is the time
to bite the bullet and look at a more efficient system.

More questions will follow!

rbel

The early Ecotecs used to suffer from dodgy pressure switches, pumps and
weak rubber hoses. All these issues are sorted now and its a very
reliable boiler.

--
David

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New furnace reliability Don Home Repair 9 August 3rd 05 04:30 AM
OT - Is this representative of US public opinion? UK Newspaper Front Page Noel Hegan Woodworking 134 February 2nd 04 04:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"