Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aldi have an 800w (peak) 650w standard generator up for £59.99 this Sunday.
I've Googled back and got mixed responses. Caravan discussion sites seem anti, but in 2009 this NG was cautiously in favour. I am considering this as an emergency power supply to the motorhome when wild camping. However I wouldn't want to incinerate an expensive Electroblok by using a £60 generator with dodgy output. So: (1) Is the output smooth enough to feed into a 240V input for a caravan or motorhome? (2) If not, is there something reasonably priced to put between the generator and the socket? Honda is the quality answer but kicks off at around £1,000. I note the references to farm sales but I suspect that farmers use the robust generators in a pipe frame not the suitcase generators which are easier to stow inside a camper or caravan. Kipor is a cheap(ish) alternative but still at around £300 for a 1Kw peak 900w standard genny it is around 5 times the cost of this. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under £180 which does compare favourably with £400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. All I really need is something to recharge the batteries without having to run the engine. So with 2 * 100 amp hour batteries to charge from 50% to 100% I would need 100 amps for an hour - well, lets say 50 amps for 2 hours. Amps = watts/volts so 300 watts at 12 volts should give 25 amps charge current - 4 hours running. 600 watts at 12 volts should give 50 amps charge current (if the system would take it) - 2 hours running. All in all, a 600w generator run for a couple of hours in the morning should be a reasonable alternative to a solar panel on the roof, given that 100w of solar panel can cost £300 without the controller or fixing kit. So , what does the team think? Cheers Dave R P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. -- No plan survives contact with the enemy. [Not even bunny] Helmuth von Moltke the Elder (\__/) (='.'=) (")_(") |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 7, 8:44*pm, "David WE Roberts"
wrote: snip snip Aldi have an 800w (peak) 650w standard generator up for 59.99 this Sunday.. I am considering this as an emergency power supply to the motorhome when wild camping. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under 180 which does compare favourably with 400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. All I really need is something to recharge the batteries without having to run the engine. So with 2 * 100 amp hour batteries to charge from 50% to 100% I would need 100 amps for an hour - well, lets say 50 amps for 2 hours. Amps = watts/volts so 300 watts at 12 volts should give 25 amps charge current - 4 hours running. 600 watts at 12 volts should give 50 amps charge current (if the system would take it) - 2 hours running. All in all, a 600w generator run for a couple of hours in the morning should be a reasonable alternative to a solar panel on the roof, given that 100w of solar panel can cost 300 without the controller or fixing kit. So , what does the team think? Cheers Dave R P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. If your chagrer is electronic swtched mode, just full wave rectify the output from each gen, then conncet all 3 together. Check the genny chassis is NOT connected to either L or N before doing this - it probabyl wont be. Another option I looked at for much teh same task was to build a big nonrechargeable battery. NT |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/07/2011 20:52, NT wrote:
On Jul 7, 8:44 pm, "David WE Roberts" wrote: snip snip Aldi have an 800w (peak) 650w standard generator up for 59.99 this Sunday. I am considering this as an emergency power supply to the motorhome when wild camping. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under 180 which does compare favourably with 400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. All I really need is something to recharge the batteries without having to run the engine. So with 2 * 100 amp hour batteries to charge from 50% to 100% I would need 100 amps for an hour - well, lets say 50 amps for 2 hours. Amps = watts/volts so 300 watts at 12 volts should give 25 amps charge current - 4 hours running. 600 watts at 12 volts should give 50 amps charge current (if the system would take it) - 2 hours running. All in all, a 600w generator run for a couple of hours in the morning should be a reasonable alternative to a solar panel on the roof, given that 100w of solar panel can cost 300 without the controller or fixing kit. So , what does the team think? Cheers Dave R P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. If your chagrer is electronic swtched mode, just full wave rectify the output from each gen, then conncet all 3 together. Check the genny chassis is NOT connected to either L or N before doing this - it probabyl wont be. Wouldn't it be cheaper and less hassle "just" to get a bigger genny? Another option I looked at for much teh same task was to build a big nonrechargeable battery. Why? If cost is an issue, how can that be cost effective? |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 20:44:41 +0100, David WE Roberts wrote:
