View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
John Rumm John Rumm is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default Are these boiler reviews anything like representative of reliability?

On 31/10/2011 23:18, gremlin_95 wrote:
On 31/10/2011 22:59, Newshound wrote:
On 31/10/2011 20:54, Justine Time wrote:
On 31/10/2011 19:58, rbel wrote:
http://www.reviewcentre.com/products4607.html?f2229=Gas

Forgetting those with just a few reviews it appears that virtually all
the boilers mentioned are more than a little unreliable.

rbel
Take into consideration that if your boiler is working ok, your probably
not going to write a review. The ones likely to write are the folk who
have had problems and want the world to know about it.


Worth noting that their "top five" are a Vaillant and two Worcesters,
exactly what the experts in this group say. (The other two look like
adverts).

It would be interesting if geoff can tell us if he gets more Worcester
parts or Vaillant parts in for repairs? General consensus seems to be
the electronics of a Vaillant are more solid...


The difficulty with interpreting that sort of information, is not
knowing how many of each model are actually in service, and hence what
proportion of those you are seeing failed components from.


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/