(1) Is the output smooth enough to feed into a 240V input for a caravan or motorhome? Do you have anything "sensitive" in the motorhome. Motors, lights, heaters etc are not "sensitive". Electonics, TV etc, might be. Honda is the quality answer but kicks off at around £1,000. snip Kipor is a cheap(ish) alternative but still at around £300 for a 1Kw peak 900w standard genny it is around 5 times the cost of this. They are probably invertor generators and will produce a decent waveform. The "little stinky" Aldi two stroke will just be an alternator and engine, the waveform may get distorted near capacity. Little stinky will be that as well smelly by being a two stroke and compared to the Honda/Kipor invertor range rather noisey. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? Not easyly. You can't simply wire them in parallel as I doubt the load sharing woud be equal and the moment that you join two non-synchrous sets together might be interesting as well. You can get link kits for the Honda invertors. So with 2 * 100 amp hour batteries to charge from 50% to 100% I would need 100 amps for an hour - well, lets say 50 amps for 2 hours. Amps = watts/volts so 300 watts at 12 volts should give 25 amps charge current - 4 hours running. 600 watts at 12 volts should give 50 amps charge current (if the system would take it) - 2 hours running. The 12v out from most of these small set is normally only about 10A, so you'd be looking at using the 240v out and a beefy battery charger, which will add losses, say 25% overall. P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. Yes but they don't come particularly cheap and the feed in isn't quite the same as what you are wanting. -- Cheers Dave. |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 7, 10:14*pm, Fredxx wrote:
On 07/07/2011 20:52, NT wrote: On Jul 7, 8:44 pm, "David WE Roberts" *wrote: snip snip Aldi have an 800w (peak) 650w standard generator up for 59.99 this Sunday. I am considering this as an emergency power supply to the motorhome when wild camping. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under 180 which does compare favourably with 400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. All I really need is something to recharge the batteries without having to run the engine. So with 2 * 100 amp hour batteries to charge from 50% to 100% I would need 100 amps for an hour - well, lets say 50 amps for 2 hours. Amps = watts/volts so 300 watts at 12 volts should give 25 amps charge current - 4 hours running. 600 watts at 12 volts should give 50 amps charge current (if the system would take it) - 2 hours running. All in all, a 600w generator run for a couple of hours in the morning should be a reasonable alternative to a solar panel on the roof, given that 100w of solar panel can cost 300 without the controller or fixing kit. So , what does the team think? Cheers Dave R P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. If your chagrer is electronic swtched mode, just full wave rectify the output from each gen, then conncet all 3 together. Check the genny chassis is NOT connected to either L or N before doing this - it probabyl wont be. Wouldn't it be cheaper and less hassle "just" to get a bigger genny? Another option I looked at for much teh same task was to build a big nonrechargeable battery. Why? *If cost is an issue, how can that be cost effective? A big battery costs peanuts compared to a generator. There's a wide variety of chemistries available, IIRC the one that tempted me was aluminium electrodes in what was it, soda? I dont remember the electrolyte now. NT |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David WE Roberts wrote:
Aldi have an 800w (peak) 650w standard generator up for £59.99 this Sunday. I've Googled back and got mixed responses. Caravan discussion sites seem anti, but in 2009 this NG was cautiously in favour. I am considering this as an emergency power supply to the motorhome when wild camping. However I wouldn't want to incinerate an expensive Electroblok by using a £60 generator with dodgy output. Don't. We have a Honda 600w gennie that's pretty damn good, giving exactly what it says on the tin, and pretty clean, we've run laptops directly from it when timing races etc .. We tried one of these a year or so ago and it was reasonable when not under too much load! When equipment was being used it laboured and 'hunting' speed changes made it appear even louder than it actually was. We didn't dare attach the laptops to it 'cos of the speed changes, so probably can't really comment on how 'clean' the output was other than to say it didn't inspire confidence at all. I think it's not the sort of gennie for anyone in a caravan/motorhome/camping who has a need to run potentially voltage sensitive equipment from it, or for anyone who cares about neighbours and their very local, personal, environment .. the two-stroke is a bit loud and definitely smelly. (personally I love 2t smells and sounds, 'specially racing 2t's, but this is the worst kind of 2t, like an angry waso!) -- Paul - xxx |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:20:41 +0100, David WE Roberts wrote:
Yes, there are sensitive bits of kit including the Electroblok which is some kind of fancy charge controller for the batteries and distribution system so the input should really be, I guess, from a good quality smoothed and regulated source. Check with the maker, though they may cover their arse and say it has to be connected to mains. Mind you some mains supplies can be pretty ropey... The big problem with these little gensets is regulation when the load changes. They don't have enough grunt to maintain volts when the load goes up and tend to overshoot when it drops. Under constant load conditions they aren't too bad. So - noisy, smelly, unregulated output. Noisy compared to the Honda invertors which are *very* quiet... Not noisy when compared to an open frame petrol set and positively inaudible compared to an open frame diesel. B-) Being a two stroke you do have the faff of mixing the fuel and oil. Wonders if you can get scented two stroke oil, fresh mown grass? I was impressed by an old 600W Honda (no longer made AFAICT) used by another motor homer in France. Probably not a lot different TBH. -- Cheers Dave. |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David WE Roberts wrote:
So - noisy, smelly, unregulated output. Thought it was too cheap to be suitable but thought I'd check just in case. I was impressed by an old 600W Honda (no longer made AFAICT) used by another motor homer in France. Heh, I should have read through to here before my reply to the original post .. ![]() -- Paul - xxx |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/07/2011 09:06, NT wrote:
On Jul 7, 10:14 pm, wrote: On 07/07/2011 20:52, NT wrote: On Jul 7, 8:44 pm, "David WE Roberts" wrote: snip snip Aldi have an 800w (peak) 650w standard generator up for 59.99 this Sunday. I am considering this as an emergency power supply to the motorhome when wild camping. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under 180 which does compare favourably with 400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. All I really need is something to recharge the batteries without having to run the engine. So with 2 * 100 amp hour batteries to charge from 50% to 100% I would need 100 amps for an hour - well, lets say 50 amps for 2 hours. Amps = watts/volts so 300 watts at 12 volts should give 25 amps charge current - 4 hours running. 600 watts at 12 volts should give 50 amps charge current (if the system would take it) - 2 hours running. All in all, a 600w generator run for a couple of hours in the morning should be a reasonable alternative to a solar panel on the roof, given that 100w of solar panel can cost 300 without the controller or fixing kit. So , what does the team think? Cheers Dave R P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. If your chagrer is electronic swtched mode, just full wave rectify the output from each gen, then conncet all 3 together. Check the genny chassis is NOT connected to either L or N before doing this - it probabyl wont be. Wouldn't it be cheaper and less hassle "just" to get a bigger genny? Another option I looked at for much teh same task was to build a big nonrechargeable battery. Why? If cost is an issue, how can that be cost effective? A big battery costs peanuts compared to a generator. There's a wide variety of chemistries available, IIRC the one that tempted me was aluminium electrodes in what was it, soda? I dont remember the electrolyte now. NT Aluminium is £2.50 per kg at world prices, in practice you'll be paying double this. A Aluminium KOH batter gets 1300WH per kg. Hand waving guess. So £2 per kWH We also have to factor in that Al batteries degrade irrespective of whether a current is drawn or not. You can get a 850W genny from Machine Mart for just £100, ie just 40kg of aluminium at world prices. I don't feel quite as "tempted" as you!! |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/
Kipor is a cheap(ish) alternative but still at around £300 for a 1Kw peak 900w standard genny it is around 5 times the cost of this. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under £180 which does compare favourably with £400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. I have used several Kipor generators, and have checked the output waveform on an oscilloscope under load, and can confirm that it is a true sinewave, and remains in good shape until nearly full load (3kw model checked). Even then the distortion is minimal. I have ran many laptops, printers, chargers etc from them without issues. |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AlanD wrote:
On 07/ Kipor is a cheap(ish) alternative but still at around £300 for a 1Kw peak 900w standard genny it is around 5 times the cost of this. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under £180 which does compare favourably with £400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. I have used several Kipor generators, and have checked the output waveform on an oscilloscope under load, and can confirm that it is a true sinewave, and remains in good shape until nearly full load (3kw model checked). Even then the distortion is minimal. I have ran many laptops, printers, chargers etc from them without issues. We use one of the big diesel models. It's quiet, rugged and works flawlessly with a huge range of equipment including running a commercial microwave. |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 11:40*am, Fredxx wrote:
On 08/07/2011 09:06, NT wrote: On Jul 7, 10:14 pm, *wrote: On 07/07/2011 20:52, NT wrote: On Jul 7, 8:44 pm, "David WE Roberts" * *wrote: snip snip Aldi have an 800w (peak) 650w standard generator up for 59.99 this Sunday. I am considering this as an emergency power supply to the motorhome when wild camping. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under 180 which does compare favourably with 400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. All I really need is something to recharge the batteries without having to run the engine. So with 2 * 100 amp hour batteries to charge from 50% to 100% I would need 100 amps for an hour - well, lets say 50 amps for 2 hours. Amps = watts/volts so 300 watts at 12 volts should give 25 amps charge current - 4 hours running. 600 watts at 12 volts should give 50 amps charge current (if the system would take it) - 2 hours running. All in all, a 600w generator run for a couple of hours in the morning should be a reasonable alternative to a solar panel on the roof, given that 100w of solar panel can cost 300 without the controller or fixing kit. So , what does the team think? Cheers Dave R P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. If your chagrer is electronic swtched mode, just full wave rectify the output from each gen, then conncet all 3 together. Check the genny chassis is NOT connected to either L or N before doing this - it probabyl wont be. Wouldn't it be cheaper and less hassle "just" to get a bigger genny? Another option I looked at for much teh same task was to build a big nonrechargeable battery. Why? *If cost is an issue, how can that be cost effective? A big battery costs peanuts compared to a generator. There's a wide variety of chemistries available, IIRC the one that tempted me was aluminium electrodes in what was it, soda? I dont remember the electrolyte now. NT Aluminium is 2.50 per kg at world prices, in practice you'll be paying double this. A Aluminium KOH batter gets 1300WH per kg. *Hand waving guess. So 2 per kWH We also have to factor in that Al batteries degrade irrespective of whether a current is drawn or not. You can get a 850W genny from Machine Mart for just 100, ie just 40kg of aluminium at world prices. I don't feel quite as "tempted" as you!! Aluminium costs nothing in the form of drinks cans, just look in the recycling box. There is no degradation when no current is drawn, the plates are kept dry, only dipped in when power is wanted. If you dont like the ali cells there are plenty of other options. NT |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 11:48*am, AlanD wrote:
On 07/ Kipor is a cheap(ish) alternative but still at around £300 for a 1Kw peak 900w standard genny it is around 5 times the cost of this. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under £180 which does compare favourably with £400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. I have used several Kipor generators, and have checked the output waveform on an oscilloscope under load, and can confirm that it is a true sinewave, and remains in good shape until nearly full load (3kw model checked). Even then the distortion is minimal. I have ran many laptops, printers, chargers etc from them without issues. Laptops couldnt care less about the waveform, and are tolerant of very wide voltage swings too. You can feed them with 300v dc and they'll be happy. What they dont tolerate so well is high voltage surges, and this is one situation where surge absorbers have a genuine use. NT |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fredxx" wrote in message ... Aluminium is £2.50 per kg at world prices, in practice you'll be paying double this. A Aluminium KOH batter gets 1300WH per kg. Hand waving guess. So £2 per kWH We also have to factor in that Al batteries degrade irrespective of whether a current is drawn or not. While I was at Marconi we were investigating Al batteries as standby in exchanges. They had a long life as the Al was not in the hydroxide until needed. They were primary cells though and after use the hydroxide and Al were replaced. I don't think they were actually used but I don't know why (its not a project I worked on). You can get a 850W genny from Machine Mart for just £100, ie just 40kg of aluminium at world prices. I don't feel quite as "tempted" as you!! |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NT wrote:
[snip] Laptops couldnt care less about the waveform, Utter ********. Many switched mode PSUs will fail within a short time of being connected to the pseudo sine wave output from cheap inverters. They are also intolerant of the output from cheap unregulated alternators. and are tolerant of very wide voltage swings too. You can feed them with 300v dc and they'll be happy. No that's ******** as well. Most will handle 90-270V AC only. The ones that run on DC are at best 9-30V and have a four wire connection to the PSU with a separate DC input. The cannot take DC on the AC input. What they dont tolerate so well is high voltage surges, and What I don't tolerate well is ********. this is one situation where surge absorbers have a genuine use. Yes, put one in your gob until the desire to talk **** goes away. |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Firth" wrote in message ... AlanD wrote: On 07/ Kipor is a cheap(ish) alternative but still at around £300 for a 1Kw peak 900w standard genny it is around 5 times the cost of this. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under £180 which does compare favourably with £400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. I have used several Kipor generators, and have checked the output waveform on an oscilloscope under load, and can confirm that it is a true sinewave, and remains in good shape until nearly full load (3kw model checked). Even then the distortion is minimal. I have ran many laptops, printers, chargers etc from them without issues. We use one of the big diesel models. It's quiet, rugged and works flawlessly with a huge range of equipment including running a commercial microwave. I have one of the 2.5 kva generators that Aldi sold about 8 years ago for £149. It has had periodic use as standby and a few weekends powering lights at events. It runs everything in the house with no problem, but not all at once mind. Computers, TVs, Central heating, Kettle and of course lighting. The only problem I can't solve is that on very low loads the engine has decided to constantly hunts up and down on the last two occasions I have used it. When used to power the house I find that switching all the outside lights on is enough load to keep it stable, and that helps wind up the neighbours that we have power and they don't :-) Mike |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/07/2011 13:10, NT wrote:
On Jul 8, 11:48 am, wrote: On 07/ Kipor is a cheap(ish) alternative but still at around £300 for a 1Kw peak 900w standard genny it is around 5 times the cost of this. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under £180 which does compare favourably with £400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. I have used several Kipor generators, and have checked the output waveform on an oscilloscope under load, and can confirm that it is a true sinewave, and remains in good shape until nearly full load (3kw model checked). Even then the distortion is minimal. I have ran many laptops, printers, chargers etc from them without issues. Laptops couldnt care less about the waveform, and are tolerant of very wide voltage swings too. You can feed them with 300v dc and they'll be happy. What they dont tolerate so well is high voltage surges, and this is one situation where surge absorbers have a genuine use. In the good old days when power factor wasn't an issue I can well believe that. Current rules have a harmonic content which means that AC current must faithfully follow AC voltage. I'd be surprised if a laptop power supply would work with DC - BICBW. |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:06:28 +0100, Fredxx wrote:
On 08/07/2011 13:10, NT wrote: On Jul 8, 11:48 am, wrote: On 07/ Kipor is a cheap(ish) alternative but still at around £300 for a 1Kw peak 900w standard genny it is around 5 times the cost of this. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under £180 which does compare favourably with £400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. I have used several Kipor generators, and have checked the output waveform on an oscilloscope under load, and can confirm that it is a true sinewave, and remains in good shape until nearly full load (3kw model checked). Even then the distortion is minimal. I have ran many laptops, printers, chargers etc from them without issues. Laptops couldnt care less about the waveform, and are tolerant of very wide voltage swings too. You can feed them with 300v dc and they'll be happy. What they dont tolerate so well is high voltage surges, and this is one situation where surge absorbers have a genuine use. In the good old days when power factor wasn't an issue I can well believe that. Current rules have a harmonic content which means that AC current must faithfully follow AC voltage. I'd be surprised if a laptop power supply would work with DC - BICBW. Every SMPS front end rectifies the mains supply and gives it a bit of smoothing before driving the mains side oscillator. I can't see any reason why a stepped "sine" wave or poor power factor of the supply would make any difference at all. Big spikes on the supply would probably kill it, but that applies to so-called "clean" mains supplies too. Just put some 275v L-N, L-E & N-E VDRs (belt and braces!) on the input to protect against that. -- Mick (Working in a M$-free zone!) Web: http://www.nascom.info Filtering everything posted from googlegroups to kill spam. |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fredxx wrote:
In the good old days when power factor wasn't an issue I can well believe that. Current rules have a harmonic content which means that AC current must faithfully follow AC voltage. I'd be surprised if a laptop power supply would work with DC - BICBW. The BBC Micro had an SMPSU, Way back when, I knew someone who soldered 100 NiCads in series (housed in a length of drainpipe) with a 13A socket on one end, it happily powered the BBC micro ... OK so it's not a modern laptop. |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 1:41*pm, Steve Firth wrote:
NT wrote: [snip] Laptops couldnt care less about the waveform, Utter ********. Many switched mode PSUs will fail within a short time of being connected to the pseudo sine wave output from cheap inverters. They are also intolerant of the output from cheap unregulated alternators. and are tolerant of very wide voltage swings too. You can feed them with 300v dc and they'll be happy. No that's ******** as well. *Most will handle 90-270V AC only. The ones that run on DC are at best 9-30V and have a four wire connection to the PSU with a separate DC input. The cannot take DC on the AC input. What they dont tolerate so well is high voltage surges, and What I don't tolerate well is ********. this is one situation where surge absorbers have a genuine use. Yes, put one in your gob until the desire to talk **** goes away. Laptop supplies are always switched mode. Mains input goes thru a bridge rec to reservoir cap(s), at which point its 330v dc. The following switch mode supply can handle a wide voltage range, designed tht way so it can handle 100 to 240v ac without a sswitch or risk of damage. Whether you feed the beast with 120v ac, 240v ac, 170v dc or 330v dc doesnt make any difference to its operation. Portabel gens are ill regulatde and inductive sources. Load dump can kill some electronic items, and surge absorbers, which are a waste of time on mains, actually have a use in this situation. Provide some overlooked and relevant data, or dont, but grow up. NT |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy Burns wrote:
The BBC Micro had an SMPSU, Way back when, I knew someone who soldered 100 NiCads in series Make that 200 (housed in a length of drainpipe) with a 13A socket on one end, it happily powered the BBC micro ... OK so it's not a modern laptop. |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:37:53 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote:
Laptop supplies are always switched mode. Mains input goes thru a bridge rec to reservoir cap(s), at which point its 330v dc. The following switch mode supply can handle a wide voltage range, designed tht way so it can handle 100 to 240v ac without a sswitch or risk of damage. Whether you feed the beast with 120v ac, 240v ac, 170v dc or 330v dc doesnt make any difference to its operation. Provided that the bridge rectifier diodes where speced for at least 100% duty cycle not just to handle the expected 50% when fed from AC. -- Cheers Dave. |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/07/2011 17:32, mick wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:06:28 +0100, Fredxx wrote: On 08/07/2011 13:10, NT wrote: On Jul 8, 11:48 am, wrote: On 07/ Kipor is a cheap(ish) alternative but still at around £300 for a 1Kw peak 900w standard genny it is around 5 times the cost of this. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under £180 which does compare favourably with £400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. I have used several Kipor generators, and have checked the output waveform on an oscilloscope under load, and can confirm that it is a true sinewave, and remains in good shape until nearly full load (3kw model checked). Even then the distortion is minimal. I have ran many laptops, printers, chargers etc from them without issues. Laptops couldnt care less about the waveform, and are tolerant of very wide voltage swings too. You can feed them with 300v dc and they'll be happy. What they dont tolerate so well is high voltage surges, and this is one situation where surge absorbers have a genuine use. In the good old days when power factor wasn't an issue I can well believe that. Current rules have a harmonic content which means that AC current must faithfully follow AC voltage. I'd be surprised if a laptop power supply would work with DC - BICBW. Every SMPS front end rectifies the mains supply and gives it a bit of smoothing before driving the mains side oscillator. I can't see any reason why a stepped "sine" wave or poor power factor of the supply would make any difference at all. Big spikes on the supply would probably kill it, but that applies to so-called "clean" mains supplies too. Just put some 275v L-N, L-E& N-E VDRs (belt and braces!) on the input to protect against that. You're entirely mistaken. There are rules for the harmonic content of current for supplies over 75W since 2001. IEC/EN61000-3-2 sets some very strict rules which entirely rule out the use of simple AC rectification using a standard bridge rectifier. |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/07/2011 20:48, Andy Burns wrote:
Fredxx wrote: In the good old days when power factor wasn't an issue I can well believe that. Current rules have a harmonic content which means that AC current must faithfully follow AC voltage. I'd be surprised if a laptop power supply would work with DC - BICBW. The BBC Micro had an SMPSU, Way back when, I knew someone who soldered 100 NiCads in series (housed in a length of drainpipe) with a 13A socket on one end, it happily powered the BBC micro ... OK so it's not a modern laptop. Given the age that wouldn't surprise me. Using a bridge rectifier to produce the internal power supply is cheap and efficient. There is a thought that the newer directives are counter productive since they inherently produce less efficient solutions! |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Andy Burns wrote: Fredxx wrote: In the good old days when power factor wasn't an issue I can well believe that. Current rules have a harmonic content which means that AC current must faithfully follow AC voltage. I'd be surprised if a laptop power supply would work with DC - BICBW. The BBC Micro had an SMPSU, Way back when, I knew someone who soldered 100 NiCads in series (housed in a length of drainpipe) with a 13A socket on one end, it happily powered the BBC micro ... OK so it's not a modern laptop. That seemed like hard work... Once upon a time, I used a BBC B to 'drive' an experimental Automatic Guided Vehicle round a factory floor. The AGV had a pair of 12V lead acid batterys and I just wired the 12V from the battery into a 5V regulator and used that to power the unit. I think it needed -5V for something, but I've forgotten what now but it seemed OK without it! I'd have the AGV next to my workbench, plug the Beeb into a monitor & the Econet, load up the software, then unplug it, sit on the AGV and drive it round using the F keys for speed and arrows to steer (ok, not quite automatic, but it was proof of concept ![]() Gordon |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/07/2011 00:38, Steve Firth wrote:
And back to your cobblers. Yes, it does make a difference. Using DC for example means that current only flows through half of the diodes in the bridge and presents a much higher average current through those diodes. Since heating effect is, as I'm sure you are aware[1], proportional to i^2 premature failures of the diodes can be expected unless the diodes are over-specced to deal with this situation. In my experience heating effect has always been V x I. It so happens that the voltage appearing across the specific case of a resistor is proportional to current to give a heating effect proportional to I^2. However, diodes do not behave in the same linear way as resistors. |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/07/2011 18:30, Gordon Henderson wrote:
In articleca2dnVwirYNpw4rTnZ2dnUVZ7q6dnZ2d@brightvie w.co.uk, Andy wrote: The BBC Micro had an SMPSU, Way back when, I knew someone who soldered 100 NiCads in series (housed in a length of drainpipe) with a 13A socket on one end, it happily powered the BBC micro ... OK so it's not a modern laptop. That seemed like hard work... Once upon a time, I used a BBC B to 'drive' an experimental Automatic Guided Vehicle round a factory floor. The AGV had a pair of 12V lead acid batterys and I just wired the 12V from the battery into a 5V regulator and used that to power the unit. I think it needed -5V for something, but I've forgotten what now but it seemed OK without it! I'd have the AGV next to my workbench, plug the Beeb into a monitor& the Econet, load up the software, then unplug it, sit on the AGV and drive it round using the F keys for speed and arrows to steer (ok, not quite automatic, but it was proof of concept ![]() Gordon I thought the 6502 was a NMOS CPU which required a -5V supply? It would have taken very little current, would it have been sourced by a charge pump of the +5V? |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:38:20 +0100, Steve Firth wrote:
330v dc. You mean a peak of 339.41V, the average being 216.08V. Where does the 216.08v come from? How can you have two decimal places of precision for something connected to the mains that has a +6 -10% allowable tolerance on the voltage? The voltage across the smoothing capacitor(s) after the full wave bridge rectifier could be anywhere from 300 to 354v DC with a nominal value of 322v DC. Ripple will subtract from the DC voltage when on load. -- Cheers Dave. |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"David WE Roberts" writes: All I really need is something to recharge the batteries without having to run the engine. Not that I've looked, but I would have thought someone would make a frame consisting of a petrol engine and an alternator, specifically for this sort of task. Something like an older Lucus alternator (with embedded controller, rather than a modern one controlled by the engine management unit) would probably work well. Even on my decades old mini, that could output 45A peak (and 32A on tickover), and there were probably larger ones for larger cars. It contains all the smarts for charging regulation, and doesn't care about clean power input (which is mechanicanal in this case anyway). P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. They have inverter outputs, designed to generate just a very slightly fractionally higher voltage than mains, so they feed back into it the rate they're generating. You can't use them without having a working mains supply - they're deliberately designed to switch-off if the mains goes away. Apart from having no voltage to regulate against, you don't want something back-feeding a dead supply network and electrocuting someone who might be working on it. -- Andrew Gabriel [email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup] |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 1:00*pm, NT wrote:
On Jul 8, 11:40*am, Fredxx wrote: On 08/07/2011 09:06, NT wrote: On Jul 7, 10:14 pm, *wrote: On 07/07/2011 20:52, NT wrote: On Jul 7, 8:44 pm, "David WE Roberts" * *wrote: snip snip Aldi have an 800w (peak) 650w standard generator up for 59.99 this Sunday. I am considering this as an emergency power supply to the motorhome when wild camping. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under 180 which does compare favourably with 400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. All I really need is something to recharge the batteries without having to run the engine. So with 2 * 100 amp hour batteries to charge from 50% to 100% I would need 100 amps for an hour - well, lets say 50 amps for 2 hours. Amps = watts/volts so 300 watts at 12 volts should give 25 amps charge current - 4 hours running. 600 watts at 12 volts should give 50 amps charge current (if the system would take it) - 2 hours running. All in all, a 600w generator run for a couple of hours in the morning should be a reasonable alternative to a solar panel on the roof, given that 100w of solar panel can cost 300 without the controller or fixing kit. So , what does the team think? Cheers Dave R P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. If your chagrer is electronic swtched mode, just full wave rectify the output from each gen, then conncet all 3 together. Check the genny chassis is NOT connected to either L or N before doing this - it probabyl wont be. Wouldn't it be cheaper and less hassle "just" to get a bigger genny? Another option I looked at for much teh same task was to build a big nonrechargeable battery. Why? *If cost is an issue, how can that be cost effective? A big battery costs peanuts compared to a generator. There's a wide variety of chemistries available, IIRC the one that tempted me was aluminium electrodes in what was it, soda? I dont remember the electrolyte now. NT Aluminium is 2.50 per kg at world prices, in practice you'll be paying double this. A Aluminium KOH batter gets 1300WH per kg. *Hand waving guess. So 2 per kWH We also have to factor in that Al batteries degrade irrespective of whether a current is drawn or not. You can get a 850W genny from Machine Mart for just 100, ie just 40kg of aluminium at world prices. I don't feel quite as "tempted" as you!! Aluminium costs nothing in the form of drinks cans, just look in the recycling box. There is no degradation when no current is drawn, the plates are kept dry, only dipped in when power is wanted. If you dont like the ali cells there are plenty of other options. NT FWIW one way to make these charge lead acids is to make only 2 cells, eg in ice cream tubs, or really something more robust but similar size, run a meaty 6v relay in self oscillating mode, and use a good sized transformer with its priamry removed as a choke. Between that lot you get a slow switched mode upconvertor with minimal hassle. The 2 cells are stored in unfilled form: the water and soda (or whatever youre using) are stored in a separate containers. The advantages of a switche mode convertor are simplicity of battery construction, and simplicity of plate replacement. The electrical output of one with no lead acid connected is lethal. You can run one off a single cell in principle, but you'd then need to rewind both relay and transformer, and every circuit connection becomes resistance critical. There are several variations on the theme, 2 cells and no primary on the transformer are probably the simplest. NT |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/07/2011 10:47, NT wrote:
On Jul 8, 1:00 pm, wrote: On Jul 8, 11:40 am, wrote: On 08/07/2011 09:06, NT wrote: On Jul 7, 10:14 pm, wrote: On 07/07/2011 20:52, NT wrote: On Jul 7, 8:44 pm, "David WE Roberts" wrote: snip snip Aldi have an 800w (peak) 650w standard generator up for 59.99 this Sunday. I am considering this as an emergency power supply to the motorhome when wild camping. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under 180 which does compare favourably with 400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. All I really need is something to recharge the batteries without having to run the engine. So with 2 * 100 amp hour batteries to charge from 50% to 100% I would need 100 amps for an hour - well, lets say 50 amps for 2 hours. Amps = watts/volts so 300 watts at 12 volts should give 25 amps charge current - 4 hours running. 600 watts at 12 volts should give 50 amps charge current (if the system would take it) - 2 hours running. All in all, a 600w generator run for a couple of hours in the morning should be a reasonable alternative to a solar panel on the roof, given that 100w of solar panel can cost 300 without the controller or fixing kit. So , what does the team think? Cheers Dave R P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. If your chagrer is electronic swtched mode, just full wave rectify the output from each gen, then conncet all 3 together. Check the genny chassis is NOT connected to either L or N before doing this - it probabyl wont be. Wouldn't it be cheaper and less hassle "just" to get a bigger genny? Another option I looked at for much teh same task was to build a big nonrechargeable battery. Why? If cost is an issue, how can that be cost effective? A big battery costs peanuts compared to a generator. There's a wide variety of chemistries available, IIRC the one that tempted me was aluminium electrodes in what was it, soda? I dont remember the electrolyte now. NT Aluminium is 2.50 per kg at world prices, in practice you'll be paying double this. A Aluminium KOH batter gets 1300WH per kg. Hand waving guess. So 2 per kWH We also have to factor in that Al batteries degrade irrespective of whether a current is drawn or not. You can get a 850W genny from Machine Mart for just 100, ie just 40kg of aluminium at world prices. I don't feel quite as "tempted" as you!! Aluminium costs nothing in the form of drinks cans, just look in the recycling box. There is no degradation when no current is drawn, the plates are kept dry, only dipped in when power is wanted. If you dont like the ali cells there are plenty of other options. NT FWIW one way to make these charge lead acids is to make only 2 cells, eg in ice cream tubs, or really something more robust but similar size, run a meaty 6v relay in self oscillating mode, and use a good sized transformer with its priamry removed as a choke. Between that lot you get a slow switched mode upconvertor with minimal hassle. The 2 cells are stored in unfilled form: the water and soda (or whatever youre using) are stored in a separate containers. The advantages of a switche mode convertor are simplicity of battery construction, and simplicity of plate replacement. The electrical output of one with no lead acid connected is lethal. You can run one off a single cell in principle, but you'd then need to rewind both relay and transformer, and every circuit connection becomes resistance critical. There are several variations on the theme, 2 cells and no primary on the transformer are probably the simplest. Have you built one of these? Surely a standard switching boost regulator would be far better than a relay!! |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 12, 11:16*am, Fredxx wrote:
On 12/07/2011 10:47, NT wrote: On Jul 8, 1:00 pm, *wrote: On Jul 8, 11:40 am, *wrote: On 08/07/2011 09:06, NT wrote: On Jul 7, 10:14 pm, * *wrote: On 07/07/2011 20:52, NT wrote: On Jul 7, 8:44 pm, "David WE Roberts" * * *wrote: snip snip Aldi have an 800w (peak) 650w standard generator up for 59.99 this Sunday. I am considering this as an emergency power supply to the motorhome when wild camping. Hmmm.......any way of linking the output of 3 of these together? That would give 2.4kw (peak) 1.95kw (standard) of generating power for just under 180 which does compare favourably with 400 for a 2Kw generator from Kipor. All I really need is something to recharge the batteries without having to run the engine. So with 2 * 100 amp hour batteries to charge from 50% to 100% I would need 100 amps for an hour - well, lets say 50 amps for 2 hours. Amps = watts/volts so 300 watts at 12 volts should give 25 amps charge current - 4 hours running. 600 watts at 12 volts should give 50 amps charge current (if the system would take it) - 2 hours running. All in all, a 600w generator run for a couple of hours in the morning should be a reasonable alternative to a solar panel on the roof, given that 100w of solar panel can cost 300 without the controller or fixing kit. So , what does the team think? Cheers Dave R P.S. there must be a reasonably simple way of combining different 240V inputs or the whole concept of solar feed in just wouldn't work. If your chagrer is electronic swtched mode, just full wave rectify the output from each gen, then conncet all 3 together. Check the genny chassis is NOT connected to either L or N before doing this - it probabyl wont be. Wouldn't it be cheaper and less hassle "just" to get a bigger genny? Another option I looked at for much teh same task was to build a big nonrechargeable battery. Why? *If cost is an issue, how can that be cost effective? A big battery costs peanuts compared to a generator. There's a wide variety of chemistries available, IIRC the one that tempted me was aluminium electrodes in what was it, soda? I dont remember the electrolyte now. NT Aluminium is 2.50 per kg at world prices, in practice you'll be paying double this. A Aluminium KOH batter gets 1300WH per kg. *Hand waving guess. So 2 per kWH We also have to factor in that Al batteries degrade irrespective of whether a current is drawn or not. You can get a 850W genny from Machine Mart for just 100, ie just 40kg of aluminium at world prices. I don't feel quite as "tempted" as you!! Aluminium costs nothing in the form of drinks cans, just look in the recycling box. There is no degradation when no current is drawn, the plates are kept dry, only dipped in when power is wanted. If you dont like the ali cells there are plenty of other options. NT FWIW one way to make these charge lead acids is to make only 2 cells, eg in ice cream tubs, or really something more robust but similar size, run a meaty 6v relay in self oscillating mode, and use a good sized transformer with its priamry removed as a choke. Between that lot you get a slow switched mode upconvertor with minimal hassle. The 2 cells are stored in unfilled form: the water and soda (or whatever youre using) are stored in a separate containers. The advantages of a switche mode convertor are simplicity of battery construction, and simplicity of plate replacement. The electrical output of one with no lead acid connected is lethal. You can run one off a single cell in principle, but you'd then need to rewind both relay and transformer, and every circuit connection becomes resistance critical. There are several variations on the theme, 2 cells and no primary on the transformer are probably the simplest. Have you built one of these? *Surely a standard switching boost regulator would be far better than a relay!! Electronic ones are more energy efficient and silent, but how many diyers could make one? Relay based switched mode convertors are extremely simple. I did forget to mention add snubbers on the relay. NT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Aldi portable generator tricks for starting please. | UK diy | |||
Aldi generator | UK diy | |||
fridge freezer in garage latest views | UK diy | |||
someone on here was regretting not buying an aldi generator | UK diy | |||
aldi 2.2kW long-run generator | UK diy |